Video clip #1
Video clip #2
Sunday, October 16, 2022
Friday, August 12, 2022
Tangible Bioelectric Energy (Qi/Chi) Exercises
Video clip #1:
https://youtube.com/clip/Ugkx8i0kMSOxkHBiHLlE2xXFIjAAueuRkfLh
Video clip #2:
https://youtube.com/clip/UgkxnGDZo7TaCPIt49cl38H43ARoprZl_-9g
Video clip #3:
https://youtube.com/clip/Ugkx5_PAftubwN_8S-m-tJmUiRWrkCyQLp7l
Video clip #4:
https://youtube.com/clip/Ugkxj58LDed4rBknLgLnFkvxbXj_QyfT2yX0
Wednesday, July 13, 2022
Sunday, June 5, 2022
Thursday, May 26, 2022
Problem, Reaction, "Solution" over & over & over again
Reaction: "This isn't good. What's the best way to respond?"
"Solution" (from the rulers): "You should accept more preemptive attack/abuse/control from us so we can best take care of situations like this."
The only reason people keep falling for this age-old deception is because they don't have a handle on basic ethics, namely the moral fact that abuse (for example, disarming nonviolent people, or coercing the use of medical devices/drugs) is pure evil and shouldn't be accepted as a solution to any problem, at any time.
If you think giving rulers the power to abuse (more than they already do) is the way to make the world a better place, you are morally inept and ignorant of political history and current events. Abuse *never* increases the good, and that's a very simple thing to understand, don't let the fact that this backwards society never taught you that make you doubt its accuracy.
Notice that "preemptive attack = abuse = evil" is almost never stated by anyone; what's most important to know and say is sidelined and ignored.
If you still don't understand why this really is what's most important as far as ethics and social-justice is concerned, keep contemplating this until you do get it, don't just sigh and think "it's complicated," or "it's a grey area," it's really not either; the Devil's playbook is short, and the goal is always the same: deceive you into accepting and participating in abuse, so you violate God's Law. Stop letting Satan play you. Stand on true morality, not fear and false guilt being pushed by the mass-media.
Related current events:
Sunday, May 22, 2022
How To Avoid An Oil & Electricity Crisis (The E100 Solution)
July 18 2022
When the basics for survival are controlled by a pyramidal system with psycho satanists at the top, that's not an "advanced civilization." What crisis will be manufactured next so that the "elite" can offer their "solution" of more control over humanity? Being dependent on corporate oil & electricity is no doubt playing into their hands (manufactured shortages and blackouts). If we were all growing our own fuel (e.g., making ethanol at home) and growing our own food on sovereign homesteads, that would avoid that, but apparently no one wants to hear actual answers, following disinformation against real solutions and false solutions instead, whether mainstream (e.g., electric everything) or "alternative"/"progressive" (e.g., no more cars at all).
Making ethanol from plants is the easiest option (basically you just need a bucket, yeast & water, a home distiller), second would be making your own biodiesel.
Ethanol has been made out to be a problem, because it's actually the solution for individuals & communities. Cars, trucks, lawnmowers, etc. that run on 100% ethanol have existed for a long time, and you can easily make ethanol yourself using items from your local supermarket & hardware store, but Big Oil surely doesn't want you to know that, so disinfo is duseminated about how it "destroys engines" and is "not sustainable," as if fermenting plant scraps was the same thing as GMO monoculture, and as if e100 vehicles haven't already been proven reliable. (It's similar to the disinfo about the real solution of veganism, claiming it necessarily pushes GMOs, and that all vegans are pushy or arrogant.)
https://www.popularmechanics.com/science/a3251/4262690/
Hemp Ethanol (fast forward to 25 minutes):
Biodiesel:
1) https://www.popularmechanics.com/cars/hybrid-electric/a4717/4332200/
2) https://www.treehugger.com/make-your-own-biodiesel-part-1-85187
3) https://www.wikihow.com/Make-Bio-Diesel
Henry Ford & Rudolph Diesel Against Corporate Dependency, Part 1:
Part 2:
Rudolph Diesel's original engine design and intention was for us to grow our own fuel so as not to be dependent on oil companies:
pop
Related article:
https://biodix.wordpress.com/2007/03/31/mr-diesel-and-the-original-biofuels/
Sunday, May 8, 2022
Blind to the Pyramid & Chain of Command
"For we are opposed around the world by a monolithic and ruthless conspiracy that relies primarily on covert means for expanding its sphere of influence... It is a system which has conscripted vast human and material resources into the building of a tightly knit, highly efficient machine that combines military, diplomatic, intelligence, economic, scientific and political operations. Its preparations are concealed, not published. Its mistakes are buried, not headlined. Its dissenters are silenced, not praised. No expenditure is questioned, no rumor is printed, no secret is revealed." - President John F. Kennedy, April 27th, 1961.
"[T]he drive of the Rockefellers and their allies is to create a one-world government, combining super-capitalism and Communism under the same tent, all under their control ... Do I mean conspiracy? Yes I do. I am convinced there is such a plot, international in scope, generations old in planning, and incredibly evil in intent." - Congressman Larry McDonald, 1976
[updated May 21st, 2022]
After a while, you may notice, if you give yourself the time to objectively observe independent from mainstream viewpoints, that the worst practices and deceptions have always come and continue to come from the major institutions of power in society (corporate, state, education, medical, media, church, banking). All of the most destructive lies and practices come from those devilish "kingdoms" in society (see Matthew 4:8-9), things like the global dissemination of the psychological toxins of inherited sin doctrine, satanic music & entertainment (celebrities), cultural-Marxism-infused education and activism, to the physical environmental toxins (which are likely the cause of many modern diseases, but Establishment Medicine "educates" and pours all the reasearch funding elsewhere, mainly into more drugs and biotech), like micro-plastics, GMOs, glyphosate, atrazine, lead, cadmium, mercury (e.g., toxic tooth fillings, as if no nontoxic alternative exists), aluminium (e.g., unnecessarily in "personal care" products), flouride (a "medical" prescription given without consent and without dosage control through the water supply "for healthy teeth"), chlorine (as if there's no nontoxic way to purify our water), aspartame (available for free on diner tables across the country), xenoestrogen overloads (from plastics, etc.), mandatory "for your safety" toxic flame-retardants on your bed, pillows and furniture (for you to absorb for hours every day!), et al., to horrific hospital birth protocols that traumatize humanity immediately as they take their first breaths, to cycles of state-sponsored terrorism that instill populations with further trauma (and Stockholm Syndrome) on top of their birth trauma.
Toxins & Tyranny/Terrorism are intertwined because they both oppress and destroy, the opposite of God's will, and it's all propagated through these devil-run institutions.
These institutions have become so embedded in society their toxic fallout is difficult to avoid, and most people, because of their indoctrination, don't even try to avoid taking part in them much less avoid their toxicity, thinking these institutions are bastions of human progress and "civilization." Others may express a half-awareness that the worst always come forcefully from the top, complaining (rightfully so) about the latest disruptive nonsense coming down the pike from "Corporate", "the Adminstration," "the Board," etc., labels that obscure who is really calling the shots ultimately at the very top, the chain of command turning into a mysterious cloud at the peak of the Pyramid.
The key thing to understand with these embedded and interconnected institutions, which have coerced and/or deceived most people into participation with them, is that they operate in a hierarchical, pyramidal manner, they operate by a chain of command. You may think your local hospital doctor or police officer is a decent person, but they work for Pyramid institutions (the Medical Establishment & the State), so they ultimately take orders from, via the chain of command, policy-forming "shadow government" at the top of the Pyramid, and those people are invariably not decent. Those shady characters at the top choose what particular things they want disseminated, and then send the orders down, and fund those things/research/projects for everyone below they want furthered, and fine/defund/bankrupt those that don't get with their destructive programs (hence why anyone talking about natural medicine and cures has to always give the legal disclaimer "this is not medical advice"). Those at the very top also ensure compliance by hiring/promoting those who demonstrate unquestioning compliance (the deceived enthusiastic, immoral, or simply money-hungry), and firing those that fall out compliance.
These destructive programs/practices, because of indoctrination, directed by those same few at the very top, have many people (especially university and medical students) think the destructive practices are actually good things.
The recent 2 year scamdemic, pushing compliance to tyrannical medical mandates, is a perfect recent example of how the Pyramid System operates, pushing something that most people wouldn't have pushed on their own, but did so because of their dumb & blind faith in the top-of-the-pyramid "authorities," and/or because of their monetary dependence on those so-called authorities (monetary dependency rooted in denial of humanity's birthright to cost/tax-free veganic homesteading land, water & seed, the key solution it seems people are under mind-control to always dismiss/ignore immediately for no good reason).
There is also the big factor of moral corruption, that has caused much of the youth and young adults to a) think of abortion as no big deal, b) engage in almost constant slander of other people as their dominant mode of conversation (and social-media activity), along with c), holding disdain for real ethics and religion (denying the possibility that either can be discovered in their true forms). But they do show some love, for artificial intelligence, virtual reality, socialism, and their smart-phone addiction/appendage (so, very much like The Borg in Star Trek).
"Do not make gods of metal and worship them." (Exodus 34:17, Good News Translation)
The way people are conditioned, it really is like they've been made to be a prototype of the morally bankrupt collectivist cyborgs that seem to be the Devil's end goal for humanity (along with a one-world government and one-world luciferian religion). Millennials aren't the only ones of course, the fact that child abuse and trauma remains commonplace generation after generation, (adding another layer of trauma to those already mentioned), shows what's inevitably produced from a society engineered by evil minds.
Because of how destructive and backwards everything is that comes from the top of the Pyramid, it's reasonable to conclude that the people at the top are evil, and they want to destroy what could be Paradise continually, through their command of institutions (that almost everyone tragically sees as good things, rather than the main channels of the Devil's control over society). If people could just see that Establishment Institutions = The Pyramid, and see that there is a chain of command within that pyramid, and those at the top are clearly deranged psychopaths, then why the world is the way it is will become much more clear to them, and they'll start to (if they still have compassion and critical thinking active in their mind) avoid and disconnect themselves as much as possible from these devil-at-the-top institutions. Again, the idea that the people at the very top, who put forth satanic hospital birth protocols, water flouridation, toxic vaccines, covering the earth in autism-causing glypohosate, et al., are actually satanists/luciferians, are actually just tools and puppets of Satan himself, actually makes sense of why these evil destructive things are pushed on humanity mainly through these institutions; it's logical to infer that the conspiracy theorists are right, and that those at the top are indeed Satanists who hate humanity, because humans & the Earth were created by God, who is the enemy of the Satan they follow. Perhaps the End Game of this agenda is opening a portal for Satan and his demons via the CERN collider, created by a coalition of the world's "elite" (top of the Pyramid) as many people now believe; the bizarre satanic theater opening to CERN supports this, as dose their placement of a statue of the god of destruction at that location. And/or their goal is a "New World Order" that resembles the society portrayed in the book 1984 by George Orwell. Basically we should expect their goal to be the opposite of the real Paradise that was and is The Creator's intent for humanity; instead of sovereign humans having dominion over the Earth (i.e., having sovereign homesteads), the want a global Communist order wherein everyone owns nothing and has no individual sovereignty, wherein most people are slaves to the cabal running the global State.
A lot of people focus on figuring out what Satanic groups/organizations/families comprise the upper levels of the Pyramid, but from a practical standpoint, it really doesn't matter, since most of us aren't dealing with those people directly, but instead with the institutions that they direct; therefore the task at hand is an exodus from those institutions, (taking away the means of societal corruption and control), and a return of individual sovereignty and dominion, and natural voluntary community.
Conclusion
So the overview of why the world is so messed up is not complicated: again, all mainstream hierarchical institutions push lies and destruction and cancel/ban/slander crucial truth and healing solutions, because they're ultimately led by someone who is hell-bent on deceiving and destroying humanity physically and morally/spiritually (in large part by convincing them that the enslavement, murder and consumption of animals is not actually an evil in God's sight), and turning the beautiful Earth into a toxic irradiated wasteland (again in large part due to the livestock industry), to be eventually populated by programmed/hackable cyborgs.
I know many will just dismiss all this as a crazy conspiracy theory, rather than a rational and objective observation of society, ignoring the reasoning and verifiable observations, like why about 1 in 25 children have autism now, 1 in 3 adults get cancer (there are reportedly over 140,000 cancer-causing man-made chemicals all released on a daily basis, so getting an environmental toxin test is a good idea), along with the skyrocketed rates of Parkinson's and Alzheimer's Disease, Thyroid Diseases, sleep disorders, et al..
Hopefully mainstream society will wake up and cease being heartless carnist news-watching Darwin-believing atheist irradiating technology-loving "educated" statists who slander non-conformists (i.e., those not completely indoctrinated and deceived); maybe one day they'll see the pattern of evil always coming from the top of these interconnected/inter-owned institutions, and see this deceptive and destructive Pyramid for what is (the Devil's kingdom), before they're too far corrupted by it. Hopefully one day restoring Eden won't seem "backwards" to them, and Genesis 1:29 & 2:15 will seem like the obvious way to go to them too.
Related Presentation
Related Podcast (by ReallyGraceful)
Related Song Lyrics (by Lukas Lion)
Monday, May 2, 2022
Quantifiable Discipleship
We shouldn't be too surprised that the spiritual side of life has some set numerical characteristics, just like the physical side of the world does. One of the most important numbers to get a handle on is 8, because 8 is the number of sinful toxic emotion-thoughts that regularly attempt to mislead us. These 8 sins (conquered by 8 opposing virtues) are "Not-Self," they are "Mara-mind," perhaps they are actually evil spirits, but just call them collectively "ego" if that's too much for you right now. The traditional "Seven Deadly Sins" came fairly close to the complete truth, but through your own scientific self-observation you can discover and confirm that there are actually exactly 8, and what those 8 are exactly.
Because these stressful thoughts are not really our own thoughts, not our True Selves, being relaxed & authentic is key to overcoming them; our Authentic Selves are naturally relaxed and virtuous, so basically it's just a matter of not clinging to the false self/"ego", the 8 toxic/stressful emotion-thoughts/sins, which are: Fear, Anger/Impatience, Depression, Craving/Rushing, Sloth, Mischievousness, Conceitedness, and Suspiciousness. The opposing virtues to align with are: Courage, Calmness, Hopefulness, Temperance, Liveliness, Righteousness, Humility, and Trust.
The 8 sins are all equally bad, but fear perhaps should be tackled first (here is a comprehensive guidebook on doing that if you're interested: https://ko-fi.com/s/1bea6ef1d3). The 8 sins lead us to violate the Greatest Commandments of Jesus to love God, others and ourselves; they do this by leading us to do the opposite of love, which is abuse. There are 3 forms of abuse: Aggression (the initiation of violence), Deception, and Stealing. There are 13 expressions of those 3 forms, e.g., slandering, crowding and staring are 3 of the expressions of subtle aggression, and snubbing someone is a subtle expression of theft.
Returning to The Octad of Sin, there are 3 main forms of each sin, each main form has 3 subtypes, so there's 9 total forms of each sin, making for 72 total forms of The Octad of Sin, and 72 corresponding Right Thoughts to conquer them, the truth that can set us free from the bondage of sin.
Jesus "sent out the 72 ahead of him" (Luke 10:1), symbolizing the inner work we need to do (affirming and memorizing the 72 Right Thoughts) in order to be prepared for (i.e., aligned with) his arrival in our lives at Kairos Moments, so that the Kairos will be fulfilled, and we will "drink living water," i.e., find deep satisfaction. Jesus also referred to them as 72 colors that produce a white/purified garment:
"The Lord once came to the dye-works of Levi. He took 72 different dyes and threw them into the vat. Then He took all fabrics from it, and they were white. He said, 'Even so the Son of Man works.'" (Philip 54)
Kairos Moments are what Jesus was talking about when he described the Kingdom/Dimension of Heaven, which always manifests in a small/subtle ("like a mustard seed" ), sudden (like "a robber at night"), and brief way (a gate that is only open for one second, or alternatively, a master who only knocks on your door once). There are exactly 12 forms of Kairos Moments (6 for Desire, 6 for Justice) again referred to symbolically by Jesus "sending them out" to help people:
"Jesus called his twelve disciples to him and gave them authority to drive out impure spirits and to heal every disease and sickness." (Matthew 10:1)
&
"Then Jesus called the Twelve to Him and began to send them out two by two, giving them authority over unclean spirits." (Mark 6:7)
So, in conclusion, the numbers 8, 12, & 72 (along with the 13 Violations) should be at the forefront of the mind of a disciple of Jesus because they correspond to critical components of that discipleship.
---
The 13 Violations (abusive behaviors to be rebuked calmly and assertively at the 6 Justice Kairos Moments) are:
- Privacy invasion.
- Unnecessary disturbance.
- Crowding/Blocking/Shoving.
- Damaging or neglecting property (including your own body).
- Staring.
- Threatening.
- Slander (verbal or nonverbal).
- Bossing Around/Imposition.
- Reckless Endangering.
- Usurping Control.
- Betrayal/Treachery.
- Deception/Cheating.
- Stealing/Theft/Extortion.
(#1 - #11 are expressions of aggression, #12 is deception, and #13 is stealing; again, these are the 3 main forms of abuse, the three main violations of the Law of Love).
Related Talk:
Sunday, May 1, 2022
The Now Ubiquitous Toxic Chemical Destroying the Minds & Bodies of Children & Adults
Probably the most important part starts at 34:00. This is a crime against humanity, especially against children, denied by government and industry, year after year.
The mention of the Roundup commercial of guys killing dandelions, which are very medicinal for humanity, with a chemical that is poison for humanity, was also very significant, a succinct microcosm of how evil and backwards the agenda of the-powers-that-be at the top of the Pyramid is, encouraging us to destroy God's good Creation, and ourselves.
Part 2:
Related Article
"Toxins & Tyranny" -->
https://colindonoghue.wordpress.com/2009/01/27/top-5-examples/
Saturday, April 16, 2022
Easter/Passover Celebrators: Here's Why Not to Be So Sure Jesus Killed and Ate Lambs
[May 21st, 2022]
It amazes me that people look at illustrations & paintings of Jesus gently holding a lamb, and then also think him cutting the throat of that lamb would also be true to life. Jesus is the Good Shepherd of men, and he told fishermen to leave their boats & nets to become fishers of men; he was replacing violent activities with higher nonviolent activities.
"But God approved animal sacrifices and eating animal flesh, neither are really bad." People are so sure that God, who is love, approves of abuse, which is the direct opposite of love; and why are they so sure? Well, because some words on paper tell them so. To quote particular words on paper that support abuse and ignore others that don't, is a flawed morality, it's the moral position of "The good is whatever particular words I choose on paper says is the good." The true morality is comprehensive love (again the complete opposite of abuse), the true moral Law is the Greatest Commandments and Golden Rule, not a mix of rules, some being abusive and others not (as Leo Tolstoy and many other writers/commentators have rightly said over the years).
If you look outside of Empire-approved texts (and the Empire/rulers corrupting/omitting original texts/testimonies really shouldn't be a surprise), you'll find that Jesus wanted to abolish the animal sacrifices (Recognitions of Clement 1:54), and God never wanted animals to be sacrificed or to be killed at all (Homilies of Clement 3:45, plus canonical Genesis 1:29 & Isaiah 1:11). The Ebionite gospel in fact has Jesus declaring, “I have come to destroy the sacrifices” and Jesus rejects eating the Passover lamb flesh as well (Epiphanius, Panarion 30). This fits with Jesus repeatedly saying in the more ambiguous Empire-approved scripture: “I require mercy, not sacrifice” (Matthew 9:13, 12:7, Jesus quoting Hosea 6:6).
Killing baby lambs shows no mercy, it is the cruel, twisted murder of innocent and beautiful creatures, it is most certainly not pleasing to God, especially when it's completely unnecessary for your survival or health.
I believe in the Law of Love given by Yeshua/Jesus the Messiah; I believe God did not create humans in a way that requires them to murder sentient beings (again, Genesis 1:29). Why seek verses to support unnecessary abuse that violates the true Law? If I asked a child "Why don't you hurt animals?" they'd probably say "Because that's not nice." Then people grow up and believe logical fallacies, like Appeal to Authority (e.g., to some "authoritative" scroll/letter/dogma), and Appeal to Tradition, and think they're wiser and more pleasing in the sight of God than the nonviolent child. "But I like these verses better that tell me it's okay to be blood-thirsty and heartless toward animals." Again, that's not a sound moral position. If Yeshua asked you "Why didn't you just leave animals alone?" you think selective pro-abuse verse-picking is going to be a satisfactory reply to Him?
When you read books like 'Disciples' and 'The Lost Religion of Jesus' by Keith Akers and related research, you'll discover that Jesus was, as shouldn't be a surprise, loving & nonviolent, and his teachings were hijacked and distorted by so-called apostles and various Bible editors. Those original teachings that show Jesus was completely against animal sacrifice and flesh-eating can thankfully still be read, again in large part currently thanks to those two excellent books by Keith Akers, 'Disciples' & 'The Lost Religion of Jesus.'
God's original plan for humans was a nonviolent one (Genesis 1:29); trust that it is also His plan for us now and the future (Isaiah 11:7) as well. Letting go of Paul as an idol is an excellent start to aligning with the true teachings of Jesus/Yeshua, but don't let certain verses in scrolls be a different misleading idol. Don't forget, the Golden Rule is simple, and "love others" should logically include animals since they are also sentient, have emotions, feel pain and want to live.
Yeshua wasn't killing animals in his spare time, as made clear by all the "unapproved" historical texts, like The Gospel of The Holy Twelve. Yeshua was actually completely against animal sacrifice and animal flesh eating. It's not God's way to support unnecessary violence toward sentient beings, to say so is blasphemous; again if you do a little research, you'll discover Yeshua is recorded as saying: "I've come to abolish the [animal] sacrifices," and you should re-read Isaiah 1:11, Hosea 6:6 & 8:13, Micah 6:8, and Jeremiah 7:21 as well to reinforce that.
I have zero doubt that killing and eating lambs (and chickens, et al.) will be something you'll be very glad you stopped doing, the sooner the better. Imagine the living animal right in front of you, and/or go to a farm or animal sanctuary, and notice, the Holy Spirit is not going to tell you to kill them.
---
Please also see this video playlist (various content-creators) on Vegan Christianity as well.
Thursday, April 14, 2022
What Does God Think of Domesticated Animals?
Humanity has been deceived by "authorities" for so long, that speaking truth that exposes any of those deceptions can seem far-fetched; the key is discerning when assumptions are being made, in the context of this discussion those assumptions being that whatever authorities (of church, science, or education) say, and whatever has been the tradition, are both based on the best reasoning, facts and morality. Oftentimes they're not, and that's why those are logical fallacies (Appeal to Authority & Appeal to Tradition).
An important question (important because of how much animal domestication effects our lives, the lives of animals, and the environment), that will help expose those aformentioned logical fallacies, used to defend humans turning wild animals into domesticated animals, is: "What does God think of animal domestication?"
Being that most people aren't opposed to animal domestication, it's safe to say, among those that believe in God, they'll say that God is perfectly fine with it, and maybe even encourages us to domesticate animals. This may in part be due to reading and believing the clear mistranslation (thought to be "authoritative") of Genesis 2:20 that says Adam "gave names to all the livestock," as if the practice of animal domestication/slavery had already been established somehow at the beginning of Creation; it wasn't, all the animals were wild animals. The original Hebrew word behemah translated in many Bibles as "livestock" or "cattle" actually just meant "beast" or "animal." Once again Bible editors push their own agenda, not God's, and once again people follow those editors/writers/scribes as if they were Divine themselves (again, the Appeal to Authority Fallacy).
Another Fallacy at play with animal domestication is the Bandwagon Fallacy, assuming something is good, logical and true because it's popular/trendy. "Sustainable grazing" is super popular and trendy now; it's just another re-hashed version of animal slavery, presented as supposedly "essential" & "ecological," ignoring the immorality of it, and ignoring how it creates more hassles and distractions for people than benefits, and ignoring how it is nowhere near the superiority of veganic gardening & orcharding.
Many unfortunately consistently go for mainstream/institutional b.s. that's based on abuse (the other big example being politics); rather than just stick with the Golden Rule, they are following the false morality of false gods.
Jesus said "[T]hat which is highly esteemed among people is detestable in the sight of God," (Luke 16:15) and I believe He actually views domesticated animals as such a detestable sight; not the Spirits of the animals, not the individuals themselves, but rather the forced departure from their wild ancestors being the abomination, the distortion of their bodies and minds is the abomination.
Domesticated cats will leave dead songbirds they killed (but didn't eat) laying in your garden, while the peace-giving sounds of the song of that bird's still-living relatives are overwhelmed by the sound of barking dogs (a simultaneous and compounded disturbance originating from the forceful domestication of wolves into dogs and wild cats into house pets). In the United States alone, outdoor cats kill over 2 billion birds every year. And some neighborhoods, all around the world, have the sound of barking dogs 365 days a year, it's become normalized permanent background noise for people's lives, adding stress and sleep deprivation.
These, along with many other similar observations of domestic vs. wild animals, like the negative environmental effects of the pet and livestock indusries, is actually observation of karmic feedback from the moral fabric of Creation. The simple truth is that domesticated animals produce more disturbance and unproductive distraction in our lives than they do produce any real qualitative benefit, and that's because they're not part of God's perfect design of Nature.
I'm sure that by claiming that domesticated animals are unpleasing to God, most people will find that claim "too extreme." Understandably, most people will probably immediately think of some benefits of domesticated animals, and ignore or deny the severe negatives (just like those that focus on some good things Paul said in his letters found in the New Testament, ignoring/rationalizing the very toxic and false things he also said), missing the forest for the trees, a biased evaluation (the Special Pleading Fallacy) + assuming a conclusion can't be right because it's "too simple" (the Complexity Bias), preventing the correct conclusion, namely that domesticating animals was a mistake by humanity, going against God's design and moral law. The latter moral component can be readily understood when you recognize it was mainly abuse that transformed wild animals into domesticated animals, and abuse is pure evil, pure evil that distorted and Corrupted Creation to breed domesticated animals that don't fit in Nature's perfect design, and do things like decimate the Beauty of entire songbird populations and fill whole communities with noise pollution.
Worth repeating, because of its significance and because it is repeatedly ignored, animal domestication originated from abuse, and relies on abuse to keep it going. Abuse is the opposite of love; Jesus taught us that the true Law is comprehensive love; therefore animal domestication violates the Law & will of God. And He gives us negative karmic feedback as a consequence of breaking that Law and going against His perfect will.
Domesticated animals really are a corruption of God's Creation, and therefore that corruption karmically produces disturbances, in stark contrast to the pleasant sites and sounds of wild animals.
Being Christian (and/or vegan) doesn't necessarily equate w/ being a pet lover. People used to worship the "golden calf," now some people basically worship their pets. But before discussing pets I should first speak of the worse use of domesticated animals, the livestock industry, which is not acceptable in God's sight, yet most Christians have been told it is by the Establishment/Paulinist Church.
To voluntarily add animals to your home that attract fleas & parasites, and that shit and pee in and/or around your home daily, and bark, and chase wildlife, etc., is not really wise. (And when the dog barks a lot that's not actually increasing your safety, it's decreasing it, because you won't be able to hear an intruder well.) Whether it's a country woman's morning ritual to clean up chicken shit or an urban man's ritual to pick up dog shit with his hand in a plastic bag (I cringe when remembering myself doing that as a teenager), this is all a waste and degradation of human life, time and energy. Again, one may think the downsides are outweighed by the supposed upsides (e.g., chicken flesh to eat, pet companionship), but closer examination shows that these "upsides" are actually just downsides too (e.g., a barking dog).
"Pet Life"
Being Christian (and/or vegan) doesn't necessarily equate w/ being a pet lover. People used to worship the "golden calf," now some people basically worship their pets. But before discussing pets I should first speak of the worse use of domesticated animals, the livestock industry, which is not acceptable in God's sight, yet most Christians have been told it is by the Establishment/Paulinist Church.
If you don't look to the book & letter compilation called The Bible as the only source of possible historical and religious truth, then you will discover that the vegetarianism/veganism of Jesus and the original followers of Jesus is not far-fetched at all; you can learn this from modern books like The Lost Religion of Jesus by Kieth Akers, and Vegetarian Christian Saints: Mystics, Ascetics and Monks by Dr. Holly Roberts, along with the ancient writings of Saint Jerome, Ephrem The Syrian, Epiphanius's writings on the Nasaraeans/Nazarenes (writings in a text called the Panarion, chapter 18 specifically), The Syriac Clementine Recognitions & Homilies (The Ebionite Book of Acts), The Syriac-Aramaic Gospel of Luke, and The Gospel of The Holy Twelve, et al., as you can learn from the following video playlist:
For even more information/evidence on Christianity and veganism see these websites:
Returning to the issue of pets, people devoting much of their lives (and resources) to pets, talking a lot to dogs, cats, chickens, etc., as if they're people (which of course I've done too)... it's kind of delusional behavior, if we're objective about it; humans are supposed to talk with other humans and have human friends (along with pray to and befriend God), not cohabitate with animals and have the as our substitute friends and children; it's all an unnatural phenomenon that isn't as harmless as it may seem, again it's living contrary to God's will and design, and there is nothing of real lasting quality to be found in that territory. When we understand the reality of the spiritual life better, then we can clearly see the spiritual problem with pets (along with the health problems, like fleas & parasites they carry, requiring major amounts of pharmaceuticals to counter, pharmaceuticals that pollute water supplies, etc.). Whether the dog or cat is generally calm or noisy, it's actually a spiritual/religious hindrance; the former is likely to have you spending more time with them, the latter has less interaction but more disturbance, so either version evens out to be basically the same in the context of a spiritual life, either one is bad for you.
To go on about the the therapeutic value of pets is to ignore their substitute nature, an inferior substitution for human/Nature-based therapies; just because some benefit is received doesn't mean it's not actually overall a hindrance for your life, overall putting a ceiling on your development through the unnatural substitution. To have irrational fixation on the limited benefits, while ignoring the overall negative effects in the biggest important context (spiritual reality & practice), leads to integrating into one's life that which should be rejected.
To go on about the the therapeutic value of pets is to ignore their substitute nature, an inferior substitution for human/Nature-based therapies; just because some benefit is received doesn't mean it's not actually overall a hindrance for your life, overall putting a ceiling on your development through the unnatural substitution. To have irrational fixation on the limited benefits, while ignoring the overall negative effects in the biggest important context (spiritual reality & practice), leads to integrating into one's life that which should be rejected.
To voluntarily add animals to your home that attract fleas & parasites, and that shit and pee in and/or around your home daily, and bark, and chase wildlife, etc., is not really wise. (And when the dog barks a lot that's not actually increasing your safety, it's decreasing it, because you won't be able to hear an intruder well.) Whether it's a country woman's morning ritual to clean up chicken shit or an urban man's ritual to pick up dog shit with his hand in a plastic bag (I cringe when remembering myself doing that as a teenager), this is all a waste and degradation of human life, time and energy. Again, one may think the downsides are outweighed by the supposed upsides (e.g., chicken flesh to eat, pet companionship), but closer examination shows that these "upsides" are actually just downsides too (e.g., a barking dog).
Yes I know dogs can be awesome and many people really love their cats, etc., I know we can have meaningful connection with domesticated animals, but we have to look at the big picture here, and be objective about whether the perceived great things about dogs and cats are really that great at all from God's point of view, concerning what our higher purpose as humans is here on Earth.
Think objectivley about time spent with domesticated animals, there is definitely a ceiling to how significant the relationship can be, and a lot of the downsides are often overlooked, like constant barking and other distracting/disturbing behavior by the animal. Why do dogs (yes, I know not all) often act in an extremely annoying way, e.g., a dog running away from you and then toward you, and then yelping as if being harmed when you try to get them out of the house/room, or a cat that walks right in front of you and then makes it so you have to stop or walk into them, etc. This is all really "dancing with the devil," crazy-making disturbing behavior that is a product of their crazy origin: slavery. Dogs/cats, overall/globally, are either constantly causing disturbances or being a constant distraction and attention/energy-drain. They are either like toxic-people that constantly push your buttons to make you react with anger and thereby fall into sin that way, or, even though it can be in a very friendly way, like energy-vampires who constantly drain your time and energy for no real (big-picture-of-life-and-purpose-wise) good outcome whatsoever, being a vehicle for the sin of sloth that way.
What I observe is people's lives sadly revolving around their pets (as mine often did when I was younger), pretty much daily family questions being "Where is Spot?" "Spot! Spot!" "Why is Spot barking now? What is it Spot?" Etc. etc. Perhaps God actually sees this as a pathetic corruption of the human life, perhaps He sees it as another big example of how humans have strayed from His original design.
Pets have become so normal in our society though, that people can't see this possibility clearly, they think it's no big deal to have a pet, but in fact it is a big deal, again just on the everyday mundane level, IMMENSE amounts of your time, attention and energy are given to an animal that was never part of God's original design or plan for humanity, and because of that, ends up being more detrimental than beneficial. You may object that you're not a "crazy cat lady," or whatever, but the truth is that even just having one cat (or dog) invariably leads to some crazy behavior (adapting to something out of harmony with Creation), and is also wasting your time that should be given to higher pursuits.
Remember, domesticated animals are the result of human aggression toward wild animals (just like cruelly putting a wild bird in a cage and clipping their wings), and they are a distortion/corruption of the original design of Creation/Nature; those are not minor issues; again this is of course no fault of the animal, they are not bad as individuals, it's the violence and slavery (namely capture, abusing/"breaking" and breeding) that was bad; but since they are unnatural in that way, it causes disharmony & disturbance in Nature, e.g., the massive number of songbirds that are killed by domesticated cats, and disharmony in our personal lives when we take on their dependency (taking a lot of time that would normally be utilized for prayer, meditation, human relationship, community development, gardening, travel, the Arts, etc.).
The seemingly harsh truth is that we need to "remove all the abominations from all the lands belonging to the sons of Israel" (2 Chronicles 34:33), ultimatetly by utilizing and supporting more domesticated animal sanctuaries, if we want to live as God intended (Genesis 1:29 & 2:15), not living with an contrary to God's perfect design of Creation, because going against that design, thinking we can improve upon it, inevitably causes disturbance (going against the grain of Creation), robbing us of deeper peace found on the Higher Path of His will. Accepting the regular distractions and disturbances of pets is contrary to discipleship; it's ignoring God's superior design, and ignoring the crucial importance of having ample peace and awareness available to perceive and follow His living presence.
Remember, domesticated animals are the result of human aggression toward wild animals (just like cruelly putting a wild bird in a cage and clipping their wings), and they are a distortion/corruption of the original design of Creation/Nature; those are not minor issues; again this is of course no fault of the animal, they are not bad as individuals, it's the violence and slavery (namely capture, abusing/"breaking" and breeding) that was bad; but since they are unnatural in that way, it causes disharmony & disturbance in Nature, e.g., the massive number of songbirds that are killed by domesticated cats, and disharmony in our personal lives when we take on their dependency (taking a lot of time that would normally be utilized for prayer, meditation, human relationship, community development, gardening, travel, the Arts, etc.).
Undoing the Mistake
The seemingly harsh truth is that we need to "remove all the abominations from all the lands belonging to the sons of Israel" (2 Chronicles 34:33), ultimatetly by utilizing and supporting more domesticated animal sanctuaries, if we want to live as God intended (Genesis 1:29 & 2:15), not living with an contrary to God's perfect design of Creation, because going against that design, thinking we can improve upon it, inevitably causes disturbance (going against the grain of Creation), robbing us of deeper peace found on the Higher Path of His will. Accepting the regular distractions and disturbances of pets is contrary to discipleship; it's ignoring God's superior design, and ignoring the crucial importance of having ample peace and awareness available to perceive and follow His living presence.
So again on a practical level, I'd say they are best nonviolently phased out of society via spay/neuter and animal sanctuaries where they would enjoy the company of other animals and people that enjoy caring for them full-time, but because they're no longer being bred by humans, their populations would steadily drop. I know that can seem uncaring but it's not really, it's making the best of a bad practice that needs to end, a bad practice we need to recognize has had overall bad outcomes/consequences, as aggression and slavery and going against God's perfect plan always do (just like with abuse toward humans as well, i.e., "human domestication").
Related articles:
Related talk:
Thursday, March 31, 2022
Land, Water & Seeds ("Victory Gardens" For All)
"You trample the poor,
stealing their grain through taxes and unfair rent." (Amos 5:11)
[updated September 19th, 2022]
I just came across the quote "You can solve all of the world's problems in a garden," and there's a lot of truth to that, but why does almost everyone ignore the fact that having a garden-based society is not going to happen as long as it is not financially possible for most people on Earth to participate in one? And rather than think band-aid small/limited steps in the right direction, as good as they are (I certainly like to see them), like a bit more urban "green spaces," community gardens, or plants on top of and inside city buildings, rather than focus on those small and limited steps, why can't we be focused on the real big-leap solution that would have the most positive benefit and also be the most just, namely recognizing that a bit of land, water & seed for nonviolent/veganic homesteading is a birthright of every human? Why is that repeatedly ignored, even when spelled out in detail? By ignoring that we will in fact never see significant positive change for the better, we will never "return to Eden."
If people had the option to have some private/sovereign natural space (approximately 1 hectare), where they could cultivate a garden and orchard for themselves and/or family (in a natural voluntary gift-economy community of others doing the same), ending their dependency on the soul-sucking money-system, also ending unnecessary hunger and various other hardships that come with this unnatural and unjust global social-system set-up, don't you think billions of people would do so? Of course they would. But this real solution is almost never discussed or even debated, due to people apparently mentally stuck in the Status Quo Fallacy, Failure of Imagination Fallacy, and Fallacy of Incredulity, and the fact that's it's never presented as an option to think about at all.
When we can't grow food freely we're really not free; people often promote decentralization and self-sufficiency, but the key for that, ignored over & over, is recognizing human birthrights to survival natural resources: The key property rights needed for freedom are bodily autonomy, and birthrights to survival natural resources: homesteading land, water & seed. Why does almost everyone crazily dance around that clear and comprehensive solution? Without sovereign gardening space you're necessarily being exploited and ruled over; and since voluntary communities of sovereign homesteads exist nowhere right now, fundamentally all the people in the world are actually under different shades of Communist rule.
Unfortunately and ironically people have been programmed to associate land redistribution with Communism (as if only State-employees could ever do that), and they ignore that their "free" "capitalism" is actually a social-system run fundamentally via central banks and income tax, which are two pillars of the actual Communist Manifesto! People have been duped into believing up is down and down is up. So many problems would be solved from disconnecting from a toxic unnatural social system, yet people cling to logical fallacies as good reasons to continue on with the status quo.
Along with the aforementioned benefits of ending the root injustice of homesteading natural resource birthright denial, if everyone could eat fresh and organic vegetables, greens, herbs and fruits from their own garden, and be able to enjoy the sunshine and fresh air while gardening, that would no doubt alleviate myriad physical and mental health issues people are suffering with as well, better than the band-aid treatments of pharmaceuticals and heart disease surgeries, et al. People go to detox centers where they basically just get a version of living on a veganic homestead, but it's only temporary because they gotta get back to earning money to pay the rent/mortgage/proprety taxes. Everyone is dealing with the myriad problems of living with The Root Injustice, but no one is pinpointing what that injustice is exactly, and what the exact solution to it is, so the drudgery just goes on and on.
You will never see or hear a barrage of mainstream media promoting the benefits of men, being naturally and fully masculine, and women, being naturally and fully feminine, living self-sufficiently, non-violently and truly sustainably off the land, because that is where real empowerment is, freed of system-dependency and negative karmic-feedback, it would be a return to the original perfect design for humans for highest happiness, a “return to Eden,” a return to the original design of the good Creator. In order to not be a slave of the system we must get our needs directly from the Earth instead, so this is continuously made out to be backwards, dangerous, stupid, etc., (as well as economically impossible for most people) when in fact it's the ideal way for humans to live on Earth, with the highest potential for satisfaction and social harmony/justice. The big picture of what's going on is that God's original plan for humanity, to be gardeners who cultivated and cared for the natural world (including animals), as pointed to in Genesis 2:15, is in fact the ideal, on multiple qualitative & moral levels, but humanity is being distracted away from that fact constantly; the system is a grand deception and conceited folly, trying to improve upon that ideal original plan for humanity;; no improvements have been made, things have just gotten more toxic and oppressive, as the only truly good and free way of life is made more and more obscure, as homestead communities exist less and less every year globally.
It's not that complicated, but people seem to always overcomplicate it. Land, water & seed for natural living, survival, privacy, and freedom, are pre-existing God-created birthrights of all humans. That's what needs to be focused on and repeated, not going off on dismissive "that's impossible/impractical" or irrelevant "but some people won't like that" tangents; the societal change will organically occur at local levels once that birthright is widely accepted as true and good. About 2 acres for sovereign veganic/nonviolent homesteads (not enslaving and murdering animals or spreading toxins/GMOs), forming voluntary communities, is the clear answer that the Non-aggression Principle and Reality/Nature points to.
The objection that "all the land is already owned" ignores the main crucial point that owning more land & water than you need for your iwn homestead is actually the theft of other people's birthright, so it's not valid ownership just like owning slaves you paid for isn't valid.
A slaveowner can say "I paid for this man," but the man was never rightfully up for sale in the first place; having more land & water than you need is actually stealing the survival/freedom birthright of others; that's the key truth almost no one is talking about, and that's why nothing is really changing for the better.
To "agree in principle" but then not even repeat the solution to anyone because of possible bad reactions or logistics that need to be voluntarily sorted out... I'm trying to make it clear, as L. Rose has too (in his more generalized way), that it's actually getting people to understand and agree openly with the principle/solution that is most important, saying "but making it a reality could be difficult!" is like telling a warrior defending his village before battle, "but they will resist you," yeah no kidding, abusers resist stopping the abuse, which is ultimately irrelevant. Please try to focus on "sovereign veganic homesteads," it's tiring being the only one actually saying the words, as if everyone else is under a spell preventing them from spreading the actual solution.
Just because there would be difficulties/resistance/complications doesn't mean it's not the best and just solution overall, it clearly is, because anything less than that is actually social-injustice; denial of homesteading land, water & seed is a form of slavery, and slavery is the evil we need to fully abolish.
Land, water and seed are already built, it's a straw-man fallacy to say that I'm saying others will be required to build houses and gardens for others. And again the main point of a birthright (as in it belongs to newborn babies, without them doing anything for it), is that is not "given" by anyone because it was not theirs to give in the first place, God already gave it to us. Those objecting to sovereign homesteads being a birthright if everyone talk like slave-masters who used to say things like "Why should I just give this man his freedom, he has to earn it, take action, be responsible, before he deserves it." The idea that a birthright claim *to not be abused and exploited* is "irresponsible" and even somehow abusive itself (demanding "sacrifice" of others), is completely absurd (and again sounds like authoritarians of the past and present).
To object by basically saying "you gotta work for it" is completely dismissive of the justness of it being a cost/tax-free birthright not created by any man *needed for survival and freedom*, and the economic reality that most hard-working people still can't afford their own homestead, and even if they could, if it wasn't sovereign they still wouldn't really be free (e.g., property tax). A close-minded regurgitation of academia's platitudes (and/or a favorite author's view on natural resource property) doesn't actually hold up to reality and the Non-aggression Principle.
If people crash-landed on an uninhabited island they'd share the pre-existing food/seed, water and space because that's the sane and ethical thing to do, and that's the same exact thing I'm advocating; the objection "Well it's different because some rich people already bought all the land" is weak and false ethics, that again ignores that morally right birthrights actually do exist, that the inalienable birthrights of life & liberty *are* denied if you're denied cost/tax-free survival/homesteading land & water, because that undermines both life & liberty directly.
"By removing opportunities to live self-sufficient lives, the Marxists create a system of slavery and convince everyone that it was done in the name of fairness. It’s the same story every time."
So if you agree homesteading land, water & seed is a free birthright of humanity, please bring that crucial truth and solution up with others regularly, because it will never happen until more people are talking and agreeing about it; the thinking must be aligned with it before it can start manifesting.
----
Related philosophy:
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ringing_Cedars%27_Anastasianism
Related history (8th Century Japan):
Related Talks:
Articles on Victory Gardens:
- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Victory_garden
- https://blog.gardeningknowhow.com/trends/story-behind-victory-gardens/
Wednesday, March 30, 2022
The Holy Spirit, Intuition, Fear and the Logical Fallacy Blindfold
[updated June 5th, 2022]
Could it be that mainstream views on what's most important are actually wrong? That was certainly true in the past, but what about today? Have all of the erroneous destructive beliefs of humanity been sorted out? I will argue that no, they have not been all sorted out, and two big examples, that is, two examples that actually have a huge effect on people's lives, are the mainstream conceptions of what we call fear and intuition.
Fear
The mainstream belief that "fear is sometimes good, because fear is the same thing as the body's fight-or-flught/crisis response," is completely false (a false equivalency). You can actually see this for yourself with just a minute of critical thinking: If the fight-or-flight response of the body is just that, a bodily response, a physiological activity, and fear is an emotion-thought, how does it make sense to say they are the same thing? If fear lowers your awareness and critical thinking ability, and both of those faculties are of utmost value when facing a danger, then how is fear a "survival mechanism"? It's not. I explain this destructive false equivalency further in this short talk:
Intuition
Now to what's destructively wrong with mainstream views on Intuition. The mainstream notion is that Intuition is not actually the Holy Spirit, not actually from God. Now if the word intuition is wrongly equated with "common sense," or "gut instinct" (notice, yet another false equivalency), that is, Intuition being falsely equated with conditioned thinking of your own, then yes that's not the Holy Spirit.
So what is true Intuitive thought? The way it arises for all humans is fundamentally the same, it has it's own signature, just as Kairos Moment callings from the Son do. The characteristics of Intution's signature are:
a) Intuition manifests as non-stressful thoughts/images (that are not our own thoughts) that arise in our minds, to do or not do something, or to say or not say something (actions or inactions which could be just the initial step we need to take to get us to something else, i.e., Intuition will oftentimes lead us via something we're familiar with to get us to something new that's good for us to be engaged with).
b) Intuition usually seems relatively unimportant to us when it arises in our mind, or seems "50/50" (meaning we could "take it or leave it"), but then we often realize after we ignored/discarded it (if we have good self/reality-awareness and hindsight), that it was actually important.
c) If we do follow the Intuitive thought, we always discover that the result is very good and productive for having done so.
That is the Holy Spirit, that is Intuitive-thought-guidance from Divinity (not really our "Higher Self" or our "Soul," because we're not omniscient, we're not God, so we shouldn't pretend we are).
The reason we can "hear" Intuitive thought most clearly and readily during meditation (letting go of our own thinking, focusing our eyes on a single point like a candle light, and/or following our breath), is because it's not our own thought. This is also why many of us notice we have clear Intuition to do something when we first wake up, because our own mind has not fully revved up and filled our head with its own thoughts yet. And this is also why stress, like in the form of fear, is an enemy of Intuition, because again we can best perceive/hear Intuition when our mind is relaxed and still. If you've wondered "what's the point in meditating?" perhaps the best answer is so that we can receive absolutely perfect guidance from a loving and omniscient Divinity, guidance that will definitely improve our life (and the lives of others, in perfect omniscient win-win fashion, in ways that we could never had known with just our own limited human awareness).
Conclusion: Logical Fallacies & Spiritual Propaganda/Sabotage
So Intuition, rightly identified, i.e., identified as guidance from God, is being mixed up with other things (namely conditioning/habits), and is also conceitedly or slothfully being disregarded much of the time. Likewise with fear, it is not just simply and rightly identified as demonic, as from the Devil, and instead is being mixed up with other things, namely "a defense mechanism" and/or "fight or flight." People are, sadly, thinking that the bad is good and the good is bad, calling fear (as "fight or flight") sometimes good and Intuition (as "common sense") sometimes bad; both are confused wrong beliefs with far-reaching negative consequence, both are backwards spiritual sabotage, and both are also the declarations of all the "experts." People are literally thinking the Devil is sometimes good and God is sometimes bad, and so they embrace the former and reject the latter, and guess what that results in? The "fall of Man."
Again, when people's beliefs on crucial truth are incorrect/backwards, wackness and suffering will inevitably ensue, and that's what the Devil has been doing to humanity from the start. It's the same old and original story (never told right) of humans following the false/corrupted Knowledge of Good & Evil, and that resulting in the loss of Paradise.
And why exactly do people follow the devilish destructive false morality of false gods, thinking it's actually smart to do so? Again, because they are deceived by Logical Fallacies, i.e., they follow assumptions (like assuming whoever the "authority" is always gives the crucial truth, or assuming that a simple answer can't be right), false equivalencies (like the aforementioned ones), and abusive language (just like with pigeonhole dismissive slander believed to justify disregarding this knowledge).
Assumptions, false equivalencies, and abusive thought/language are actually the three categories of all logical fallacies (something else crucial we were also never clearly taught), logical fallacies that are being pushed on us as by "experts" as if they are actually rationality, facts and sound morality.
Logical Fallacies need to be rejected when they arise in our own minds internally and also rejected when we observe them externally; again sadly though it seems very likely that this analysis will be dismissed as either "too extreme" (Status Quo Fallacy), or because "it's not that simple" (Complexity Bias), or because of whatever other nonsense/Logical Fallacy, but I put this out there for those who might be open and able to see the plain truth of it.
Peace.
Saturday, March 26, 2022
The True Original Sin (and Mind-Control Program): Believing the Naked Body is Shameful
4/28/22
How does it make sense that the naked human body suddenly becomes "obscene" when it is simply outside of a building rather than inside a building? Why is the human body itself criminalized? Could this be a form of mind-control through pushing a form of fear, through subliminally pushing the idea that humans are inherently shameful?
I was already aware of the pro-nudity movements, like that which coincided with the 1960’s hippy culture, and more recently with the “Free The Nipple” NYC demonstrations and documentary, and, in doing a little research for this article I discovered the re-emerging Naturism Movement, and I recognized that the main premise that nudity does not equate to obscenity is right and good, but I didn’t realize how important it is (and I think actually many people in the pro-nudity movements didn’t and don’t realize how very important an issue this actually is). The wild thing is that this issue is actually central to the Creation story of humanity, but it’s never explained as such.
Adam & Eve were fine with being naked before they ate the “fruit of the knowledge of Good & Evil,” but immediately after they ate it they became ashamed of their naked bodies.
Before eating the "knowledge" of good & evil:“And they were both naked, the man and his wife, and were not ashamed.” (Genesis 2:25)
After eating the "knowledge" of good & evil:
"I heard your voice in the garden," Adam answered to God, "and I was afraid because I was naked, so I hid from you." (Genesis 3:10)
So, the “knowledge” 1), made them afraid, and 2), convinced them that the naked body is actually evil. Those two elements need to be looked at carefully. Firstly, fear is very disempowering, it is perhaps the most disempowering emotion-thought that humans can have, and people, particularly the powers-that-be, have used fear as a means of control, for centuries. The particular form of fear that Adam& Eve followed was Fear of Humiliation (one of the three main types of fear), and that was actually their original/first sin, not simply "being disobedient," as the Church tells everybody (and yes, following fear is actually a sin, as is following anger, or craving). Secondly, the idea that the naked body is evil in and of itself is actually a blasphemous notion; the human form/design is actually good, designed by a good God. So then we can logically conclude that the knowledge they ate was false knowledge, it was a false morality, and following false morality is what actually led them to losing paradise. So, the other crucial point, also never taught by Christian pastors, is that if you equate the naked human body with something bad, if you believe the naked human body, just by itself, is a bad thing, that’s actually a very deep mind-control program. If you believe the human body is bad, that is basically the same as believing your natural Self is bad, and that belief, the “I am fundamentally bad” belief, is actually the foundation of human enslavement, at its various levels. It’s also a complete violation of what Jesus said are The Greatest Commandments, which are to love God, love others, and love yourself, since if you believe you and other humans in their natural state are shameful, that’s abusive slander toward yourself and others, as is calling God’s creation bad, and abuse is the complete opposite of love.
Even though the evaluation I just made is logically sound, many people will have their mind-control kick in as pseudo-intellectual false morality hysterics, namely that laws against nudity are “to protect the children,” and because you don’t want to feel even further shame, now for “not caring about the children,” you’ll probably drop this issue of nudity like a hot potato. The truth is that by accepting the idea that nudity = obscenity, you’re in no way protecting children, you’re actually setting them up to live a life of subconscious fearful shame and acceptance of constant low-level abuse from “authorities” because of the belief/program that humans are fundamentally bad and so need to be abusively controlled at all times to some degree. If your mind goes into hysterics about sexual assault at the mere mention or sight of a naked human body, I hope you can realize that’s mind-control, and completely irrational. The naked human body is not an act of aggression, nor does it support aggression, it’s just the human body without clothes on it, and there’s actually nothing wrong with that; every supposed explanation as to why it is bad is clearly nonsense, if you actually take a minute to analyze it, rather than just let false guilt turn your critical thinking off; again, if you think the human body is shameful, then you’re holding an abusive slanderous view toward yourself, others and God, and you’re supporting human enslavement of both body and mind, and that’s a very bad thing to do; the devil has tricked, and continues to trick, humanity into doing evil and thinking that it’s good, and that’s what keeps us in the devil’s world (including its world wars), that’s what keeps us out of the Paradise God created the Earth to be for us.
Even though the evaluation I just made is logically sound, many people will have their mind-control kick in as pseudo-intellectual false morality hysterics, namely that laws against nudity are “to protect the children,” and because you don’t want to feel even further shame, now for “not caring about the children,” you’ll probably drop this issue of nudity like a hot potato. The truth is that by accepting the idea that nudity = obscenity, you’re in no way protecting children, you’re actually setting them up to live a life of subconscious fearful shame and acceptance of constant low-level abuse from “authorities” because of the belief/program that humans are fundamentally bad and so need to be abusively controlled at all times to some degree. If your mind goes into hysterics about sexual assault at the mere mention or sight of a naked human body, I hope you can realize that’s mind-control, and completely irrational. The naked human body is not an act of aggression, nor does it support aggression, it’s just the human body without clothes on it, and there’s actually nothing wrong with that; every supposed explanation as to why it is bad is clearly nonsense, if you actually take a minute to analyze it, rather than just let false guilt turn your critical thinking off; again, if you think the human body is shameful, then you’re holding an abusive slanderous view toward yourself, others and God, and you’re supporting human enslavement of both body and mind, and that’s a very bad thing to do; the devil has tricked, and continues to trick, humanity into doing evil and thinking that it’s good, and that’s what keeps us in the devil’s world (including its world wars), that’s what keeps us out of the Paradise God created the Earth to be for us.
God is actually the Master Artist, and the human body, especially the female body, has been recognized for centuries as an exquisite work of art, along with other wonderful designs, like found with wildflowers, wildlife (hummingbirds come to my mind first), landscapes (e.g., Ireland), and even nebula in outer-space (e.g., the Orion Nebula). Denying that natural beauty and goodness isn't being virtuous, the devil and his powers-that-be push that false morality on us all (from the very beginning of humanity) for their own purposes (namely to wickedly go against God's perfect design, and gain more power and control over humanity).
Politicians love nudity laws, they love to cover up naked statues, etc., because: 1), criminalizing nudity pushes subconscious fear (as false guilt/ashamedness) and the subconscious belief that human beings are fundamentally evil, both of which greatly support social-systems of abusive control and power, and 2), criminalizing nudity is done under the guise of virtue, under the banner of “protecting women and children,” and that virtue-signal basically guilt-trips people into accepting their false morality (just as they and the media did with their medical mandates). And perhaps 3), because they know just how critical Vitamin D ("the sunshine vitamin") is for good health, and a sick population is easier to control.
Returning to the psychology of false guilt/shame, this issue of criminalized nudity is much more important than is commonly understood because if you can get a society to believe that their naked bodies are shameful then you've got them, then they have a thorn of fear held deep in their minds that will sabotage them their entire lives, because it's just a version of "I'm fundamentally bad and untrustworthy," and so therefore "deserve to be punished and controlled," and because fear is actually always disempowering, it's actually a demonic/toxic emotion-though that is never beneficial (no, it's not the same thing as the body's crisis response, aka fight-or-flight).
Remember, this very destructive taboo/mind-control program was the original lie of the Enemy that took us away from God's truth and original perfect design for humanity, Eden/Paradise. If being naked is illegal, that means the human body, as deigned by God, is inherently evil. If you accept that false morality, you blaspheme God and support abusive control. Whether you'd personally enjoy going outside naked or not is irrelevant, you should see that this issue is much bigger and more important than that personal preference, you should be against the criminalization of nudity for the very deep and important reasons pointed out here. You may be surprised at how empowering and transformative repeating the affirmation "My naked body is not shameful" is for you, again regardless of whether you actually have any interest in being nude outside; although, worth mentioning, it has certainly been proven that getting some full-body sunshine (and adequate Vitamin D from that sunshine), and fresh air (indoor air pollution is a real problem) is very health-giving; a lot of people would probably get off meds and resolve various health issues if they just did simply that regularly (along with leaving animals alone with their food choices).
Again, affirming that your naked body us not shameful is empowering and transformative because if you fearfully believe your naked body is shameful, that's basically the same thing as believing that you are shameful, from jump-street and till death, and that's pure spiritual sabotage.
---------------
Related:
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)