tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21112396287600800782024-02-21T01:12:03.059-08:00Front-Line ThoughtCrucial Truth & Solution ResourceUnknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger34125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2111239628760080078.post-11597678343590461222022-10-16T17:48:00.001-07:002022-10-16T17:54:58.680-07:00Blind to the Pyramid (supplemental)<p><br /></p><p>Video clip #1</p><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><iframe allowfullscreen="" class="BLOG_video_class" height="266" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/-2CKdRio9S8" width="320" youtube-src-id="-2CKdRio9S8"></iframe></div><p><br /></p><p>Video clip #2</p><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><iframe allowfullscreen="" class="BLOG_video_class" height="266" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/r3fWnAHO-2Q" width="320" youtube-src-id="r3fWnAHO-2Q"></iframe></div><br /><p></p>Unknownnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2111239628760080078.post-29332288041826281832022-08-12T10:42:00.003-07:002022-08-12T10:52:52.949-07:00Tangible Bioelectric Energy (Qi/Chi) Exercises<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiGKJKMIebtHslaDYVWkfaX4ijijyNaxCorlvYcQTp6UV_0Jk6Kwb2sdEclNrlri35xWzcRefwJyl_byAaVN2WrGX9Ak-pNAhNRjD2HfKOTrlQgkZSoExcjgrEtp3L8vr5nBPK_1KnsAUV_oXR-WMcqIKUXDWWHKuIqN1G6NvcxnVWxVCJfOWQJJ0Dwsw/s900/ki-ball.jpg" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="636" data-original-width="900" height="226" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiGKJKMIebtHslaDYVWkfaX4ijijyNaxCorlvYcQTp6UV_0Jk6Kwb2sdEclNrlri35xWzcRefwJyl_byAaVN2WrGX9Ak-pNAhNRjD2HfKOTrlQgkZSoExcjgrEtp3L8vr5nBPK_1KnsAUV_oXR-WMcqIKUXDWWHKuIqN1G6NvcxnVWxVCJfOWQJJ0Dwsw/s320/ki-ball.jpg" width="320" /></a></div><br /><p><br /></p><p>Video clip #1:</p><p><a href="https://youtube.com/clip/Ugkx8i0kMSOxkHBiHLlE2xXFIjAAueuRkfLh" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">https://youtube.com/clip/Ugkx8i0kMSOxkHBiHLlE2xXFIjAAueuRkfLh</a></p><p><br /></p><p>Video clip #2:</p><p><a href="https://youtube.com/clip/UgkxnGDZo7TaCPIt49cl38H43ARoprZl_-9g" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">https://youtube.com/clip/UgkxnGDZo7TaCPIt49cl38H43ARoprZl_-9g</a></p><p><br /></p><p>Video clip #3:</p><p><a href="https://youtube.com/clip/Ugkx5_PAftubwN_8S-m-tJmUiRWrkCyQLp7l" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">https://youtube.com/clip/Ugkx5_PAftubwN_8S-m-tJmUiRWrkCyQLp7l</a></p><p><br /></p><p>Video clip #4:</p><p><a href="https://youtube.com/clip/Ugkxj58LDed4rBknLgLnFkvxbXj_QyfT2yX0" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">https://youtube.com/clip/Ugkxj58LDed4rBknLgLnFkvxbXj_QyfT2yX0</a></p>Unknownnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2111239628760080078.post-32975836286102912672022-07-13T19:33:00.003-07:002022-07-13T19:37:19.504-07:00The Fed Gets 36 Million Dollars An Hour?! <div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEg70Kuz4egk_ZFzrDkxLaN5oRXRuHNyIbFb1co2qgAr386Lc5m2n53-Z0IZiSDUyQZGp_fsEORzeOwromeK4JN5BccA0mI0BcMWZZb96bI5NPg1BTq0Q1SLYoKak-NWM6GMgYUcF7y6-Jg8PJq2ITv9Q2ArFcmAcqmrsUT-1j8DfWAx6d-xl0SEyBPT9w/s406/endthefedbook.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="406" data-original-width="265" height="320" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEg70Kuz4egk_ZFzrDkxLaN5oRXRuHNyIbFb1co2qgAr386Lc5m2n53-Z0IZiSDUyQZGp_fsEORzeOwromeK4JN5BccA0mI0BcMWZZb96bI5NPg1BTq0Q1SLYoKak-NWM6GMgYUcF7y6-Jg8PJq2ITv9Q2ArFcmAcqmrsUT-1j8DfWAx6d-xl0SEyBPT9w/s320/endthefedbook.jpg" width="209" /></a></div><p>Video clip:</p><p><a href="https://youtube.com/clip/UgkxxM9zv3DyeeIrqTcYaG9yJ9r9ZA53qjT9" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">https://youtube.com/clip/UgkxxM9zv3DyeeIrqTcYaG9yJ9r9ZA53qjT9</a></p>Unknownnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2111239628760080078.post-27676403227290138442022-06-05T13:33:00.005-07:002022-07-02T19:07:18.936-07:00States Repeatedly Persecutie the Most Peaceful<p> </p><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><iframe allowfullscreen="" class="BLOG_video_class" height="266" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/xnxoHqh5YgA" width="320" youtube-src-id="xnxoHqh5YgA"></iframe></div><br /><p></p><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><iframe allowfullscreen="" class="BLOG_video_class" height="266" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/036gAPlpHfU" width="320" youtube-src-id="036gAPlpHfU"></iframe></div><br /><p></p><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><iframe allowfullscreen="" class="BLOG_video_class" height="266" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/nILlRHMRGsU" width="320" youtube-src-id="nILlRHMRGsU"></iframe></div><br /><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><iframe allowfullscreen="" class="BLOG_video_class" height="266" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/TFezEGicqIU" width="320" youtube-src-id="TFezEGicqIU"></iframe></div><br /><p></p><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><iframe allowfullscreen="" class="BLOG_video_class" height="266" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/EKcc61ZjTR8" width="320" youtube-src-id="EKcc61ZjTR8"></iframe></div><br />Unknownnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2111239628760080078.post-40420397686675516202022-05-26T14:17:00.004-07:002022-06-05T08:32:12.916-07:00Problem, Reaction, "Solution" over & over & over again<p></p><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEi0-Alv6_h3RmyN-oL4E80U3tTnbPk4Ea0MdNu9adAJ2i7WFeJ7hf8J8EhyZH_3wXHbwS8pj7SewGgSVNiC-SrKuE3l-aFuvwaNXGu5Rf4pnlH5fTN6YGK2C71lsxS7P9e-rfd9JpWeNPi8bz6nmBWzOM0ZLXVCrKKBzTSL8y16u9Ep_fr49MYgyj7ALA/s300/pexels-photo-194511.jpeg" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="200" data-original-width="300" height="200" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEi0-Alv6_h3RmyN-oL4E80U3tTnbPk4Ea0MdNu9adAJ2i7WFeJ7hf8J8EhyZH_3wXHbwS8pj7SewGgSVNiC-SrKuE3l-aFuvwaNXGu5Rf4pnlH5fTN6YGK2C71lsxS7P9e-rfd9JpWeNPi8bz6nmBWzOM0ZLXVCrKKBzTSL8y16u9Ep_fr49MYgyj7ALA/s1600/pexels-photo-194511.jpeg" width="300" /></a></div><br /><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><br /></div><b>Problem</b>: A crisis or tragedy (real, manufactured, and/or exaggerated).<p></p><p><b>Reaction</b>: "This isn't good. What's the best way to respond?"</p><p>"<b>Solution</b>" (from the rulers): "You should accept more <a href="https://youtu.be/JxQA6ehOE10" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">preemptive attack</a>/abuse/control from us so we can best take care of situations like this."</p><p>The only reason people keep falling for this age-old deception is because<i> they don't have a handle on basic ethics, namely the moral fact that <b>abuse</b> (for example, <a href="https://youtu.be/EcWaG9cH89A" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">disarming</a></i><span style="font-style: italic;"><i><a href="https://youtu.be/EcWaG9cH89A" rel="nofollow" target="_blank"> nonviolent people</a>, or <a href="https://frontlinethought.blogspot.com/2021/09/free-people-dont-have-health-masters.html" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">coercing the use of medical devices/drugs</a>) <b>is pure evil and shouldn't be accepted as a solution to any problem, at any time</b></i></span><span style="font-style: italic;">.</span></p><p><span style="font-style: italic;">If you think giving rulers the power to abuse (more than they already do) is the way to make the world a better place, you are morally inept and ignorant of political history and current events. Abuse *<b>never</b>* increases the good, and that's a very simple thing to understand, don't let the fact that this backwards society never taught you that make you doubt its accuracy.</span></p><p><i>Notice that "<b>preemptive attack = abuse = evil</b>" is almost never stated by anyone; what's most important to know and say is sidelined and ignored.</i></p><p>If you still don't understand why this really is what's most important as far as ethics and social-justice is concerned, keep contemplating this until you do get it, don't just sigh and think "it's complicated," or "it's a grey area," it's really not either; the Devil's playbook is short, and the goal is always the same: deceive you into accepting and participating in abuse, so you violate God's Law. Stop letting Satan play you. Stand on <a href="https://frontlinethought.blogspot.com/2021/12/what-kind-of-love-was-jesus-referring.html" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">true morality</a>, not fear and false guilt being pushed by the mass-media. </p><p>Related current events:</p><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><iframe allowfullscreen="" class="BLOG_video_class" height="266" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/7lCSOSk6uFg" width="320" youtube-src-id="7lCSOSk6uFg"></iframe></div><br /><p><br /></p>Unknownnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2111239628760080078.post-62662342444682820282022-05-22T15:33:00.022-07:002022-07-18T15:12:02.456-07:00How To Avoid An Oil & Electricity Crisis (The E100 Solution)<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEi9XGloet3waTZU5qMxXn_oFh5Qp8dZhDu4TIP5s0V1l605lz8yH12W9D3WmLx1OROfGvQTeHucqJoAo7QBOhoiBgeLOic1Vdhj1hQ0x9JgQR4DTYu1_zSC8Vrh_L8u-J3JXxffkaloUs7hdlrFSSdPl-P6g_hPyxmiSdhgXtsjHv2J32BpT0a3IfkvKQ/s500/famous%20make%20ethanol%20gas%20book.jpg" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="500" data-original-width="382" height="400" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEi9XGloet3waTZU5qMxXn_oFh5Qp8dZhDu4TIP5s0V1l605lz8yH12W9D3WmLx1OROfGvQTeHucqJoAo7QBOhoiBgeLOic1Vdhj1hQ0x9JgQR4DTYu1_zSC8Vrh_L8u-J3JXxffkaloUs7hdlrFSSdPl-P6g_hPyxmiSdhgXtsjHv2J32BpT0a3IfkvKQ/w305-h400/famous%20make%20ethanol%20gas%20book.jpg" width="305" /></a></div><p><br /></p><p>July 18 2022</p><p>When the basics for survival are controlled by a pyramidal system with psycho satanists at the top, that's not an "advanced civilization." What crisis will be manufactured next so that the "<a href="https://frontlinethought.blogspot.com/2022/05/blind-to-pyramid-chain-of-command.html" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">elite</a>" can offer their "solution" of more control over humanity? Being dependent on corporate oil & electricity is no doubt playing into their hands (manufactured shortages and blackouts). If we were all growing our own fuel (e.g., making ethanol at home) and growing our own food on<a href="https://frontlinethought.blogspot.com/2022/03/land-water-seeds.html" rel="nofollow"> sovereign homesteads</a>, that would avoid that, but apparently no one wants to hear actual answers, following disinformation against real solutions and false solutions instead, whether mainstream (e.g., electric everything) or "alternative"/"progressive" (e.g., no more cars at all).</p><p>Making ethanol from plants is the easiest option (basically you just need a bucket, yeast & water, a home distiller), second would be making your own biodiesel.</p><p>Ethanol has been made out to be a problem, because it's actually the solution for individuals & communities. Cars, trucks, lawnmowers, etc. that run on 100% ethanol have existed for a long time, and <a href="http://imakemygas.com/" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">you can easily make ethanol yourself</a> using items from your local supermarket & hardware store, but Big Oil surely doesn't want you to know that, so disinfo is duseminated about how it "destroys engines" and is "not sustainable," as if fermenting plant scraps was the same thing as GMO monoculture, and as if e100 vehicles haven't already been <a href="https://youtu.be/uaoqgKZtaaA" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">proven</a> reliable. (It's similar to the disinfo about the real solution of <a href="https://frontlinethought.blogspot.com/2019/07/top-5-reasons-people-dont-leave-animals.html" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">veganism</a>, claiming it necessarily pushes GMOs, and that all vegans are pushy or arrogant.)</p><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><iframe allowfullscreen="" class="BLOG_video_class" height="266" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/mghba32UzUk" width="320" youtube-src-id="mghba32UzUk"></iframe></div><br /><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><iframe allowfullscreen="" class="BLOG_video_class" height="266" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/vcNFOcD4r2I" width="320" youtube-src-id="vcNFOcD4r2I"></iframe></div><br /><p><br /></p><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><iframe allowfullscreen="" class="BLOG_video_class" height="266" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/pmBMx0SyaTM" width="320" youtube-src-id="pmBMx0SyaTM"></iframe></div><br /><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><iframe allowfullscreen="" class="BLOG_video_class" height="266" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/rmFwSogNAEc" width="320" youtube-src-id="rmFwSogNAEc"></iframe></div><br /><p>https://www.popularmechanics.com/science/a3251/4262690/</p><p><br /></p><p>Hemp Ethanol (fast forward to 25 minutes):</p><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><iframe allowfullscreen="" class="BLOG_video_class" height="266" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/Du3TXm-4UcM" width="320" youtube-src-id="Du3TXm-4UcM"></iframe></div><p><br /></p><p>Biodiesel:</p><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><iframe allowfullscreen="" class="BLOG_video_class" height="266" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/0VxYuYiZZZA" width="320" youtube-src-id="0VxYuYiZZZA"></iframe></div><p><br /></p><p>1) https://www.popularmechanics.com/cars/hybrid-electric/a4717/4332200/</p><p>2) https://www.treehugger.com/make-your-own-biodiesel-part-1-85187</p><p>3) https://www.wikihow.com/Make-Bio-Diesel</p><p><u>Henry Ford & Rudolph Diesel Against Corporate Dependency, Part 1</u>:</p><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><iframe allowfullscreen="" class="BLOG_video_class" height="266" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/MGZEMwMx2vk" width="320" youtube-src-id="MGZEMwMx2vk"></iframe></div><br /><p></p><p><u>Part 2</u>:</p><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><iframe allowfullscreen="" class="BLOG_video_class" height="266" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/YR58dWGeBks" width="320" youtube-src-id="YR58dWGeBks"></iframe></div><br /><p>Rudolph Diesel's original engine design and intention was for us to grow our own fuel so as not to be dependent on oil companies:</p><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><iframe allowfullscreen="" class="BLOG_video_class" height="266" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/bLzMvbqMVQE" width="320" youtube-src-id="bLzMvbqMVQE"></iframe>pop</div><br /><p>Related article:</p><p><a href="https://biodix.wordpress.com/2007/03/31/mr-diesel-and-the-original-biofuels/" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">https://biodix.wordpress.com/2007/03/31/mr-diesel-and-the-original-biofuels/</a></p><p><br /></p>Unknownnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2111239628760080078.post-91587885636951425492022-05-08T10:36:00.071-07:002022-05-31T14:41:31.819-07:00Blind to the Pyramid & Chain of Command<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiWi7_GIuRfJEykr-7D4jdN3P3lniF6kKA5LNx19BAaMJpVnwxOKCSmjQ9Lik23SenEBiwp3RClsIl-obRs0ycDNU_nyvLURfLKpWKXuudzAJtd53XFLAqe-vVLGj9fugAJlSQ3xoS6U7ZlMLFt-oFxUjG8CxfFUz_-LoPiXEY1xepSGfrKytcSzI8Rpw/s476/Screenshot_20220522-041220~2.png" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="322" data-original-width="476" height="432" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiWi7_GIuRfJEykr-7D4jdN3P3lniF6kKA5LNx19BAaMJpVnwxOKCSmjQ9Lik23SenEBiwp3RClsIl-obRs0ycDNU_nyvLURfLKpWKXuudzAJtd53XFLAqe-vVLGj9fugAJlSQ3xoS6U7ZlMLFt-oFxUjG8CxfFUz_-LoPiXEY1xepSGfrKytcSzI8Rpw/w640-h432/Screenshot_20220522-041220~2.png" width="640" /></a></div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><br /></div></div><div><blockquote>"For we are opposed around the world by a monolithic and ruthless conspiracy that relies primarily on covert means for expanding its sphere of influence... It is a system which has conscripted vast human and material resources into the building of a tightly knit, highly efficient machine that combines military, diplomatic, intelligence, economic, scientific and political operations. Its preparations are concealed, not published. Its mistakes are buried, not headlined. Its dissenters are silenced, not praised. No expenditure is questioned, no rumor is printed, no secret is revealed." - President John F. Kennedy, April 27th, 1961. </blockquote><blockquote>"[T]he drive of the Rockefellers and their allies is to create a one-world government, combining super-capitalism and Communism under the same tent, all under their control ... Do I mean conspiracy? Yes I do. I am convinced there is such a plot, international in scope, generations old in planning, and incredibly evil in intent." - Congressman Larry McDonald, 1976</blockquote></div><p>[updated May 21st, 2022]</p><p>After a while, you may notice, if you give yourself the time to objectively observe independent from mainstream viewpoints, that the worst practices and deceptions have always come and continue to come from the major institutions of power in society (corporate, state, education, medical, media, church, <a href="https://youtu.be/WGSPlyZJ4b0" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">banking</a>). All of the most destructive lies and practices come from those devilish "kingdoms" in society (see Matthew 4:8-9), things like the global dissemination of the psychological toxins of <a href="https://youtu.be/VITHwgumudg" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">inherited sin doctrine</a>, satanic music & entertainment (celebrities), <a href="https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PLzRXyF7K41sMu8Z448o70XTgwanNCmmLW" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">cultural-Marxism</a>-infused education and activism, to the physical <a href="https://youtu.be/O0iURaj0ku4" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">environmental toxins</a> (which are likely the cause of many modern diseases, but Establishment Medicine "educates" and pours all the reasearch funding elsewhere, mainly into more drugs and biotech), like <a href="https://youtu.be/A59U5NnR8CQ" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">micro-plastics</a>, <a href="https://sites.google.com/a/veganmail.com/gmo-truth/home" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">GMOs</a>, <a href="https://frontlinethought.blogspot.com/2022/05/the-now-ubiquitous-toxic-chemical.html" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">glyphosate</a>, <a href="https://youtu.be/Mq3TccjFrcQ" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">atrazine</a>, lead, cadmium, mercury (e.g., toxic<a href="https://youtu.be/9ylnQ-T7oiA" rel="nofollow" target="_blank"> tooth fillings</a>, as if no nontoxic alternative exists), aluminium (e.g., unnecessarily in "personal care" products), <a href="https://youtu.be/AY0O0X7uI4k" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">flouride</a> (a "medical" prescription given without consent and without dosage control through the water supply "for healthy teeth"), chlorine (as if there's no nontoxic way to purify our water), aspartame (available <i>for free</i> on diner tables across the country), <a href="https://stephencabral.com/podcast/1769/" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">xenoestrogen</a> overloads (from plastics, etc.), mandatory "for your safety" toxic flame-retardants on your bed, pillows and furniture (for you to absorb for hours every day!), et al., to horrific <a href="https://frontlinethought.blogspot.com/2017/07/natural-births.html" rel="nofollow">hospital birth protocols</a> that traumatize humanity immediately as they take their first breaths, to cycles of <a href="https://sites.google.com/a/veganmail.com/9-11-truth/" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">state-sponsored terrorism</a> that instill populations with further trauma (and Stockholm Syndrome) on top of their birth trauma. </p><p><a href="https://colindonoghue.wordpress.com/2009/01/27/top-5-examples/" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Toxins & Tyranny</a>/Terrorism are intertwined because they both oppress and destroy, the opposite of God's will, and it's all propagated through these devil-run institutions.</p><p>These institutions have become so embedded in society their toxic fallout is difficult to avoid, and most people, because of their indoctrination, don't even try to avoid taking part in them much less avoid their toxicity, thinking these institutions are bastions of human progress and "civilization." Others may express a half-awareness that the worst always come forcefully from the top, complaining (rightfully so) about the latest disruptive nonsense coming down the pike from "Corporate", "the Adminstration," "the Board," etc., labels that obscure who is really calling the shots ultimately at the very top, the chain of command turning into a mysterious cloud at the peak of the Pyramid.</p><p>The key thing to understand with these embedded and interconnected institutions, which have coerced and/or deceived most people into participation with them, is that they operate in a hierarchical, pyramidal manner, <u>they operate by a chain of command</u>. You may think your local hospital doctor or police officer is a decent person, but they work for Pyramid institutions (the Medical Establishment & the State), so they ultimately take orders from, via the chain of command, policy-forming "shadow government" at the top of the Pyramid, and those people are invariably not decent. Those shady characters at the top choose what particular things they want disseminated, and then send the orders down, and fund those things/research/projects for everyone below they want furthered, and fine/defund/bankrupt those that don't get with their destructive programs (hence why anyone talking about natural medicine and cures has to always give the legal disclaimer "this is not medical advice"). Those at the very top also ensure compliance by hiring/promoting those who demonstrate unquestioning compliance (the deceived enthusiastic, immoral, or simply money-hungry), and firing those that fall out compliance.</p><p>These destructive programs/practices, because of indoctrination, directed by those same few at the very top, have many people (especially university and medical students) think the destructive practices are actually good things. </p><p>The recent 2 year scamdemic, pushing compliance to <a href="https://frontlinethought.blogspot.com/2021/09/free-people-dont-have-health-masters.html" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">tyrannical medical mandates</a>, is a perfect recent example of how the Pyramid System operates, pushing something that most people wouldn't have pushed on their own, but did so because of their dumb & blind faith in the top-of-the-pyramid "authorities," and/or because of their monetary dependence on those so-called authorities (monetary dependency rooted in <a href="https://frontlinethought.blogspot.com/2022/03/land-water-seeds.html" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">denial of humanity's birthright</a> to cost/tax-free veganic homesteading land, water & seed, the key solution it seems people are under mind-control to always dismiss/ignore immediately for no good reason).</p><p>There is also the big factor of moral corruption, that has caused much of the youth and young adults to a) think of <a href="https://frontlinethought.blogspot.com/2017/10/abortionthe-three-main-lies.htm" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">abortion</a> as no big deal, b) engage in almost constant <a href="https://biblehub.com/greek/1228.htm" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">slander</a> of other people as their dominant mode of conversation (and social-media activity), along with c), holding disdain for real ethics and religion (denying the possibility that either can be discovered in their true forms). But they do show some love, for artificial intelligence, virtual reality, socialism, and their smart-phone addiction/appendage (so, very much like The Borg in Star Trek). </p><p></p><blockquote>"Do not make gods of metal and worship them." (Exodus 34:17, Good News Translation)</blockquote><p></p><p>The way people are conditioned, it really is like they've been made to be a prototype of the morally bankrupt collectivist cyborgs that seem to be the Devil's end goal for humanity (along with <a href="https://youtu.be/NDX6O6AlIUE" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">a one-world government and one-world luciferian religion</a>). Millennials aren't the only ones of course, the fact that child abuse and trauma remains commonplace generation after generation, (adding another layer of trauma to those already mentioned), shows what's inevitably produced from a society engineered by evil minds.</p><p>Because of how destructive and backwards everything is that comes from the top of the Pyramid, it's reasonable to conclude that the people at the top are evil, and they want to destroy what could be Paradise continually, through their command of institutions (that almost everyone tragically sees as good things, rather than the main channels of the Devil's control over society). If people could just see that Establishment Institutions = The Pyramid, and see that <i>there is a chain of command within that pyramid</i>, and those at the top are clearly deranged psychopaths, then why the world is the way it is will become much more clear to them, and they'll start to (if they still have compassion and critical thinking active in their mind) avoid and disconnect themselves as much as possible from these devil-at-the-top institutions. Again, the idea that the people at the very top, who put forth satanic hospital birth protocols, water flouridation, toxic vaccines, covering the earth in autism-causing glypohosate, et al., are actually satanists/luciferians, are actually just tools and puppets of Satan himself, <i>actually makes sense of why these evil destructive things are pushed on humanity mainly through these institutions</i>; it's logical to infer that the conspiracy theorists are right, and that those at the top are indeed Satanists who hate humanity, because humans & the Earth were created by God, who is the enemy of the Satan they follow. Perhaps the End Game of this agenda is <a href="https://youtu.be/3ugmcQS3Vk0" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">opening a portal for Satan and his demons via the CERN collider</a>, created by a coalition of the world's "elite" (top of the Pyramid) as many people now believe; the bizarre satanic theater opening to CERN supports this, as dose their placement of a statue of the god of destruction at that location. And/or their goal is a "New World Order" that resembles the society portrayed in the book 1984 by George Orwell. Basically we should expect their goal to be the opposite of the real Paradise that was and is The Creator's intent for humanity; instead of sovereign humans having dominion over the Earth (i.e., having sovereign homesteads), the want a global Communist order wherein everyone owns nothing and has no individual sovereignty, wherein most people are slaves to the cabal running the global State.</p><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjmfYAMaAyQaQe1d3K-FMg3BIrbsxvOiR7BgI1AB26d-8lKgVIKekQ39dRUSY6cQkoP_S8OISPMT3T3M9S3wV_WgHk9UeWZesS6SOfe0hYjPdt0uqhS8BQw3AVPTxPsNhxwbBv5XVLWn25mDNJpJB6_yo0-a-fv0Vor6_g2NG94ejM9oYW7CU3dYgsJFQ/s1291/Screenshot_20220514-215222~4.png" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="693" data-original-width="1291" height="215" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjmfYAMaAyQaQe1d3K-FMg3BIrbsxvOiR7BgI1AB26d-8lKgVIKekQ39dRUSY6cQkoP_S8OISPMT3T3M9S3wV_WgHk9UeWZesS6SOfe0hYjPdt0uqhS8BQw3AVPTxPsNhxwbBv5XVLWn25mDNJpJB6_yo0-a-fv0Vor6_g2NG94ejM9oYW7CU3dYgsJFQ/w400-h215/Screenshot_20220514-215222~4.png" width="400" /></a></div><p>A lot of people focus on figuring out what Satanic <a href="https://youtu.be/OzOR_xo6qmI" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">groups/organizations/families</a> comprise the upper levels of the Pyramid, but from a practical standpoint, it really doesn't matter, since most of us aren't dealing with those people directly, but instead with the institutions that they direct; therefore the task at hand is an exodus from those institutions, (taking away the means of societal corruption and control), and a return of individual sovereignty and dominion, and natural voluntary community.</p><p><u>Conclusion</u></p><p>So the overview of why the world is so messed up is not complicated: again, all mainstream hierarchical institutions <a href="https://frontlinethought.blogspot.com/2020/07/the-top-disempowering-lies-pushed-on.html" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">push lies and destruction</a> and cancel/ban/slander crucial truth and healing solutions, because they're ultimately led by someone who is hell-bent on deceiving and destroying humanity physically and morally/spiritually (in large part by convincing them that the enslavement, murder and consumption of animals is not <a href="https://frontlinethought.blogspot.com/2019/07/top-5-reasons-people-dont-leave-animals.html">actually an evil in God's sight</a>), and turning the beautiful Earth into a toxic irradiated wasteland (again in large part due to the livestock industry), to be eventually populated by programmed/hackable cyborgs.</p><p>I know many will just dismiss all this as a crazy conspiracy theory, rather than a rational and objective observation of society, ignoring the reasoning and verifiable observations, like why about 1 in 25 children have autism now, 1 in 3 adults get cancer (there are reportedly over 140,000 cancer-causing man-made chemicals all released on a daily basis, so getting an <a href="https://youtu.be/CFwHYG0Wjtk" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">environmental toxin test</a> is a good idea), along with the skyrocketed rates of Parkinson's and Alzheimer's Disease, <a href="https://mindd.org/environmental-toxins-thyroid-diseases/" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Thyroid Diseases</a>, sleep disorders, et al..</p><p>Hopefully mainstream society will wake up and cease being heartless carnist news-watching <a href="https://frontlinethought.blogspot.com/2015/08/the-bunk-science-of-evolution-and.html" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Darwin-believing</a> atheist irradiating technology-loving "educated" <a href="https://frontlinethought.blogspot.com/2020/05/top-5-reasons-people-think-anarchism-is.html" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">statists</a> who slander non-conformists (i.e., those not completely indoctrinated and deceived); maybe one day they'll see the pattern of evil always coming from the top of these interconnected/inter-owned institutions, and see this deceptive and destructive Pyramid for what is (the Devil's kingdom), before they're too far corrupted by it. Hopefully one day restoring Eden won't seem "backwards" to them, and Genesis 1:29 & 2:15 will seem like the obvious way to go to them too.</p><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><iframe allowfullscreen="" class="BLOG_video_class" height="266" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/OY7iO8WGrSE" width="320" youtube-src-id="OY7iO8WGrSE"></iframe></div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><br /></div><p><u>Related Presentation</u></p><p><a href="https://youtu.be/GSz8Xl26N2I" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">https://youtu.be/GSz8Xl26N2I</a></p><p><u>Related Podcast (by ReallyGraceful)</u></p><p><a href="https://youtu.be/oZEW3aWTs-Q" rel="" target="">https://youtu.be/oZEW3aWTs-Q</a></p><p><u>Related Song Lyrics (by Lukas Lion)</u></p><p><u><a href="https://youtu.be/aUcdic50y9Y" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">https://youtu.be/aUcdic50y9Y</a></u></p><p><a href="https://youtu.be/SPiJrWQvUXY">https://youtu.be/SPiJrWQvUXY</a></p>Unknownnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2111239628760080078.post-31118428628667466702022-05-02T17:10:00.016-07:002022-05-30T15:58:03.603-07:00Quantifiable Discipleship<div><br /></div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><br /></div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgKdSRTyWyL0MDHlF23TC8eIVGheYGE_WPCAxS0kpYOAdsSg8Lv79Y2zV5uu60YKPdatrb5xdzY2QfspByFDdjDV39_MkQLyEcxGL5H9SnCF6tQhqmMJj9zRkVg8ZP3VnDy8Nx23mIHm-qyTXbjGizb5u_IMIB09UrulQXIY31qWrhD3Wshaki921Eojw/s2248/pexels-photo-1203808.jpeg" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="1500" data-original-width="2248" height="214" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgKdSRTyWyL0MDHlF23TC8eIVGheYGE_WPCAxS0kpYOAdsSg8Lv79Y2zV5uu60YKPdatrb5xdzY2QfspByFDdjDV39_MkQLyEcxGL5H9SnCF6tQhqmMJj9zRkVg8ZP3VnDy8Nx23mIHm-qyTXbjGizb5u_IMIB09UrulQXIY31qWrhD3Wshaki921Eojw/s320/pexels-photo-1203808.jpeg" width="320" /></a></div><br /><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><br /></div><div>We shouldn't be too surprised that the spiritual side of life has some set numerical characteristics, just like the physical side of the world does. One of the most important numbers to get a handle on is 8, because 8 is the number of sinful toxic emotion-thoughts that regularly attempt to mislead us. These 8 sins (conquered by 8 opposing virtues) are "Not-Self," they are "Mara-mind," perhaps they are actually evil spirits, but just call them collectively "ego" if that's too much for you right now. The traditional "Seven Deadly Sins" came fairly close to the complete truth, but through your own scientific self-observation you can discover and confirm that there are actually exactly 8, and what those 8 are exactly.</div><br />Because these stressful thoughts are not really our own thoughts, not our True Selves, being relaxed & authentic is key to overcoming them; our Authentic Selves are naturally relaxed and virtuous, so basically it's just a matter of not clinging to the false self/"ego", the 8 toxic/stressful emotion-thoughts/sins, which are: Fear, Anger/Impatience, Depression, Craving/Rushing, Sloth, Mischievousness, Conceitedness, and Suspiciousness. The opposing virtues to align with are: Courage, Calmness, Hopefulness, Temperance, Liveliness, Righteousness, Humility, and Trust.<br /><br />The 8 sins are all equally bad, but fear perhaps should be tackled first (here is a comprehensive guidebook on doing that if you're interested: https://ko-fi.com/s/1bea6ef1d3). The 8 sins lead us to violate the Greatest Commandments of Jesus to love God, others and ourselves; they do this by leading us to do the opposite of love, which is abuse. There are 3 forms of abuse: Aggression (the initiation of violence), Deception, and Stealing. There are 13 expressions of those 3 forms, e.g., slandering, crowding and staring are 3 of the expressions of subtle aggression, and snubbing someone is a subtle expression of theft.<div><br /></div><div>Returning to The Octad of Sin, there are 3 main forms of each sin, each main form has 3 subtypes, so there's 9 total forms of each sin, making for 72 total forms of The Octad of Sin, and 72 corresponding Right Thoughts to conquer them, the truth that can set us free from the bondage of sin.</div><div><br /></div><div>Jesus "sent out the 72 ahead of him" (Luke 10:1), symbolizing the inner work we need to do (affirming and memorizing the 72 Right Thoughts) in order to be prepared for (i.e., aligned with) his arrival in our lives at <a href="https://ko-fi.com/s/18b5885046" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Kairos Moments</a>, so that the Kairos will be fulfilled, and we will "drink living water," i.e., find deep satisfaction. Jesus also referred to them as 72 colors that produce a white/purified garment:</div><div><div>"The Lord once came to the dye-works of Levi. He took 72 different dyes and threw them into the vat. Then He took all fabrics from it, and they were white. He said, 'Even so the Son of Man works.'" (Philip 54)</div></div><div><br /></div><div>Kairos Moments are what Jesus was talking about when he described the Kingdom/Dimension of Heaven, which always manifests in a small/subtle ("like a mustard seed" ), sudden (like "a robber at night"), and brief way (a gate that is only open for one second, or alternatively, a master who only knocks on your door once). There are exactly 12 forms of Kairos Moments (6 for Desire, 6 for Justice) again referred to symbolically by Jesus "sending them out" to help people:</div><div>"Jesus called his twelve disciples to him <u>and gave them authority to drive out impure spirits</u> and to heal every disease and sickness." (Matthew 10:1)</div><div>&</div><div>"Then Jesus called the Twelve to Him and began to send them out two by two, giving them authority over unclean spirits." (Mark 6:7)</div><div><br /></div><div>So, in conclusion, the numbers 8, 12, & 72 (along with the 13 Violations) should be at the forefront of the mind of a disciple of Jesus because they correspond to critical components of that discipleship.</div><div><br /></div><div>---</div><div><br /></div><div><span>The 13 Violations (abusive behaviors to be rebuked calmly and assertively at the 6 Justice Kairos Moments) are:</span></div><div><ol style="text-align: left;"><li><span>Privacy invasion.</span></li><li><span>Unnecessary disturbance.</span></li><li><span>Crowding/Blocking/Shoving.</span></li><li><span>Damaging or neglecting property (including your own body).</span></li><li><span>Staring.</span></li><li><span>Threatening.</span></li><li><span>Slander (verbal or nonverbal).</span></li><li><span>Bossing Around/Imposition.</span></li><li><span>Reckless Endangering.</span></li><li><span>Usurping Control.</span></li><li><span>Betrayal/Treachery.</span></li><li><span>Deception/Cheating.</span></li><li><span>Stealing/Theft/Extortion.</span></li></ol><div><span>(#1 - #11 are expressions of <b>aggression</b>, #12 is <b>deception</b>, and #13 is <b>stealing; again, these are the 3 main forms of abuse, the three main violations of the Law of Love</b>).</span></div></div><div><span><br /></span></div><div><span>Related Talk:</span></div><div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><iframe allowfullscreen="" class="BLOG_video_class" height="266" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/WSMZKayhSKU" width="320" youtube-src-id="WSMZKayhSKU"></iframe></div><br /><span><br /></span></div><div><br /></div>Unknownnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2111239628760080078.post-89374227345203255362022-05-01T16:45:00.007-07:002022-05-09T16:36:20.227-07:00The Now Ubiquitous Toxic Chemical Destroying the Minds & Bodies of Children & Adults<p> </p><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><iframe allowfullscreen="" class="BLOG_video_class" height="266" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/jWgnkgYtqnw" width="320" youtube-src-id="jWgnkgYtqnw"></iframe></div><br /><p></p><p>Probably the most important part starts at 34:00. This is a crime against humanity, especially against children, denied by government and industry, year after year. </p><p>The mention of the Roundup commercial of guys killing dandelions, which are very medicinal for humanity, with a chemical that is poison for humanity, was also very significant, a succinct microcosm of <a href="https://frontlinethought.blogspot.com/2022/05/blind-to-pyramid-chain-of-command.html" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">how evil and backwards the agenda of the-powers-that-be at the top of the Pyramid</a> is, encouraging us to destroy God's good Creation, and ourselves.</p><p>Part 2:</p><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><iframe allowfullscreen="" class="BLOG_video_class" height="266" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/4tBTv0I5-qk" width="320" youtube-src-id="4tBTv0I5-qk"></iframe></div><br /><p><u>Related Article</u> </p><p>"Toxins & Tyranny" --></p><p><a href="https://colindonoghue.wordpress.com/2009/01/27/top-5-examples/" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">https://colindonoghue.wordpress.com/2009/01/27/top-5-examples/</a></p>Unknownnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2111239628760080078.post-44558164325087052152022-04-16T08:28:00.022-07:002022-05-21T16:54:14.490-07:00Easter/Passover Celebrators: Here's Why Not to Be So Sure Jesus Killed and Ate Lambs<p> <a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgQ4Rk_T4X52YtTovuVUyjezGiPoWrdT9Mo-jeR2M5aS9HhR4Kcy6r9owjuj1y97hSomOCpgGysiL3WY9gyVAMaS8AABf5qL5FocGhoVIgLcTnxnhWk3RX2foqgZg6I-YNfPqIHopnQmBanAxQ1eXpnup1F-XyyjzoXZRmiMlyCB6dV8Gxc2B3jWLF_XQ/s2443/810103-2__04332.1614460934.jpg" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em; text-align: center;"><img border="0" data-original-height="2443" data-original-width="1920" height="320" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgQ4Rk_T4X52YtTovuVUyjezGiPoWrdT9Mo-jeR2M5aS9HhR4Kcy6r9owjuj1y97hSomOCpgGysiL3WY9gyVAMaS8AABf5qL5FocGhoVIgLcTnxnhWk3RX2foqgZg6I-YNfPqIHopnQmBanAxQ1eXpnup1F-XyyjzoXZRmiMlyCB6dV8Gxc2B3jWLF_XQ/s320/810103-2__04332.1614460934.jpg" width="251" /></a></p><p></p><p>[May 21st, 2022]</p><p>It amazes me that people look at illustrations & paintings of Jesus gently holding a lamb, and then also think him cutting the throat of that lamb would also be true to life. Jesus is the Good Shepherd <i>of men</i>, and he told fishermen to leave their boats & nets to become <i>fishers of men</i>; he was replacing violent activities with higher nonviolent activities.</p><p>"But God approved animal sacrifices and eating animal flesh, neither are really bad." People are so sure that God, who is love, approves of abuse, which is the direct opposite of love; and why are they so sure? Well, because some words on paper tell them so. To quote particular words on paper that support abuse and ignore <a href="https://youtu.be/Fqq_p19hDj8" rel="" target="">others that don't</a>, is a flawed morality, it's the moral position of "The good is whatever particular words I choose on paper says is the good." The true morality is comprehensive love (again the complete opposite of abuse), the true moral Law is <a href="https://frontlinethought.blogspot.com/2021/12/what-kind-of-love-was-jesus-referring.html" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">the Greatest Commandments and Golden Rule</a>, not a mix of rules, some being abusive and others not (as Leo Tolstoy and many other writers/commentators have rightly said over the years). </p><p>If you look outside of Empire-approved texts (and the Empire/rulers corrupting/omitting original texts/testimonies really shouldn't be a surprise), you'll find that Jesus wanted to abolish the animal sacrifices (Recognitions of Clement 1:54), and God never wanted animals to be sacrificed or to be killed at all (Homilies of Clement 3:45, plus canonical Genesis 1:29 & Isaiah 1:11). The Ebionite gospel in fact has Jesus declaring, “I have come to destroy the sacrifices” and Jesus rejects eating the Passover lamb flesh as well (Epiphanius, Panarion 30). This fits with Jesus repeatedly saying in the more ambiguous Empire-approved scripture: “I require mercy, not sacrifice” (Matthew 9:13, 12:7, Jesus quoting Hosea 6:6).</p><p>Killing baby lambs shows no mercy, it is the cruel, twisted murder of innocent and beautiful creatures, it is most certainly not pleasing to God, especially when it's completely unnecessary for your survival or health.</p><p>I believe in the Law of Love given by Yeshua/Jesus the Messiah; I believe God did not create humans in a way that requires them to murder sentient beings (again, Genesis 1:29). Why seek verses to support unnecessary abuse that violates the true Law? If I asked a child "Why don't you hurt animals?" they'd probably say "Because that's not nice." Then people grow up and believe logical fallacies, like Appeal to Authority (e.g., to some "authoritative" scroll/letter/dogma), and Appeal to Tradition, and think they're wiser and more pleasing in the sight of God than the nonviolent child. "But I like these verses better that tell me it's okay to be blood-thirsty and heartless toward animals." Again, that's not a sound moral position. If Yeshua asked you "Why didn't you just leave animals alone?" you think selective pro-abuse verse-picking is going to be a satisfactory reply to Him? </p><p>When you read books like '<i>Disciples</i>' and '<i>The Lost Religion of Jesus</i>' by Keith Akers and related research, you'll discover that Jesus was, as shouldn't be a surprise, loving & nonviolent, and his teachings were hijacked and distorted by so-called apostles and various Bible editors. Those original teachings that show Jesus was completely against animal sacrifice and flesh-eating can thankfully still be read, again in large part currently thanks to those two excellent books by Keith Akers, '<i>Disciples</i>' & '<i>The Lost Religion of Jesus</i>.'</p><p>God's original plan for humans was a nonviolent one (Genesis 1:29); trust that it is also His plan for us now and the future (Isaiah 11:7) as well. <a href="https://colindonoghue.wordpress.com/2021/06/15/1451/" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Letting go of Paul as an idol</a> is an excellent start to aligning with the true teachings of Jesus/Yeshua, but don't let certain verses in scrolls be a different misleading idol. Don't forget, the Golden Rule is simple, and "love others" should logically include animals since they are also sentient, have emotions, feel pain and want to live.</p><p>Yeshua wasn't killing animals in his spare time, as made clear by all the "unapproved" historical texts, like <a href="https://youtu.be/Fqq_p19hDj8" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">The Gospel of The Holy Twelve</a>. Yeshua was actually completely against animal sacrifice and animal flesh eating. It's not God's way to support unnecessary violence toward sentient beings, to say so is blasphemous; again if you do a little research, you'll discover Yeshua is recorded as saying: "I've come to abolish the [animal] sacrifices," and you should re-read Isaiah 1:11, Hosea 6:6 & 8:13, Micah 6:8, and Jeremiah 7:21 as well to reinforce that.</p><p>I have zero doubt that killing and eating lambs (and chickens, et al.) will be something you'll be very glad you stopped doing, the sooner the better. Imagine the living animal right in front of you, and/or go to a farm or animal sanctuary, and notice, the Holy Spirit is not going to tell you to kill them. </p><p>---</p><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><iframe allowfullscreen="" class="BLOG_video_class" height="266" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/j8Qfd6g1rZc" width="320" youtube-src-id="j8Qfd6g1rZc"></iframe></div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><iframe allowfullscreen="" class="BLOG_video_class" height="266" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/fgdhhla1xh8" width="320" youtube-src-id="fgdhhla1xh8"></iframe></div><p>Please also see this <a href="https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PLzRXyF7K41sO2jj9pWViNdjkyWvrovuWh" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">video playlist (various content-creators) on Vegan Christianity</a> as well.</p><p><br /></p>Unknownnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2111239628760080078.post-14457369435527152012022-04-14T17:08:00.018-07:002022-06-05T09:14:45.512-07:00What Does God Think of Domesticated Animals? <div><br /></div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgqtCGqnIBhlW93UCwhceadfFfSCrRk_fYc8pLykdFQKjOTlklHxVWw-h_Tq6NvUy-aam-mJQazUbyhvIBCV-__vlwhqNLg-pKOfx8K12LSA396jR5azn2USmgNIyzv2j-DisBB0I3ah3PBzi8GYR3QiBTr9TUELHZjBnbj_T2COTbaIshzvhbyuO_45w/s1875/pexels-photo-3912703.jpeg" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="1500" data-original-width="1875" height="256" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgqtCGqnIBhlW93UCwhceadfFfSCrRk_fYc8pLykdFQKjOTlklHxVWw-h_Tq6NvUy-aam-mJQazUbyhvIBCV-__vlwhqNLg-pKOfx8K12LSA396jR5azn2USmgNIyzv2j-DisBB0I3ah3PBzi8GYR3QiBTr9TUELHZjBnbj_T2COTbaIshzvhbyuO_45w/s320/pexels-photo-3912703.jpeg" width="320" /></a></div><div><br /></div>[updated June 5th, 2022]<div><br /><div>Humanity has been deceived by "authorities" for so long, that speaking truth that exposes any of those deceptions can seem far-fetched; the key is discerning when assumptions are being made, in the context of this discussion those assumptions being that whatever authorities (of church, science, or education) say, and whatever has been the tradition, are both based on the best reasoning, facts and morality. Oftentimes they're not, and that's why those are logical fallacies (Appeal to Authority & Appeal to Tradition).</div><div><br /></div><div>An important question (important because of how much animal domestication effects our lives, the lives of animals, and <a href="https://freefromharm.org/why-vegan/#environment" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">the environment</a>), that will help expose those aformentioned logical fallacies, used to defend humans turning wild animals into domesticated animals, is: "What does God think of animal domestication?" </div><div><br /></div><div>Being that most people aren't opposed to animal domestication, it's safe to say, among those that believe in God, they'll say that God is perfectly fine with it, and maybe even encourages us to domesticate animals. This may in part be due to reading and believing the clear mistranslation (thought to be "authoritative") of Genesis 2:20 that says Adam "gave names to all the livestock," as if the practice of animal domestication/slavery had already been established somehow at the beginning of Creation; it wasn't, all the animals were wild animals. The original Hebrew word <i>behemah</i> translated in many Bibles as "livestock" or "cattle" actually just meant "beast" or "animal." Once again Bible editors push their own agenda, not God's, and once again people follow those editors/writers/scribes as if they were Divine themselves (again, the Appeal to Authority Fallacy).</div><div><br /></div><div>Another Fallacy at play with animal domestication is the Bandwagon Fallacy, assuming something is good, logical and true because it's popular/trendy. "Sustainable grazing" is super popular and trendy now; it's just another re-hashed version of animal slavery, presented as supposedly "essential" & "ecological," ignoring the immorality of it, and ignoring how it creates more hassles and distractions for people than benefits, and ignoring how it is nowhere near the superiority of <a href="https://goveganic.net/rubrique23.html" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">veganic</a> gardening & orcharding. </div><div><br /></div><div>Many unfortunately consistently go for mainstream/institutional b.s. that's based on abuse (the other big example being <a href="https://frontlinethought.blogspot.com/2020/05/top-5-reasons-people-think-anarchism-is.html" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">politics</a>); rather than just stick with the Golden Rule, they are <a href="https://youtu.be/4tUmuBZRe-0" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">following the false morality of false gods</a>. </div><div><br /></div><div>Jesus said "[T]hat which is highly esteemed among people is detestable in the sight of God," (Luke 16:15) and I believe He actually views domesticated animals as such a detestable sight; not the Spirits of the animals, not the individuals themselves, but rather the forced departure from their wild ancestors being the abomination, the distortion of their bodies and minds is the abomination.</div><div><br /></div><div>Domesticated cats will leave dead songbirds they killed (but didn't eat) laying in your garden, while the peace-giving sounds of the song of that bird's still-living relatives are overwhelmed by the sound of barking dogs (a simultaneous and compounded disturbance originating from the forceful domestication of wolves into dogs and wild cats into house pets). In the United States alone, outdoor cats kill over 2 billion birds every year. And some neighborhoods, all around the world, have the sound of barking dogs 365 days a year, it's become normalized permanent background noise for people's lives, adding stress and sleep deprivation. </div><div><br /></div><div>These, along with many other similar observations of domestic vs. wild animals, like the negative environmental effects of the pet and livestock indusries, is actually observation of karmic feedback from the moral fabric of Creation. The simple truth is that domesticated animals produce more disturbance and unproductive distraction in our lives than they do produce any real qualitative benefit, and that's because they're not part of <a href="https://frontlinethought.blogspot.com/2015/08/the-bunk-science-of-evolution-and.html?m=1" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">God's perfect design of Nature</a>. </div><div><br /></div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhZelbFfqivvCHLewO_YT460h6jVvlf0H2KhdudSmCIhgRYpCriYMWOV_tHZGxgc3kP4fTBEUCAUqU0KDmGA23fRsvQeQ-pIlo59kSM0O3gog-iTp45LcYkwpod4s3DNmRG1qOf9M1hsju0gDfbxWs6E9noJjI6Q4fSwg2KQqrKdMXrX4NEJJSP5PK2hg/s1780/IMG_20220418_214538397~2.jpg" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="1739" data-original-width="1780" height="313" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhZelbFfqivvCHLewO_YT460h6jVvlf0H2KhdudSmCIhgRYpCriYMWOV_tHZGxgc3kP4fTBEUCAUqU0KDmGA23fRsvQeQ-pIlo59kSM0O3gog-iTp45LcYkwpod4s3DNmRG1qOf9M1hsju0gDfbxWs6E9noJjI6Q4fSwg2KQqrKdMXrX4NEJJSP5PK2hg/s320/IMG_20220418_214538397~2.jpg" width="320" /></a></div><div><br /></div><div>I'm sure that by claiming that domesticated animals are unpleasing to God, most people will find that claim "too extreme." Understandably, most people will probably immediately think of some benefits of domesticated animals, and ignore or deny the severe negatives (just like those that focus on some good things Paul said in his letters found in the New Testament, ignoring/rationalizing the very toxic and false things he also said), missing the forest for the trees, a biased evaluation (the Special Pleading Fallacy) + assuming a conclusion can't be right because it's "too simple" (the Complexity Bias), preventing the correct conclusion, namely that domesticating animals was a mistake by humanity, going against God's design and moral law. The latter moral component can be readily understood when you recognize it was mainly abuse that transformed wild animals into domesticated animals, and abuse is pure evil, pure evil that distorted and Corrupted Creation to breed domesticated animals that don't fit in Nature's perfect design, and do things like decimate the Beauty of entire songbird populations and fill whole communities with noise pollution. </div><div><br /></div><div>Worth repeating, because of its significance and because it is repeatedly ignored, <b>animal domestication originated from abuse, and relies on abuse to keep it going</b>. Abuse is the opposite of love; Jesus taught us that <a href="https://frontlinethought.blogspot.com/2021/12/what-kind-of-love-was-jesus-referring.html" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">the true Law is comprehensive love</a>; therefore animal domestication violates the Law & will of God. And <u>He gives us negative karmic feedback as a consequence of breaking that Law and going against His perfect will</u>. </div><div><br /></div><div>Domesticated animals really are a corruption of God's Creation, and therefore that corruption karmically produces disturbances, in stark contrast to the pleasant sites and sounds of wild animals.<div><br /></div><div>"<u>Pet Life</u>" </div><div> <br />Being <a href="https://frontlinethought.blogspot.com/2021/07/top-5-mistakes-of-mainstream.html" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Christian</a> (and/or <a href="https://frontlinethought.blogspot.com/2019/07/top-5-reasons-people-dont-leave-animals.html" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">vegan</a>) doesn't necessarily equate w/ being a pet lover. People used to worship the "golden calf," now some people basically worship their pets. But before discussing pets I should first speak of the worse use of domesticated animals, the livestock industry, which is not acceptable in God's sight, yet most Christians have been told it is by the Establishment/Paulinist Church.</div><div><span style="background-color: black; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif;"><br /></span></div><div><span style="background-color: black; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif;">If you don't look to the book & letter compilation called The Bible as the only source of possible historical and religious truth, </span><a href="https://compassionatespirit.com/wpblog/2022/04/13/jesus-and-animal-sacrifice/" rel="nofollow" style="color: #c6dafc; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; text-decoration-line: none;" target="_blank">then you will discover that the vegetarianism/veganism of Jesus and the original followers of Jesus is not far-fetched at all</a><span style="background-color: black; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif;">; you can learn this from modern books like</span><span style="background-color: black; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif;"> </span><i style="font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif;">The Lost Religion of Jesus</i><span style="background-color: black; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif;"> </span><span style="background-color: black; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif;">by Kieth Akers, and</span><span style="background-color: black; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif;"> </span><i style="font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif;">Vegetarian Christian Saints: Mystics, Ascetics and Monks</i><span style="background-color: black; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif;"> </span><span style="background-color: black; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif;">by Dr. Holly Roberts, along with the ancient writings of Saint Jerome, Ephrem The Syrian, Epiphanius's writings on the Nasaraeans/Nazarenes (writings in a text called the Panarion, chapter 18 specifically), The Syriac Clementine Recognitions & Homilies (The Ebionite Book of Acts), The Syriac-Aramaic Gospel of Luke, and The Gospel of The Holy Twelve, et al., as you can learn from the following video playlist: </span></div><div><ul style="background-color: black; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 15.84px; line-height: 1.4; list-style-image: initial; list-style-position: initial; margin: 0px -15px; padding: 0px 2.5em;"><li style="border: none; margin: 0px 0px 0.25em; padding: 0.25em 0px;"><a href="https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLzRXyF7K41sO2jj9pWViNdjkyWvrovuWh" rel="nofollow" style="color: #c6dafc; text-decoration-line: none;" target="_blank">Vegan Christianity Video Playlist</a></li></ul><p style="background-color: black; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif;">For even more information/evidence on Christianity and veganism see these websites: </p><ul style="background-color: black; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 15.84px; line-height: 1.4; list-style-image: initial; list-style-position: initial; margin: 0px -15px; padding: 0px 2.5em;"><li style="border: none; margin: 0px 0px 0.25em; padding: 0.25em 0px;"><a href="https://christianityandveganism.wordpress.com/" rel="nofollow" style="color: #c6dafc; text-decoration-line: none;" target="_blank">https://christianityandveganism.wordpress.com</a> (Spanish: <a class="XqQF9c" href="https://veganocristiano.wordpress.com/" rel="nofollow" style="color: #c6dafc; text-decoration-line: none;" target="_blank">Vegano Cristiano</a>)</li><li style="border: none; margin: 0px 0px 0.25em; padding: 0.25em 0px;"><a href="https://compassionatespirit.com/" style="color: #c6dafc; text-decoration-line: none;">https://compassionatespirit.com</a></li><li style="border: none; margin: 0px 0px 0.25em; padding: 0.25em 0px;"><a href="https://www.petalambs.com/feature/" rel="nofollow" style="color: #c6dafc; text-decoration-line: none;" target="_blank">https://www.petalambs.com/feature/</a></li><li style="border: none; margin: 0px 0px 0.25em; padding: 0.25em 0px;"><a href="https://medium.com/sant-mat-meditation-and-spirituality/uncovering-a-vegetarian-jesus-at-the-beginning-of-christianity-9279741be7c4" rel="nofollow" style="color: #c6dafc; text-decoration-line: none;" target="_blank">Comprehensive Article on Early Christianity and Veganism</a></li></ul></div><div>Returning to the issue of pets, people devoting much of their lives (and resources) to pets, talking a lot to dogs, cats, chickens, etc., as if they're people (which of course I've done too)... it's kind of delusional behavior, if we're objective about it; humans are supposed to talk with other humans and have human friends (along with pray to and befriend God), not cohabitate with animals and have the as our substitute friends and children; it's all an unnatural phenomenon that isn't as harmless as it may seem, again it's living contrary to God's will and design, and there is nothing of real lasting quality to be found in that territory. When we understand the reality of the spiritual life better, then we can clearly see the spiritual problem with pets (along with the health problems, like fleas & parasites they carry, requiring major amounts of pharmaceuticals to counter, pharmaceuticals that pollute water supplies, etc.). Whether the dog or cat is generally calm or noisy, it's actually a spiritual/religious hindrance; the former is likely to have you spending more time with them, the latter has less interaction but more disturbance, so either version evens out to be basically the same in the context of a spiritual life, either one is bad for you. <br /> <br />To go on about the the therapeutic value of pets is to ignore their substitute nature, an inferior substitution for human/Nature-based therapies; just because <i>some</i> benefit is received doesn't mean it's not actually <i>overall</i> a hindrance for your life, <i>overall</i> putting a ceiling on your development through the unnatural substitution. To have irrational fixation on the limited benefits, while ignoring the overall negative effects in the biggest important context (spiritual reality & practice), leads to integrating into one's life that which should be rejected.</div><div> <br />To voluntarily add animals to your home that attract fleas & parasites, and that shit and pee in and/or around your home daily, and bark, and chase wildlife, etc., is not really wise. (And when the dog barks a lot that's not actually increasing your safety, it's <i>decreasing</i> it, because you won't be able to hear an intruder well.) Whether it's a country woman's morning ritual to clean up chicken shit or an urban man's ritual to pick up dog shit with his hand in a plastic bag (I cringe when remembering myself doing that as a teenager), this is all a waste and degradation of human life, time and energy. Again, one may think the downsides are outweighed by <a href="https://frontlinethought.blogspot.com/2019/07/top-5-reasons-people-dont-leave-animals.html" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">the supposed upsides</a> (e.g., chicken flesh to eat, pet companionship), but closer examination shows that these "upsides" are actually just downsides too (e.g., a barking dog).</div><div><br /></div><div><div>Yes I know dogs can be awesome and many people really love their cats, etc., I know we can have meaningful connection with domesticated animals, but we have to look at the big picture here, and be objective about whether the perceived great things about dogs and cats are really that great at all from God's point of view, concerning what our higher purpose as humans is here on Earth.</div><div><br /></div><div>Think objectivley about time spent with domesticated animals, there is definitely a ceiling to how significant the relationship can be, and a lot of the downsides are often overlooked, like constant barking and other distracting/disturbing behavior by the animal. Why do dogs (yes, I know not all) often act in an extremely annoying way, e.g., a dog running away from you and then toward you, and then yelping as if being harmed when you try to get them out of the house/room, or a cat that walks right in front of you and then makes it so you have to stop or walk into them, etc. This is all really "dancing with the devil," crazy-making disturbing behavior that is a product of their crazy origin: slavery. Dogs/cats, overall/globally, are either constantly causing disturbances or being a constant distraction and attention/energy-drain. They are either like toxic-people that constantly push your buttons to make you react with anger and thereby fall into sin that way, or, even though it can be in a very friendly way, like energy-vampires who constantly drain your time and energy for no real (big-picture-of-life-and-purpose-wise) good outcome whatsoever, being a vehicle for the sin of sloth that way. </div></div><div> <br /></div><div>What I observe is people's lives sadly revolving around their pets (as mine often did when I was younger), pretty much daily family questions being "Where is Spot?" "Spot! Spot!" "Why is Spot barking now? What is it Spot?" Etc. etc. Perhaps God actually sees this as a pathetic corruption of the human life, perhaps He sees it as another big example of how humans have strayed from His original design.</div><div><br /></div><div>Pets have become so normal in our society though, that people can't see this possibility clearly, they think it's no big deal to have a pet, but in fact it is a big deal, again just on the everyday mundane level, IMMENSE amounts of your time, attention and energy are given to an animal that was never part of God's original design or plan for humanity, <i>and because of that</i>, ends up being more detrimental than beneficial. You may object that you're not a "crazy cat lady," or whatever, but the truth is that even just having one cat (or dog) invariably leads to some crazy behavior (adapting to something out of harmony with Creation), and is also wasting your time that should be given to higher pursuits.<div> <br />Remember, domesticated animals are the result of human aggression toward wild animals (just like cruelly putting a wild bird in a cage and clipping their wings), and they are a distortion/corruption of the original design of Creation/Nature; those are not minor issues; again this is of course no fault of the animal, they are not bad as individuals, it's the violence and slavery (namely capture, abusing/"breaking" and breeding) that was bad; but since they are unnatural in that way, it causes disharmony & disturbance in Nature, e.g., the massive number of songbirds that are killed by domesticated cats, and disharmony in our personal lives when we take on their dependency (taking a lot of time that would normally be utilized for prayer, meditation, human relationship, community development, gardening, travel, the Arts, etc.).</div><div><br /></div><div><u>Undoing the Mistake</u></div><div><br />The seemingly harsh truth is that we need to "remove all the abominations from all the lands belonging to the sons of Israel" (2 Chronicles 34:33), ultimatetly by utilizing and supporting more domesticated animal sanctuaries, if we want to live as God intended (Genesis 1:29 & 2:15), not living with an contrary to God's perfect design of Creation, because going against that design, thinking we can improve upon it, inevitably causes disturbance (going against the grain of Creation), robbing us of deeper peace found on the Higher Path of His will. Accepting the regular distractions and disturbances of pets is contrary to discipleship; it's ignoring God's superior design, and ignoring the crucial importance of having ample peace and awareness available to perceive and follow His living presence. </div><div><br /></div><div>So again on a practical level, I'd say they are best nonviolently phased out of society via spay/neuter and animal sanctuaries where they would enjoy the company of other animals and people that enjoy caring for them full-time, but because they're no longer being bred by humans, their populations would steadily drop. I know that can seem uncaring but it's not really, it's making the best of a bad practice that needs to end, a bad practice we need to recognize has had overall bad outcomes/consequences, as aggression and slavery and going against God's perfect plan always do (just like with abuse toward humans as well, i.e., "human domestication").</div></div></div><div><br /></div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgvQLSEN8yB90byXLuI8Vf_Vpn-Bh4Zsjq89UE9yeFr1pNN9eMaGDM3Xvqocsc7kczL7NPZfG2owtgry4kGOZXUOVYxT8tbBT0rptZkH2-yoocgsCQO24_9Bsue8ByoSBGFBVe29sat_2x8FyP33FXpG24Lqjc-wm-Gb_NXtmiLWlog233Q6_5EJwHhjQ/s727/GMO%20people.png" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="727" data-original-width="712" height="320" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgvQLSEN8yB90byXLuI8Vf_Vpn-Bh4Zsjq89UE9yeFr1pNN9eMaGDM3Xvqocsc7kczL7NPZfG2owtgry4kGOZXUOVYxT8tbBT0rptZkH2-yoocgsCQO24_9Bsue8ByoSBGFBVe29sat_2x8FyP33FXpG24Lqjc-wm-Gb_NXtmiLWlog233Q6_5EJwHhjQ/s320/GMO%20people.png" width="313" /></a></div><br /><div><br /></div><div>Related articles:</div><div><ul style="text-align: left;"><li><a href="https://abcbirds.org/program/cats-indoors/cats-and-birds/" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">https://abcbirds.org/program/cats-indoors/cats-and-birds/</a></li></ul><ul style="text-align: left;"><li><a href="https://www.smithsonianmag.com/smart-news/parasite-spread-house-cats-killing-californias-sea-otters-180973014/" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">https://www.smithsonianmag.com/smart-news/parasite-spread-house-cats-killing-californias-sea-otters-180973014/</a></li></ul></div><div><div><br /></div><div>Related talk:</div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><iframe allowfullscreen="" class="BLOG_video_class" height="266" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/PLHbGBoKlfE" width="320" youtube-src-id="PLHbGBoKlfE"></iframe></div><br /><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><br /></div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><br /></div></div></div>Unknownnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2111239628760080078.post-74582599179337765592022-03-31T14:41:00.022-07:002022-09-19T19:28:45.336-07:00Land, Water & Seeds ("Victory Gardens" For All)<p></p><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEj-xhDJYOTgx6e0OrhQ19ycQvS2XYOixhRi-QhvgOEVvC69_9QFr4NBaSLozofPP6A9kdGVqOjSPjzgjWYEHodNsCcP4pB9EwwIGnVlbGXeTasl_7Wg3ac-de47WCnYPnL4ue-6gHVLABzR5Gaw_yqksik_pzLY0pUXCN0URBHFHPhSm_yk1epdr8qRnA/s616/communism%20is%20already%20here.jpeg" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="616" data-original-width="478" height="400" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEj-xhDJYOTgx6e0OrhQ19ycQvS2XYOixhRi-QhvgOEVvC69_9QFr4NBaSLozofPP6A9kdGVqOjSPjzgjWYEHodNsCcP4pB9EwwIGnVlbGXeTasl_7Wg3ac-de47WCnYPnL4ue-6gHVLABzR5Gaw_yqksik_pzLY0pUXCN0URBHFHPhSm_yk1epdr8qRnA/w310-h400/communism%20is%20already%20here.jpeg" width="310" /></a></div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><br /></div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><br /></div><div style="text-align: center;">"You trample the poor,</div><div style="text-align: center;"> stealing their grain through taxes and unfair rent." (Amos 5:11)</div><div><br /></div><div>[updated September 19th, 2022]</div><div><br /></div><div>I just came across the quote "You can solve all of the world's problems in a garden," and there's a lot of truth to that, but why does almost everyone ignore the fact that having a garden-based society is not going to happen as long as it is not financially possible for most people on Earth to participate in one? And rather than think band-aid small/limited steps in the right direction, as good as they are (I certainly like to see them), like a bit more urban "green spaces," community gardens, or plants on top of and inside city buildings, rather than focus on those small and limited steps, why can't we be focused on the real big-leap solution that would have<i> the most</i> <i>positive benefit </i>and also be <i>the most</i> <i>just</i>, namely recognizing that a bit of land, water & seed for nonviolent/veganic homesteading is a birthright of every human? Why is that repeatedly ignored, <a href="https://colindonoghue.wordpress.com/2014/05/16/the-root-injustice-a-real-way-forward-to-a-sustainable-society/" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">even when spelled out in detail</a>? By ignoring that we will in fact never see significant positive change for the better, we will never "return to Eden."<div><br /></div><div>If people had the option to have some private/sovereign natural space (approximately 1 hectare), where they could cultivate a garden and orchard for themselves and/or family (in a natural voluntary gift-economy community of others doing the same), ending their dependency on the soul-sucking money-system, also ending unnecessary hunger and various other hardships that come with this unnatural and unjust global social-system set-up, don't you think billions of people would do so? Of course they would. But this real solution is almost never discussed or even debated, due to people apparently mentally stuck in the Status Quo Fallacy, Failure of Imagination Fallacy, and Fallacy of Incredulity, and the fact that's it's never presented as an option to think about at all.</div><div><br /></div><div>When we can't grow food freely we're really not free; people often promote decentralization and self-sufficiency, but the key for that, ignored over & over, is recognizing human birthrights to survival natural resources: The key property rights needed for freedom are bodily autonomy, and birthrights to survival natural resources: homesteading land, water & seed. Why does almost everyone crazily dance around that clear and comprehensive solution? Without sovereign gardening space you're necessarily being exploited and ruled over; and since voluntary communities of sovereign homesteads exist nowhere right now, fundamentally all the people in the world are actually under different shades of Communist rule.</div><div><br /></div><div>Unfortunately and ironically people have been programmed to associate land redistribution with Communism (as if only State-employees could ever do that), and they ignore that their "free" "capitalism" is actually a social-system run fundamentally via central banks and income tax, <i>which are two pillars of the actual Communist Manifesto! </i> People have been duped into believing up is down and down is up. So many problems would be solved from disconnecting from a toxic unnatural social system, yet people cling to logical fallacies as good reasons to continue on with the status quo. </div><div><br /></div><div>Along with the aforementioned benefits of ending the root injustice of homesteading natural resource birthright denial, if everyone could eat fresh and organic vegetables, greens, herbs and fruits from their own garden, and be able to enjoy the sunshine and fresh air while gardening, that would no doubt alleviate myriad physical and mental health issues people are suffering with as well, better than the band-aid treatments of pharmaceuticals and heart disease surgeries, et al. People go to detox centers where they basically just get a version of living on a veganic homestead, but it's only temporary because they gotta get back to earning money to pay the rent/mortgage/proprety taxes. Everyone is dealing with the myriad problems of living with The Root Injustice, but no one is pinpointing what that injustice is exactly, and what the exact solution to it is, so the drudgery just goes on and on.</div><div><span face="Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif" style="background-color: black; font-size: 15.84px;"><br /></span></div><div><span face="Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif" style="background-color: black; font-size: 15.84px;">You will never see or hear a barrage of mainstream media promoting the benefits of men, being naturally and fully masculine, and women, being naturally and fully feminine, living self-sufficiently, non-violently and truly sustainably off the land, because that is where real empowerment is, freed of system-dependency and negative karmic-feedback, it would be a return to the original perfect design for humans for highest happiness, a “return to Eden,” a return to the original design of the good Creator. In order to not be a slave of the system we must get our needs directly from the Earth instead, so this is continuously made out to be backwards, dangerous, stupid, etc., (as well as </span><a href="https://www.blogger.com/#" style="background-color: black; color: #c6dafc; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; text-decoration-line: none;">economically impossible for most people</a><span face="Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif" style="background-color: black; font-size: 15.84px;">) when in fact it's the ideal way for humans to live on Earth, with the highest potential for satisfaction and social harmony/justice. The big picture of what's going on is that God's original plan for humanity, to be gardeners who cultivated and cared for the natural world (including animals), as pointed to in Genesis 2:15, is in fact the ideal, on multiple qualitative & moral levels, but humanity is being distracted away from that fact constantly; the system is a grand deception and conceited folly, trying to improve upon that ideal original plan for humanity;; no improvements have been made, things have just gotten more toxic and oppressive, as the only truly good and free way of life is made more and more obscure, as homestead communities exist less and less every year globally.</span></div><div><span face="Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif" style="background-color: black; font-size: 15.84px;"><br /></span></div><div><span face="Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif" style="background-color: black;"><div style="font-size: 15.84px;"> </div><div style="font-size: 15.84px;">It's not that complicated, but people seem to always overcomplicate it. Land, water & seed for natural living, survival, privacy, and freedom, are pre-existing God-created birthrights of all humans. That's what needs to be focused on and repeated, not going off on dismissive "that's impossible/impractical" or irrelevant "but some people won't like that" tangents; the societal change will organically occur at local levels once that birthright is widely accepted as true and good. About 2 acres for sovereign veganic/nonviolent homesteads (not enslaving and murdering animals or spreading toxins/GMOs), forming voluntary communities, is the clear answer that the Non-aggression Principle and Reality/Nature points to. </div><div style="font-size: 15.84px;"><br /></div><div style="font-size: 15.84px;">The objection that "all the land is already owned" ignores the main crucial point that owning more land & water than you need for your iwn homestead is actually the theft of other people's birthright, so it's not valid ownership just like owning slaves you paid for isn't valid.</div><div style="font-size: 15.84px;"><br /></div><div><span style="font-size: 15.84px;">A slaveowner can say "I paid for this man," but the man was never rightfully up for sale in the first place; having more land & water than you need is actually stealing the survival/freedom birthright of others; that's the key truth almost no one is talking about, and that's why nothing is really changing for the better. </span></div><div><span style="font-size: 15.84px;"><br /></span></div><div><div><span style="font-size: 15.84px;">To "agree in principle" but then not even repeat the solution to anyone because of possible bad reactions or logistics that need to be voluntarily sorted out... I'm trying to make it clear, as L. Rose has too (in his more generalized way), that it's actually getting people to understand and agree openly with the principle/solution that is most important, saying "but making it a reality could be difficult!" is like telling a warrior defending his village before battle, "but they will resist you," yeah no kidding, abusers resist stopping the abuse, which is ultimately irrelevant. Please try to focus on "sovereign veganic homesteads," it's tiring being the only one actually saying the words, as if everyone else is under a spell preventing them from spreading the actual solution. </span></div><div><span style="font-size: 15.84px;"><br /></span></div><div><span style="font-size: 15.84px;">Just because there would be difficulties/resistance/complications doesn't mean it's not the best and just solution overall, it clearly is, because anything less than that is actually social-injustice; denial of homesteading land, water & seed is a form of slavery, and slavery is the evil we need to fully abolish. </span></div><div><br /></div><div>Land, water and seed are already built, it's a straw-man fallacy to say that I'm saying others will be required to build houses and gardens for others. And again the main point of a birthright (as in it belongs to newborn babies, without them doing anything for it), is that is not "given" by anyone because it was not theirs to give in the first place, God already gave it to us. Those objecting to sovereign homesteads being a birthright if everyone talk like slave-masters who used to say things like "Why should I just give this man his freedom, he has to earn it, take action, be responsible, before he deserves it." The idea that a birthright claim <span style="color: #888888;">*</span><i>to not be abused and exploited</i><span style="color: #888888;">*</span> is "irresponsible" and even somehow abusive itself (demanding "sacrifice" of others), is completely absurd (and again sounds like authoritarians of the past and present).</div><div><p dir="ltr">To object by basically saying "you gotta work for it" is completely dismissive of the justness of it being a cost/tax-free birthright not created by any man <span style="color: #888888;">*</span><i>needed for survival and freedom</i><span style="color: #888888;">*</span>, and the economic reality that most hard-working people still can't afford their own homestead, and even if they could, if it wasn't sovereign they still wouldn't really be free (e.g., property tax). A close-minded regurgitation of academia's platitudes (and/or a favorite author's view on natural resource property) doesn't actually hold up to reality and the Non-aggression Principle.</p><p dir="ltr">If people crash-landed on an uninhabited island they'd share the pre-existing food/seed, water and space because that's the sane and ethical thing to do, and that's the same exact thing I'm advocating; the objection "Well it's different because some rich people already bought all the land" is weak and false ethics, that again ignores that morally right birthrights actually do exist, that the inalienable birthrights of life & liberty <span style="color: #888888;">*</span><i>are</i><span style="color: #888888;">*</span> denied if you're denied cost/tax-free survival/homesteading land & water, because that undermines both life & liberty directly.</p>
<p dir="ltr"></p><blockquote>"By removing opportunities to live self-sufficient lives, the Marxists create a system of slavery and convince everyone that it was done in the name of fairness. It’s the same story every time."</blockquote><p></p></div></div></span></div><div><span face="Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif" style="background-color: black; font-size: 15.84px;">So if you agree homesteading land, water & seed is a free birthright of humanity, please bring that crucial truth and solution up with others regularly, because it will never happen until more people are talking and agreeing about it; the thinking must be aligned with it before it can start manifesting.</span></div><div><span face="Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif" style="background-color: black; font-size: 15.84px;"><br /></span></div><div style="text-align: center;"><span face="Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif" style="background-color: black; font-size: 15.84px;">----</span></div><div style="text-align: center;"><span face="Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif" style="background-color: black; font-size: 15.84px;"><br /></span></div><div><span face="Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif" style="background-color: black; font-size: 15.84px;">Related philosophy:</span></div><div><span face="Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif" style="background-color: black; font-size: 15.84px;">https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ringing_Cedars%27_Anastasianism</span></div><div><span face="Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif" style="background-color: black; font-size: 15.84px;"><br /></span></div><div><span face="Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif" style="background-color: black; font-size: 15.84px;">Related history (8th Century Japan):</span></div><div><span face="Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif" style="background-color: black; font-size: 15.84px;"><a href="https://youtube.com/clip/Ugkxxc2bqGRHmrwjDugVbKUGm4Q_IjYsa5Oj" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">https://youtube.com/clip/Ugkxxc2bqGRHmrwjDugVbKUGm4Q_IjYsa5Oj</a></span></div><div><span face="Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif" style="background-color: black; font-size: 15.84px;"><br /></span></div><div><span face="Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif" style="background-color: black; font-size: 15.84px;">Related Talks:</span></div><div><br /></div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><iframe allowfullscreen="" class="BLOG_video_class" height="266" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/EvDHpJj2meE" width="320" youtube-src-id="EvDHpJj2meE"></iframe></div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><iframe allowfullscreen="" class="BLOG_video_class" height="266" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/_SXQ1Q2nHGo" width="320" youtube-src-id="_SXQ1Q2nHGo"></iframe></div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><br /></div><br /><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><span style="text-align: left;">Articles on Victory Gardens:</span></div><div><ol style="text-align: left;"><li>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Victory_garden</li><li>https://blog.gardeningknowhow.com/trends/story-behind-victory-gardens/</li></ol></div></div>Unknownnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2111239628760080078.post-37775521058140015492022-03-30T00:42:00.019-07:002022-06-05T14:20:49.120-07:00The Holy Spirit, Intuition, Fear and the Logical Fallacy Blindfold<blockquote style="border: none; margin: 0px 0px 0px 40px; padding: 0px;"><blockquote style="border: none; margin: 0px 0px 0px 40px; padding: 0px;"><blockquote style="border: none; margin: 0px 0px 0px 40px; padding: 0px;"><blockquote style="border: none; margin: 0px 0px 0px 40px; padding: 0px;"><p></p></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><img border="0" data-original-height="2931" data-original-width="1841" height="320" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEi4cP5QdHjrVuHt_YHOIPfrslUSsd_sGwFr9KW_WuvekkrJfh3yBpBrJkoUP4n_v5xYr-KGoSewWvTCuxUKfdH42trG9AHyxPW0SC4mKdnu5XCNKbBkts60N4MbGFDQdJcWymS-9Y2JmU6ib4musPwCuKuhUf1ElxN--9KNB0FuyhS_-vj5eWed2Mtxbw/s320/pexels-photo-6785277.jpeg" width="201" /></div><blockquote style="border: none; margin: 0px 0px 0px 40px; padding: 0px;"><blockquote style="border: none; margin: 0px 0px 0px 40px; padding: 0px;"><blockquote style="border: none; margin: 0px 0px 0px 40px; padding: 0px;"><blockquote style="border: none; margin: 0px 0px 0px 40px; padding: 0px;"><p></p></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><p><br /></p><p>[updated June 5th, 2022]</p><p>Could it be that mainstream views on what's most important are actually wrong? That was certainly true in the past, but what about today? Have all of the erroneous destructive beliefs of humanity been sorted out? I will argue that no, they have not been all sorted out, and two big examples, that is, two examples that actually have a huge effect on people's lives, are the mainstream conceptions of what we call fear and intuition.</p><p><u>Fear</u></p><p>The mainstream belief that "fear is sometimes good, because fear is the same thing as the body's fight-or-flught/crisis response," is completely false (a false equivalency). You can actually see this for yourself with just a minute of critical thinking: If the fight-or-flight response of the body is just that, a <i>bodily</i> response, a <i>physiological activity</i>, and fear is <i>an emotion-thought</i>, how does it make sense to say they are the same thing? If fear lowers your awareness and critical thinking ability, and <i>both of those faculties are of utmost value when facing a danger</i>, then how is fear a "survival mechanism"? It's not. I explain this destructive false equivalency further in this short talk:<br /></p><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><iframe allowfullscreen="" class="BLOG_video_class" height="266" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/tedO9UkAM-E" width="320" youtube-src-id="tedO9UkAM-E"></iframe></div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><br /></div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;"><u>Intuition</u></div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;"><u><br /></u></div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;">Now to what's destructively wrong with mainstream views on Intuition. The mainstream notion is that Intuition is not actually the Holy Spirit, not actually from God. Now if the word intuition is wrongly equated with "common sense," or "gut instinct" (notice, yet another false equivalency), that is, Intuition being falsely equated with conditioned thinking of your own, then yes <i>that's</i> not the Holy Spirit.</div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;">So what is <i>true</i> Intuitive thought? The way it arises for all humans is fundamentally the same, it has it's own signature, just as Kairos Moment callings from the Son do. The characteristics of Intution's signature are: </div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;">a) Intuition manifests as non-stressful thoughts/images (that are not our own thoughts) that arise in our minds, to do or not do something, or to say or not say something (actions or inactions which could be just the initial step we need to take to get us to something else, i.e., Intuition will oftentimes lead us via something we're familiar with to get us to something new that's good for us to be engaged with). </div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;">b) Intuition usually seems relatively unimportant to us when it arises in our mind, or seems "50/50" (meaning we could "take it or leave it"), but then we often realize after we ignored/discarded it (if we have good self/reality-awareness and hindsight), that it <i>was</i> actually important.</div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;">c) If we <i>do</i> follow the Intuitive thought, we <i>always</i> discover that the result is very good and productive for having done so.</div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;"><br /></div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;"><i>That</i> is the Holy Spirit, that <i>is</i> Intuitive-thought-guidance from Divinity (not really our "Higher Self" or our "Soul," because we're not omniscient, we're not God, so we shouldn't pretend we are). </div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;"><br /></div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiIOCCY7IVXlmQXoB0w5zr6uFFEVvrQlxHL_2QbbqYs9s7T0ieNczerbUOVuvKVbJAGW4wFXU5rH2bmmyjkKBfqMGG1IzXFKVT8FuXnFbqf3DBtPbT5cpNWf9XLgl52e6GSBEon8CsyHE5NGuXQ_8pweswcWqaeYic79bVlXrKvV1QzHP4jYiK_hXSa_w/s6000/pexels-photo-4503270.jpeg" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="6000" data-original-width="4000" height="320" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiIOCCY7IVXlmQXoB0w5zr6uFFEVvrQlxHL_2QbbqYs9s7T0ieNczerbUOVuvKVbJAGW4wFXU5rH2bmmyjkKBfqMGG1IzXFKVT8FuXnFbqf3DBtPbT5cpNWf9XLgl52e6GSBEon8CsyHE5NGuXQ_8pweswcWqaeYic79bVlXrKvV1QzHP4jYiK_hXSa_w/s320/pexels-photo-4503270.jpeg" width="213" /></a></div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;">The reason we can "hear" Intuitive thought most clearly and readily during meditation (letting go of our own thinking, focusing our eyes on a single point like a candle light, and/or following our breath), is <i>because it's not our own thought.</i> This is also why many of us notice we have clear Intuition to do something when we first wake up, because our own mind has not fully revved up and filled our head with its own thoughts yet. And this is also why stress, like in the form of fear, is an enemy of Intuition, because again we can best perceive/hear Intuition when our mind is relaxed and still. If you've wondered "what's the point in meditating?" perhaps the best answer is <i>so that we can receive absolutely perfect guidance from a loving and omniscient Divinity</i>, guidance that will definitely improve our life (and the lives of others, in perfect omniscient win-win fashion, in ways that we could never had known with just our own limited human awareness).</div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;"><br /></div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;"><u>Conclusion: Logical Fallacies & Spiritual Propaganda/Sabotage</u></div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;"><br /></div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;">So Intuition, rightly identified, i.e., identified as guidance from God, is being mixed up with other things (namely conditioning/habits), and is also conceitedly or slothfully being disregarded much of the time. Likewise with fear, it is not just simply and rightly identified as demonic, as from the Devil, and instead is being mixed up with other things, namely "a defense mechanism" and/or "fight or flight." People are, sadly, thinking that<i> the bad is good and the good is bad, calling fear (as "fight or flight") sometimes good and Intuition (as "common sense") sometimes bad</i>; both are confused wrong beliefs with far-reaching negative consequence, both are backwards spiritual sabotage, and both are also the declarations of all the "experts." <i>People are literally thinking the Devil is sometimes good and God is sometimes bad</i>, and so they embrace the former and reject the latter, and guess what that results in? The "fall of Man." </div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;"><br /></div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;">Again, when people's beliefs on crucial truth are incorrect/backwards, wackness and suffering will inevitably ensue, and that's what the Devil has been doing to humanity from the start. It's the same old and original story (never <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4tUmuBZRe-0" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">told right</a>) of humans following the false/corrupted Knowledge of Good & Evil, and that resulting in the loss of Paradise. </div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;"><br /></div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;">And why exactly do people follow the devilish destructive false morality of false gods, thinking it's actually smart to do so? Again, because they are deceived by Logical Fallacies, i.e., they follow <i>assumptions</i> (like assuming whoever the "authority" is always gives the crucial truth, or assuming that a simple answer can't be right), <i>false equivalencies </i>(like the aforementioned ones)<i>,</i> and <i>abusive language </i>(just like with pigeonhole dismissive slander believed to justify disregarding this knowledge). <i> </i></div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;"><br /></div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;">Assumptions, false equivalencies, and abusive thought/language are actually the three categories of all <b>logical fallacies</b> (something else crucial we were also never clearly taught), logical fallacies that are being pushed on us as by "experts" as if they are actually rationality, facts and sound morality.</div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;"><br /></div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;">Logical Fallacies need to be rejected when they arise in our own minds internally and also rejected when we observe them externally; again sadly though it seems very likely that this analysis will be dismissed as either "too extreme" (Status Quo Fallacy), or because "it's not that simple" (Complexity Bias), or because of whatever other nonsense/Logical Fallacy, but I put this out there for those who might be open and able to see the plain truth of it. </div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;">Peace.</div>Unknownnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2111239628760080078.post-14109198328611060902022-03-26T11:40:00.034-07:002022-04-28T19:50:05.139-07:00The True Original Sin (and Mind-Control Program): Believing the Naked Body is Shameful<div style="text-align: center;"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjNOJQdx5JaFiEDCx5fls18B5AXcQoBxuEbx73evy1NvWQrVcapdsiYU3k6xGwykCozTSUpsddkv_Jn2aPaRKKvPGRj9Exi_Exh9Hj1W-nMq3l12aPncDlUrl9Xj2xwsdMgwngAR7Kppo8DOr92lZOX07ATKscFBObkvWBKN4Echm_f04sjcKi2jvbopw/w273-h400/pexels-photo-5546427.jpeg" /></div><div>4/28/22</div><div><br /></div><div>How does it make sense that the naked human body suddenly becomes "obscene" when it is simply outside of a building rather than inside a building? Why is the human body itself criminalized? Could this be a form of mind-control through pushing a form of fear, through subliminally pushing the idea that humans are inherently shameful?</div><div><br /></div>I know the topic of nudity is not a concern for most people, it seems like a minor issue, or an already-settled issue, and so doesn’t deserve any attention, especially with all that’s being presented on mainstream news; I imagine someone might say, “We’re possibly facing World War 3 and you write an article on nudity? What’s wrong with you?” and I can put myself in the shoes of such a person, I can understand why that perspective could seem right. And I’m actually not personally very interested in this issue, I’m not looking to start up a new nudist organization/group/club/colony, or petition for the opening of a new stretch of nudist beach (though kudos to whoever is doing those things), it’s just that I’ve come to realize that this issue is much more important than most people, including myself until very recently, realize. <div><br />I was already aware of the pro-nudity movements, like that which coincided with the 1960’s hippy culture, and more recently with the “Free The Nipple” NYC demonstrations and <a href="https://www.imdb.com/title/tt2298394/" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">documentary</a>, and, in doing a little research for this article I discovered the re-emerging <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Naturism" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Naturism Movement</a>, and I recognized that the main premise that <u>nudity does not equate to obscenity</u> is right and good, but I didn’t realize <i>how</i> important it is (and I think actually many people in the pro-nudity movements didn’t and don’t realize <i>how</i> very important an issue this actually is). The wild thing is that this issue is actually <i>central to the Creation story of humanity, but it’s never explained as such</i>. <br /><br />Adam & Eve were fine with being naked <i>before</i> they ate the “fruit of the knowledge of Good & Evil,” but immediately <i>after</i> they ate it they became ashamed of their naked bodies. <blockquote><div><i>Before</i> eating the "knowledge" of good & evil:</div>“And they were <b><u>both naked</u></b>, the man and his wife, <b><u>and were not ashamed</u></b>.” (Genesis 2:25)<br /><br /><i>After</i> eating the "knowledge" of good & evil:<br />"I heard your voice in the garden," Adam answered to God, "and <b><u>I was afraid because I was naked</u></b>, so I hid from you." (Genesis 3:10)</blockquote><div>So, <i>the “knowledge” 1), <u>made them afraid</u>, and 2), <u>convinced them that the naked body is actually evil</u>. </i>Those two elements need to be looked at carefully. Firstly, fear is very disempowering, it is perhaps the most disempowering emotion-thought that humans can have, and people, particularly the powers-that-be, have used fear as a means of control, for centuries. The particular form of fear that Adam& Eve followed was <i>Fear of Humiliation </i>(one of the <a href="https://ko-fi.com/s/1bea6ef1d3" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">three main types of fear</a>), and <i>that</i> was actually their original/first sin, not simply "being disobedient," as the Church tells everybody (and yes, following fear is actually a sin, as is following anger, or craving). Secondly, <u>the idea that</u> <u>the naked body is evil in and of itself is actually a blasphemous notion; the human form/design is actually good, designed by a good God.</u> So then we can logically conclude that the knowledge they ate was <i>false</i> knowledge, it was a <i>false morality</i>, and <i>following false morality is what actually led them to losing paradise</i>. So, the other crucial point, also never taught by Christian pastors, is that <b>if you equate the naked human body with something bad, if you believe the naked human body, just by itself, is a bad thing, that’s actually a very deep mind-control program. If you believe the human body is bad, that is basically the same as believing your natural Self is bad, and that belief, the “I am fundamentally bad” belief, is actually the foundation of human enslavement, at its various levels. It’s also <u>a complete violation of what Jesus said are The Greatest Commandments, which are to love God, love others, and love yourself</u>, since <i>if you believe you and other humans in their natural state are shameful, that’s abusive slander toward yourself and others, as is calling God’s creation bad, and <a href="https://frontlinethought.blogspot.com/2021/12/what-kind-of-love-was-jesus-referring.html" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">abuse is the complete opposite of love</a></i></b>. <br /><br /> Even though the evaluation I just made is logically sound, many people will have their mind-control kick in as pseudo-intellectual false morality hysterics, namely that laws against nudity are “to protect the children,” and because you don’t want to feel even further shame, now for “not caring about the children,” you’ll probably drop this issue of nudity like a hot potato. <b>The truth is that by accepting the idea that nudity = obscenity, you’re in no way protecting children, you’re actually setting them up to live a life of subconscious fearful shame and acceptance of constant low-level abuse from “authorities” because of the belief/program that humans are fundamentally bad and so need to be abusively controlled at all times to some degree. If your mind goes into hysterics about sexual assault at the mere mention or sight of a naked human body, I hope you can realize that’s mind-control, and completely irrational. The naked human body is not an act of aggression, nor does it support aggression, it’s just the human body without clothes on it, and there’s actually nothing wrong with that; every supposed explanation as to why it is bad is clearly nonsense, if you actually take a minute to analyze it, rather than just let false guilt turn your critical thinking off; again, <i>if you think the human body is shameful, then you’re holding an abusive slanderous view toward yourself, others and God, and you’re supporting human enslavement of both body and mind, and that’s a very bad thing to do</i>; the devil has tricked, and continues to trick, humanity into doing evil and thinking that it’s good, and that’s what keeps us in the devil’s world (including its world wars), that’s what keeps us out of the Paradise God created the Earth to be for us</b>. </div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgFNDoS_x56OD6xsqgdw3N3bNh4m639WqnW8fhMZqWMaZFQuUBZE9M1-b6-IbpUrOAg6_APGaQw-dPPB9JogV5EMgmqKDpsveH2kkBxh_Op9eyEbbfSXQ8ll9q3euR_MK3kibRjnWPzxnU7_cO2804cig9UQowPuVIBBL3jp02vMmxPZi1uN3-KAJmt-g/s1500/pexels-photo-1727658.jpeg" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="1500" data-original-width="1000" height="320" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgFNDoS_x56OD6xsqgdw3N3bNh4m639WqnW8fhMZqWMaZFQuUBZE9M1-b6-IbpUrOAg6_APGaQw-dPPB9JogV5EMgmqKDpsveH2kkBxh_Op9eyEbbfSXQ8ll9q3euR_MK3kibRjnWPzxnU7_cO2804cig9UQowPuVIBBL3jp02vMmxPZi1uN3-KAJmt-g/s320/pexels-photo-1727658.jpeg" width="213" /></a></div><div>God is actually the Master Artist, and the human body, especially the female body, has been recognized for centuries as an exquisite work of art, along with other wonderful designs, like found with wildflowers, wildlife (hummingbirds come to my mind first), landscapes (e.g., Ireland), and even nebula in outer-space (e.g., the Orion Nebula). <u>Denying that natural beauty and goodness isn't being virtuous</u>, the devil and his powers-that-be push that false morality on us all (from the very beginning of humanity) for their own purposes (namely to wickedly go against God's perfect design, and gain more power and control over humanity).</div><div><br />Politicians love nudity laws, they love to cover up naked statues, etc., because: 1), criminalizing nudity pushes subconscious fear (as false guilt/ashamedness) and the subconscious belief that human beings are fundamentally evil, both of which greatly support social-systems of abusive control and power, and 2), criminalizing nudity is done under the guise of virtue, under the banner of “protecting women and children,” and that virtue-signal basically guilt-trips people into accepting their false morality (just as they and the media did with their <a href="https://frontlinethought.blogspot.com/2021/09/free-people-dont-have-health-masters.html" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">medical mandates</a>). And perhaps 3), because they know just how critical Vitamin D ("the sunshine vitamin") is for good health, and a sick population is easier to control.</div><div><br /></div><div>Returning to the psychology of false guilt/shame, this issue of criminalized nudity is much more important than is commonly understood because <b>if you can get a society to believe that their naked bodies are shameful then you've got them, then they have a thorn of fear held deep in their minds that will sabotage them their entire lives, because it's just a version of "I'm fundamentally bad and untrustworthy," and so therefore "deserve to be punished and controlled,</b>" and because fear is actually <i>always</i> disempowering, it's actually a demonic/toxic emotion-though that is never beneficial (no, <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tedO9UkAM-E" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">it's not the same thing as the body's crisis response, aka fight-or-flight</a>). </div><div><br /></div><div>Remember, this very destructive taboo/mind-control program was the original lie of the Enemy that took us away from God's truth and original perfect design for humanity, Eden/Paradise. <b>If being naked is illegal, that means the human body, as deigned by God, is inherently evil. If you accept that false morality, you blaspheme God and support abusive control</b>. Whether you'd personally enjoy going outside naked or not is irrelevant, you should see that this issue is much bigger and more important than that personal preference, you should be against the criminalization of nudity for the very deep and important reasons pointed out here. You may be surprised at how empowering and transformative repeating the affirmation "My naked body is not shameful" is for you, again regardless of whether you actually have any interest in being nude outside; although, worth mentioning, it has certainly been proven that getting some full-body sunshine (and <a href="https://www.naturalnews.com/Vitamin_D.html" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">adequate Vitamin D</a> from that sunshine), and fresh air (indoor air pollution is a real problem) is very health-giving; a lot of people would probably get off meds and resolve various health issues if they just did simply that regularly (along with <a href="https://frontlinethought.blogspot.com/2019/07/top-5-reasons-people-dont-leave-animals.html" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">leaving animals alone</a> with their food choices). </div><div><br /></div><div>Again, affirming that your naked body us not shameful is empowering and transformative <i>because</i> <u>if you fearfully believe your naked body is shameful, that's basically the same thing as believing that <i>you</i> are shameful, from jump-street and till death, and that's pure spiritual sabotage</u>.<div><br /></div><div>---------------</div><div><br /></div><div>Related:</div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><iframe allowfullscreen="" class="BLOG_video_class" height="266" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/LDGSct43REM" width="320" youtube-src-id="LDGSct43REM"></iframe></div><div><br /></div><div><ol style="text-align: left;"><li><a href="https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Naturist_organizations" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Naturist_organizations</a></li><li><a href="https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Naturism_in_the_United_States" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Naturism_in_the_United_States</a></li><li><a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anarcho-naturism" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anarcho-naturism</a></li></ol></div></div></div>Unknownnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2111239628760080078.post-60398398016798788982021-12-15T08:57:00.064-08:002022-05-14T15:55:16.870-07:00What kind of love was Jesus referring to? And what is the opposite of that love?<p> </p><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/a/AVvXsEgrqJypGhf1w4-a5IDsXJjXbGi-BMEjTNLqAbBDKonQ4m6xGgSYOc5Yx4wBgTITye8iHtViBCsShGjz6woq3LgempHygbo00chSvI8WEaUxTOaCckCa03ZxdWkLMXe5-xQTigNHZPycbKrzufpQNqLgveUQ_Udx0LJotB8_MEfs3iAVv7rcRMwhLy3IRA=s4928" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="3264" data-original-width="4928" height="265" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/a/AVvXsEgrqJypGhf1w4-a5IDsXJjXbGi-BMEjTNLqAbBDKonQ4m6xGgSYOc5Yx4wBgTITye8iHtViBCsShGjz6woq3LgempHygbo00chSvI8WEaUxTOaCckCa03ZxdWkLMXe5-xQTigNHZPycbKrzufpQNqLgveUQ_Udx0LJotB8_MEfs3iAVv7rcRMwhLy3IRA=w400-h265" width="400" /></a></div><br /><p></p>Jesus declared “<u>Love the Lord your God with all your heart and with all your soul and with all your mind</u>. This is the first and greatest commandment. And the second is like it: <u>Love your neighbor as yourself</u>. <u>All the Law and the Prophets hang on these two commandments</u>.” (Matthew 22:37-40)<div><br />Jesus said we "must love one another <u>as he loved us</u>." (John 13:34)<br /><br />Jesus said "<u>He who has my commandments</u><b> </b><u><i><b>and keeps them</b>, he it is who loves me</i></u>; and he who loves me shall be loved by my Father, and I will love him, and will disclose myself to him." (John 14:21)</div><div><br /></div><div>Jesus said "You are my friends if you do what I command." (John15:14)</div><div><br /><span style="font-family: georgia;">Jesus said “Do you see this woman? When I entered your house, you did not give Me water for My feet, but she wet My feet with her tears and wiped them with her hair. You did not greet Me with a kiss, but she has not stopped kissing My feet since I arrived. You did not anoint My head with oil, but she has anointed My feet with perfume. On account of this, I say to you, that her many sins are forgiven her <u>because she loved much</u>, but he who is forgiven a little loves a little.” (Luke 7:44-47)</span><br /><br />"<u>Love means <i>doing</i> what God has commanded us</u>, and he has commanded us to love one another, just as you heard from the beginning." (2 John 1:6)<div><p style="line-height: 100%; margin-bottom: 0in; text-align: center;"><span style="font-family: georgia;">~~~</span></p><p style="line-height: 100%; margin-bottom: 0in; text-align: center;"><span style="font-family: georgia;"><br /></span></p>[updated May 14th, 2022]<p style="line-height: 100%; margin-bottom: 0in;">Firstly, Jesus said that the most important thing is to love comprehensively: to love God, others and ourselves<i> </i>(Matthew 22:36-40 & Mark 12:28-32 & Luke10:25-28)<i>. And yes</i>, self-love definitely <i>is</i> part of that which Jesus called The Greatest Commandments: "love others <i>as yourselves</i>" (Matthew 22:39) is oftentimes not even mentioned by the <a href="https://colindonoghue.wordpress.com/2021/06/15/1451/" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Pauline Church</a>, and when it is they don't explain that "as yourself" <i>necessitates</i> self-love, as it clearly and logically does; and on top of that they've also wrongly made self-love out to be an evil, equivalent to conceitedness, which it is not. The <a href="https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/Paulinist" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Paulinist</a> obsession with self-deprecation, with constantly referring to oneself as "broken" and "depraved," is not only perverse, it's abusive slander toward oneself and all of humanity, thereby violating the self-love and love of others aspects of the Greatest Commandments, and actually violates the love of God aspect as well because it's calling the human being that God created in His own image and likeness inherently wicked.</p><p style="line-height: 100%; margin-bottom: 0in;">So secondly, after clearing up that self-love is actually a good thing Jesus told us to do, and slandering all human beings is actually a bad and blasphemous thing, we can now ask: What did Jesus mean when he said to love <i>like he loved, </i>and what kind of love was he pointing to<i> when he described the woman who loved him much? </i></p><p style="line-height: 100%; margin-bottom: 0in;"></p><table align="center" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" class="tr-caption-container" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;"><tbody><tr><td style="text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/a/AVvXsEi_mnx31KN47IdFf2ZRg4TDE7erUmNxTtA_YhjyYxyS0aBF0rw3O0PJbm4DcYoPLgF8KTA6TFYySgnJmBTqnG6ry06noez1LouaYbXDSIU4kACUIWNNUFvnZGySPkWbbpwuAMZymGUYeNIinl-w0TgIuB8jynL2a8bSmqdKyUY1wK1llNwHMmtPBwggqw=s3862" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;"><img border="0" data-original-height="566" data-original-width="3862" height="59" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/a/AVvXsEi_mnx31KN47IdFf2ZRg4TDE7erUmNxTtA_YhjyYxyS0aBF0rw3O0PJbm4DcYoPLgF8KTA6TFYySgnJmBTqnG6ry06noez1LouaYbXDSIU4kACUIWNNUFvnZGySPkWbbpwuAMZymGUYeNIinl-w0TgIuB8jynL2a8bSmqdKyUY1wK1llNwHMmtPBwggqw=w400-h59" width="400" /></a></td></tr><tr><td class="tr-caption" style="text-align: center;">Psalm 50:23</td></tr></tbody></table><p></p><p style="line-height: 100%; margin-bottom: 0in;">He was clearly speaking of <i>action-based</i> forms of love (which are necessarily non-abusive toward people or animals). The ultimate love Jesus pointed us to is in The Greatest Commandments, as he did with his statement that "everyone who hears these words of mine <u><i>and acts on them</i></u> is like a wise man who built his house on the rock" (Matthew 7:24), and as does the direct explanation given by the apostle John that "<b><u>love means <i>doing</i> what God has commanded us,</u></b>" all point to actual expressions of love, not just an internal thought and feeling of love.</p><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><img border="0" data-original-height="1080" data-original-width="1920" height="225" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/a/AVvXsEhGMyrN-A4pAu1PU51FO_JTZL-_jYm7JlZ0ycmDo1-mQRm18N1le9YmAz2sCxarHFrT4ouT0Yy93p6ivAEJ8yFuGaMBwQ1Y484jfdC2nm8qg8Jug62Cvor7NCNlAuBvbeSZCf0kCTIdwSAfBZ4OZIkW5yJKp0YLN0Wg3MVGPMPh_4WMSdmJs2WsdBEndg=w400-h225" width="400" /></div><p style="line-height: 100%; margin-bottom: 0in;">We must recognize
that there is a noun version of the word love and a <i>verb</i> version; the
former is inactive, basically "<i>a</i><i> </i><i>strong like</i>,"
e.g., "I love this meal" or "I love your hat,"
and the latter is something beyond a strong like, it is instead an
<i>action</i>; so what is this action? Again Jesus pointed us to the answer by linking the love he wants us to practice with The Greatest Commandments. Unfortunately, the verb definition of love is usually given in dictionaries as
just a variation of the noun, e.g., thesaurus synonyms for the verb
version of love are "adoration," "devotion/enthusiasm
for," "admiration," "hold high," "esteem"
or "cherish." But those are actually all basically
<i>synonymous of the noun version of love</i>, "a strong like," and <i><u>that's a mistake</u></i>. <u>The verb version has been conflated with the noun version, and
because the verb version is wrongly equated with the noun version <i>the
antonyms are also wrongly equated</i></u>, i.e., the correct antonym for
"strong like" (the noun version of love) is "hate,"
but the antonym of the verb version is also (wrongly) said to be
hate, as if the noun and the verb were the same, when they're not. </p><p style="line-height: 100%; margin-bottom: 0in;">The first of The Greatest Commandments is to "Love God, with your whole mind, heart and soul," and again, what <i>kind</i> of love are we talking about? <i>Was Jesus sacrificing animals to show love to the Father? No, Jesus actually freed the animals that were going to be "sacrificed" as a hollow form of love/worship of God. </i></p><p style="line-height: 19.8756px; margin-bottom: 0in;"><i>Was he praising Him and praying to Him and following everything the Father told him to do? Yes.</i></p><p style="line-height: 100%; margin-bottom: 0in;">But slitting the throats of animals? Again, a big no. </p><table align="center" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" class="tr-caption-container" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;"><tbody><tr><td style="text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/a/AVvXsEiGl_EDdkBEKqcHStjEnpB2Vz_twIp-_OYtcrLGzxsi7U9NekMWbvHaGVb5Cdxc97mx8HBPDzOY5HQMUQklK6S4oh3jwtdWPNc3cL_3wpaJymvS182DW9H1k2YPyV95KQmoH5_DGjzi0H4CK1k8IGe3cfX1OYyGi87n7tgT-cEXjTzgP6pbceznO8sQ-g=s3244" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;"><img border="0" data-original-height="3244" data-original-width="2313" height="320" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/a/AVvXsEiGl_EDdkBEKqcHStjEnpB2Vz_twIp-_OYtcrLGzxsi7U9NekMWbvHaGVb5Cdxc97mx8HBPDzOY5HQMUQklK6S4oh3jwtdWPNc3cL_3wpaJymvS182DW9H1k2YPyV95KQmoH5_DGjzi0H4CK1k8IGe3cfX1OYyGi87n7tgT-cEXjTzgP6pbceznO8sQ-g=s320" width="228" /></a></td></tr><tr><td class="tr-caption" style="text-align: center;">Micah 6<br /></td></tr></tbody></table><p style="line-height: 100%; margin-bottom: 0in;">God says He wants us to <i>pray to Him</i>, <i>praise Him</i>, <i>thank Him</i>, and <i>follow</i> His guidance (which includes following the guidance of <a href="https://frontlinethought.blogspot.com/2021/05/to-save-male-female-relationships.html" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">how He designed men & women</a>), and all of those things are <i>active, in a nonviolent way); </i>again<i> it's</i> not just a matter of saying you love Him or holding a feeling of love for Him (although that's good of course), the Commandment is calling us to a higher form of love, an <i>active</i> love. (And our lives noticeably change for the better once we start doing all those active loving actions on a daily basis, proving that it is the correct way to obey the Commandment, since God rewards those that do His will. Similarly, if we really love Jesus, we should seek to know him as well as possible, and so that means <a href="https://compassionatespirit.com/wpblog/2001/09/01/the-lost-religion-of-jesus/" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">not limiting our knowledge of him and his teachings</a> to only the collection of letters and books called The New Testament).</p><blockquote><p style="line-height: 100%; margin-bottom: 0in;">“He who offers a sacrifice of praise and thanksgiving honors Me; And to him who orders his way rightly [who follows the way that I show him], I shall show the salvation of God.” (Psalm 50:23, Amplified Bible)</p></blockquote><p>So what would be a correct a definition for the verb version of love? "To be affectionate," comes close to defining active love, but that doesn't always fit, e.g., when a man loves his brother or friend in a non-affectionate way. <u>The word that is most fitting as a basic synonym for the verb version of love is "<b>befriend</b>.</u>" And again Jesus pointed us to the truth when he said "You are <i>my friends</i> if you do what I command."</p><p>We should look to become friends with God, friends with our Heavenly Father, Jesus the Christ, and the Holy Spirit; that means an active relationship that involves daily interaction; that means daily prayer, devotion to His will, and receptivity to guidance and callings every minute of our days.</p><p><u>Identifying the Opposite of This Love is Extremely Important</u></p><p style="line-height: 100%; margin-bottom: 0in;">And so then what is its correct opposite/antonym to that befriending kind of love? Well <u>if you look up the word <b>abuse</b>, you will find that <b>befriend is
it's antonym</b>; so, <b>the opposite of active love is abuse, not hate</b></u>.
<u>Therefore Jesus was asking us to <i>befriend</i> him (in a deep and profound
way), and likewise with loving others and ourselves; and so, and here is where many people mentally check out: <b><i>to be
abusive toward others is a direct violation of The Greatest
Commandments</i></b></u>. </p><p style="line-height: 100%; margin-bottom: 0in;">One of the three fundamentals Laws of Logic is "the law of non-contradiction." This law states that a proposition and its negation cannot both be true at the same time and in the same sense. A negation is the opposite of the original proposition. Abuse is the negation of love (love being the "original proposition"). Abuse and love can never co-exist, or be performed simultaneously. </p><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><img border="0" data-original-height="232" data-original-width="1752" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/a/AVvXsEileV0m-eq8RIUiaTOSULQYpaoNdMa5c7DXbI-T4-m4YeBPMHUfHU09Wyn2hF7nZEfaNNcApMiFZhJEcy3vujOq2XM_Bjx8L502qLKDM49jPrzS4eSR5WmTgMYWBSSb1PGrV-YW09ZPzLo8B7iugMgAMoqJykHkQmewqzfZYJ33lVOxFmE6yJTBpHevJw=s16000" /></div><p style="line-height: 100%; margin-bottom: 0in;">Hating/strongly disliking something like a certain food
or clothing style is <i>not</i> a violation, and hating evil is certainly
correct (see Amos 5:15, Hebrews 1:9, et al.), and because The
Greatest Commandments are the perfect moral law (on what's good), <u><b>if
something is completely against this perfect moral law, then it is
the opposite of good, which is evil, it is directly disobeying that moral law</b></u>. Abuse is pure evil, and should
not be accepted under any circumstance, <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fLrPDp9_rmQ" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">including a crisis</a>; evil
doesn't ever make the world a better place, it always makes it worse,
that's why evil is evil. Confusion over this point, <u>not being 100% certain that abuse is pure evil that is the complete opposite of loving action (i.e., abuse is the <i>negation</i> of love)</u>, is a major stumbling block for those that want to align with God's will; if you're thinking it's not that clear-cut, if you're thinking this is just some guy's interpretation, if you're not willing to accept that there must be an exact opposite to loving action, and abuse makes the most sense as being that opposite (<i>not</i> hate), <u>then you can't actually follow Jesus because you don't understand what he was telling you to do <b>and not do</b></u>, and doing or accepting what Jesus told us directly not to is actually disastrous, it undermines our salvation, so this is no minor point at all.</p><p style="line-height: 100%; margin-bottom: 0in;">To give a recent and ongoing example of disaster following moral confusion, officials world-wide have been pushing a false
morality that says "hate-speech" is evil, <i>but their own abuse, </i>e.g., <a href="https://frontlinethought.blogspot.com/2021/09/free-people-dont-have-health-masters.html" target="_blank">medical mandates</a>, <a href="https://frontlinethought.blogspot.com/2019/09/two-key-points-on-gun-control-for.html" target="_blank">disarmament of nonviolent people</a>, <a href="https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/judge-denies-bail-to-canadian-pastor-jailed-for-breaking-covid-rules-claims-hes-a-threat-to-public-safety/" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">arresting and imprisoning Christian pastors for speaking out</a>, <i>is okay</i>. <u>They are only able to pull this off because of people who do not understand the perfect moral law Jesus pointed us to; that the
opposite of the love Jesus was commanding is abuse, and so accepting
or participating in abuse is therefore direct opposition to God's
will. So <b>when you accept tyranny you are disobeying Jesus</b>.</u></p><p style="line-height: 100%; margin-bottom: 0in;">On top of the aforementioned false morality pushed by "authorities," the words of Jesus have been twisted to actually be pro-abuse, when they were actually anti-abuse; Pauline/Empire Christianity has deceived people into ignoring what Jesus actually taught, and to follow doctrine that is abusive toward God, others and ourselves, completely violating the Greatest Commandments. For example, the establishment church will tell you that when Jesus said "but I say, love your enemies and pray for those that persecute you" (Matthew 5:44 & Luke 6:28), Jesus was saying to always be a completely passive pacifist who never uses defensive force against abuse; in reality he was against abuse, he accepted the crucifixion for a higher purpose, not to teach pacifism, something he never actually said was good. "But he said to turn the other cheek!" you may reply. Actually he never said that. The establishment/empire church also mistranslated the words of Jesus to say "turn the other cheek," when in fact it correctly reads "<i>re</i>turn to them likewise on the same jaw, one of the same kind," explaining that you should not accept <i>any </i>level of abuse! He was <i>refining</i> the Law as expressed by "eye for an eye, tooth for a tooth," not contradicting it! Again this fits the Greatest Commandments, since defensive force is actually an expression of love. This is no theory, it's just a very basic observation; <u>if someone is attacking someone you love and you defend them, you do so because you love them, you do so out of love (and the same goes for self-defense, an act of self-love)</u>. The correct pro-defense translation of Luke 6:29/Matthew 5:39 also fits what Jesus said about him not contradicting the Law (Matthew 5:17), yet Pauline Christians once again ignore what Jesus actually said and trust in Empire Church Paulinist dogma. But most Christians will probably think I am the one twisting the words of Jesus, not the establishment church, and so the moral confusion and destructive system of abuse marches on, just as the powers-that-be want it to.</p><p style="line-height: 100%; margin-bottom: 0in;">The Empire/Establishment has always been all about justifying and perpetuating their own abusive actions against humanity, hence why they work so hard to keep your focus off of the crucial ethical truth, lest you reject their abusive rule. </p><p style="line-height: 100%; margin-bottom: 0in;">The key thing to realize and remember here again is that Jesus was talking about the action version of love, the verb version, and he was saying that you should still not be unloving/abusive even to those that you hate, even those that abuse you; in other words <u>Jesus was saying don't respond to evil with evil action of your own, that is, if you use proportional self-defense force, that is not abusive/evil, it's an act of love</u>. Why is this clear and important moral point ignored?</p><p style="line-height: 100%; margin-bottom: 0in;">He wasn't saying "hate is evil" and "accept all abuse," <u>he was saying don't respond to abuse with your own abuse (i.e.<i>, excessive</i> defensive force)</u> and <i><u>be forgiving and pray for those that are abusive</u>, even though you hate what they're doing</i>. <u>Jesus actually said he <i>hated</i> <a href="https://youtu.be/eXnKoG0U184" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">the anti-morality doctrine of the Nicolaitans</a>, and so again, hate in and of itself is obviously not a violation of his own Commandment, because he would never violate his own Commandment</u>. </p><p style="line-height: 100%; margin-bottom: 0in;">Returning to the main point of this post, knowing what the <i>opposite</i> of the Commandment to love is just as important as knowing clearly what the positive sense of that love is; the proof of that is all around us to see: a global society that accepts various kinds of abuse (like extortion/taxation) "for the greater good," because: a) they aren't sure that abuse is the opposite of love, and b) they aren't sure what counts as abuse and what doesn't. What counts isn't complicated to know: if it's not right if your neighbor <b><u>initiates violence</u></b> against you, <b><u>steals</u></b> from you, or <b><u>deceives</u></b> you (the <b>three forms of abuse)</b>, then the same actually holds true for everyone else, even if they call themselves "governor," and <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KX86quA6pVE" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">even if that governor declares some kind of emergency</a>! No exceptions! Simple! Don't be deceived that there are exceptions to the rule, <a href="https://frontlinethought.blogspot.com/2020/05/top-5-reasons-people-think-anarchism-is.html" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">that's the deception abusers have been utilizing for centuries</a>.</p><p style="line-height: 100%; margin-bottom: 0in; text-align: center;">~~~</p><p style="line-height: 100%; margin-bottom: 0in;">Related Talk:</p><p style="line-height: 100%; margin-bottom: 0in;"><br /></p><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><iframe allowfullscreen="" class="BLOG_video_class" height="266" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/9AtX5k8B_J0" width="320" youtube-src-id="9AtX5k8B_J0"></iframe></div><br /><p style="line-height: 100%; margin-bottom: 0in;"><br /></p>
<script src="https://storage.ko-fi.com/cdn/widget/Widget_2.js" type="text/javascript"></script><script type="text/javascript">kofiwidget2.init('Support Me on Ko-fi', '#29abe0', 'T6T54CINZ');kofiwidget2.draw();</script> </div></div>Unknownnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2111239628760080078.post-28634100675531451032021-11-21T11:08:00.154-08:002022-07-27T17:04:18.474-07:00Anarchism/Voluntaryism 101 vs. Nonsensical Pro-Abuse Indoctrination<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><img border="0" data-original-height="2250" data-original-width="3375" height="426" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/a/AVvXsEimtQa2wG5CgPckMTph328iofFmfluTPdU8OMa3u2dl7pdle6Y7bOOXDtd72ILGfPHKZKaySrIk1zZBZjMFWJ7qDJ64c4Or4IaTuBv5tdp7fe2-hnzXgSGC2T7HYjRC0nZ_mEeTxKrGXcapsSJ94vTFL7Q6rISnNI5GgvZ3ry9yvj5UuuLwBtLjBtxMcg=w640-h426" width="640" /></div> <div style="text-align: center;"><br /></div><div style="text-align: center;">“You know that in this world kings are tyrants, and officials lord over the people beneath them. But among you it should be quite different." "The ruler of this world now stands condemned."</div><div style="text-align: center;">- Jesus Christ (Mark 10:42, John 16:11)</div><div style="text-align: center;"><br /></div><div style="text-align: center;"><div>"We live in a very low state of the world, and pay unwilling tribute to governments founded on force.”</div><div>– Ralph Waldo Emerson, from his essay <i>Politics</i></div></div><div style="text-align: center;"><br /></div><div style="text-align: center;">"Peter and the other apostles replied: 'We must obey God rather than human beings!'"</div><div style="text-align: center;">(Acts 5:29)</div><div style="text-align: center;"><br /></div>[updated 7/10/22]<p>Most people, and understandably so, find anarchist philosophy to not be something practical for society, because they've been led to believe that anarchy is the same thing as chaos, that if there was anarchy, then bad people would just do whatever violence they wanted to do, and no one would stop them; people have been led to believe that anarchy equates to no moral law in effect, and so immoral behavior would then run rampant and unchecked. And no one in their right mind wants there to be more violence and destruction in the world, so anarchism is dismissed, usually immediately, again because the people doing so have been led to believe that anarchy means chaos, no moral law, and no bad consequence for violence. Anarchy actually just means "No Rulers," the second definition of "destruction
and chaos" is actually a false replacement definition that rulers have put on the word anarchy, in order to neutralize any resistance to their rule. Who is a ruler? A ruler is a
person that abusively controls other people. <i>And guess what happens when you make abusers the leaders of society</i>? Well, ironically for those believe States prevent chaos, repeating patterns of chaos/war/terrorism/tyranny are what happens. This shouldn't be a surprise, the problem is most people don't believe the abuse is abuse, because they've been heavily indoctrinated to not see it (especially the foundational extortion/taxation) as abuse, but rather as a "service." In other words people have been deceived into seeing abuse as love, and this has been the root cause of humanity's problems, from the very beginning.</p><p>Abuse is the opposite of
love, it's evil behavior. So, since extorting rulers are abusive, <u>an anarchist is simply someone who is
against abusive control</u>. In other words, anarchy is an expression of the Non-Aggression Principle, the principle that states that the initiation of violence is <u>always</u> wrong. Self-defense force is <i>not</i> aggression/violence, as some also wrongly define that as; defensive force is the forcible and proportional <i>response</i> to violence that has already commenced, so pure anarchism is not against that. </p><p>When most people think about why we need governments, the #1 reason thought of and said to be why is <i>protection</i>, and that protection means fundamentally <i>protection from abuse</i>; the Bill of Rights are fundamentally about being protected from abuse. So then, why would we need to set up a system of abuse, to protect us from abuse? Why think we need evil to do good in the world? <u>The mistake is not only thinking that we need evil to accomplish good, but that evil could <i>ever</i> accomplish good; in reality it ultimately can't, that's what makes evil evil, it's the opposite of good, and God's creation doesn't allow for the nonsense backwardness of evil and the sane good of the non-aggression principle really being one and the same</u>. It really is this simple, but the propaganda/indoctrination/brainwashing is constantly working to confuse you about this so you'll accept evil as a means to accomplish the good, more specifically and fundamentally in this discussion, so you'll accept that extortion is the best means of ensuring protection. </p><p>In the current March 2022 issue of the print magazine <i>America's 1st Freedom</i>, the cover story article is on 10 truths about our rights, and the first truth stated is "We all have <u>natural rights, which are granted by our Creator, not our government,</u>" and #2 is stated as "Our government exists to protect our natural rights." #1 is certainly true, but how can #2 be true if that "protection" is actually done by <i>violating those rights</i>, which are again fundamentally <i>the natural right to not be abused</i>? The intention of government may have been the protection of our natural right to not be abused, but if government is actually based on abuse (which it is), then <i>the means are contrary to the intention</i>; again you can't actually achieve good ends from evil means, that is a key ethical and metaphysical truth for humans, that although most might agree with when stated plainly like that, they don't usually see or agree that they are actually going against that fundamental ethical and metaphysical truth by overlooking the abuses of governments as a "necessary evil" in order to achieve "the greater good." That utilitarian tough-love viewpoint might seem smart and practical, but it's actually neither.</p><p>When people say that we need "The Rule of Law," that's true, but the devil is in the details concerning what "rule of" should be, and what that "law" is fundamentally. The fundamental moral Law is actually <a href="https://frontlinethought.blogspot.com/2021/12/what-kind-of-love-was-jesus-referring.html" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">what Jesus said it is</a>: to comprehensively love (Matthew 22:36-40 & Mark 12:28-32 & Luke10:25-28). <u>And the opposite of loving action is actually abuse, so abuse is really what's against the true and fundamental Law for humans on Earth</u>. And again, defensive force is not a form of violence/abuse, it's actually a form of love, defending people from abuse. So the right way to have "rule of law" is first to be clear that abuse (which can be in the form of aggression, deception/cheating or theft) is what Law-violation actually is, and then secondly, to be clear that using defensive force to stop that abuse is the proper loving response, in keeping with that Law. <u><b>So the mistake, again due to deception and propaganda, is thinking that rulers, who fundamentally exist and operate because of extortion, <i>which is a form of abuse</i>, are necessary in order to carry out defensive force against abusers</b>; <i>humanity has been deceived into believing that we need abusers to stop abusers; we don't</i>, and that's why anarchism, especially Christian Anarchism, makes a lot of sense</u> and is not at all "crazy" as you've been led to believe it is. <u>Institutions based on abuse should be condemned rejected completely; a of good-intentioned people hesitate in doing this because they right think that we should never condemn an individual person, mistakenly equating the abusive social-system structure with a person, the latter being redeemable while the former is not</u>. Yes governments are made up of individual people, but they are people carrying out an abusive program/paradigm, and so rejecting that paradigm is not equivalent with rejecting/condemning individual people, which Jesus told us not to do when he said "Judge (i.e., condemn) not..."</p><p>Again the true Law that is the foundation for any sound moral rules, is simply The Non-Abuse Principle (the other side of The Greatest Commandments of Jesus); it's an extremely basic ethic, it's just
promoting basic decency. If a "regular" person committed extortion against you, or tried to coerce you into taking their favorite drug, or tried to disarm you even though you haven't been violent, would you find all of that to be aggressive? Of course you would. And if you became shipwrecked on an uninhabited island with a bunch of other vacationers, wouldn't the rational thing to do be to share the land, water and seed on that island evenly among you, so that no one could dominate and abusively control any one else? Of course. <u>But what if a politician commits extortion, drug & <a href="https://frontlinethought.blogspot.com/2020/07/mandatory-masks-in-land-of-free.html" target="_blank">medical device</a>-pushing, <a href="https://frontlinethought.blogspot.com/2019/09/two-key-points-on-gun-control-for.html" target="_blank">disarmament,</a> and controls the necessities of survival that are actually your free birthright? Wouldn't it still be wrong</u>? Here is where the statist departs from common sense and basic ethics, and enters the fairy-land of "<a href="https://youtu.be/ESgLYZpVjck" target="_blank">social-contracts</a>" and "representatives," an abuse-condoning illusory realm inhabited by indoctrinated idol-worshipers <i>that never speak of the Non-Aggression Principle</i>. <u>Here is where The Golden Rule is discarded, supposedly for "the greater good." Here is where basic neighbor-to-neighbor ethics is discarded, because people irrationally think States aren't actually just people too (just people with a different job), and irrationally think those people are somehow automatically superior to everyone else, just because of that employment</u>. <b>Here is where the three main blunders (or deceptions) come into play: </b></p><p><b>1) The blunder/deception that "Some people are bad, so we need government to protect us from those bad people," as if those bad people couldn't be, and never have been, the government themselves, and </b></p><p><b>2) </b><b>The blunder/deception that</b><b> abuse (e.g., extortion, medical tyranny and disarmament) equals protection, and </b></p><p><b>3), The blunder/deception that we couldn't have safety, education or health services without extortion, ignoring the private sector and charitable organizations as if they don't exist and oftentimes do a better service than the government version, and ignoring that local police, firefighters, teachers and medical experts could basically just continue on with their jobs, continue on with offering their services to the community, </b><u style="font-weight: bold;">just without their paychecks funded by extortion</u><b>, and without having a "commander in chief" politician that they have sworn to obey no matter how deranged he or she is. </b></p><p><b>So the big "revelation" with exposing these 3 Blunders is simply that governments are just people too and we don't need people given the "authority" to abuse, to make the world a better place! Adding abuse to the world doesn't actually help! It's really that simple! </b><br /></p><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEikHm92R3ZfBi7-5ZDxaM5OhmasQW7ULYVaY5FCJ67-2zbbyJ-y0PlyCqTCX0ajcy-RSZWfwkDcBPjnriDMmi-Mq-ym4b-ex31atU1kdprN_Boiz2TPB_u7JYbX7cXR1v3EKRQciotNMit2/s448/some+people+are+bad.png" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="436" data-original-width="448" height="194" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEikHm92R3ZfBi7-5ZDxaM5OhmasQW7ULYVaY5FCJ67-2zbbyJ-y0PlyCqTCX0ajcy-RSZWfwkDcBPjnriDMmi-Mq-ym4b-ex31atU1kdprN_Boiz2TPB_u7JYbX7cXR1v3EKRQciotNMit2/w200-h194/some+people+are+bad.png" width="200" /></a></div><p>It is that simple ultimately, however because of how people have been programmed, it takes some discussion to get to that simple conclusion; it takes critical thinking and analysis; some debate and some questioning of unquestioned "truths," to reach that simple truth that really is true. Stevie Ray Vaughn asked in one of his songs "Whatever happened to the Golden Rule?" and the answer is that it was thwarted by immoral deception, immoral deception that you can start to free yourself from by thinking through those aforementioned blunders; also key is to keep in mind that what's going on is fundamentally <i>a confusion over identity and ethics</i>, namely rulers have people confused about <i>who they are fundamentally</i>, and <i>what fundamental basic ethics are</i>. Who are you fundamentally? What's fundamentally good and what's fundamentally evil? If you really knew the correct answers to those questions, anarchism wouldn't seem like a foolish philosophy to you, it would seem like common sense. Are you a human being, created by God, or are you the livestock of politicians that you happened to be born near? Why is something abusive when you do it (e.g., extortion, restricting someone's travel, disarming them, invading their privacy, pushing drugs and medical devices on them, etc.), but not abusive when politicians do the same thing? Knowing your core identity and knowing core ethics would actually bring down their house of cards, and so that's why they're constantly working on confusing you concerning your identity (e.g., with identity politics and nationalism), and confusing you concerning what's unethical (e.g., with daily fear-mongering and guilt-tripping). This is why they employ <a href="https://artofliberty.substack.com/p/the-anarchists-episode-2-review-and" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">controlled opposition</a> to say things like "Our leaders are out of control, no longer serving their <i>own</i> populations," so that you still subconsciously identify with the false identity as human livestock, and still subconsciously accept the false morality of the appeal to authority and "obedience to rulers/system = being a good person," and still subconsciously accept that the solution is simply petitioning politicians, assumed to be legitimate "leaders," to rule correctly (deep ethics reminder: abusing/ruling over people can't be made good because <a href="https://frontlinethought.blogspot.com/2021/12/what-kind-of-love-was-jesus-referring.html" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">abuse is pure evil</a>). </p><p><b>Keeping you confused on your true identity and confused about basic ethics is also in large part accomplished by <i>simply <a href="https://lenonhonor.com/product/the-911-fear-based-mind-control-program-ebooks/" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">having one major crisis follow another</a></i> ("social-engineers" do actually exist), and have the crisis always support two main goals upon your subconscious: 1) "You are a citizen in the grand play as presented to you on your TV screen, not an autonomous human being created by God on the planet Earth with other humans like yourself who you should treat how you want to be treated," and 2) "The Non-Abuse Principle needs to be put aside to take care of the crisis, we gotta let these "authorities" take the reigns and do whatever they say."</b></p><p></p><blockquote>"Here you will find, wedded to each other, the two essential elements of contemporary nihilism, the great diffused fear of contemporary man and his singularly terrorist [i.e., abusive] passion. Nihilism, terrorism, here is the heart of the disturbing reality which, in the past thirty years has broken through the last romantic languors [i.e., through dreamy, in a good way, notions of peace & love that people instinctually have]. <u>Here is that scandalous and secret spot where the decomposition of the societies recently fighting for human liberty merges imperceptibly into the delirium which opposed them</u> [i.e., those that fight for liberty actually end up supporting its opposite when they are just hit with yet another crisis and the need to "do something" about it, and that something of course invariably being <i>something abusive</i>, hence the nihilism, the abandonment of the Non-Abuse Principle, for supposedly "practical" and "necessary" reasons]. Nihilism, which engenders the spirit of catastrophe [i.e., the moral relativism and moral decay fostered through mass-media/entertainment supports acceptance of yet another manifestation of abuse as "crisis solution" from the terrorist-rulers posing as caretakers], is <u>a vast reaction of infantile type</u>. You know how easily children or the weak or sickly or nervous, are discouraged. They analyze neither their action nor their thinking. <u>The original impulse is global, enthusiastic and blind</u>. Something gets in the way [of society actually progressing toward liberty] and the whole wave collapses upon itself [and that's why social-engineers have one crisis follow another, forever creating "order out of chaos" as their motto goes, that order being their abusive control and exploitation of the masses]." - Emmanuel Mounier, <i>Be Not Afraid </i>(1946)</blockquote><p></p><p>Those are the deeper core elements at play, but I'll return to those main 3 Blunders to hopefully help make this all more simple and clear to you, because again, it really is fundamentally simple, and because most people seem to have their minds tear them away from actually hearing what the real crucial truth and solutions are. Why is that? Why can't most people focus on the key truths that would be most productive to focus on? People have developed theories, like "<a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/System_justification" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">System Justification Theory</a>," or "<a href="https://effectiviology.com/ostrich-effect/" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">The Ostrich Effect</a>," and although they contain some valuable insights for sure, the theories themselves actually circle around the key points that need to be focused on; it's as if people are influenced to talk about everything <i>except what's most important</i>; you can call that Demonic Influence Theory if you'd like, as I haven't found another label for that allergic-to-the-actual-crucial-truth-and-solution human psychology/behavior that is definitely affecting most people, the Three Blunders being ignored or just irrationally discredited (falsely equating them with other ideas, etc.) being a perfect case-in-point. </p><p>Many spiritual people look at problems caused by governments and theorize on cosmic meanings for it, always trying to see some bright side to something that is completely dark, and never considering that <b>the reason the tyranny/oppression/state-sponsored terrorism is happening in the world yet another time is simply because people are paying taxes under coercion, simply a matter of society being established on abuse, and so most people are empowering abusers, who then, as should be expected, like clockwork, abuse even more</b>. That true answer is never considered, and instead they'll go on about astrological shifts or what have you.</p><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhgditv-UpMQRzcxiWbF2cxyLv4TaqIMNZ3OZRU3znGlh_MSGOzdeJdyLf1jSRqaCdinEfPmSSoybnSY8GAtFHkgoxk5cTHUTPlBCRHU3-qhuuC35d7Fybe6DxI4gfBd7vvyaW6oXCSzXLIM68vP0TZ0eLslS_V8MsuHPZr4piOk2SIrSMQ1IoBka8mkA/s3935/Good%20Books.jpg" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="2707" data-original-width="3935" height="440" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhgditv-UpMQRzcxiWbF2cxyLv4TaqIMNZ3OZRU3znGlh_MSGOzdeJdyLf1jSRqaCdinEfPmSSoybnSY8GAtFHkgoxk5cTHUTPlBCRHU3-qhuuC35d7Fybe6DxI4gfBd7vvyaW6oXCSzXLIM68vP0TZ0eLslS_V8MsuHPZr4piOk2SIrSMQ1IoBka8mkA/w640-h440/Good%20Books.jpg" title="Book Recommendations" width="640" /></a></div><p>Again, Blunder #1 is dealing with the most common objection to anarchism, that it is a utopia vision that denies the existence of bad people; that's completely false; it's actually <i>because</i> there are bad people, and <i>because</i> they can (and often throughout history do!) occupy positions of power where they can (and do!) do <i>even more</i> destruction (a military can do far more damage than a gang, look into the numbers with democide, the most violence throughout history has come from States), that it makes no sense at all to set up those positions of power in the first place. Those that support a ruling class are the ones actually living more in a fairy-tale wherein it's actually fair to be ruled over and abused because you can vote every now and then, and maybe they'll count all the votes, and maybe the person you vote for will win, and then maybe that politician will keep their word and do exactly as they promised, and maybe all the unelected people in government will likewise be saints and not abuse their power... that's a lot of maybes, and even if all those things happen, there is the very real problem of founding a society on extortion (trying to make good come from Evil, which God does not actually allow in His creation), and the very real problem of an ever-growing State that gets more and more powerful and abusive as they continue to funnel in money from everyone every single day automatically. The claim that anarchists are the ones disconnected from reality, and believers in politics are the "realists," doesn't hold up to scrutiny. Once you actually question common platitude objections like "We're not a pack of wolves," or "We can't return to the law of the jungle," or "We can't have everyone being the legislator, judge and jury," or "It would be gangs taking over" or "It would be mob rule," etc., once you can consider for a moment that good men <i>can</i> actually form communities wherein they don't abuse each other, and actually help each other, <i>then</i> you can begin to see that anarchism is not actually more naïve than statism is. </p><p>This leads to Blunder #2, when you can get a moment of clarity wherein you see that the command of Jesus to love our neighbor didn't have any exceptions added, not because Jesus was naïve, but because Jesus was our Master Teacher and really did know best. Because of massive indoctrination, starting from childhood, and remaining continuous from then, people are led to believe that they're being smart and reasonable by accepting human rulers, accepting abuse (the complete opposite of love), when they're actually being neither smart or reasonable, they're actually being deceived into being naïve idol-worshipers that ignore current events, all of history, and basic logic and ethics. </p><p>The idea that <i>we have to allow some people to commit aggression towards everyone, all the time, in order to prevent some people from being aggressive some times</i>, is an idea that is almost never pin-pointed and questioned, it's just accepted as a given, again because of massive indoctrination. If you were to pin-point this auto-accepted idea, and then actually question and analyze it however, going against the programming/indoctrination, you'd probably also come to the conclusion that "<u>We don't actually need to allow constant abuse in order to defend against abuse, and giving people this immense power is extremely dangerous, allowing for even greater abuse than anyone could do without that extortion-system and monopoly on violence in place</u>." </p><p>The ridiculousness of much of political activism (which I've done plenty of in the past) is that it's usually basically just asking officials to <i>stop what they're doing</i>, <i>stop being abusive in various ways</i>; so big picture zoom-out in this: some people fund the pay-checks of other people who have these positions as rulers, and then lo and behold, they don't just twiddle their thumbs but get to doing their job, i.e., ruling over other people, and we oftentimes, as should be expected, don't like the results, so we then petition them to stop. [insert forehead-slap here] Wouldn't it be better not to set up this dynamic in the first place? Wouldn't it be better not to accept that some people have the right to <a href="https://youtube.com/clip/Ugkxw90U64HM1AceNnOl9yVruaLYp1rk9dI1" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">extort</a> money from and rule over and abuse other people? Of course it would be better! Again it really is that simple, but all kinds of "experts" will disagree, and people submit to their "authority," and so the machine keeps churning, <a href="https://youtu.be/n4Xdt6-UIjU" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">society keeps facing the same problems decade after decade</a>, the same patterns of tyranny keep repeating, and things actually get worse overall with advanced technology/weapons/toxins/propaganda at the disposable of the rulers and their supporting institutions.<br /></p><p>If you've wondered why the world is so
messed up, why there is so much injustice and corruption and
unnecessary suffering in the world, it's because basic decency (and basic logic) has been disregarded, and even worse, that basic decency has been labeled
"extreme" and "dangerous." If your immediate
reaction to this is something like "I don't know... I still think we
need some military and police to keep us safe," like most people
say, that right there again is an absence of basic ethics and reasoning (it's basically Blunder #3), specifically by <i>having
conflated abuse with safety, even though those are contradictory
terms, even though abuse always undermines safety (if you're being
abused, you're not safe</i>.) </p><p>A big part of why people accept abuse, why they actually become <i>moral nihilists</i> to large degree, is probably also due to <a href="https://frontlinethought.blogspot.com/2021/07/top-5-mistakes-of-mainstream.html" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">the false apostle Paul's doctrines</a> of "human depravity" & "inherited sin" combined with his other nonsense notion that "governments and slave-masters are ordained by God," leading people to subconsciously think that people are inherently wicked, and so some abusive control by these "divine" human authorities is necessary and good. Are you holding that belief in your subconscious? Do you deep-down think we need abusive rulers because humans are evil at their core? (Re-read the above quote by Emmanuel Mounier as it's very relevant here). If so, you then need to de-program yourself from <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=On6ixGsmca8" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">that false doctrine</a> disseminated by a false apostle and pushed everyday by a church establishment that is not true to the teachings of Jesus, if anarchism 101 is ever going to be seen by you as the common sense that it really is. If you think we need abusive
rulers for security, you ignore that there is no security in constant and ever-expanding abuse! Slaves aren't safe!</p><p>The police-state and <a href="https://frontlinethought.blogspot.com/2021/09/free-people-dont-have-health-masters.html" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">medical tyranny</a> grows, all
because people have been largely brainwashed to never think the thought-crime that we can actually have health and security without abuse. It's
sad, and tragic. We don't need politicians making medical decisions for us and our children to make good health choices, and we don't need a ruling class to have more security; we aren't better off accepting a system of abuse that gets more and more powerful, secretive, deceptive and destructive century after century. If you still doubt that, and wonder what a world without abusive social-systems/human-farms bordering one another would look like, it's really not hard to imagine, and this is undoing Blunder #3, de-programming/un-indoctrinating yourself from that blunder, actually imagining the alternative to living in an abusive social-system.</p><p>What would a post Blunder # 3 world look like? It would look like local teachers and experts in health & wellness offering their services to their local communities, without State involvement; it would look like gun-ownership being <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8_ymYRHOrSw" target="_blank">commonplace</a>, as well as
independent (not under the command of some politician, like the
military is) local <a href="https://youtu.be/TGNuCCjRpGo" target="_blank">militias</a> trained and ready to get together to
defend against any aggressive groups in their region. Not rocket-science. If you pay taxes so that you can call 911 and someone will
probably show up (and if it involves an ambulance, expect to be
charged thousands of dollars despite your taxes), why is it so hard
to imagine calling a local 24-hour health or security service instead? Or even
better, calling your local militia members or community health experts, who don't charge you any
monthly fee, but simply expect help in return if they ever need it and you are able to give it? Is that really so far-fetched? No, it's actually what goes on regularly in more natural communities that still exist, where people haven't yet all been corralled into city-control-grids through economic coercion (and this is why <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_SXQ1Q2nHGo" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">recognizing homesteading land & water as a birthrigh</a>t is key, because without that we'll always be living in some kind of abusive system that undermines the ideal potential of natural communities from ever manifesting on Earth). </p><blockquote><p><span style="font-family: courier;">"<b><u>Government should never be able to do anything you can't do</u></b>. If you can't steal from your neighbor, you can't send the government to your neighbor to steal from you." - Ron Paul</span></p></blockquote><blockquote><p><span style="font-family: courier;">"<b>Tyranny is defined as that which is legal for the government, but illegal for the citizenry</b>.” - Thomas Jefferson</span></p></blockquote><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/a/AVvXsEhWZhFXIA0x_9OlzSi3TGnzZm4Dj_dkAlYYcGiwfPWwjpqU-VRlzW7BUlkpqzG1zgzoBX6Uu8s2PrOt8SfziwceV01PdhVt1E03_GHJJMMwkfAN4wvuzT9pj2PM2R8IjN-owBlov4wjDC7fmJUDufawKJVTM1BliO7twO3OK2cqoAoNQlJUqB81x_GRkw=s817" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="451" data-original-width="817" height="177" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/a/AVvXsEhWZhFXIA0x_9OlzSi3TGnzZm4Dj_dkAlYYcGiwfPWwjpqU-VRlzW7BUlkpqzG1zgzoBX6Uu8s2PrOt8SfziwceV01PdhVt1E03_GHJJMMwkfAN4wvuzT9pj2PM2R8IjN-owBlov4wjDC7fmJUDufawKJVTM1BliO7twO3OK2cqoAoNQlJUqB81x_GRkw=s320" width="320" /></a></div><br /><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><img border="0" data-original-height="348" data-original-width="628" height="177" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/a/AVvXsEhhWz_VSBiPdpzfFMeVOridWlT76tXk1fWvFmxZ8g5s_5xKqIqBkJFyRUNheqV3YLDRGdr9C0v-ViDZsmobdwKwn_-phZjr94Ng6knyvvPmZw8k8pT9EyE6SlDKlvWsW_K1KN0fiyIz5RvvZyzZxBqPerKzKsO9YICUIRNEK72tVGWK5cH_N17544u9zg=s320" width="320" /></div><p>Is it really for the greater good to have the foundation of society be abusive, instead of using abuse to build up these <a href="https://truecapitalists.wordpress.com/2018/06/06/taxation-really-is-theft-and-heres-why/" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">tax-charging</a>, privacy-invading, propaganda-spewing, war-making,
nuclear-bomb building, <a href="https://truthaboutfluoride.com/what-is-fluoride" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">water-fluoridating</a>, chemtrail-spreading, bio-weapon manufacturing, wireless radiation
and GMO proliferating institutions of illegitimate power that attract
satanists, narcissists and pedophiles? Is it really the right and safest thing to allow extortion to
go on every day to fund them, so we can be "secure" under their rule? Beyond the abuses we can observe, the truth is we have no idea what our tax dollars are used for in large part, all the secret programs, operations, technology, etc., oftentimes making our lives and the world worse, oftentimes decreasing our health and well-being in ways we don't even know about; we oftentimes face the consequences of their secret activities but never know the origin, our own money being used against us, like a parasite that grows stronger the more blood it takes from its host. Why support the conditions for a dystopia? Why support <a href="https://colindonoghue.wordpress.com/2009/01/27/top-5-examples/" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">toxins & tyranny</a>? Why give some people the unnatural power to do that, to do things that are considered abusive for "regular" people to do (aka a monopoly on violence)? <i>Why think that people stealing money from us will then stop being bad after that theft, and use the money only for good? Would you trust a robber to take care of you?</i></p><p>Saying that "taxation is not theft because some services are provided for by that taxation" and/or "you use services that taxation pays for so you shouldn't speak against taxation," again forgets basic neighbor-to-neighbor ethics: if your neighbor fixed up your driveway for you, but you never asked him to and never agreed to pay him to do so, would it be right for you to pay him simply because you continue to use your driveway? No, because you never agreed to the exchange, you never gave consent, and that matters! It's amazing how statists side-step consent as if it's irrelevant! Or they say consent was "implied" by you simply using your driveway, or simply using services (services that can be very poor by the way) that were payed for with a fraction of the money stolen from you! Statists claim that what you wouldn't accept your neighbor or a stranger to do, you <i>should accept</i> if that person simply says "I work for the government." Wow, what magic words those are! It's like the word "emergency," that whenever uttered by officials, supposedly gives them "emergency powers" to abuse people! Again magical words! And yet it is the anarchists who are living in a fairy-land? To think abuse/stealing is sometimes okay (i.e., to violate the command of Jesus is sometimes okay), if the person doing the abuse/stealing simply has a certain the job, <i>doesn't actually make ethical sense, it's not actually legitimate, despite all the people that say so matter-of-factly that it is legitimate.</i> Why ignore that abuse is always an evil, and that unnatural power tends to corrupt people? Why ignore all of political history, and just hope for the best (and plan on regular protests and demonstrations, and voting, to "remedy" the inevitable abuse of power that will arise)? There's really no logic to it, there's really no "common sense" to ignoring crucial truth about ethics and history, ethics and history that are of course absent from State "education" of the public, i.e., indoctrination, coming from those profiting from an abusive system that starts from an unethical foundation.</p><p>The "common sense" pushed by the powers-that-be goes against our own conscience and reasoning, forgetting how neighbors in a neighborhood should treat each other, forgetting how two strangers on the road should treat each other. Letting the mainstream narrative do the ethical thinking for us, telling us the ethics changes "in a society," or "in civilization," and/or "in an emergency," telling us that abuse is okay when they do it, but not okay when we do it... this is in fact deception trying to convince us that they are doing us a favor by abusing us! All of the distractions and "emergencies" (many of which agencies of the State create themselves), that are pushed hard every day by the mass-media, additionally support this narrative of being "helped" by the government, and hinder people really thinking for themselves, living in survival-mode most of the time while simultaneously being lied to by talking-heads and controlled opposition over and over again. It's the strategy of an abuser: keep them emotionally traumatized so you can more easily deceive and control them; it's the worst of human behavior that has been put on a pedestal as "civilization," as if it was actually something great. <a href="https://www.sunypress.edu/p-4607-against-the-state.aspx" target="_blank">Anarchism 101</a> becomes more accessible when you stop watching mass-media, stop worrying about conforming to mainstream society, avoiding toxic distractions, avoiding "higher education" and propaganda outlets like
mainstream news/movies/TV/Netflix/TED talks/popular social-media commentators (many of which are controlled opposition, never telling you the crucial liberating truths). Be sure to set aside free
time in your life to just <a href="https://www.pmpress.org/index.php?l=product_detail&p=565" target="_blank">read</a>, think, and write independently; I imagine most
people would probably come to the same conclusions if these
changes occurred in their lives, rather than remaining too busy being
entertained/brainwashed, self-medicating/drugging (as I used to, a lot) and/or working to
pay for things they don't really need, on top of us all having to pay taxes unjustly and, perhaps most importantly (yet also most ignored), <i>unjustly having to pay for our <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_SXQ1Q2nHGo" target="_blank">free birthrights of homesteading land, water & seed, pre-existing in Nature and necessary for survival and freedom</a></i>. </p><p>Some argue for States by saying something like "If people are being unjustly deprived of the basic necessities of life, then it would be justifiable force for the starving to take what they need from those who have too much of those survival necessities," and that's not actually wrong because that would be justified defensive force against aggression committed against them, but the problem is in seeing States/extortionists as the only way to solve that imbalance, when the real answer is recognizing those survival natural resources, namely homesteading land, water & seed, as *a cost/tax-free birthright* of everyone on Earth; the real answer, that people keep ignoring, is *voluntary communities of sovereign veganic/nonviolent homesteads*. (Those that want to continue to live in control-grids with a ruling class can do so, but not force others to join them.) Freeing people to live more naturally and cooperatively is a truly reliable "social safety net," the idea that without the State we would be abandonding the poor and hungry is a false dilemma because it ignores the real solution, recognizing land, water & seed as a birthright of all humans, <i>a birthright that is the best poverty solution possible</i>. Fruit & nut trees keep on producing fruit & nuts during an economic crisis! Most people's #1 expense is having to pay rent just for a place to sleep on the Earth at night (let alone a space to grow food), and if you think that's fair because "we have to work to survive," you're ignoring that homesteading involves work too and <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_SXQ1Q2nHGo" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">you're ignoring the issue</a> of the land water & seed being <i>pre-existing in Nature and necessary for survival</i>, and so therefore restricting access to it is unjust and exploitative; again, one would still have to work their garden and orchard, and most would be glad to be free from other work to do so! God said we are here to be gardeners (Genesis 2:15), not money-slaves to governments and corporations. </p><p>Related to this issue is the pro-State slogan that says "If you don't like it leave," assuming that the State is really the rightful owner of the Earth (they're not, the Creator is), and that there is some non-State-human-farm out there when in fact the whole world is one State bordering another; to think it is ethically legitimate to tell someone to endure the hardship and great expense (assuming they can afford that expense, most can't) of leaving their home and trying to find another place to live just because they don't want to be your slave, is not ethically sound; again the Earth is for all humans; land, water, & seed are a birthright, so if anyone is acting as a controller of your birthright, then they are being abusive, and so they are the one who is wrong; it's really that black & white, the ethics is really that clear.</p><p>Returning to "but how would that work?" again, education can be provided by teachers who simply aren't employed by an institution that utilizes extortion of the population, and likewise defensive security can be provided by firearms and voluntary local defense networks, aka Militias or "Mutual Assistance Groups" (or other <a href="https://mises.org/library/private-production-defense" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">private defense services</a>, all better than standing armies that can be used domestically by officials for tyrannical purposes), health security can be provided by local experts in that field (or becoming an expert yourself), and
food security can be provided by our own gardens & orchards in a community of
others with their own gardens & orchards, ideally forming a gift-economy community of independent sovereign veganic
homesteads that share and help each other. We need freedom for <i>community homestead security</i>; instead we got slavery for "homeland
security," i.e., <i>State security</i>; they've given us their substitute that serves them
and disempowers us, like advertisers that play on our natural desires
and make us think their product will provide happiness for us; <i>it's a counterfeit</i> of the the real and good thing that God wants us to have. Property tax alone undermines free & natural living on this planet; even if you buy your home, you're still having to pay rent to the State in the form of property tax, which shows you never really owned your home but have rather then been renting it from the State, demonstrated by the seizure of your home and your forceful eviction from it if you stop paying them that tax; that control of private property is actually a form of Communism, <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zO2BhIUSItw" target="_blank">just as medical mandates are as well</a>. </p><p><u>But "We need the military."</u> </p><p>If all of the above reasoning and ethics is basically just thrown out the window with a thought like "We need to have a military to protect us from other governments," realize that that's saying "We need government, to protect us from government"... that's the same as saying "My abuser protects me from other worse abusers." Think about that. Is that the right foundation for society? Why not support thousands of voluntary extortion-free militias instead, so there really would be (almost) "a gun behind every blade of grass" to dissuade possible invading forces who want us to submit to their abusive social-system/human-farm? Also one must face the reality that when militaries are under the control of politicians, those politicians can and do send men off to die for mistaken reasons, they can and do give commands that make no military sense whatsoever, and they can even be operating on nothing more than a personal grudges they may have with another politician, or simply out of greed for wealth and resources for themselves and their corporate partners, and also they can and do turn militaries against the their "own" people. Military being used against the very tax-payers that fund the military's existence is a real possibility, and that can come about vis infiltration in a government (or a coup) that then misuses or transforms the military from the top down to get more agreeable generals, et al. in place, say by pushing "gender equality" measures that are really just a smoke-screen for changing the military to more socialist-minded soldiers (and unquestioning military robots/drones), in the interest of a dictator-type government to be activated post-transformation. And when things like this happen, the warriors of the nation having been for the most part all co-opted/hijacked or replaced by the State, there are no strong militias in place to actually protect the people anymore; then people will finally realize, too late, that founding societal protection on extortion (a form of abuse) and blind obedience to a "commander-in-chief's" hierarchy, really was <i>not</i> the better option; again when you can see the simple and deep ethics at play, the simple fact that supporting large-scale abuse is not the right prescription for large-scale safety, then you can see the objective reality that God keeps trying to show us by the moral fabric of His Creation.</p><p><u>The Key God-given Right & Law</u></p><p>Many conservatives/patriots have an immediate knee-jerk reaction to the terms anarchism or anarchy and see it as Commies/socialists/Marxists trying to tear down all that's good in the place called the USA, and this is mistaken and unfortunate, true anarchism is totally opposed to Communism, and it isn't about removing any good traditions and values already in place. Philosophical Anarchism recognizes the good elements in USA tradition, the Deceleration of Independence and Bill of Rights in particular, and actually wants to <i>elevate and expand on the pro-freedom anti-tyranny principles</i> described therein, not tear them down as Marxists want to do (to be replaced by a Communist totalitarian society, which has been advancing in the so-called Land of the Free). The Bill of Rights are a list of rights, first of all given by God, not by politicians, and secondly the rights listed are <u>all speaking to aspects of the most fundamental God-given right, <b>the right to not be abused</b>; aggression and theft are acts of abuse, and tyranny and taxation are acts of aggression and theft</u>. A true Land of the Free, a nation of truly independent people, who are free of all abuse (including the abuse of extortion, and the abuse of survival birthrights being controlled), would consist of sovereign individuals (i.e., people not ruled over by anyone), who all have their birthright to sovereign homesteads, which are <a href="https://colindonoghue.wordpress.com/2014/05/16/the-root-injustice-a-real-way-forward-to-a-sustainable-society/" target="_blank">absolutely necessary</a> in order to be a free human being on the planet Earth. </p><p>If the spirit of the Declaration of Independence and Bill of Rights was actually taken seriously and not held back because of a mistaken statist view on the supposed necessity of human rulers, then we'd recognize each other as sovereign individuals created by God, the only true Authority worthy of worship and obedience. The answer, as Leo Tolstoy forcefully promoted in his book <i><a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xo0OR63gG1U" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">The Kingdom of God is Within You</a>, </i>a kind of Christian Anarchism, is a more correct "spirit of 1776," it's <i>the spirit of man's desire to be free from slavery while choosing to follow the perfect moral law Jesus pointed us to</i>, <u>which is simply a law against all abuse, in all scenarios, for all time, no exceptions</u>. Thomas Jefferson too was going in the right direction when he said "resistance to tyrants is obedience to God," and "I have no fear that the result of our experiment will be that men may be trusted to govern themselves without a master."</p><p>---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------</p><p><u>Related articles</u>:</p><p></p><ul style="text-align: left;"><li><a href="https://www.simpleliberty.org/giaa/christian_anarchy.htm" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">https://www.simpleliberty.org/giaa/christian_anarchy.htm</a></li></ul><ul style="text-align: left;"><li><a href="http://www.anarchochristian.com/is-the-non-aggression-principle-biblical/" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">http://www.anarchochristian.com/is-the-non-aggression-principle-biblical/</a></li></ul><ul style="text-align: left;"><li>https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Christian_anarchism</li></ul><p></p><p><u>Related books</u>:</p><p></p><ul style="text-align: left;"><li><i>In Search of Jesus the Anarchist</i> by Paul Dordal</li></ul><ul style="text-align: left;"><li><i>The Kingdom of God is Within You </i>by Leo Tolstoy</li></ul><ul style="text-align: left;"><li><i>That Holy Anarchist: Reflections on Christianity & Anarchism </i>by Mark Van Steenwyk</li></ul><ul style="text-align: left;"><li><i>Tolstoy's Writings on Civil Disobedience and Non-Violence </i>(Signet Books, 1967)</li></ul><ul style="text-align: left;"><li><i>Living on Hope While Living in Babylon: The Christian Anarchists of the 20th Century</i> by Tripp York</li></ul><ul style="text-align: left;"><li><a href="https://www.nordskogpublishing.com/product/rendering-to-caesar-the-things-that-are-gods-statism-the-golden-calf-of-the-modern-world/" rel="nofollow" target="_blank"><i>Statism: The Golden Calf of the Modern World</i> by Stephen McDowell</a></li></ul><p></p><p><u><br /></u></p><p><u>Related talks</u>:</p><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><iframe allowfullscreen="" class="BLOG_video_class" height="266" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/LOhYJCjGP-I" width="320" youtube-src-id="LOhYJCjGP-I"></iframe></div><br /><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><iframe allowfullscreen="" class="BLOG_video_class" height="266" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/0xMHjAi790I" width="320" youtube-src-id="0xMHjAi790I"></iframe></div><br /><p><br /></p><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><iframe allowfullscreen="" class="BLOG_video_class" height="266" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/uSuTt_WzbPg" width="320" youtube-src-id="uSuTt_WzbPg"></iframe> <iframe allowfullscreen="" class="BLOG_video_class" height="266" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/hTy6jC8xdFw" width="320" youtube-src-id="hTy6jC8xdFw"></iframe><br /><br /><span style="font-family: courier; font-size: medium;">“It’s just extremely implausible that merely the property of being a state is explanatory for why it’s permissible to coerce people.” </span></div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><span style="font-family: courier; font-size: medium;">- Michael Huemer</span></div><p><iframe allowfullscreen="" class="BLOG_video_class" height="266" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/34VviNblx2E" width="320" youtube-src-id="34VviNblx2E"></iframe><iframe allowfullscreen="" class="BLOG_video_class" height="266" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/vb8Rj5xkDPk" width="320" youtube-src-id="vb8Rj5xkDPk"></iframe></p><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><iframe allowfullscreen="" class="BLOG_video_class" height="266" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/xMoPBDz5ycA" width="320" youtube-src-id="xMoPBDz5ycA"></iframe><iframe allowfullscreen="" class="BLOG_video_class" height="266" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/dxG8acUyYgA" width="320" youtube-src-id="dxG8acUyYgA"></iframe></div><br /><p>---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------</p><p><u>Playlist of talks on Christian Anarchism</u>:</p><p><a href=" https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PLzRXyF7K41sNau-jhiiRZye3M4G5a51Sb " rel="nofollow" target="_blank"> https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PLzRXyF7K41sNau-jhiiRZye3M4G5a51Sb</a><br /></p><p>--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- <br /></p>
<p>Some related tweets that were ignored or shadow-banned:</p>
<p style="line-height: 100%; margin-bottom: 0in;"><b><span style="font-family: Courier New, monospace;"><span style="font-size: x-small;">So
there's this school of thought that's existed for hundreds of years,
it's called anarchism; it's about not basing society on
extortion/aggression, not creating a ruling class that does immoral
things in the name of safety or the greater good. Most people call it
stupid & evil.</span></span></b></p><b>
</b><p style="line-height: 100%; margin-bottom: 0in;"><b><span style="font-family: Courier New, monospace;"><span style="font-size: x-small;">So
$191 billion tax-dollars were used to weaponize viruses against
humanity, and y'all still think anarchism is more dangerous? Oh and don't forget historical democide.</span></span></b></p><b>
</b><p style="line-height: 100%; margin-bottom: 0in;"><b><span style="font-family: Courier New, monospace;"><span style="font-size: x-small;">It's
never-ending examples of doing things in a harmful backwards way
because slavery always produces harmful and backwards results, it
never can actually produce good no matter how often it says it will;
this the anarchism and karmic reality people need to understand but
ignore.</span></span></b></p><b>
</b><p style="line-height: 100%; margin-bottom: 0in;"><b><span style="font-family: Courier New, monospace;"><span style="font-size: x-small;">Saying
anarchism doesn't solve all problems, and so should be discarded, is
the Perfect Solution Fallacy, the logical fallacy that says all
difficulties must be solved by a proposal for it to be a solution.
Anarchism solves the problem of the automatic & systemic abuse by
States.</span></span></b></p><b>
</b><p style="line-height: 100%; margin-bottom: 0in;"><b><span style="font-family: Courier New, monospace;"><span style="font-size: x-small;">Are
you against slavery and violence? Then you should be against statism
& carnism, and for anarchism & veganism. It's really that
simple.</span></span></b></p><b>
</b><p style="line-height: 100%; margin-bottom: 0in;"><b><span style="font-family: Courier New, monospace;"><span style="font-size: x-small;"><span lang="en-US">#Anarchism,
without land equality, isn't a good replacement for social-$ystems
(which we have become dependent on for survival). #Anarchy</span></span></span></b></p><b>
</b><p style="line-height: 100%; margin-bottom: 0in;"><b><span style="font-family: Courier New, monospace;"><span style="font-size: x-small;"><span lang="en-US">Human
authority loses legitimacy the moment it becomes abusive. Extortion
is a form of abuse. Controlling the bodies, businesses and travel of
nonviolent people, are forms of abuse. The so-called social contract
is really just a smokescreen for an abusive relationship. </span></span></span><span style="color: #1d9bf0;"><span style="font-family: Courier New, monospace;"><span style="font-size: x-small;"><span lang="en-US">#Anarchism101</span></span></span></span></b></p><b>
</b><p><b><span style="font-family: Courier New, monospace;"><span style="font-size: x-small;">The
hypocrisy is never ending because it's an institution based on
immorality (namely aggression e.g., extortion/taxation) acting as
society's moral authority. If most people understood that, we could
have global transformation for the better; but they don't, so we
don't. #ChristianAnarchism</span></span></b></p><p>
<b><span style="font-family: Courier New, monospace;"><span style="font-size: x-small;">To
make an institution that only exists because of aggression (e.g.,
extortion/taxation) the moral authority for humanity ignores history
and the fact that God didn't create a world in which good can be
secured via evil. </span></span></b>
</p><p>
<b><span style="font-family: Courier New, monospace;"><span style="font-size: x-small;">Why
is ->unalienable<- rights hard to understand? Why are more
people not pointing out that if you're not *actually* violating
someone else's rights than you get to keep yours, and preemptive
attack "to try and save lives" is not legit?
Basic/foundational ethics is critical for effective resistance. </span></span></b>
</p><p><b><span style="font-family: Courier New, monospace;"><span style="font-size: x-small;">
Again
with the "we." If you understood why it's irrational to say
that you'd also know why all these irrational police actions take
place: slavery is irrational, slave-masters aren't aligned with logic
& goodness. Anarchism101 to be ignored cuz "it's not that
simple." Yes, it is.</span></span></b></p><p><b><span style="font-family: Courier New, monospace;"><span style="font-size: x-small;">
</span></span><span style="font-family: Courier New, monospace;"><span style="font-size: x-small;"><span lang="en-US">When
the means of accomplishing a good end are evil, e.g.,
aggression/extortion, the end will invariably be evil too; you'd
think humans would have noticed this pattern repeating for thousands
of years, but no, idol-worship over ethics, again & again.
Philosophical Anarchism 101.</span></span></span></b></p><b>
</b><p style="line-height: 100%; margin-bottom: 0in;"><b><span style="font-family: Courier New, monospace;"><span style="font-size: x-small;"><span lang="en-US">You
set up positions of power so some people can rule over other people,
and the former will get the idea that the latter are their livestock,
and the more that idea becomes reality, the more they like it.
Anarchist philosophy 101. #EndMedicalMandates #IrelandHasFallen</span></span></span></b></p><b>
</b><p><b><span style="font-family: Courier New, monospace;"><span style="font-size: x-small;">How
about the "personal boundary" of other people not getting
to coerce you to take whatever drugs they want to inject you with?
The fact that there's any debate over this is sad and ridiculous;
being a slave isn't safe, even if you're a healthy slave. Basics for
Humanity 101. </span></span></b>
</p><b>
</b><p style="line-height: 100%; margin-bottom: 0in;"><b><span style="font-family: Courier New, monospace;"><span style="font-size: x-small;"><span lang="en-US">They
were always the latter and never really the former; a servant doesn't
carry out extortion and aggression against the person they're
serving, that's an insoluble contradiction, covered over by
indoctrination. #</span></span></span><span style="font-family: Courier New, monospace;"><span style="font-size: x-small;"><span lang="en-US">A</span></span></span><span style="font-family: Courier New, monospace;"><span style="font-size: x-small;"><span lang="en-US">narchism</span></span></span><span style="font-family: Courier New, monospace;"><span style="font-size: x-small;"><span lang="en-US">
</span></span></span><span style="font-family: Courier New, monospace;"><span style="font-size: x-small;"><span lang="en-US">101</span></span></span></b></p><b>
</b><p style="line-height: 100%; margin-bottom: 0in;"><b><span style="font-family: Courier New, monospace;"><span style="font-size: x-small;">So
if you won't accept injections filled with whatever they want,
they'll contaminate the whole water supply with IQ-lowering
fluoride... also for "safety" of course. At what point
would anarchism not be "crazy" to the masses? That requires
critical thinking... so fluoridate H2O.</span></span></b>
</p><p style="line-height: 100%; margin-bottom: 0in;"><b><span style="font-family: Courier New, monospace;"><span style="font-size: x-small;">Because
what you say here is indeed possible, among other countless examples
of destructive use of unnatural power, anarchism is actually the
safer way, but that crucial truth and solution is constantly brushed
aside, so the pattern and downward spiral continues. Statism is dumb.</span></span></b></p><b>
</b><p style="line-height: 100%; margin-bottom: 0in;"><b><span style="font-family: Courier New, monospace;"><span style="font-size: x-small;">Wrongly
conflating anarchism with senseless violence & destruction is a
discrediting tactic used for centuries; true anarchists don't believe
having rulers is best for society, because ruling over others is
itself violence, true anarchists are more anti-violence than any
statist.</span></span></b>
</p><p style="line-height: 100%; margin-bottom: 0in;"><b><span style="font-family: Courier New, monospace;"><span style="font-size: x-small;"><span lang="en-US">How
is setting up society on a foundation of extortion, creating
positions of mostly unaccountable power, a better idea than
anarchism? Every statist response I've ever heard is nonsense; folks
need "individual sovereignty" in their daily vocabulary to
end the karma of #slavery.</span></span></span></b>
</p><p style="line-height: 100%; margin-bottom: 0in;"><b><span style="font-family: Courier New, monospace;"><span style="font-size: x-small;">If
you give an inch, they'll take a mile. Anarchism is better than
statism, tyranny is not safety.</span></span></b></p><b>
</b><p style="line-height: 100%; margin-bottom: 0in;"><b><span style="font-family: Courier New, monospace;"><span style="font-size: x-small;"><span lang="en-US">A</span></span></span><span style="font-family: Courier New, monospace;"><span style="font-size: x-small;"><span lang="en-US">
servant doesn't carry out extortion and aggression against the person
they're serving, that's an insoluble contradiction, covered over by
indoctrination. #anarchism 101</span></span></span></b></p><b>
</b><p style="line-height: 100%; margin-bottom: 0in;"><b><span style="font-family: Courier New, monospace;"><span style="font-size: x-small;">The
fundamental blunder is believing the smart idea is to set up a small
group of humans (called "representatives") to rule over
everyone else (supposedly kept angelic by a principled guiding
document & institutional "checks & balances"),
because anarchism is surely a worse idea.</span></span></b></p><b>
</b><p style="line-height: 100%; margin-bottom: 0in;"><b><span style="font-family: Courier New, monospace;"><span style="font-size: x-small;"><span lang="en-US">There's
a crucial "Aha" moment for anyone working for
#SocialJustice, when they realize all the things they're protesting
come from Establishment Institutions, & those Institutions were
established by a non-voluntary coercive system. "So, origins
matter. #Anarchism is necessary."</span></span></span></b></p><b>
</b><p style="line-height: 100%; margin-bottom: 0in;"><b><span style="font-family: Courier New, monospace;"><span style="font-size: x-small;">You
can't establish greater peace & justice through a form of
violence; extortion is a form of violence; <a href="https://duckduckgo.com/?q=why+taxation+is+theft&t=brave&ia=web" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">taxation is a form of extortion</a>. This is why anarchism makes sense, but societal
conditioning against it is so thick that cognitive dissonance can
beat logic.</span></span></b></p><p style="line-height: 100%; margin-bottom: 0in;"><b><span style="font-family: Courier New, monospace;"><span style="font-size: x-small;"><span lang="en-US">Wisdom
"separating the wheat from the chaff" -> "And if
you only greet those you already know, what do you do more than
others? Don't even the tax collectors do that?" -Yeshua the
Messiah (aka #Jesus Christ), Matthew 5:47 </span></span></span></b>
</p><p style="line-height: 100%; margin-bottom: 0in;"><b><span style="font-family: Courier New, monospace;"><span style="font-size: x-small;"><span lang="en-US">Jesus
called tax collectors immoral and said those that have to pay taxes
are not free. (Read Matthew 5:47 & 17:26) #BibleStudy #Anarchism</span></span></span></b></p><b>
</b><p style="line-height: 100%; margin-bottom: 0in;"><b><span style="font-family: Courier New, monospace;"><span style="font-size: x-small;"><span lang="en-US">Media
keeps portraying #anarchism as irrational & violent; a
never-ending smear-campaign against rational & nonviolent
anarchist philosophy.</span></span></span></b></p><p style="line-height: 100%; margin-bottom: 0in;"><b><span style="font-family: Courier New, monospace;"><span style="font-size: x-small;"><span lang="en-US">Veganarchism:</span></span></span><span style="font-family: Courier New, monospace;"><span style="font-size: x-small;"> synonyms:
nonviolence, non-exploitation</span></span><span style="font-family: Courier New, monospace;"><span style="font-size: x-small;">.</span></span><span style="font-family: Courier New, monospace;"><span style="font-size: x-small;">
</span></span>
<span style="font-family: Courier New, monospace;"><span style="font-size: x-small;">antonyms:
carnism, statism</span></span><span style="font-family: Courier New, monospace;"><span style="font-size: x-small;">.</span></span></b></p><b>
</b><p style="line-height: 100%; margin-bottom: 0in;"><b><span style="font-family: Courier New, monospace;"><span style="font-size: x-small;"><span lang="en-US">Anarchism
and Veganism, the "extreme" notions that people and animals
aren't the property of other people. Check your beliefs. </span></span></span></b>
</p><p style="line-height: 100%; margin-bottom: 0in;"><b><span style="font-family: Courier New, monospace;"><span style="font-size: x-small;"><span lang="en-US">Anarchism
& Veganism, the "extreme" notions that other sentient
life isn't your property, i.e. slavery is an evil. </span></span></span></b></p><p style="line-height: 100%; margin-bottom: 0in;"><b><span style="font-family: Courier New, monospace;"><span style="font-size: x-small;">Veganism
& Anarchism are complimentary; both are fundamentally against
aggression & slavery (done by humans to animals, & humans to
humans).</span></span></b></p><b>
</b><p style="line-height: 100%; margin-bottom: 0in;"><b><span style="font-family: Courier New, monospace;"><span style="font-size: x-small;">Reformism
is wrong medicine used for a misdiagnosis of the disease. Anarchism
is the right medicine used for the tru</span></span><span style="font-family: Courier New, monospace;"><span style="font-size: x-small;">e
disease.</span></span></b>
</p><p style="line-height: 100%; margin-bottom: 0in;"><b><span style="font-family: Courier New, monospace;"><span style="font-size: x-small;"><span lang="en-US">If
you want to stop future abuses of power like the killing of Eric</span></span></span><span style="font-family: Courier New, monospace;"><span style="font-size: x-small;"><span lang="en-US">
</span></span></span><span style="font-family: Courier New, monospace;"><span style="font-size: x-small;"><span lang="en-US">Garner
then stop being a fool supporting State power, support anarchism.</span></span></span></b></p><b>
</b><p style="line-height: 100%; margin-bottom: 0in;"><b><span style="font-family: Courier New, monospace;"><span style="font-size: x-small;"><span lang="en-US">The
destructiveness of racism/ignorance is intensified via artificial
centralization of power into the hands of the few. We need
#anarchism.</span></span></span></b>
</p><p style="line-height: 100%; margin-bottom: 0in;"><b><span style="font-family: Courier New, monospace;"><span style="font-size: x-small;"><span lang="en-US">The
solution I'm referring to is sustainable egalitarian anarchism:
gift-economy communities of sovereign veganic homesteads. </span></span></span></b>
</p><p style="line-height: 100%; margin-bottom: 0in;"><b><span style="font-family: Courier New, monospace;"><span style="font-size: x-small;"><span lang="en-US">Why
supporting social-systems, instead of #anarchism, is what's truly
wishful thinking, irrational, and unrealistic:</span></span></span><span style="font-family: Courier New, monospace;"><span style="font-size: x-small;"><span lang="en-US">
</span></span></span><span style="font-family: Courier New, monospace;"><span style="font-size: x-small;"><span lang="en-US">colindonoghue.wordpress.com</span></span></span></b>
</p><p style="line-height: 100%; margin-bottom: 0in;"><b><span style="font-family: Courier New, monospace;"><span style="font-size: x-small;"><span lang="en-US">"Tolstoy
believed the state to be an intrinsically violent institution, and
concluded the Gospel implies anarchism."</span></span></span></b></p><b>
</b><p style="line-height: 100%; margin-bottom: 0in;"><b><span style="font-family: Courier New, monospace;"><span style="font-size: x-small;">Are
you saying the state is overall good or bad? If the former, how do
your ensure a benevolent state and override the reality of "power
corrupts"? If the latter, why not clearly endorse egalitarian
anarchism wherein everyone has land & water?</span></span></b>
</p><p style="line-height: 100%; margin-bottom: 0in;"><b>“<span style="font-family: Courier New, monospace;"><span style="font-size: x-small;"><span lang="en-US">The
reason there will be no change is because the people who stand to
lose from change have all the power. And the people who stand to gain
from change have none of the power.” - Machiavelli Solution: Humans
claiming their birthright to Sovereign Veganic Homesteads. #anarchism</span></span></span></b>
</p><p style="line-height: 100%; margin-bottom: 0in;"><b><span style="font-family: Courier New, monospace;"><span style="font-size: x-small;"><span lang="en-US">"Occupy
Your Garden" actually encapsulates the solution to all the major
political, economic & environmental problems in the world, in
just 3 words. Of course the idea needs to be unpacked & I do in
this agrarian #anarchism essay:
<a href="https://t.co/5C7wEABrvZ?amp=1" target="_blank">https://colindonoghue.wordpress.com/2014/05/16/the-root-injustice-a-real-way-forward-to-a-sustainable-society/</a>
</span></span></span></b>
</p><b>
</b><p style="line-height: 100%; margin-bottom: 0in;"><b><span style="font-family: Courier New, monospace;"><span style="font-size: x-small;"><span lang="en-US">About
370 years ago a man named Gerrard Winstanley made pamphlets that
struck at the root of social injustice, including the spiritual
dimension of it. Unsurprisingly in this world dominated by delusion,
he's been mostly ignored. #LandRights #RadicalHistory #Anarchism
#Homesteads</span></span></span></b></p><p style="line-height: 100%; margin-bottom: 0in;"><span style="font-family: Courier New, monospace;"><span style="font-size: x-small;"><span lang="en-US"></span></span></span></p><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><span style="font-family: Courier New, monospace;"><span style="font-size: x-small;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiGDdgRaHNn6rdFe6PpzqiwMGnUw5LUO2M7-dRFN8pK0zOynoq9mO3NCKr3CZOmEXRJWj4inUM17MN1k_A56cvDqnhQsM_65N01sBXOGQDI9kHV-KSsurdoeRhpEgKwM1_zpF5Akvg0CYos/s2048/Winstanley.jpg" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;" target="_blank"><img border="0" data-original-height="2048" data-original-width="1902" height="400" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiGDdgRaHNn6rdFe6PpzqiwMGnUw5LUO2M7-dRFN8pK0zOynoq9mO3NCKr3CZOmEXRJWj4inUM17MN1k_A56cvDqnhQsM_65N01sBXOGQDI9kHV-KSsurdoeRhpEgKwM1_zpF5Akvg0CYos/w371-h400/Winstanley.jpg" width="371" /></a></span></span></div><br />Unknownnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2111239628760080078.post-78743777984989222102021-09-06T15:21:00.041-07:002022-06-05T12:32:42.754-07:00Free People Don't Have Health Masters<div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><img border="0" data-original-height="557" data-original-width="990" height="180" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEht22ffAcJfE9u5vJvlr676coICES51gP2kjutztQ73Q8RGjzpUZCIxHt97LGDBYb7ExH7ptJJD95_8zsa8i7MduwkeUsCRqTYdRAxKAziDDk79HAcgBqzFf3QGxmyfY7IFjO8IU2m6D7iukvIqRoRNAcBgRiG04nRZa0dmc-zder_tgMegc4dvONKdPg/s320/3ab48063-2eeb-43b5-aa0c-b6892c458927-large~3.jpg" width="320" /></div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"> </div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;">New "Pandemic Treaty" Warning: Was 2020-2022 a global test run for permanent medical tyranny?</div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;">New Petition Against World Health Organization's Plans:</div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;"><br /></div>"The past two years has been rife with infringements on civil rights by national governments, but now the World Health Organization is seeking to appropriate those same draconian powers to itself at a global level.<br /><br />194 countries representing 99% of the world's population are expected to sign pandemic treaties that would allow the WHO to dictate exactly how your nation responds to a new disease outbreak which <i>they</i> consider a pandemic.<br /><br />These are precarious times in which freedom and self-determination must be defended from those who would ride rough-shod over your civil rights.<br /><br />Tell the WHO you will never live under their control:</div><div><a href="https://lifepetitions.com/petition/stop-tedros-who-pandemic-treaty" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">https://lifepetitions.com/petition/stop-tedros-who-pandemic-treaty</a><br /><br />The wheels are already in motion, with the Biden administration submitting amendments to the WHO's International Health Regulations (IHR), which would give the Director General the right to declare health emergencies in any nation, even when disputed by the country in question.<br /><br />These amendments, which will be legally binding if passed by the World Health Assembly (the governing body of the WHO), set the stage for a fully-fledged pandemic treaty to be passed.<br /><br />SIGN THE PETITION<br /><br /><a href="https://lifepetitions.com/petition/stop-tedros-who-pandemic-treaty" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">https://lifepetitions.com/petition/stop-tedros-who-pandemic-treaty</a><br /><br />With 20 national leaders already calling for a Pandemic Treaty, we must oppose a return to global lockdowns, vaccine mandates and propoganda, most of all from the WHO.<br /><br />Our right to self-determination must be respected in all policy decisions.<br /><br />Thank you for SIGNING and SHARING this petition to show the WHO that you won't accept their power-grab.<br /><br />Yours faithfully,<br /><br />Tim Jackson and the entire Team at LifeSite"</div><div>-------------------------------------------------------<br /><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"> </div><p align="center" style="line-height: 100%; margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="font-size: medium;"><b><u>The Exact Reasons Why
Medical Mandates Are Wrong</u></b></span></p><br /><br /><div style="text-align: center;">"Tyranny is defined as that which is legal for the government,</div><div style="text-align: center;">but illegal for the citizenry.”</div><div style="text-align: center;">- Thomas Jefferson</div><br />Medical mandates are not ethically legitimate, and should not be accepted, because:<br /><br /> 1) One neighbor does not have the right to coerce another neighbor into being tested for a disease (a test which may or may not be accurate), or into using a medical device (like a mask), or into taking some kind of pill or injection. That would be abusive control, it would be criminal. <u>The reason it is wrong and criminal for you to coerce your neighbor to take medical tests, drugs, or use medical devices, is the same exact reason why it is wrong and criminal for politicians to do that; it does not become okay just because they are people on TV that say the word “emergency</u>.”<br /><br /> 2) Governments are people too (“of the people”), and we are not the livestock of these other people; we refuse to be human livestock on their farms that they can control and medicate however they want to; they are not our parents, we are not their children; they are not our masters, we are not their slaves; when they do something abusive, it’s still abuse regardless of what crisis is happening (or is reported to be happening by the fear-pushing mass-media or designed-to-be-addictive social-media). Politicians can be mistaken or deceptive (and sometimes even create a crisis so that they can offer their “solution” of having more power); pharmaceutical companies (making tens of billions of dollars off this, and not liable for any injuries or deaths caused by their products) can be mistaken or deceptive. Coercing people to trust them with our lives and the lives of our children, to inject with whatever they want to (like aborted fetal cells), forever, is just plain evil; it’s authoritarian medical tyranny, it’s totalitarianism, fascism (merging of Big Pharma and Law, purchase and use of their products made mandatory) and Communism (the State taking control of private business and the most fundamental form of private property: our own bodies). <u>Government employees don’t own the bodies of non-government employees; again, citizens aren’t the livestock of the State</u>. <u>Freedom is another form of safety; we aren’t safe if we don’t have the freedom to control our own bodies</u> (or the freedom to protect our bodies, with whatever weapon needed to do so).<br /><br /> 3) Preemptive attack is when someone is committing real violence now, to supposedly prevent possible violence or harm; if we accept this bunk premise, then people could commit violence whenever they say “it’s for safety” or “the greater good.” One neighbor cannot be abusive toward another neighbor (for example, by disarming that neighbor, or pushing drugs on them) just because they say “it’s for safety.” <u>Preemptive attack in any form, including medical mandates, is never ethically legitimate; it’s bunk morality used by abusers over and over as supposed justification for their abuse</u>.<p></p><p style="line-height: 100%; margin-bottom: 0in; text-align: left;"><span style="font-size: x-large;">------------------------------------</span></p><p style="line-height: 100%; margin-bottom: 0in; text-align: left;">[please copy and print the above as a one-page flyer for in-person distribution (that's the most effective way to educate on this right now)]</p><p style="line-height: 100%; margin-bottom: 0in;"><span style="font-size: x-large;">------------------------------------</span><br /><br />And here's an additional idea, ask all members of law enforcement that you know the following questions: <br />"If one citizen were to go next door to a neighboring citizen and start coercing them to take certain drugs and use certain medical devices, would that be a crime? What crime exactly? What's the exact words for that criminal offense? Why can't a person who is simply a government employee not be charged with that same offense with that same exact crime? If someone has a title "governor" does that make them above the law any time they say the word "emergency"? Can they do whatever they want as long as they say "it's for safety"? If the law does not apply to them, what protection is there from a dictator or tyrant who can easily hide behind the false "caretaker" role by just saying the word "safety" over and over?"</p><p style="line-height: 100%; margin-bottom: 0in;"><br /></p><div>---------------------------------------------------</div><div style="clear: both; text-align: center;">Communist Medical Tyranny and Genocide in China: </div><div style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PLuNA3yIh-KFmchkHnHjH0iJB_ragBNveT" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PLuNA3yIh-KFmchkHnHjH0iJB_ragBNveT</a></div><span style="font-size: large;">-------------------------------------------</span></div><div><span style="font-size: large;"><br /></span></div><div>Additional thoughts on medical mandates:</div><div><ul style="text-align: left;"><li>What if a lot more people were dying of an illness (and not just the "medicine")? What if it was a real and obvious pandemic? Many people would say, "Well now we certainly need to accept medical mandates." Wrong. As long as people think inalienable rights are actually only valid in non-emergency circumstances, all the control-freaks have to do is up the level of emergency until most people agree it's "reasonable precautionary measures." People need to get a handle on the ethical fundamentals: aggression (e.g., coercing people to stay home, not travel, not assemble, get vaccines, etc.) is evil, and preemptive attack in the name of public health & safety is a form of aggression. Otherwise the door stays open for deception and abuse.</li></ul><ul style="text-align: left;"><li>Concerning churches being forced to close, freedom of assembly and religion, violated because some people are sick and dying in the world, is 0% ethically valid. Counting on States to protect our natural rights is foolish because there's no guarantee they will, no matter what's written in a Constitution, and because the main master-slave arrangement of automatic citizenship and extortion/taxation is aggression, so it's fundamentally relying on someone who's been repeatedly attacking/violating you to also simultaneously defend you from attack/violation, which is irrational, it's actually an impossibility. If most people could really understand this we could transform into a truly just/nonviolent/free society, but Stockholm Syndrome is unfortunately very dominant and entrenched worldwide.</li></ul><ul style="text-align: left;"><li>Yet pro-mandaters think they're smarter, saying things like "It's an INFECTIOUS DISEASE, we have to take precautions you dumbass!," as if we don't understand what infectious means or that we don't think anything infectious exists, or don't believe in any form of healthcare or medicine; they are projecting their own ignorance, in this case an ignorance of what tyranny is (unable to define it if asked) and mislabeling it simply "precautions," and if they do have some understanding of what tyranny is, they don't believe it can actually exist here and now, because of "checks & balances & voting & rule of law."</li></ul><ul style="text-align: left;"><li>Abuse/Tyranny/Slavery is never actually a valid response to a sickness (voluntary precautions are), because that's just adding one problem on top of another, and two problems are worse than one; it's really that simple, but the mass-media and politicians are constantly trying to confuse you and make it seem more ethically complicated than it really is. A website like <a href="https://www.vaclib.org/" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Vaccine Liberation</a> should never have been needed to be created.</li></ul><ul style="text-align: left;"><li>It's good to give accurate perspective on this so-called pandemic, but in a sense the numbers are irrelevant, when we are talking about freedom vs. slavery; at what % mortality from a virus is it justified to have your life controlled by other people, people that simply have the State as their employer? 5%? 50%? To be open to enslavement under any circumstances = an inferiority complex ingrained via indoctrination. Aggression is always wrong, as is slavery; true morality is absent in the mass-media programming. </li></ul><ul style="text-align: left;"><li>The possibility that authorities could be wrong, or even malicious, is unthinkable to those in which the irrational indoctrination that "those with power are the most trustworthy" is still unshaken, the cognitive dissonance acting as a shield to their core beliefs, all questioning of authority perceived as irrational, projecting their own irrational trust in it; and so the world gets worse, one big lie deception at a time, preemptive attacks tightening the controls on a population perceived as human livestock by "the elite." </li></ul>
</div><p style="text-align: left;"><style type="text/css">p { margin-bottom: 0.1in; line-height: 115% }</style></p>
Unknownnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2111239628760080078.post-25022036490325423112021-07-17T14:37:00.006-07:002021-08-22T20:16:43.082-07:00Natural Births vs. Satanic Hospital Birth Protocols<div><p> </p><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgvSZSRc_ElxhA8sUZke8rlTGEESwITO4IIzSp_m6c2SoikdO2G8bz3nvabbS087Nf_QHt5K5vlHG6IhOitQLsnIXrXxPU2ogJt5D_3ZrR5zhW9yAMnu29mZUpzC8YKHQvbVUIdjH14IqAf/s2048/pexels-jonathan-borba-3259629.jpg" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="2048" data-original-width="1365" height="320" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgvSZSRc_ElxhA8sUZke8rlTGEESwITO4IIzSp_m6c2SoikdO2G8bz3nvabbS087Nf_QHt5K5vlHG6IhOitQLsnIXrXxPU2ogJt5D_3ZrR5zhW9yAMnu29mZUpzC8YKHQvbVUIdjH14IqAf/s320/pexels-jonathan-borba-3259629.jpg" /></a></div><br />[updated August 22nd, 2021]</div><div> <br /></div><div>This post contains important info for you to review concerning hospital birth protocols, which have been called satanic in that they are abusive to the infant and mother, and damage an infant's trust in people in general through the birth trauma, as well undermine their physical & mental health. The basic lesson to take away from all of this information is a) the more natural the birth the safer, and b) avoiding hospitals for childbirth is actually a good idea (even though that's not what's taught in mainstream society).</div><div>Again there does appear to be an agenda to traumatize children during birth, immediately after birth, and then continuing afterward with <a href="https://circumcision.org/male-circumcision-information-summary/" target="_blank">circumcision of boys</a>, and sexual abuse of both boys and girls. This needs to be fully exposed and eradicated for humanity to progress.<br /><br />Hospital Birth Protocols include: Immediate cord clamping (cutting large amount of oxygen flow to baby, one third of the baby’s oxygen-rich blood stays behind in the placenta, damaging baby's brain & body), artificial Vitamin K shot with other ingredients (which can cause anaphylactic shock), wrapping baby in tight artificial/chemical blanket to quiet them (also traumatizing, inducing shock), breaking the water artificially which makes the contractions painful for the baby, internal heart monitoring with an electrode attached to the baby's head (which is painful to the baby), blinding eye drops given immediately (disallowing eye-to-eye bonding with mother), etc.<br /> <br /></div><span style="color: black; font-family: georgia, serif;"><span><span style="line-height: 16px;"> </span></span></span><img border="0" data-original-height="387" data-original-width="626" height="248" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhvzoks0xRpN9UrWfWVwW5z_v9w59hV78dRqF1N5Any6-lSzEDSYf0Y5izOcNKcDSrUPAkz-6QKLhadQCodXw1T-9a39U5_qdEzPS6PePTUMDYeoqptQnLwcDqVIdd5dXnD8j1xgPC4Gz5j/w400-h248/barcelo2015sd.jpg" width="400" />
<div class="gmail_default"><span style="color: black; font-family: georgia, serif;"><br /></span></div><p><span style="font-family: georgia;"><span style="color: black; font-size: small;"><span style="line-height: 17.3611px;"></span></span></span><span style="font-family: georgia;"></span>All hospital birth protocols inflict pain repeatedly on the baby and undermine <br /> a human love-bond between mother and child.<br /><br /> -- Horizontal position which makes it more difficult for mother and baby, causing the "need" for more invasive/harmful drugs/procedures.<br />– Sonograms (harmful radiation).<br />– Induction (very invasive and harmful, also the baby gets the message s/he is not in charge of its own destiny.)<br /> – Amniotomy: Breaking/removing the water; the water is there to protect the baby from the intensity of contractions, so results in pain for baby.<br /> - Fetal heart monitor screwed into the baby’s head at soft spot (the spot called "the seat of transmissions from the divine mind"), the screw pulls an tugs with every contraction, very painful. <br /><br />During a natural/normal birth the baby signals to the mother's body, and the mother starts making the necessary chemicals naturally. In unnatural/abnormal births, these Artificial Drugs are used: </p><p>– Pitocin: “Pit to distress”: can cause "need" for a C section, (synthetic oxytocin). The mother’s ability to bond wit her baby is undermined. Basically mothers not producing natural oxytocin = no bonding at birth, and thereby the child is negatively programmed. Pitocin causes unnatural and intense contractions. No rest in between. Uterus is made to be as harsh as a mechanical compactor.<span class="style-scope yt-formatted-string" dir="auto"> "Most women during hospital birth, at least in the USSA are given a chemical called pitocin which supposedly speeds up the birth.. </span><span class="style-scope yt-formatted-string" dir="auto">
</span><span class="style-scope yt-formatted-string" dir="auto">
</span><span class="style-scope yt-formatted-string" dir="auto">and what this does among other things, is interrupt the natural chemical oxytocin, which is a Love bonding chemical that all mammals produce while giving birth.. </span><span class="style-scope yt-formatted-string" dir="auto">
</span><span class="style-scope yt-formatted-string" dir="auto">
</span><span class="style-scope yt-formatted-string" dir="auto">So the pitocin is given sometimes just because some doctor wants to get to the golf game or whatever.. I think something like 80% of hospital births are with pitocin.. </span><span class="style-scope yt-formatted-string" dir="auto">
</span><span class="style-scope yt-formatted-string" dir="auto">
</span><span class="style-scope yt-formatted-string" dir="auto">and so, the natural bond between mother and baby is severed that way too..." The </span>natural oxytocin is released by the body is called the "hormone of well being and
love," again creating good contractions that massage all the
systems and organs in the baby’s body ("butterfly massage").<br />– Cytotec used to enhance induction procedure, ripening the uterus,<br /> doing extreme harm and pain.<br />– Remifentanil: opiate resulting in a confused, disoriented baby.<br /> – Epidural: anesthesia introduced in between the vertebrae. Mother cannot move, cannot help the baby being born. The natural opiates are not forthcoming. Mothers may not feel anything, the baby is feeling all the more pain. She is strapped, laying down, which is narrowing her pelvis. Now the baby has no help, is completely abandoned, knowing there is something out there that is dangerous.<br />– Vitamin K, anaphylactic shock. (see: <a href="http://www.vaccination.inoz.com/VitaminK.html">http://www.vaccination.inoz.com/VitaminK.html</a>)<br /> - A high # of vaccines are given to infants, especially in the USA, and there is very good reason to be weary of them:<br /><a href="https://www.blogger.com/#">http://www.naturalnews.com/043662_vaccine_safety_medical_myths_junk_science.html</a><br /> <br />Also in hospital births there is:<br /><br /> – C sections: compounding the imprint of being helpless on the baby's mind, i.e., "someone outside has to do it for me," no victory of life.<br />– Eye drops for baby, prevents eye contact with parents, prevents bonding and the activating of the capacity for love. "If this neurobiology is not activated at birth, it does not happen."</p><p>- Genital mutilation, a.k.a. "circumcision" ==> <a href="https://www.iaim.net/extreme-trauma-from-male-circumcision-causes-damage-to-areas-of-brain/">https://www.iaim.net/extreme-trauma-from-male-circumcision-causes-damage-to-areas-of-brain/</a><br /><br />In a <i>natural birth</i>, there is:</p><p>-Fulfillment of human love, the family has a memory that can keep the family together for life…</p><p>– Skin to skin contact and smell are the primary means for the love beginning to occur. </p><p>More info on natural birthing (and negatives of hospital protocol):<br /> <br /><a href="http://wellnessmama.com/6657/natural-birth-options-and-tips/">http://wellnessmama.com/6657/natural-birth-options-and-tips/</a><br /> <br /><a href="https://www.blogger.com/#">http://whale.to/a/birth_trauma_h.html </a><br /></p><p></p>Unknownnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2111239628760080078.post-26720435396192892652021-07-15T12:07:00.255-07:002022-07-18T14:04:13.484-07:00Top 10 Mistakes of Mainstream Pauline Christianity<table align="center" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" class="tr-caption-container" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;"><tbody><tr><td style="text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEibhVMVto1XKV_Wfx9rNIyAWcXLV8yfNrHmkcysqj7r31S-UbwXV1tNYqjNz1dNkW3zvd8YoAXMl6LtMjRE9eOkS7e75orXaooYvmP9EJ-LHfBkrYxHpuCGOAK54IQM9cdAJY1P9lBI8WUWnX6r9qv2yqKttijvEbn7JXmR__uCMmOK9vOGzoYEUSeatA/s4073/2%20books%202%20read.jpg" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;"><img border="0" data-original-height="2885" data-original-width="4073" height="284" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEibhVMVto1XKV_Wfx9rNIyAWcXLV8yfNrHmkcysqj7r31S-UbwXV1tNYqjNz1dNkW3zvd8YoAXMl6LtMjRE9eOkS7e75orXaooYvmP9EJ-LHfBkrYxHpuCGOAK54IQM9cdAJY1P9lBI8WUWnX6r9qv2yqKttijvEbn7JXmR__uCMmOK9vOGzoYEUSeatA/w400-h284/2%20books%202%20read.jpg" width="400" /></a></td></tr><tr><td class="tr-caption" style="text-align: center;">The truth is out there.<br /><br /></td></tr></tbody></table>“Enter by the narrow gate. For the gate is wide and the way is easy that leads to destruction, and those who enter by it are many. For the gate is narrow and the way is hard that leads to life, and those who find it are few." - Jesus (Matthew 7:13-14)<div><br /></div><div><div>"But if you do not listen, I will weep in secret because of your pride. My eyes will overflow with tears, because the Lord's flock has been taken captive." (Jeremiah 13:17)</div><p></p>[updated July 18th, 2022]<br /><p></p><p>Over the years as I've read more Christian books, heard more Christian speakers, contemplated the various teachings and also the Reality I perceive in my own life, I've come to see that there are some major specific mistakes made by mainstream Christianity, repeatedly preached on a daily basis, that take listeners away from what Jesus & God were actually teaching, and what Their living presence continues to teach us (if we pay attention).</p><p>If these 10 corrections to mainstream Christianity were made, the true faith could be restored, but unfortunately most idol-worshiping Christians will see these truths as falsehoods because they've been so thoroughly deceived. </p><p><b>1. "We should fear God." </b>No, we definitely should <i>not</i> fear God, we should <i>revere </i>God; that is the correct translation and it is also what doesn't contradict the teachings of Jesus and the apostle John, et al.. The Greek and Hebrew dictionaries along will footnotes in Bibles will tell you "or revere" as an equally valid translation of the word translated into "fear<u>,</u>" <u>yet fear and reverence are not at all synonymous terms; revere means "to feel great respect or admiration," and to equate that with fear is incorrect;</u> <u><i><b>fear and love are actually incompatible</b></i> (as said so in 1 John 4:18), <i>and we are commanded to love God, so therefore it sabotages our ability to obey God's command.</i></u> Fear is actually from the Enemy, so saying that we should employ the Enemy in serving God is actually a form of trying to "serve two masters," as Jesus warned us against. This is not a minor technicality; again, it's directly undermining obedience to the first and Greatest Commandment, and that's no small thing. It may seem that fearing God's punishment for disobedience is a good thing, that fearing the consequences of sin is a good thing "to keep us in line," but we can actually not want those bad consequences without fear involved, just as we can not want to burn our hand from a candle flame without being afraid of the flame; fear is the enemy, not our friend, even in a crisis; we don't need fear to want to avoid sin or avoid something clearly dangerous like a fire. Again the apostle John said "love has no fear, because perfect love expels all fear. If we are afraid, <u>it is for fear of punishment, and this shows that we have not fully experienced his perfect love</u>." John <i>spoke directly against this idea that fear of punishment is a good thing</i>, something Christians shouldn't ignore because they they think "common wisdom" on fear is what's actually correct; the suppressed truth is that there is <i>no reason we should think fearfully of God;</i> again <i>it's letting the devil in our relationship with God</i>, which again is no small thing, it's a major error.</p><p><b>2.</b> <b>"The Word of God is the Bible."</b> No, it's not. The Word of God is Jesus and The Holy Spirit; yes there is certainly writing that was Divinely inspired that can be found in the compilation of books and letters called The Bible, yes the prophets Isaiah, Jeremiah, Amos, Micah, the letters of James and John, The Gospels of Luke, Mark, Matthew & John, The Book of Psalms, et al., all contain extremely valuable and uplifting teachings worth studying intensively daily, and of course the words of Jesus, when true to him actually speaking them and perfectly translated, are certainly <i>like</i> hearing directly from God, <i>but</i> one particular compilation of writing should <i>not</i> be considered Divine itself, i.e., the canonization and <i>deification</i> of certain writing into what we now call The Holy Bible, wherein "church authorities" have included highly questionable content like the letters of Paul while excluding other writing that is definitely worthy of study (e.g., The Book of Ecclesiasticus/Sirach/Ben Sira). Most Christians repeat the words of Paul that "all Scripture is inspired by God," words found in one of Paul's letters (2 Timothy 3:16), as if because Paul called his letters Scripture it just automatically becomes pure words from the mouth of God; it's actually pure idolatry of Paul, Paul who said many things that do actually contradict the teachings of Jesus, and words that will contradict the will of the living God which is available for us to discover in our own daily lives.</p><p>When the apostle Peter wrote that we must be "born again, not of <i>corruptible</i> seed, but of incorruptible, through the living and enduring word of God" (1 Peter 1:23), the particular compilation of letters and books we call The Bible didn't exist, and on top of that he was clearly not talking about a book as incorruptible (when writing corrupted by scribes, intentionally and unintentionally, is no conspiracy theory but a reality), he certainly wasn't just talking about a book when speaking of the <i>living </i>word of God; it's only <i>idolatry</i> and <i>appeal to tradition/authority</i> that blinds someone to this obvious fact and has them idol-worship a book, but think it really isn't idol-worship, when it clearly is<i>.</i> Again we can definitely be pointed to God from words written on paper, but those words on paper are not the actual living Word of God; to think certain words on paper are Divine is actually a form of idol-worship <i>because you are idolizing the writer and translator of those words as if they were God Himself, and you are denying God is a living being</i>. <i>God is not a book</i>; that should not be a controversial statement; nor is Jesus a character in a book, he is <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p2gNaR0PcEw" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">a living reality</a>, an <a href="https://youtu.be/sJXWVONxh8k" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">active savior</a> in our lives (more on this in the point #4) to be worshiped and followed as a <i>living Being</i>, as well as The Holy Spirit recognized and followed in our daily lives as Intuitive Guidance, a <i>living and interactive loving intelligence in our lives</i>, spoken of in writing yes, but not the writing itself; our relationship should be with the<i> living</i> God, and that doesn't actually occur just through words on paper, <i>words on paper that are corruptible, words on paper that could be false, words on paper that could actually be written by an antichrist</i>. Jeremiah spoke directly to this when he said "the lying pen of the scribes has handled it falsely" (Jeremiah 8:8), and it can be seen for yourself by comparing all the Pauline translations of <a href="https://biblehub.com/john/3-36.htm" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">John 3:36</a> to the accurate translations, the former translations changing the words "<i>disobey</i> Jesus" to "don't <i>believe</i> in Jesus," a mistranslation pushed to fit Paul's saved-by-blood doctrine. Also the Pauline church endlessly repeats their <a href="https://youtu.be/i-NLh5AmZwA" rel="nofollow" target="_blank"><i>mistranslation </i>of John 3:16</a>, again changing the words "keeps obeying" to just "believes," so people will think it's solid support of Paul's amoral salvation teaching, which is the opposite of what Jesus actually taught.</p><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhagABvzNpyIycIpnQYB2cNxuUI0ixJcuwxQeyjIjmiBVko3LEq2de2DQdYp7yzt1a5qlLPHNPFQYm3zI8ll2FZLb4QJrsJGyFqni_Y_CbuQM2t8oKKhy5qzzTMsaDBwHVZrI--6AF17tcvPU4x6SuzDr1bAXZ88p28pqEEomM9sXl3m4dZypthIdHhsg/s423/Screenshot_20220710-045436.png" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="274" data-original-width="423" height="207" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhagABvzNpyIycIpnQYB2cNxuUI0ixJcuwxQeyjIjmiBVko3LEq2de2DQdYp7yzt1a5qlLPHNPFQYm3zI8ll2FZLb4QJrsJGyFqni_Y_CbuQM2t8oKKhy5qzzTMsaDBwHVZrI--6AF17tcvPU4x6SuzDr1bAXZ88p28pqEEomM9sXl3m4dZypthIdHhsg/s320/Screenshot_20220710-045436.png" width="320" /></a></div><p>Though again, I'm not saying there's <i>nothing</i> good and true in what's called the Bible, not at all, again I believe it's worthy of daily study (when done with discernment, mainly meaning rejecting the mistranslations and toxic content of the letters of Paul). The parts of the Bible that are indeed good and true <i>can</i> point us to God, and God can Himself point us to some of those good and true words as a form of personal guidance. The key point here being that those words shouldn't be <i>equated</i> with Divinity, and <i>it shouldn't be assumed that everything in a book is Divinely inspired, nor should it be assumed that it has been perfectly translated from the original language written or spoken</i>. The Bible is a book, it is words on paper (or on a screen nowadays), and it is more accurately a collection of books and letters by various authors, and <a href="https://santmatradhasoami.blogspot.com/2019/01/ebionite-nasoraean-jewish-or-hebrew.html" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">many texts</a> that should qualify to be called Scripture, and did previously qualify for Chritians, like <a href="https://www.thenazareneway.com/ght_table_of_contents.htm" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">The Gospel of the Holy Twelve</a> (probably the "Q"/Source for the Synoptic Gospels), The Gospel of Thomas, The Apocrypha, The Odes of Solomon, et al., have been <a href="https://tv.gab.com/channel/davidbradford/view/nazarene-acts-an-introduction-6173a59a6df72426a5e9b02c" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">omitted</a>, by <i>the choices of men</i>, oftentimes pushing their own agenda. </p><p>Also the idea that Bible is perfectly <i>complete</i> is nonsensical, as if only Mark, Matthew, Luke and John could have ever written anything about Jesus, and all their writings were included in the complilation done by certain Church authorities; additionally, the approved Bible even has a verse that states that any book on Jesus would be incomplete: "Jesus also did many other things. If they were all written down, I suppose the whole world could not contain the books that would be written." (John 21:25). To not search for those other books, letters and gospels outside of the "authority"-approved ones (with discernment) actually demonstrates a lack of love for Jesus and God; Christians oftentimes do more historical research on comparetively trivial matters than they do historical research on Jesus the Christ. If you really love Jesus, why would you limit your study of his words and deeds to what's recorded in only one book, that again is actually a collection of books and letters, a collection that has been changed over time (the 1611 KJV Bible had 80 books instead of the current 66, for example), and ignore other historical records that may also contain truth about him? If you think one particular book/letter compilation/canon and translation is perfectly complete and Divine, and everything in it is without flaw or omission, again, you're idol-worshiping a book. </p><p>Some Christians say that "God can prevent a book from being corrupted if He wanted to" in order to defend their idol-worship of that book, but <a href="https://youtu.be/Akbyp1-ueas" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">God never said there would be a book that would be perfect</a> and that He would protect it from containing anything <a href="https://listing10.com/top-10-mistranslations-in-the-bible/" target="_blank">incorrect</a> through His super-natural power. Additionally, the Bible itself speaks to the problem of <a href="https://www.franknelte.net/article.php?article_id=236" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">human error</a>, oftentimes intentional, in writing on religious matters, e.g., Jeremiah 8:3 and Revelation 22:18-19, so if those prophets didn't think it was impossible to happen, why should you think it's impossible? Why believe in Biblical Inerrancy and in every author of the books and letters found in the Bible as Divine beings? Because a guy named Saul/Paul said so? Jesus never talked about a book being the Word of God, Jesus never said trust everyone who calls themselves a prophet or an apostle; <i>Jesus actually taught the opposite, he said to beware of false prophets and <b>wicked false apostles</b></i> (see Matthew 7:15 and Revelation 2:2). </p><p>On top of all that, Biblical Inerrancy can easily be disproven by pointing to a couple of actually pretty well known mistranslations: Jesus said "It's easier for <a href="http://www.revelations-revealed.com/biblical_truths/biblical_truths/camel_or_rope.html" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">a rope</a> to go through an eye of a needle..." not "camel," the common mistranslation, and John the Baptist was eating a <a href="https://www.hkbnews.net/post/did-john-the-baptist-eat-locusts-go-vegan-by-chapman-chen-hkbnews" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">kind of bread</a> (from the carob bean, or the fruit of the <i>locust tree</i>, made into flour), not the <i>insect</i> locust, et al. </p><p>The bottom-line is Biblical Inerrancy doctrine is a form of idol-worship (of the book itself, and of the authors and translators of that book), and idol-worship violates the Commandments of God, and that is indeed a major mistake, that supports confusion, deception and false doctrines.</p><p><b>3.</b> An extremely terrible consequence of this idol-worship of a book written by men is the belief that <b>"Paul is a true Apostle of Jesus and everything he taught was perfect and good, everything he taught perfectly compliments what Jesus taught, there are no contradictions, no false teachings, and the real Apostles were never in disagreement with him."</b> All false; there were 12 Apostles, not 13, Paul (previously called <i>Saul</i>, which is spelled the same as <a href="https://jesuswordsonly.github.io/recommendedreading/811-isaiah-28-prophecy-about-paul-offering-a-covenant-at-odds-with-foundation-stone-laid-in-messiah.html" rel="nofollow" target="_blank"><i>Sheol</i></a> in Hebrew, very relevant when reading Isaiah 28:18), who was a bounty-hunter of Yeshua’s followers and also called himself a “crafty deceiver” (2 Cor 12:16), <a href="https://evidenceforchristianity.org/14087-2/" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">made himself the 13th</a> after supposedly having a change of heart after supposedly having a vision (that is told in different opposing versions) on the <i>wilderness</i> road wherein Jesus supposedly appeared to him as a sort of <i>angel of light</i> (<i>not in the flesh</i>), and then <i>blinded him</i> (even though Jesus healed the blind), and then supposedly gave Saul a new gospel of grace-through-blood, making Saul the 13th Apostle as he then declared himself to be. Remember that the true Apostle John said that "those who do not confess the coming of Jesus Christ in the flesh... is the deceiver and the antichrist." And remember Jesus said he saw Satan fall like lightning from heaven, which also just so happens to fit Paul's story. Paul’s story, which was given in contradicting different versions, and again just so happens to have the elements that fit the exact warnings Jesus & John gave us concerning false prophets/antichrists, supports Paul's subsequent doctrines, which just so happen to fit the amoral doctrine of the Nicolaitans ("antinomianism") that Jesus said he hated (Revelation 2:15), a doctrine actually aligned with Satanism... So Paul's gospel is hardly a sound replacement for the teachings of Jesus, but when Paul's doctrines are declared to be "The Word of God" and pushed by church “authorities” every week and disseminated every day via mass-media, pamphlets, etc., it’s tragically accepted as gospel truth, “truth” that somehow overrides what Jesus said, even though Jesus, as you should know, was/is actually an embodiment of perfect truth. </p><p>Jesus called out this hijacking of his ministry directly in Matthew 15:7-9:</p><blockquote><p>"You hypocrites! Isaiah prophesied correctly about you: These people honor Me with their lips, but their hearts are far from Me. They worship Me in vain; they teach as doctrine the precepts of men."</p></blockquote><p>What doctrine of men is he talking about?? What was he talking about when he said "beware of the leaven of the Pharisees" (Matthew 16:6 & Mark 8:15)?? Who is the false apostle Jesus warns us about in Revelation 2:2?? </p><p>Any decent effort given to learn about the real history of early Christianity will reveal piles of evidence that the original Apostles were also very much opposed to the Pharisee Paul; I recommend all Christians read the book <i><u>Jesus' Words Only: Or Was Paul The Apostle Jesus Condemns in Revelation 2:2</u>? </i>by Douglas J. Del Tondo as a starting point, along with the videos & links at the end of this post for much more revelation on the truth about Saul/Paul. There's so much that could be said on this but I'll leave you with those recommendations and the additional attempt to help you see the truth by saying don't be so quick to believe the "our dear friend Paul" found in 2 Peter, a letter many scholars believe has been tampered with (by either Paul or the Establishment Church that he worked with), and in direct support of this in the Clementine Homiles we read <a href="https://www.judaismvschristianity.com/chapter-11-did-peter-endorse-paul/" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Peter writing to James about about a false apostle pushing immorality and putting words into his mouth</a>; Peter also <a href="https://youtu.be/B7JqSwQsFzA" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">spoke directly against Paul's vision (supposedly of Jesus) on the road</a> that supposedly gave Paul special relationship and understanding of Jesus; additionally, the letter of James is in fact largely a continuous rebuke of the false teachings of Paul, and that's why most Pauline pastors avoid the letter of James, (along with Psalm 119!) and whenever they do mention it, they usually do so briefly and bring up Paul's teachings at the same time, giving preference to Paul. And again, Jesus said to keep away from the teachings/leaven of the Pharisees (Matthew 16:12, 16) and Paul declared himself to be a Pharisee (Acts 23:6). Once you start listening to or reading the mountains of opposition to Paul, and realize Jesus and the true Apostles were part of that opposition, you'll see that this is not all heretical nonsense, it's actually accurate, despite what the Pauline church will tell you.</p><p><b>4.</b> Pauline Christianity, following the letters of Paul over the teachings of Jesus, falsely teaches that<b> the crucifixion of Jesus was a cosmic legal-proceeding that cancels your sin debt </b>(Colossians 2:14)<b> , and auto-pays </b>(Romans 8:3) <b>for your entrance into heaven, making you pure through "atonement" and "justification" </b>(Galatians 2:16)<b> even if you still do impure things</b>. </p><p>Paul tells us (in Romans 6:14) that we "are not under the Law [i.e., The Greatest Commandments], but under grace," <i>even though <b><u>Jesus never taught any such thing, he actually taught the opposite</u></b></i>. Paul tells us (in Romans 10:9) that salvation is just a matter of confessing that Jesus is Lord and believing that he was raised from the dead after his crucifixion; that if you simply do and believe that, "you will be saved," <i>even though the devil and demons also believe that</i>, and <i>even though that's something Jesus never taught as the means of salvation</i>. James, the apostle and leader of the original church spoke directly against this kind of thinking when he said "Good for you! Even the demons believe this, and they tremble in terror" (James 2:19). Mainstream Christianity tells you that simply belief in Jesus and God makes you "justified" and "guiltless." If that were true Satan himself could easily re-enter Heaven! Here is a quote from a mainstream Christian article, which says basically the same thing as every other mainstream Pauline Christian source on this topic: "In Christianity, justification means that God has declared an individual to be guiltless in his sight. And being guiltless, they now have right standing with God. We understand justification to be possible because of the atoning death of Jesus on the cross." So, because of what they call "the finished work of the cross," that work being interpreted as simply a legal-proceeding and payment that nullifies all your sins from the past, present and future, <i>all of the moral teachings of Jesus are made to be practically irrelevant</i>. The message they give is that instead of doing what Jesus actually commanded you to do, all you <i>really</i> have to do is believe in this amoral Pauline dogma, all you <i>really</i> have to do is have faith in a blood-sacrifice ritual, even though <u>Jesus never reduced his life, teaching and death to any such thing</u>. Jesus never said the reason he came was to just serve as a blood-sacrifice for humanity, what he said he did come for was to preach about the Kingdom of God: "<i>Actually</i>, I was born and came into the world to testify to the truth." & "He said to them, “I must preach the kingdom of God to the other cities also, <i>for I was sent for this purpose</i>." (John 18:37 & Luke 4:43) The Pauline Church ignores those words of Jesus and puts their own words, really the words of Paul, into his mouth! It's shameful! </p><p><i>Jesus told us why he came</i>, and he didn't say it was to be a glorified animal sacrifice that we simply need to believe gets us into heaven! Paulinists ignore the obvious, as if Jesus accepting the crucifixion couldn't be to accomplish some other work, like the <i>work he said it was to accomplish:</i> to get his gospel out to the whole world, to prove what he said about coming back from death in three days was indeed true, to foster relationship for all of humanity with him and the Holy Spirit, and to prove and condemn human rulers as false and abusive authorities (with counterfeit kingdoms opposed to God's kingdom), by showing what they'd do to the most innocent/Divine man on Earth (regarding this, these crucial words of Jesus/Yeshua have survived the Empire's scribes: “The ruler of this world now stands condemned” (John 16:11)). </p><p>But no, Pauline Christianity never talks much or at all about all those logical reasons consistent with Yeshua's teachings, instead every day they push an irrational and immoral pro-State/Empire/Slavery Easy Grace theology originating from Paul. (Yes, Paul <i>did</i> condone chattel slavery in Ephesians 6:5-6, and this support was used by slaveholders to "justify" the hell they put Africans and others through!). </p><p>Jesus warned us about such toxic teachings coming from a Pharisee like Paul exactly when he said "'Watch out! Beware of the leaven of the Pharisees and of Herod,'” (Matthew16:6 & Mark 8:15), again he was saying to <i>watch out for the toxic ideas slipped in by the religious and political authorities (who worked together, then and still today)</i>, and how many Christians have heeded that warning? Not many. Instead false doctrines by false authorities have been proclaimed as the Word of God; instead of rejecting Saul/Paul, he's been made an idol. Saul/Paul was never actually with Jesus in person like the true Apostles were; Jude, a true apostle of Jesus, wrote about Saul/Paul in his letter: "<i>Some ungodly people</i> have wormed their way into your churches, saying that God’s marvelous grace <i>allows us to live immoral lives</i>" (Jude 1:4). </p><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEg8qBMrBC2n6yjQ-uaiPiXcnMMwd8AvaWxFHujH-MtyUWEIDus7HRxFmIEZADH61aJo21ii09Z1jukKrLjp7AHIS20TMS-2iO08xE7MeOe6UalQlHn6UfCYKMgNSNIndslgA19X2dZ1u7zooYXkoMCnV6KJoyTipUAWBw6yCgukSVN-zI0zWOpJid1Pdw/s3501/IMG_20220506_173300228~2.jpg" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="1448" data-original-width="3501" height="165" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEg8qBMrBC2n6yjQ-uaiPiXcnMMwd8AvaWxFHujH-MtyUWEIDus7HRxFmIEZADH61aJo21ii09Z1jukKrLjp7AHIS20TMS-2iO08xE7MeOe6UalQlHn6UfCYKMgNSNIndslgA19X2dZ1u7zooYXkoMCnV6KJoyTipUAWBw6yCgukSVN-zI0zWOpJid1Pdw/w400-h165/IMG_20220506_173300228~2.jpg" width="400" /></a></div><p>Paul pushed the doctrine on amoral Easy Grace, the same doctrine of the Nicolaitans that Jesus said he <i>hated</i> (Revelation 2:6). This "the Greatest Commandments don't matter because killing an innocent person gets you into Heaven" theology is an incredible spin-off of the teachings of Jesus, so far off in fact, that the term "Christianity" is too generous, it should be called Paulinsim (which bears a striking resemblance to Satanism, with its emphasis on killing innocent people for empowerment, and the total disregard of morality). </p><p>Jesus repeatedly said "stop sinning," he said to "be perfect," he said that without exceedingly high righteousness we will by no other means enter the kingdom of heaven (Matthew 5:20); Jesus said "He who has my commandments <i>and keeps them</i>, he it is who loves me; and he who loves me shall be loved by my Father, and I will love him, and will disclose myself to him" (John 14:21). How is that compatible with just believing in an immoral blood sacrifice ritual to go to heaven as Pauline Christianity promotes? It's not compatible. <i>We do have to stop sinning; we do have to follow the Greatest Commandments. Jesus also said "Therefore anyone who <b>sets aside</b> one of the least of these commands <u>and <b>teaches others accordingly</b> will be called <b>least</b> in the kingdom of heaven, but anyone who <b>obeys God’s laws</b> and teaches them <b>will be called great</b> in the Kingdom of Heaven.</u>" (Matthew 5:19). Did you get that? He said whoever teaches against following his Commandments will be considered as the very least among men by those in heaven! Paul did exactly that when he said "I know that nothing good lives in me, that is, in my sinful nature. I want to do what is right, but I can’t" (Romans 7:18). Paul teachers men to see themselves the same way, as lame and forever broken, unable to take responsibility for their actions and stop sinning as Jesus commanded, calling an amoral blood payment theology Jesus never taught "humility" and "glorifying God."</i></p><p>Jesus also said "Do not think that I have come to abolish the Law or the Prophets. I have not come to abolish them, but to fulfill them" (Matthew 5:17). And yet Pauline Christianity says the exact opposite! They will say he <i>did</i> abolish the importance of moral law! What amazing shamelessness to ignore and contradict what Jesus/Yeshua said, and yet claim to follow Jesus/Yeshua. </p><blockquote><p>"Paul's teachings about Yeshua were very different from those of James, Peter, and the others in the Jerusalem group. It is striking that Paul's letters never quote Yeshua, rarely refer to Yeshua's teachings, and never mention Yeshua's life. Paul taught his own version of Yeshua's teachings and created his own rules. The Christian Church throughout the 2,000 years since Yeshua has been formed by Paul's teachings, not the teachings of James, the brother of Yeshua, and, some say, not the teachings of Yeshua himself. The fact that Paul did not present Yeshua's teachings in his epistles or his own preaching has been acknowledged for centuries. Only the Church, built around Paul, fails to admit that fact." (https://30ce.com/paulinechristianity.htm)</p></blockquote><p>"No one who abides in Him [who remains united in fellowship with Him—deliberately, knowingly, and habitually] practices sin." (1 John 3:6, Amplified Bible)</p><p>“I the LORD search the heart and examine the mind, to reward each person according to their conduct, according to what their deeds deserve.” (Jeremiah 17:10)</p><p>"I am the One who searches minds and hearts, and I will repay each of you according to your deeds." (Revelation 2:23)</p><p>Paul's new gospel, that says you can't stop sinning because the crucifixion of Jesus paid for your sins and all you have to do is believe in the power of a blood-sacrifice ritual, is <i>something that not only Jesus never taught as the means to salvation</i>, but <i>actually contradicts what Jesus said to do</i>, namely to "stop sinning" and <i>obey</i> The Greatest Commandments. Jesus was actually asked the direct question "What must I do to enter eternal life?," and what was his answer? To believe in a blood payment for sins? No. His answer was to follow The Greatest Commandments, the comprehensive Law of Love (see Luke 10:25-28). Pauline Christianity often points to a twisted verse of the book of Isaiah (53:10) to supposedly prove that Jesus was meant to be blood-payment of our sins, changing the word which has the first definition of <i>offense</i>, as in Jesus <i>was offensive to the religious authorities</i>,<i> </i>to "atoning sacrifice," or "an offering for sin," and additionally ignore the fact that the gospel of Matthew (in verse 8:17) actually quotes Isaiah 53 to give the correct interpretation! That correct interpretation given via the context of Jesus <i>removing demons from people</i>, not paying for their sins with his blood! </p><p>Likewise Hebrews 9:11-27 is pointed to as proof that Jesus was basically just a Divine animal sacrifice, but who wrote the letter of Hebrews? A man, or multiple men, wrote those 16 verses, <i>and none of those men are Jesus, and none of them are even quoting Jesus</i>. Again the doctrines of men have taken precedence over what the Messiah actually said, and this is incredibly thought of as no big deal by Christians! </p><p>Jesus freed the animals that were going to be sacrificed as supposed sin-payment, and <u>Jesus quoted Hosea 6:6</u>, “For I desire steadfast love and not sacrifice [killing animals], the knowledge of God rather than burnt offerings [of animals],” <i><u>twice</u></i> (Matthew 9:13 & 12:7), yet Pauline Christians ignore all this (and more that shows this murder-for-salvation instead of love-for-salvation doctrine is nonsense), and insist Jesus really <i>was</i> all about the idea that the blood of innocents can pay for sins and give you a free ticket to heaven! They are fooling themselves and fooled by Paul, who himself was fooled by (if the story is true at all) the false Jesus he said spoke to him on the wilderness road; foolishness on top of foolishness, all to support an immoral doctrine Jesus never taught and goes against what he did actually teach, which was that "he will reward each of us <i>according to our works"</i> (Matthew 16:27). And yet Paul's worshippers will call me the heretic, and claim they are the true followers of Jesus, while they cling to belief in human depravity and murder of innocents for empowerment, identical to what's believed and practiced by Satanists! Somehow I'm the wicked one for repeating the doctrine of love and mercy Jesus actually taught?! </p><p>God <i>does</i> actually care if we think and do evil, despite the Easy Grace doctrine Pauline Christianity disseminates to the masses, packaged as "humility," but is really the opposite of humility, it's <i>vain</i> entitlement, ignoring what Jesus commanded because of supposedly being already "saved by the blood," and "once saved, always saved." James, the brother of Jesus and leader of the original church after Jesus ascended to Heaven, called this out directly when he said "But will you know, O vain man, that faith without works is dead?" (James 2:20), calling out the complete hypocrisy of claiming humility when actually <i>your position of entitlement</i> shows <i>the opposite</i>, it shows <i>conceitedness</i>. [Note many Bibles poorly translate the word vain as "foolishness," the literal translation is "empty of moral content" which fits vain better than just foolish.]</p><p>Jesus asked "Why do you call me ‘Lord, Lord,’ and not do what I tell you?" (Luke 6:46). I imagine if Pauline Christians were to go in a time-machine to see Jesus preaching in person, they'd be in the back of the crowd listening to Jesus preach on following the Greatest Commandments, and they'd whisper to someone of that time "Yeah... don't worry, you don't have to actually do any of that, the Romans are gonna murder him, and then his blood pays for your sins." "Really?" "Yeah this Roman guy Saul, or Paul, whatever, anyway he's a bounty-hunter for the empire of people like you now, but later he has some kinda vision on the road, and then he gives this new gospel that says we can keep on sinning and it'll be fine because humans are depraved and the shed blood of Jesus erases your sins, and basically nullifies all his teachings for that matter." "Oh yeah and he says empires, like this one that is going to kidnap, torture and murder your Lord, are actually established by God and obeying them is equivalent to obeying God." After hearing all that, the follower of Jesus at that time in the crowd would probably perceive this future Christian to be completely crazy, and yet today these Christians think that those who follow the original teachings are crazy! </p><blockquote><p>"They will put you out of the synagogues; yes, the time is coming that whoever kills you will think that he offers God service. And these things they will do to you <i>because they have not known the Father nor Me</i>." - Jesus (John 16:2-3)</p></blockquote><blockquote><p>"Do not be like Cain, <i>who belonged to the evil one</i> and murdered his brother. And why did Cain slay him? Because his own deeds were evil, while those of his brother were righteous. <i>So do not be surprised, brothers, if the world hates you</i>." (1 John 3:12-13)</p>"An unjust man is detestable to the righteous, and one whose way is upright is detestable to the wicked." (Proverbs 29:27)</blockquote><p>The religion has been completely turned upside-down by the wicked genius of Paul; for example, most modern/mainstream Christians would just laugh at the idea that <a href="https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLzRXyF7K41sO2jj9pWViNdjkyWvrovuWh" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Jesus didn't slit the throats of lambs and eat their fle</a><a href="https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLzRXyF7K41sO2jj9pWViNdjkyWvrovuWh">sh</a>, and maybe even think you're possessed for saying he didn't! Likewise if you told them that Jesus never said his death was payment for their sins, you'd probably just get raised eyebrows and rejection. It's twisted psychological projection of foolishness, and it makes for a true follower of Jesus to live in a bizzaro-world of enthusiastic abusers and idol-worshipers, isolated from much of any real fellowship with so-called followers of Jesus. But from the mainstream perspective, they are just preserving "the word of God" and protecting a true apostle's reputation.</p><p>As mentioned in point #2, Jesus is <i>active</i> in our lives, he is not just a historical figure that did a legal procedure for us in the past! This activity is namely through what we can call <i>Kairos Moments</i>, a term that is rarely talked about by the Pauline Church, and whenever they do, it's almost always in a sense that's detached from what Jesus was actually teaching; they will say something like "our nation is facing a Kairos Moment," as if it's some months-long period that is presented to everyone collectively (and tied to mainstream news reports), when the truth is Kairos Moments are just one-second long and presented to each of us personally! Whenever Jesus talks about himself arriving in a sudden, subtle (like a mustard seed) unexpected and brief moment (like lightning), almost everyone unfortunately thinks he is just talking about a single day at the End of Time, the Final Judgment Day, for which the Christian must “be prepared,” but that "preparation" is extremely passive, not actually requiring any specific reaction at that time itself, the idea being that you just basically stand back and watch as Jesus transforms the world for all to see in a grand metaphysical historical event. Theologically speaking, this is thinking in terms of eschatology, "the study of the end times" in the Bible; the gargantuan error that sabotages the lives of believers in Jesus is to interpret all of his teachings on Kairos Moments in our daily lives as all merely referring to some single final day/time in the future, that, when it comes, will be too late for you to do anything different anyway; the world has been deceived into interpreting his teachings on Kairos Moments in an eschatological sense, which is not only inaccurate, but extremely disempowering, it’s actually spiritual sabotage, setting you up for the end of your life still wondering when Jesus is going to come, when he had actually come to you personally thousands of times in your daily life, calling you to conquer your inner demons and follow his direction, as illustrated by him calling Peter out of the boat during a storm. (More on this is explained in detail in this <a href="https://ko-fi.com/s/18b5885046" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Guidebook on Kairos Moments</a>).</p><p><b>5</b>. Likewise people believe that "<b>governments are divine, because Paul said so, in his letter to the Romans (13:1-7),</b>" as if all the atrocities committed by governments, all of the insane tyrants and regimes of political history, were all ordained and supported by God, an absurd and blasphemous idea. <u>To think blind submission to any person who happens to have a job in a government equals obedience to God is a completely bankrupt morality and theolog</u>y. Almost identical text to the nonsense found in Romans 13 is also found in 1 Peter 2:13-14 (that some translations, in pure blasphemous and idol-worshipping fashion, include the statement that "the Emperor is the Supreme Authority"). These verses in 1 Peter have been identified by many scholars as an obvious forgery/insert, never actually written by the true apostle Peter (and you can see for yourself how verse 2:12 flows directly to 2:15, without the bizarre pro-State verses of 13 and 14 that were inserted). What Peter is quoted as actually saying, in contrast to this idol-worship of human rulers, is “We must obey God rather than men" (Acts 5:29). </p><p>And when Jesus said to give back the money coin to Ceasar, <a href="https://youtu.be/D7YGRJUL2gY" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">that was <i>not</i> an endorsement of taxation and government</a>! He was evading arrest and so gave an indirect answer, because the truth, that taxation/extortion is not God's will, would have caused his arrest before he was led by the Father to allow that to happen.</p><p>Again, <i>to think that obedience to whoever is the ruler over a territory is equivalent to obeying the Greatest Commandments is complete absurdity</i>; <a href="https://frontlinethought.blogspot.com/2020/05/top-5-reasons-people-think-anarchism-is.html" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">all human rulers are actually illegitimate</a> in that their rule is based on abuse, and <a href="https://frontlinethought.blogspot.com/2021/12/what-kind-of-love-was-jesus-referring.html" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">abuse is the complete opposite of the love we are commanded to carry out</a>.</p><p><b>6.</b> Paul taught that people are inherently evil and can't stop sinning (even though that's what Jesus commanded us to do). In his letter to the Romans (5:18-19) he said <b>"one trespass brought condemnation for all men,"</b> that "through the disobedience of the one man [Adam] the many were made sinners." Paul said that we take on the sins of others, and that all of humanity was condemned by one sin by one man! <u>This toxic teaching of "<a href="https://youtu.be/Tb3Kx6f763Y" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">original sin</a>" was never given by Jesus</u>, and it is <i>extremely</i> destructive, resulting in people thinking abusively about themselves, and being more likely to accept abuse from others, which <u>violates the Greatest Commandments of Jesus (which are actually <i>necessary to follow in order to achieve salvation</i>), and also is <i>blasphemous</i> toward the Creator because it says that every newborn baby is created with an inclination to be evil</u>. Jesus told us to become like little children (Matthew 18:3), so he obviously believed, as actually most people, religious or not do, that children embody innocence, <i>not depravity</i>. <u>Jesus also said "A good man brings good things out of the good stored up in his heart, and an evil man brings evil things out of the evil stored up in his heart." (Luke 6:45 & Matthew 12:35), so how can it be that everyone's heart is inherently wicked as Paul taught? Again, Jesus said that unless we return to the innocence of little children we won't enter the Kingdom of Heaven (Matthew 18:3), so how could it also be that newborns are fundamentally depraved as Paul said</u>? (Plus you should be able to look at infants and children and see for yourself it's not true). Jesus and Paul can't both be right, and yet most modern Christians actually foolishly side with and believe in the teachings of Paul over those of Jesus.</p><p>Pauline Christians insist on defending this toxic teaching of human depravity, saying that when it's taken in the context of the salvation of Jesus, it's not actually toxic; well that's quite the willful ignorance, again <i>ignoring that Jesus never taught this</i> (and it goes directly against what he <i>did </i>teach), that it <i>violates the Greatest Commandments</i>, that <i>it's blasphemous</i>, and that <i>people often accept abuse and commit suicide because they believe in this lie of human depravity</i>, they believe the toxic idea that they are inherently wicked. Along with ignoring all that, we would have to also deny the sane truth that "a son will not bear the iniquity of his father, and a father will not bear the iniquity of his son. The righteousness of the righteous man will fall upon him, and the wickedness of the wicked man will fall upon him" (Ezekiel 18:20), never mind that "each is to die for his own sin" (Deuteronomy 24:16); never mind that we were "wonderfully made" "in the image and likeness of [i.e., the state or quality of being like] God" (Psalm 139:14 & Genesis 1:27), never mind all of that as if it all doesn't matter, because it was over-written by the idol Paul? Pauline pastors love to read a mistranslation of Jeremiah 17:9 that says "the human heart is deceitful above all things," to support this toxic human depravity teaching of Paul, but the correct translation (found in lesser known Bibles) is "The heart is deep beyond all things, who knows it?" Likewise those that gravitate to the human depravity doctrine often quote Proverbs 3:5 that says to "lean not on your own understanding," and interpret that wrongly to mean that we should disregard our own reasoning <i>all-together</i>; "lean on" is pointing to <i>leaning</i>, i.e., <i>being unbalanced</i>, by not being receptive to God's guidance and the perspective of others along with your own view (following the Greatest Commandments). Yes we need to focus on our faults and repent over them, <i>so that we can eliminate those faults</i>, so we can <i>stop sinning as Jesus said to</i>, not just be part of a weekly "pity party" called church that wallows in self-deprecation and packages it with thin wrappings of humility. Jesus called us to be conquerors, Jesus wants to save us and lead us to a happy abundant life, and if we think personal growth is an impossibility, that's disempowering sabotage.</p><p>Shouldn't what Jesus taught (and recognizing what he didn't teach), take priority? Additionally, to believe in inherited sin/human depravity is to believe a doctrine that violates The Greatest Commandments, violates a law of Love, and goes against the reality we can see with our own eyes when we see a young child.</p><p>This teaching of human depravity pushes a toxic mentality of <i>lameness</i> (rather than of being a spiritual warrior and devil-conqueror), as if it was actually "righteous" and "humble" to think you're inherently flawed and can't stop being wicked no matter how hard you try. It's a <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4tUmuBZRe-0" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">false morality</a>, a false teaching, something Jesus never taught, and something that sabotages the lives of anyone who believes in it. Jesus said: “Not everyone who says to me, ‘Lord, Lord,’ will enter the kingdom of heaven, but the one who does the will of my Father who is in heaven" (Matthew 7:21). </p><p>"By this we can be sure that we have come to know Him: <b><u>if we keep His commandments</u></b>. If anyone says, “I know Him,” <i>but does not keep His commandments, he is a liar, and the truth is not in him</i>. But if anyone keeps His word, the love of God has been truly perfected in him. (1 John 2:3-5). </p><p><b>7.</b> <b>"Jesus said to turn the other cheek when someone is hitting/abusing you."</b> No, that's a mistranslation, the original Greek shows that He was saying "<i><u>Re</u></i>turn a strike to the jaw likewise, one of the same type," in other words, use defensive force that is proportional to the force used in attacking you. This fits the context of him adding specificity to Scripture ("Eye for an eye, tooth for a tooth" refined to "slap for slap") rather than contradicting it (Matthew 5:17), and it also fits his Greatest Commandments (Mark 12:29-31 & Matthew 22:36-40) which includes the commandment to <i>love ourselves</i>, and, as should be obvious to you, <i>defending ourselves from abuse is a form of self-love</i>. Additionally, Pauline Christianity downplays or ignores Jesus saying "if you don’t have a sword, sell your cloak and buy one!" in Luke 22:36, and always try to "cancel" that idea by pointing to when Jesus told his disciples to put their swords away when he was being arrested, <i>ignoring the fact that he was letting that particular act of violence happen for a specific higher purpose</i>. <u>The idea that God would want you to accept abuse of yourself and the abuse of others is crazy and blasphemous</u>; additionally, since you need to have equal power as that of the abuser in order to use defensive force effectively, having knives and <a href="https://www.blogger.com/blog/post/edit/2111239628760080078/4275628652308322681" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">guns</a> for self-defense is 100% reasonable as a precaution, just as you would wear a safety-belt, or wear a life-jacket, or have a fire-extinguisher, just in case you need them in an emergency; the idea that Jesus would support the abuse of a robber or murderer, by saying you shouldn't have and carry the tools needed to defend yourself against them, is again seen to be crazy and blasphemous once you question it, an idea only abusers would want you to adopt (and so it shouldn't be surprising that rulers would be interested in mistranslating verses to support their abusive System/Empire, a Satan-backed Empire that hijacked the true religion of Jesus, starting with the Roman citizen/agent Saul/Paul, to undermine the true moral Law of the Non-Abuse Principle/Greatest Commandments).</p><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><img border="0" data-original-height="172" data-original-width="1465" height="48" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/a/AVvXsEixJxeELFotTYbgySFjUr1pf9Ndc7n1-SWOO8u0U1eQzGBAxJENHKMBgcCDQhhkhkRjjJQTE0EgMchTn5WNKIWBoejKGvbn68j1s76F3hWk79AGyLa1KwVKIH01ZcjPstx-Vtq_mqNNKPvEluxsaT537mW77QrJoobwjnDEkeX2sy5xnyY6zFmhfDmTaA=w400-h48" width="400" /></div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><br /></div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;">Likewise, other portions of the Sermon on the Mount teachings of Jesus were twisted to be pro-abuse, when the original true teaching was anti-abuse/pro-love. We're told Jesus said to give any clothing someone asks of you, and even give them more than they ask for, but he wasn't talking about being <i>commanded</i> to do so, he was talking about when someone is in dire need of some basics for survival, that you should be generous in your charity to them; if someone was without even a shirt outside in very cold weather and asked you for a shirt, a good person would not only get them a shirt but get them a jacket or sweater too, that's what Jesus was talking about! Not to just give whatever people command of you, like if some rich Roman wants to take all your possessions you should give it to them and then even more than they commanded! The latter is abusive toward yourself, which again violates the Greatest Commandments.</div><p><b>8.</b> <b>"Abusing/exploiting/enslaving/murdering animals is perfectly fine."</b> No, it's not. First of all, did God ever actually tell <i>you</i> that animals are here for your use? If God's original plan for humanity was to eat plant foods only (Genesis 1:29), and if that is our prophesized future as well (<a href="https://www.all-creatures.org/sermons98/s20181202-god-created-a-vegan-world.html" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">as Isaiah said</a>), then why would you go against God's will today? Why would you be uncaring to animals for no good reason until God tells you directly to stop doing so? Did you just get off a boat after a global flood that destroyed all the crops and fruit & nut trees? No, so why are you talking about such a flood as justification for your unethical behavior in the 21st century? Secondly, <a href="https://youtu.be/MsZuQoMQjpc" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Jesus probably never actually ate fish</a>, the Greek word <i>opsarion </i>translated into English as "fish," is actually a word used in Greek often to refer to <i>plant foods</i>, not fish or other animal flesh. Jesus, being perfectly loving, who said to "Be merciful, just as your Father is merciful," who told us to love others, to treat others the way we would like to be treated (and it makes sense that animals would be included in the category of others since they have emotions, feel pain, and want to live, like humans do), this Jesus (untangled from false doctrines about him and his teachings) <a href="https://jesusvegans.wordpress.com/2020/03/24/article-about-why-jesus-was-most-likely-a-vegan/" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">was most likely a vegan</a>, who not only didn't eat fish, but <a href="https://youtu.be/ZfuE6p1GEOQ" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">didn't multiply fish</a> either, it was just bread that he multiplied. Why would God or Jesus want us to inflict unnecessary suffering, enslavement and violence on sentient beings that feel pain, have emotions, and want to live? It's a ridiculous notion, <i>even blasphemous, making God out to be uncaring, which He of course is not</i>. Daniel succeeded on a vegan diet (Daniel 10:3), countless <a href="https://gamechangersmovie.com/" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">vegan athletes</a> do today, and so can you. </p><p>Additionally there is <a href="https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/new-testament-studies/article/i-have-come-to-abolish-sacrifices-epiphanius-pan-30165-reexamining-a-jewish-christian-text-and-tradition/C57C00120217A962F3C1E5AB6C3BA8EB" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">scholarly record</a> that Jesus and his original and early followers didn't eat animal flesh, quoting Jesus as saying that he came to abolish animal sacrifices, and "Consequently, <i>there is no reason to doubt that the Ebionite gospel implicitly affirms a vegetarian Jesus</i>, especially given that this Jesus has ‘come to abolish sacrifices.’" The "yoke" Jesus spoke of, that is "easy" to put on, other scholars have pointed out referred to <i>the discipline of abstaining from the eating of flesh</i>; just as vegans today keep telling people that being vegan really isn't hard to do! But those that oppose the truth about a comprehensively loving Jesus will, just as they always have, say that this truth is actually the false doctrine (even "the doctrine of demons" as Paul psychologically projected and slandered, as he did when he probably said, posing as Peter at the end of 2 Peter in defense of himself, to "take care that you don't get carried away with the errors of lawless people"). How crazy to say that being merciful to creatures that feel pain, have emotions, and want to live is "demonic" (when factory-farms are <a href="https://mercyforanimals.org/the-problem-ca/" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">a literal hell on earth for animals</a>, and people that befriend animals on small "happy" farms only to suddenly betray and murder the animal are arguably even more cruel)! Talk about about a false and backwards morality! The wicked have been and continue to be projecting themselves onto the innocent true followers of Christ, deceiving the multitudes into their pro-abuse satanic doctrine that pleases the Enemy, not God.</p><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/a/AVvXsEhIP6QA06oCoTfFUdJ6WGfeuqQTPN8Hb3cBgPrlxBJfMXLFeRltdSGP3XhHzPNJLVFy5rjgzV8ciUL4IiWPia50Hdr_n_oQasgoesCb1H6altd8b0M5CfO-agGjUHuw6Fwz0vH_A3qwZgfTv2pZBsXCTUiUwRYUq0HU2XBI1br9j1-16F10bypEUZlL3A=s769" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="262" data-original-width="769" height="136" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/a/AVvXsEhIP6QA06oCoTfFUdJ6WGfeuqQTPN8Hb3cBgPrlxBJfMXLFeRltdSGP3XhHzPNJLVFy5rjgzV8ciUL4IiWPia50Hdr_n_oQasgoesCb1H6altd8b0M5CfO-agGjUHuw6Fwz0vH_A3qwZgfTv2pZBsXCTUiUwRYUq0HU2XBI1br9j1-16F10bypEUZlL3A=w400-h136" width="400" /></a></div><p>Also <a href="https://youtu.be/bvoLj--oF_Q" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">a careful reading of the Greek</a> in Genesis 9 shows that Noah was given permission to eat cold-blooded creatures, reptiles and insects, not birds and mammals, <i>as an emergency survival measure, as Noah and his family transitioned back to a garden-based lifestyle post-flood</i>, and in Genesis 6:12-13 it says that the reason God had the flood come was because "man had corrupted their way on earth" and "the earth is filled with violence." So it appears that the Scripture is being twisted to support the very thing that caused the flood, cruelty toward animals! This is just like the changing and twisting of Jesus' words to make him sound pro-abuse as well with the false "turn the other cheek translation." The Devil has attacked Scripture thoroughly, to support his agenda and go against God's will, as should be expected!</p><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/a/AVvXsEigaQAFbDL2ZvobKT_H2PfpbPJT_9EDFlz0CjS4cyxrYEg-GJtewnWFBGt5mrZfMvdBEqGq54GiRoDSz4fyE-jFIB2KgdLE4_8kAJc63hzVHwuZQ5X2xZkGrTU_2XOXi-8sdY3eu_xM4Eezh7Ah_EVPNq78tS9lxoMGSGcab--rqK9k9p_Ts24Su5HdlA=s1534" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="475" data-original-width="1534" height="124" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/a/AVvXsEigaQAFbDL2ZvobKT_H2PfpbPJT_9EDFlz0CjS4cyxrYEg-GJtewnWFBGt5mrZfMvdBEqGq54GiRoDSz4fyE-jFIB2KgdLE4_8kAJc63hzVHwuZQ5X2xZkGrTU_2XOXi-8sdY3eu_xM4Eezh7Ah_EVPNq78tS9lxoMGSGcab--rqK9k9p_Ts24Su5HdlA=w400-h124" width="400" /></a></div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><br /></div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/a/AVvXsEhKQxHzcSWrhnegf0qMmy3ySsbtl0bOS56ge84Bxn7eywn2h2bqFsxV4Yw1KtR1HhjHYtxeucQYoZ3SIgbPlDIijJQNo7GLmgmkDlpSbSGuemLSbJk0TLsBh92OzNNc1M2EYF9GysZlmgNkxeqe2IEDxOw7lbxF7iW8FlUdJckVBCNfpGSr3vgcS0G8_w=s1518" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="400" data-original-width="1518" height="105" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/a/AVvXsEhKQxHzcSWrhnegf0qMmy3ySsbtl0bOS56ge84Bxn7eywn2h2bqFsxV4Yw1KtR1HhjHYtxeucQYoZ3SIgbPlDIijJQNo7GLmgmkDlpSbSGuemLSbJk0TLsBh92OzNNc1M2EYF9GysZlmgNkxeqe2IEDxOw7lbxF7iW8FlUdJckVBCNfpGSr3vgcS0G8_w=w400-h105" width="400" /></a></div><p>If you don't look to the book & letter compilation called The Bible as the only source of possible historical and religious truth, <a href="https://compassionatespirit.com/wpblog/2022/04/13/jesus-and-animal-sacrifice/" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">then you will discover that the vegetarianism/veganism of Jesus and the original followers of Jesus is not far-fetched at all</a>; you can learn this from modern books like <i>The Lost Religion of Jesus</i> by Kieth Akers, and <i>Vegetarian Christian Saints: Mystics, Ascetics and Monks</i> by Dr. Holly Roberts, along with the ancient writings of Saint Jerome, Ephrem The Syrian, Epiphanius's writings on the Nasaraeans/Nazarenes (writings in a text called the Panarion, chapter 18 specifically), The Syriac Clementine Recognitions & Homilies (The Ebionite Book of Acts), The Syriac-Aramaic Gospel of Luke, and The Gospel of The Holy Twelve, et al., as you can learn from the following video playlist: </p><ul><li><a href="https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLzRXyF7K41sO2jj9pWViNdjkyWvrovuWh" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Vegan Christianity Video Playlist</a></li></ul><p>For even more information/evidence on Christianity and veganism see these websites: </p><ul style="text-align: left;"><li><a href="https://christianityandveganism.wordpress.com/" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">https://christianityandveganism.wordpress.com</a> (Spanish: <a class="XqQF9c" href="https://veganocristiano.wordpress.com/" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Vegano Cristiano</a>)</li><li><a href="https://compassionatespirit.com">https://compassionatespirit.com</a></li><li><a href="https://www.petalambs.com/feature/" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">https://www.petalambs.com/feature/</a></li><li><a href="https://medium.com/sant-mat-meditation-and-spirituality/uncovering-a-vegetarian-jesus-at-the-beginning-of-christianity-9279741be7c4" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Comprehensive Article on Early Christianity and Veganism</a></li></ul><div><p><b>9.</b> <b>"All references to 'God' in the Old Testament are referring to the
purely good Creator, never to Satan, the god of Satanists,"</b> even though
that Old Testament god repeatedly does clearly evil things. This false equivalency, supported by lazy and incorrect translation of the word "God," is rationalized by "The Bible is perfect"-Christians in absurd ways, again because Christians are idolizing a
book and don't think rationally and critically about the content within
it (as done in the talk titled '<a href="https://youtu.be/fXAAavy7g9Q" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Unveiling the Evil OT God</a>' by Bobby Collier (of <a href="https://goodgodministry.com/" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Good God Ministry</a>), and <a href="https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL4msENlSewH6MhA6d2J2bLUpNcijbKoUx" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">related talks</a> by the same speaker.)</p><p><b>10.</b> An additional mistake that has very negative consequence is the idea preached by some very prominent Christian pastors and authors that <b>"God is unreasonable,"</b> or similarly <b>"God didn't want us to have the knowledge of good and evil because He didn't want us to live by reason but instead by revelation."</b> This is actually blasphemous and is also a form of spiritual sabotage; God definitely <i>is</i> aligned with reason, and we need to be too in order to align with His will; as usual, propaganda is pushed via logical fallacies, and the one in operation here is the Either/Or Fallacy (aka the False Dichotomy Fallacy), saying that it's either reason or inspiration, as if you couldn't have both, which is completely false, of course you can have both. </p><p>"Logic is Divine" talk: <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AWQ_TTxUf_0" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AWQ_TTxUf_0</a></p><p><span style="text-align: center;">~~~</span></p><p>Looking at the above Top 10 from an overview, the main mistakes with mainstream Christianity are basically: a) idol-worship and b) supporting abuse (the opposite of love). So, mainstream Christianity isn't just slightly off, it's <i>directly opposed to what God & Jesus have taught us to do, it's </i>actually <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-_VqzYf5whU" rel="nofollow" target="_blank"><i>closer to Satanism</i></a> (e.g., morality doesn't matter + torture and murder of an innocent is your means to going to heaven) <i>than it is to the true religion of Jesus</i>. And this shouldn't really be that surprising, that the Enemy would try to hijack the religion of Jesus and turn it toward his own evil purposes (people have been tricked into participating in satanic ritual and think it's actually devotion to Jesus and God); that's exactly what happened, starting with the work of Saul/Paul, and has tragically continued for centuries since then because people idol-worship, don't think for themselves, and ignore basic ethics.</p><p><span style="text-align: center;">~~~</span></p><p><span style="text-align: center;">Some of the best presentations on the true teachings ever given:<br /><br /></span></p><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><iframe allowfullscreen="" class="BLOG_video_class" height="266" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/LcnKsysAxeM" width="320" youtube-src-id="LcnKsysAxeM"></iframe><iframe allowfullscreen="" class="BLOG_video_class" height="266" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/XAtD_5q3rWs" width="320" youtube-src-id="XAtD_5q3rWs"></iframe><iframe allowfullscreen="" class="BLOG_video_class" height="266" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/ASqKZJXOZiM" width="320" youtube-src-id="ASqKZJXOZiM"></iframe><iframe allowfullscreen="" class="BLOG_video_class" height="266" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/MFKCGjYFHyY" width="320" youtube-src-id="MFKCGjYFHyY"></iframe></div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><br /></div><p></p><p><span style="text-align: center;">Additional resources:</span></p><ul style="text-align: left;"><li>'Corrected Christianity' video playlist for further clarification on the above points and more: <a href="https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLzRXyF7K41sPo8_cqbnBfSYqlSn4C3DG-" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLzRXyF7K41sPo8_cqbnBfSYqlSn4C3DG-</a></li></ul><ul style="text-align: left;"><li><a href="https://jesuswordsonly.github.io/" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">https://jesuswordsonly.github.io/</a></li></ul><blockquote style="text-align: center;">~~~</blockquote><blockquote><div>"For as the body apart from the spirit is dead, so also faith apart from works is dead. ... <u>[A]ccording to the works of his hands it shall be repaid to him</u>." (James 2:26 & Proverbs 12:14) </div></blockquote><blockquote><div>"The way of the wicked is an abomination to the Lord... <u>The Lord is far from the wicked</u>, but he hears the prayers of the righteous." (Proverbs 15:9 & 29)</div></blockquote><blockquote><div>"But nothing unclean will ever enter it, nor anyone who does what is detestable or false, but only those who are written in the Lamb's book of life." "<u>Outside</u> are the dogs, the sorcerers, the sexually immoral, the murderers, the idolaters, and <u>everyone who loves and practices falsehood</u>." (Revelation 21:27 & 22:16)</div></blockquote><p></p></div>
</div>Unknownnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2111239628760080078.post-79826631279756505352020-07-18T13:07:00.045-07:002022-09-18T09:54:54.351-07:00The Top Disempowering Lies Pushed on You Every Day<div style="text-align: center;"><br /></div> <img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEis8p9QpPY5PYqmZIUokh2_mvkuLyiP0n-Hs5EZoel32nj7WblaeVhuokoqfMN8v6EC-wi4vK-uBnKkMC13VXci9OpmTUw94aBCe7Gl35xYY5WK3SCmUH78pYot28g0DGXeVBvfr9BUtrAB/s320/TV+programming.jpg" /> <br />[updated September 18th, 2022]<div><br /><div>If you watch/read mainstream TV shows, corporate movies, the “news” and/or mainstream religious/spritual media (e.g., popular content-creators on video and social-media sites), for any length of time, you're bound to be hit (by the media and the advertisements) with most if not all of the following messages, delivered in an underhanded/subliminal way, but can be discerned if you are critically analyzing what's being said "in-between the lines" or in other words subliminally.<br /><br /><div>Prioritized Propaganda Messages in Mass-media (remember, these ideas are NOT true):<br /><div><ul style="text-align: left;"><li>Fear and stress are sometimes good for you, because fear is also the body's crisis response, accurate intuitive risk-assessment, and is also a form of motivation. Some fear is good for you, it keeps you safe. Some stress is good for you, it, when in just the right amount, has all the benefits of concentration; experts agree that this impossible to pinpoint just-right amount of "eustress," being in the "zone of proximal anxiety," is definitely something you should strive for. Nevermind building relaxed concentration and being courageous, keep believing in fear and stress as your sometimes friends. Fear and stress aren't all bad because they are needed as part of your survival and evolutionary growth. Embrace your negative emotions, they are part of your True Self, it's not possible to reject them without suppressing them, and that's unhealthy, so become friends with your fear and other toxic emotion-thoughts.</li></ul><ul style="text-align: left;"><li>Jesus "paid for your sins" by accepting the crucifixion (it had nothing to do with exposing and perfectly condemning human "authorities" as illegitimate and evil). You need this cosmic blood-ticket to Heaven because <a href="https://youtu.be/gxAO76bOBOs" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Human Nature is inherently flawed</a>, people can never perfect their thoughts, words and actions, you can't actually "stop sinning" as Jesus said to, you can't actually follow his Greatest Commandments as he said to; ignore all that, and just listen to the <a href="https://www.blogger.com/#">false apostle Paul's</a> words about human depravity and a blood sacrifice ritual; just say the "Jesus Prayer" and you'll enter heaven, you don't actually have to comprehend and follow perfect morality in order to experience Heaven on Earth, just accept yourself as permanently perfectly imperfect and call it self-love and self-care.</li></ul><ul style="text-align: left;"><li>Satan, an evil spirit that influences the minds of humans (via completely toxic emotion-thoughts like fear and anger), doesn't actually exist (and neither does God).</li></ul><ul style="text-align: left;"><li>Your ancestors include apes (called "a common ancestor" to make it sound better, and to fit their b.s. in-between species fabrications), and before that, pond scum. (i.e., <a href="https://www.blogger.com/#">Darwinian Macro-Evolution</a> is a fact of life.)</li></ul><ul style="text-align: left;"><li>Blind obedience to whoever is employed via extortion is equal to exercising social responsibility, it's equal to you being a good person. Government (especially your country) is overall good and keeps you safe; <a href="https://www.blogger.com/#">anarchism</a> is bad and dangerous; only State officials should have powerful weapons. It's okay for the State to commit preemptive attack against a population, e.g., extortion, or taking away their ability to defend themselves (confiscating guns), or mandating preventative health devices or drugs, but it's not okay for you to do those things, they're only criminal abusive acts when you do them.</li></ul><ul style="text-align: left;"><li>People that are independent of groups/collectives are dangerous and/or crazy, and individualism is synonymous with selfishness; collectivism is equivalent to being an unselfish lover of community and good will.</li></ul><ul style="text-align: left;"><li>Having to pay other humans just live on the Earth (being a slave to money/jobs) is normal and fair, you do not have <a href="https://www.blogger.com/#">a birthright to a fair share of homesteading land, water & seed</a>. Living off-the-land/grid in Nature is a sign of backwards foolish dangerous craziness; urban living is a better quality of life; (don't think of the minimal work needed on a veganic homestead with no financial costs, think Nature = hard work and disease).</li></ul></div><div><ul style="text-align: left;"><li>Modern electronic technology (now including Artificial Intelligence, which can be fully trusted) is mankind's savior, its benefits outweigh the negatives. The next step in Human “evolution” is to become cyborgs, look forward to becoming cyborgs, it'll be great! (don't think about your mind and body possibly being hacked and controlled by others).</li></ul><ul style="text-align: left;"><li><a href="https://www.blogger.com/#">Animals</a> are here for you to exploit, enslave, murder and eat; there are no negative consequences to your health or soul for doing so.</li></ul></div><div><ul style="text-align: left;"><li>Biological <a href="https://www.blogger.com/#">races</a> are real and always in conflict with each other; you should think and behave in a race-based and oriented way to be “woke.”</li></ul></div><div><ul style="text-align: left;"><li><a href="https://www.blogger.com/#">Men and women</a> don't have distinct and separate core masculine and feminine qualities (energies that are different but equally important and complimentary); men naturally have feminine energy and women have masculine energy, we're all actually androngynous, and the closer we get to 50//50 internal androgyny, the better (so it's good that this process is aided by contaminating the global population with atrazine, which makes men more feminine and women more masculine on a biological level); women become more liberated the more masculine they become; men become less toxic the more feminine they become.</li></ul><ul style="text-align: left;"><li>Self-love is the same thing as selfish conceitedness. God is love and it's good to love others, but if you ever direct love at yourself, if you ever feel good about yourself, even for just 2 seconds, you're committing a sin. Self-love, based on knowing that you were made in the image and likeness of a perfectly good Divine Creator, is not the right view, the right view is believing in Paul's Inherited Sin doctrine, to view yourself as a worthless wicked sinner, because that's the right humble thing to believe. You are not fundamentally a pure Spirit of love, to think that is egomaniacal.</li></ul><div style="text-align: center;">~~~</div><div style="text-align: center;"><br /></div>TV “news” is mostly pushing <b><i>fear</i></b> (through amplifying, sensationalizing or manufacturing fear-inducing events), <b><i>despair</i></b> (constantly bringing up disease, disability and destruction) and <b><i>division</i></b> (mainly via amplifying, sensationalizing or manufacturing racist & misogynist aggression), while the advertising is mostly pushing fast animal-flesh foods and irradiating electronics; ALL OF IT IS DISEMPOWERING. </div><div><br /></div><div>Also realize that <u>advertising</u> is very often used as a propaganda outlet; whatever product or service is being sold is often actually just a smokescreen (so you're more mentally open to it, thinking "it's just an ad"), hitting your subconscious with disempowerment, via sounds/images/acts that are very disturbing (e.g., loud noises, screams, or horrific subject-matter) or very misleading ideas (e.g., normalizing acceptance of medical mandates, and invasive technologies like camera surveillance and robot/drone "helpers"); propaganda ads that pop up only for a few seconds (before you can skip passed them) will put the disturbing/misleading content out right away, so you can't avoid the toxicity that these evil people want to expose you to. Turn off your TV. Stop watching corporate movies. Mute and look away from all advertising. </div><div><br /></div><div>Also, avoid pop spirituality, nowadays another <i>major</i> propaganda outlet, that consistently pushes <i>the following toxic mental programs:<b> technocracy</b></i>, <b><i>moral realtivism/nihilism</i></b>, <b><i>solipsism, androgyny</i></b>, and <b><i>"being vulnerable"</i></b> (subliminally suggesting your True Self is weak and will get you really harmed if you express it).</div><div><br /></div><div>As I said in my <a href="https://frontlinethought.blogspot.com/2015/08/the-bunk-science-of-evolution-and.html" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">post on Macro-evolution theory</a>, if you think the idea of subliminal programming for the purpose of disempowering the masses is hard to believe, or if you find it overwhelming, remember that fundamentally this psychological warfare/trickery is basically always intent on getting you away from inner peace and the true good design of God, and away from the true morality of The Greatest Commandments (to love God, others and yourself), and toward more stress and following the false morality of false; their propaganda disempowers all who take it in, so it makes sense as to why those who want greater power and control over people would disseminate it.<br /></div><div><br /></div><div>-----</div><div><br /></div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><iframe allowfullscreen="" class="BLOG_video_class" height="266" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/aiWJzo4sWBU" width="320" youtube-src-id="aiWJzo4sWBU"></iframe></div><br /><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><iframe allowfullscreen="" class="BLOG_video_class" height="266" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/eLh7whFI5QM" width="320" youtube-src-id="eLh7whFI5QM"></iframe></div><br /><div><br /></div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><iframe allowfullscreen="" class="BLOG_video_class" height="266" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/ncyPxanMDvg" width="320" youtube-src-id="ncyPxanMDvg"></iframe></div><br /><div><br /></div></div></div></div>Unknownnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2111239628760080078.post-25195143907032709492020-07-14T22:05:00.006-07:002022-03-12T08:03:53.844-08:00Why I Hate Alcohol<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgLrPAbc7QCBQOpXtxbkfAyT-NrD24Qt4Fd2lMe5b-CR3yo-4b3D-oLt2cDOTM77nC25c-PAwUB1vT4nqqG92A4eAvDvJ9ABeZe1wFpLhqYFWuJ6TcJy_9gT9T1vX1LQpHo-HMsq8BHUW_B/s1600/alcoholic-beverages-back-view-beer-2076748.jpg" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="1600" data-original-width="1064" height="320" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgLrPAbc7QCBQOpXtxbkfAyT-NrD24Qt4Fd2lMe5b-CR3yo-4b3D-oLt2cDOTM77nC25c-PAwUB1vT4nqqG92A4eAvDvJ9ABeZe1wFpLhqYFWuJ6TcJy_9gT9T1vX1LQpHo-HMsq8BHUW_B/s320/alcoholic-beverages-back-view-beer-2076748.jpg" width="212" /></a></div>
<br />
If I could go in a time machine and visit myself as a boy, one of the things I would try to convince him about is that he should never have a single beer or shot of liquor. Alcohol has done me absolutely no favors in my life, it has not been my friend; in fact, there were multiple times it could have been involved in my death, in multiple different ways. But rather than get into those details I will just focus here on simplifying an important lesson learned about alcohol, namely that it is best left completely alone. I know that most people find it's fine in moderation, I know most people are not alcoholics, yet still I've come to the conclusion that it's something that is best left alone completely. I've found that, like <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tedO9UkAM-E" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">fear</a>, which is said to be "sometimes good," the truth is that were talking about something completely toxic (fear being a mental/emotional toxin), and toxins, as per their definition, are not beneficial.<br />
<br />Alcohol, like fear, is actually pushed on society as something that actually serves them, when in reality it does not (saying the world is run by the devil seems to be more and more just a statement of obvious fact as you grow older). Concerning men in particular, alcohol is usually portrayed by advertisers (and sung about by country and rap vocalists) as if it's very masculine for men to ingest it; the truth that I've found repeatedly is the complete opposite, it undermines a healthy and complete masculinity in that it:<br />
a) is unhealthy (e.g., "beer belly" growth, disrupting digestive and mental balance, lowers sperm count, increases cancer risk).<br />
b) makes a man less aware and competent, and therefore less able to do masculine things like handle various tasks proficiently, including things like driving of course, but also importantly pleasing a woman sexually, or protecting her, or protecting others nearby, or protecting himself. Alcohol makes you more stupid, vulnerable and impotent, and that's a triple non-manly whammy.<div><br /></div><div>I hate how alcohol gives a sense of greater freedom and elation only to take both away from you even more the next day as you deal with physical discomforts (headaches, dehydration, gassiness) and mental negativity (increased anxiety and inability to think as intelligently). <br />
<br />I hate how alcohol, for both men and women, undermines a person's full potential. Obviously the approximately 20,000 yearly alcohol-related deaths in the USA undermines the potential of men and women, but beyond that terrible consequence, it repeatedly deceives people into believing that it will give them lasting relief from stress, that it will make their life easier; while the truth is ultimately the complete opposite, it tends to overall cause <i>more</i> stress and makes people's lives harder. Beyond obvious examples of actions done under the influence that can cause more stress (e.g., accidents that harm yourself or others, or going to jail because you got violent while drunk), alcohol overall undermines stress-relief because it undermines the very things needed to be done that actually do lessen stress and increase peace of mind in our life, namely living better, i.e., gaining wisdom and abilities and utilizing both to one's full potential. Alcohol lessens your memory, critical thinking and physical abilities; this goes against gaining, strengthening and utilizing wisdom and abilities (including fitness/strength/endurance) that aids one greatly in realizing their full potential and destiny.<br />
<br />
I know a lot of people will find this post to promotion of complete abstinence, being a teetotaler, too extreme, thinking a couple beers or a glass of wine every now and then really isn't that bad (and "some studies say it's good for your health, so it's you're responsibility <i>to</i> drink!") but I find this to be just another case of aversion to moral absolutism, that isn't wise but is actually foolish; we (and the world we affect) really would be better off by leaving it alone completely, just like with fear, <a href="https://frontlinethought.blogspot.com/2020/05/top-5-reasons-people-think-anarchism-is.html" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">politics</a>, and <a href="https://frontlinethought.blogspot.com/2019/07/top-5-reasons-people-dont-leave-animals.html" target="_blank">animal products</a>.<div><br /></div><div>If this seems unnecessarily too strict, consider that I'm basically just saying I've noticed poison has been bad for me, and I believe poison is bad for others too, in any amount. You don't need it to find peace, that comes instead from right relationship with God.<br style="background-color: white; box-sizing: inherit; color: #555555; font-family: Arial, "Helvetica Neue", Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 14px;" /></div></div>Unknownnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2111239628760080078.post-82420371449017919582020-07-14T21:45:00.029-07:002022-05-08T15:29:40.391-07:00Mandatory Masks in the "Land of the Free"<br />
<div style="text-align: center;">
<img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhezNDgS9t5dNCwDXsfqH41Z7aq_S1DMHBOD-ayJE6CeFjDw-VQsLFDn4BiNXu3V6L8d-GmefG9mC04jx1Tau7tKJpNuArhanUkT6EldP82171txIEWvF8mkxHNYKfwyCol0_M0glED0tRz/s320/Screenshot_20200624-122642.png" /></div><div style="text-align: center;"><br /></div><div><div><div>
[updated April 11th, 2022]</div><div><br />
"It's just a mask." <br />
<br />
No, it's not. In the context of medical mandates, it's a medical device, and it's being forcefully prescribed by politicians; you're being coerced to use this medical device as if government employees have a right to make medical decisions for you, as if you were their livestock, on their farm. A more honest and accurate statement by those pushing and supporting medical mandates would be: "If you don't submit to the medical tyranny of pre-emptive attack against your bodily autonomy, which pre-supposes the intellectual and ethical superiority of officials and their right to treat you as their livestock, then you're selfish, and should be subject to further violence in the form of fines and possible arrest (which if you resist you can be killed, and that's okay too); they are making the world a better, safer place, so just obey and shut up." <br />
<br />
There<i> is </i>a clear right & wrong with this issue, and it's this: <b>Controlling a nonviolent person's body is an act of aggression; your body does not become the property of the State whenever there is a sickness in the world.</b></div><div> </div><div>People that yell at, stare/scowl at, video without permission, exclude from store entry, etc., someone just for not wearing a mask, are following a false morality, they're being aggressive toward someone who could only *possibly* and unintentionally harm someone else. The real aggression of medical mandates needs to be rejected, otherwise the State will likely push even more travel restrictions, bodily violation (e.g., toxic vaccines), control of private businesses (putting them out of business), charging people fines etc., making our lives even more controlled by untrustworthy people we are "mandated" to trust, always in the name of safety; remember, if you're being abused, you're not safe, even if you don't have the flu because of that abuse.<br />
<br />
The nonsense-backed tyranny passing as "reasonable precaution" is fundamentally saying it's okay to commit <b><u><i>actual</i></u></b> violence against someone by controlling their bodies against their will (e.g., mandatory masks) in order to prevent <i><u><b>possible</b></u></i> harm, it's saying real violence now is fine if it *might* prevent harm, it's saying being abusively controlled is okay if it reduces risk of illness being spread in the world; by that premise the government could seal everyone up in prison cells for "safety," as if being abusively controlled is a condition of safety (of course it's not). </div><div><br /></div><div>Preemptive attack is never legitimate, it's just aggression, which is always evil. This is what people should be pointing out, not the latest numbers; the number of supposed cases is irrelevant to the core ethics of it.<div><br /></div><div>"How is the mask mandate communist?" you may have been wondering. The reason it's communism in action is because communism is defined as the end of private property, all that was previously owned by individuals is now owned by the State, and what is fundamentally more your property than your own body. <b>Mask mandate operates on the unsaid subliminal premise that the State owns your body, because a main part of property rights is the ability to control your property; so if you can't control your body, but the State can, then who owns it?</b> <i>We are all now being attacked</i>, yet we are to believe that we are now <i>safer</i> while under this daily attack?</div><div><br /></div><div>We are essentially being told that we have to trust whatever numbers and "science" they put out are accurate, now and forever, trust that it's impossible that it's a deception in any way, trust that whatever medical treatment they deem necessary (masks today, who knows what tomorrow) is safe and effective... They want you to accept that <i>the State is essentially your doctor and owns your body and the bodies of your children</i>. State officials are <i>not</i> your doctor, and preventative health care medical choices should always be the choice of the individual.</div><div><br /></div><div>If you think mask-wearing, distancing, etc., is a good idea at this time, that's fine, again the issue is it being a <i><b>mandate</b></i>. If you believe officials are saints that are never mistaken or deceptive, then you can go on obeying their every order for the rest of your life, submitting to slavery, but don't expect others to do the same. </div><div><br /></div><div>Thankfully atheist <a href="https://frontlinethought.blogspot.com/2020/05/top-5-reasons-people-think-anarchism-is.html" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">statism</a> is not everyone's worldview, many people are still clear-headed enough to recgonize the true moral authority of <a href="https://frontlinethought.blogspot.com/2021/12/what-kind-of-love-was-jesus-referring.html" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Jesus and his greatest commandments</a>, and they have an inalienable right to do just that.</div><div><br /></div><div>---</div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><br /></div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><iframe allowfullscreen="" class="BLOG_video_class" height="266" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/KX86quA6pVE" width="320" youtube-src-id="KX86quA6pVE"></iframe><iframe allowfullscreen="" class="YOUTUBE-iframe-video" data-thumbnail-src="https://i.ytimg.com/vi/zXUtsft0Z74/0.jpg" frameborder="0" height="266" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/zXUtsft0Z74?feature=player_embedded" width="320"></iframe></div><div>
<div><br /></div>Related website/resource:</div></div></div></div><div><a href="https://www.vaclib.org/" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">https://www.vaclib.org/</a></div><div><br /></div><br />
<script src="https://storage.ko-fi.com/cdn/widget/Widget_2.js" type="text/javascript"></script><script type="text/javascript">kofiwidget2.init('Support Me on Ko-fi', '#29abe0', 'T6T54CINZ');kofiwidget2.draw();</script> Unknownnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2111239628760080078.post-42756286523083226812019-09-01T08:24:00.052-07:002022-07-17T15:12:49.232-07:00Key Points on Gun Control for Independent Thinkers<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<img alt="" border="0" data-original-height="587" data-original-width="1101" height="212" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgIxKYk3NgBjrsv0WGh5HYr-6-gNJmT-hzWG6-5CbqjKFjPzToDk7aahMYrm08_J0McyMFMTF9Yrp8B6UpqKpQnZk00XP1ZLtG0f31kalwJXrViqaNuRZFZ-UpjZF4md3aREeC2F84Diz0s/s400/supreme+court+affirms+right+to+self+defense.PNG" title="" width="400" /></div><blockquote><div>"The strongest reason for the people to retain the right to bear arms is, as a last resort, to protect themselves against tyranny in government." —Thomas Jefferson</div></blockquote>
[updated 5/16/2022]<br />
<br />To jump ahead to the conclusion first:<div>The simple truth is that stripping people of their God-given right to be able to defend themselves is abusive, and no one in their right mind wants to be in an abusive relationship; that's what it all comes down to on an ethical level; supporting people's ability to defend themselves (from criminals or a tyrannical government) is actually a loving thing to do; Jesus commanded us to love, and abuse is the complete opposite of love, without <i>any</i> exceptions, so abusive control is actually never justifiable, no matter what crisis/emergency/tragedy happened or is happening. (And gun-free zones just make it easier for violent people to be violent, that's why shootings are oftentimes in those unconstitutional zones, because they go to places where they know people will be defenseless). If any place on Earth is to ever truly be a The Land of The Free, the nonsense idea that only government employees can be prepared to adequately defend themselves needs to be recognized as an oppressive superiority-complex (that also supports tyranny), <u>it needs to be recognized as abusive</u>, <i>and therefore uniformly rejected as such</i>. </div><div><br /></div><div>If you are a government employee and you think to yourself "I don't think of myself as superior, and I'm not interested in committing genocide, I just want to make people safer," that's good, but ultimately you're working for a <a href="https://frontlinethought.blogspot.com/2022/05/blind-to-pyramid-chain-of-command.html" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">hierarchical chain-of-command institution</a>, with people at the top of that chain-of-command that are invariably less ethical; once people in your position of power can disarm nonviolent people, what's to stop someone less ethical/sane than you from giving orders to someone in that position for very destructive purposes? And if the person won't comply with those orders, historically they're usually just fired and replaced with someone who will carry out those orders.</div><div><br /></div><div>Likewise, if you're someone who thinks socialism is a great idea because you know of some socialist leader who you believe is a great person, you're ignoring the problem of establishing eternal positions of power occupied by transient humans, along with the fact that socialism is fundamentally abusive, treating people like the livestock of State employees. </div><div><br /></div><div>The issue of weapons ownership isn't actually complicated once you zoom out, see the big picture, and focus in on the the key ethical principal that aggression/abuse is always wrong, no matter who does it, and no matter what else is happening in the world.</div><div><br /></div><div><u>Supposedly Complex Issues are Actually Simple on an Ethical Level</u></div><div><u><br /></u></div><div>After analyzing the issues of <a href="https://frontlinethought.blogspot.com/2021/09/free-people-dont-have-health-masters.html" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">medical tyranny</a>, <a href="https://frontlinethought.blogspot.com/2015/01/police-brutality-and-bunk-premise-at.html" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">police brutality</a> and <a href="https://frontlinethought.blogspot.com/2017/10/abortionthe-three-main-lies.html" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">abortion</a> in depth, I came to similar conclusions for each, even though those issues may seem very different on the surface; as I analyzed those issues more in depth, I realized that they share commonalities, they actually share the same core content:<br />
<ul>
<li>All involve the possible deaths of innocent people.</li>
<li>All are considered by many people to be extremely complicated issues that can have no definite and final answer as to what the best resolution is. </li>
<li>All involve the The Non-Aggression Principle, Preemptive Attack and False Superiority, none of which are usually mentioned at all in the debates over these issues.</li>
</ul><p>[Update: Interestingly, and supporting my analysis that these apparently separate issues are actually related in a deeper way, we've recently had the particular government officials pushing medical tyranny (the CDC) trying to expand their power by calling gun violence a "health issue" and by doing supposedly justify their desire to disarm nonviolent people through preemptive attack. Rather than digress in further detail on that news I will just leave you with a link to an article on that here and then continue with the ethics of gun control: <a href="https://www.americas1stfreedom.org/content/no-doctor-should-prescribe-gun-control/" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">https://www.americas1stfreedom.org/content/no-doctor-should-prescribe-gun-control/</a> ]</p><p style="text-align: left;">
Definition of terms:<br />
<br />
<b>The Non-Aggression Principle</b> (NAP) is an ethical stance which asserts that aggression is inherently illegitimate and wrong; aggression being the initiation of violence against a person or their property. This of course includes violent force initiated/started through hitting someone physically, but also includes privacy invasion and blocking access to the means of preserving life and liberty. In contrast to pacifism, the non-aggression principle is not against the use of force in self-defense.<br />
<br />
<b>Preemptive Attack</b> is a form of aggression that is feigned to be done as self-defense, i.e., the person committing the aggression says it's necessary to prevent aggression from occurring; this is illegitimate because aggression could be justified based solely on suspicion or rumors, and can obviously be used by those that want an excuse to commit aggression against someone.<br />
<br />
<b>False Superiority</b> is simply the stance of superiority over others in some way that isn't actually true.<br />
<br />
The NAP is the factor of greatest importance when analyzing these issues because preemptive attack is a form of aggression, and false superiority is a serious problem when it is the basis for aggression; in other words whether we're talking about police brutality, abortion or gun control, <i>the main problem is aggression being committed, therefore the NAP is paramount as the clarifying solution to that problem</i>.<br />
<br />
Similar to recognizing certain key points concerning aggression with medical tyranny and abortion, the key ethical points repeatedly sidelined by advocates of medical tyranny and abortion, I've come to see there are three key points that are being continuously sidelined by gun control advocates in the gun control debate, and these key points resolve the confusion over what is the correct concerning State control of firearms, and how best to deal with violent events occurring in society involving firearms.<br /></p><ul style="text-align: left;"><li><u>Key point #1: Automatic All-Inclusive State Superiority Is Not True or Rational</u></li></ul>Gun-control advocates basically think tyranny is impossible, even though there are ample examples in history, continuing to the present day; they are blind to reality because of their idol-worship of Government, which is really their God. The debate over whether there should be more or less gun control by the State <i>presupposes that the State is the default superior actor, who is a fully legitimate controller of the rest of the population</i>. And why make that assumption? Based on what? Again, history and current events don't support this idea of their moral superiority. When the pro-gun-control advocates ask “What's wrong with making it more difficult for bad people to get guns?” they are presupposing that the people that are making it more difficult are they themselves people that never abuse power over others or misuse firearms, and this is incredibly out of touch with reality because it is those very people, State employees, who have abused power and misused firearms <i>more than any other group of people on the planet throughout history and to this day</i>. Some have called it the "statist delusion," a delusion usually defended by saying something like "We have checks and balances, we have the rule of law, and that keeps State employees from abusing power and misusing firearms." This is really just wishful thinking, that ignores all the atrocities that have been committed in wars/invasions, state-sponsored-terrorism, police terrorism (all while supposed to be restrained by the "democratic process" and "checks and balances") and <i>the psychological reality of power being a corrupting influence</i>; therefore an objective and rational evaluation leads to the conclusion that statist gun control advocates are disconnected from outer and inner reality. To simply say "The State is the people, we control what they do," is again naïvety, ignorance and wishful thinking all wrapped together, a package that is then often delivered via psychological projection toward self-defense/gun-right advocates, who they call naïve and ignorant. The historical progression is clear as day over and over in various times and places, e.g., at the forming of the U.S.A. there was minimal gun control (namely only racist gun control) and as the State grew in power over the decades, those in the positions of power were more corrupted by it and kept wanting more, and so gun control has kept increasing; and if it becomes complete, that power imbalance will just further corrupt the minds of those in power, making them even more dangerous; and this is exactly what other historical examples show, following full-on gun control State officials commit atrocities. This isn't some out there conspiracy theory, it's just plain recognition of historical and psychological reality; to ignore both is indeed ignorant and naïve. <u>Tyranny is always a possibility, as is foreign military invasion, or people/gangs with illegally-owned guns</u>... even in a currently super-safe country like Japan; if you think you'll never need it, yeah maybe not, <i>but the next generation</i>? <u>It's about protecting us and future generations</u>. And for free men, being disarmed is being emasculated.<p></p><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCuaA8yuX-bV0Ex5Sou1oyxg" rel="nofollow" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;" target="_blank"><img border="0" data-original-height="685" data-original-width="1597" height="274" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/a/AVvXsEilEVgVePXSnbaU4-R85qpY5LjIIT8-E_KlAYi13Wt9nH_vq55c_WDG8SQzmw7jw5DYCUYPyqhkNPitgZi7fpv9lcsq3QJR0-8BoOjSeHJUV7t_EBtZokXmwmovs4iXqLN28FPl2rFcnotVgC4RLa3PI67zHVxi_nFAa0QJ2OeXJd3xcJVlGW5QFTGa4A=w640-h274" width="640" /></a></div><p>A related argument for gun control that is also completely bunk is one that has been repeated by socialist-minded politicians and people alike: "The government has a military and nuclear weapons, so you couldn't win a fight against them anyway." This is essentially saying that you should just just submit to tyranny, they tyranny is apparently irrelevant to the people making this argument), and whatever weapons you do have to defend yourself should be stripped from you! It's like like telling someone being physically abused they should hand over the one knife they have to defend themselves because it's no match for the many other weapons the abuser has! What twisted logic! It's saying your chance of success is only 5%, so therefore you should willingly make it 0%! That's sick-mindedness being presented as sound reasoning; how anyone could go along with that and think it's legitimate is beyond me.</p><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCuaA8yuX-bV0Ex5Sou1oyxg" rel="nofollow" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;" target="_blank"><img border="0" data-original-height="235" data-original-width="254" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgoEBSNTmRfXe-mOM08cBP_ySYWxdJemQoxBUP01wwe4CPHriN3zlZmlxEs9z3ekdZ_LuAlfCNaU9qNtKxEE_PDfZ6KQr1w7HHM7VMUJtgr0r761YtR3bs2NyH7h__fjCjplG6XKwKMxaqS/s1600/absolute+power.jpg" /></a></div>
<br />
One of the current presidential candidates suggested that the State should license guns and regulate them like cars, issuing gun permits based on their "level of destruction," and I know these kind of gun control measures will seem reasonable to a lot of people, but the <i>only</i> reason that they would seem reasonable is because of<i> idolizing State employees</i>, <i>believing State employees are always superior humans; that is the belief in operation that is the foundation for all this "sensible" gun control reasoning.</i><br />
<div>
<br />
That same candidate implied that mass surveillance of gun owners might be warranted, saying “We need to know who you are, what you’re doing, and why you have this arsenal.” This of course ignores the fact that we have no idea <i>who most State employees are</i>, what <i>they're</i> doing (especially with Black Ops, at secret military bases, CIA/FBI/NSA activities, etc.) or why <i>they have the arsenals that they have</i> (e.g., what invasions, coups, etc., are being planned). Again his perspective starts from State superiority, that is the given from which all the gun control ideas come from, its' all predicated on this belief that State employees are superior humans, which just isn't true, they're not super-human, they're humans like the rest of us, some behaving better than others, but all of them subject to the corrupting influence of unnatural power (which causes problems even when exercised with good intentions), so they're always more dangerous than those without that power.<br />
<br />
I've noticed gun control advocates have been exercising another classic toxic personality behavior (in addition to the psychological projection already mentioned) in that they will change from one argument to the next and never admit that they were wrong with the previous one that they were just so passionate about moments earlier. For example, they will talk about suicides by guns as a reason for greater gun control, but restricting high-capacity magazines and military-style weapons wouldn't be relevant to gun suicides (they only use one bullet, usually from a handgun), and that suicide is not the fault of the gun (or any other weapon used, or rope, or high bridge/building, etc.), as a person who commits suicide is doing so not because of the existence of those objects but because of severe depression and desperation; when this is pointed out and their first gun control argument is shown to be nonsense, the gun control advocate, particularly of the politician variety, will switch to a second argument about State law itself (in this case gun control law), saying "Well if we pass these laws you're expected to obey them," as if the law is always Divine, and should never be questioned or rejected no matter what it is, because it comes from “legitimate representatives” (whether you voted for any of them or not, so the deeper belief being that the majority of any small group, e.g., voters, always hold the correct and most ethical view, which is obviously a false belief, along with the fact that most State employees aren't even elected anyway, so the perspective is even more absurd); they say “without the rule of law there would be chaos, so we should follow the law even if we don't like it,” <u>yet always obeying laws doesn't guarantee a better world at all, if the laws are bad, all that guarantees is continuous injustice/tyranny/oppression</u>. Right now (September 2019) politicians are saying “If we ban gun ownership, you should obey, because obeying whatever the law is is always the morally right thing to do.” The problem with that premise, as I just pointed out, is that it's false, as countless historical (and current) examples can demonstrate. Really what they're pushing is nothing more than idolization/worship of the State, without any solid ethical foundation; it's “Because I say so” morality which is no real morality, it's saying “Whatever we tell you to do, you should do, because I am your master, and one should always obey their master.” <u>The Non-Aggression Principle, however, is an actual solid ethical foundation, and gun control laws against non-violent people are a form of aggression; so they are doing evil in the name of the good</u> (“War is Peace”), and that's the same old dynamic that has been going on for centuries all the way back to the original “fall of Man,” and is basically seeing the devil at work in the world (the devil is a deceiver, and the main way he deceives is by convincing people that evil is actually good).<br />
<br />
Safety is usually the reason given to justify tyranny, and many people think it's reasonable and best for there to be some balance between the two, that we have to have some of the latter in order to preserve the former, but <u>aggression never actually helps anything, in any situation</u>.<div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCuaA8yuX-bV0Ex5Sou1oyxg" rel="nofollow" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;" target="_blank"><img border="0" data-original-height="394" data-original-width="762" height="165" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhVLi7RZLskZvCVuZN6ErugezvIpuIYr9zmfmT06MfWUy5VMb2wdmCNDmf5TZ-bRFYVYF7M48KarwY9ioG4edjB9TxRkfAoG3M1GKvLfKYWJdWZzeOa_5wwRh_M6hVFzuC7VOVctFwyPN3l/s320/liberty+for+safety.JPG" width="320" /></a></div>
<div>
<br /></div>
<div>
The main blunder with gun control is the same blunder at the core of <a href="https://frontlinethought.blogspot.com/2021/09/free-people-dont-have-health-masters.html" target="_blank">medical mandates</a>: accepting preemptive attack by "authority," which accepts a form of violence as an exception the nonviolence rule, and accepts the flawlessness of whoever the "authority" figure is. Additionally it's just plain dumb to ignore the fact that the common denominator for mass-shootings is that they occur in "gun-free zones" (created by the State) and that the violent people are on SSRI pharmaceutical drugs; what do you know, what's making it worse is the State and Big Pharma, just like with medical mandates! Hmm, maybe we would better off without these idols and rulers? Again the blunder is thinking that it's "reasonable" to let some people have a right to be aggressive/abusive/violent (e.g., disarming nonviolent people, or pushing drugs on whole populations), and to let those same people define who is a threat (red-flag laws), and who is "mentally ill," as if those doing that defining couldn't be both! History shows that's often the case!</div><div><br /></div>
<div>
Gun control advocates are pushing multi-layered nonsense (“Gun-free zones are safer!” “The State having all the guns is safer!” “You not being able to defend yourself is safer!”), forming a cake of tyranny, and expect us to eat it because they say it's good for us and we're a crazy terrorist if we don't agree (again with the psychological projection, since forcefully disarming nonviolent people so that they can be more easily victimized is crazy and a form of domestic terrorism itself); you have to be confident in your own ability to think critically and discern right from wrong in order to not be swayed by this, which can be a bit difficult, especially when dealing with someone being nasty/accusatory/hysterical (e.g., accusing you of being a racist/sexist/Nazi/terrorist for no good reason at all, while they, again in classic toxic personality/possessed fashion, actually demonstrate racist/sexist/fascist/aggressive tendencies themselves), but then that behavior should just remind you that they have no sound argument because if they did they wouldn't need to act nasty/hysterical to distract from their lack of rationality and sound morality.<br />
<br />
If you don't believe that aggression is always bad, you are either thinking of actions that aren't actually aggression (e.g., force in self-defense) or you just don't understand that aggression really is an evil. If you don't believe that abortion, gun control and surveillance are each acts of aggression, then you don't understand what aggression is: the initiation of violence. Killing an in-utero baby is an act of violence. Taking away people's ability to defend themselves is an act of violence. Invading someone's privacy is an act of violence. The crucial truth is always simple and sharp, cutting through whatever web of lies the Enemy tries to throw on people.</div><div><div><br /></div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><img border="0" data-original-height="3120" data-original-width="4160" height="240" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/a/AVvXsEhSM1nYyN9iYrwB-Mf-PxjmT_eBueDPuCZuQQq4KBUi0-YafeoqAiZZLO4PNRs-3IpBhWsD7PoI4W2TlbI05Pvmzg8W2rGslXnp9Q3ioS4FT-DMZtugs2U4Z3lke0zmumJ83iiQ4YWSWHX7-3exZ1cp-42XwpRAEX2_Ivedz8Q5bKTG9_INtRwbXQeVfQ=s320" width="320" /></div>
<br /><ul style="text-align: left;"><li><u>Key point #2: Preemptive Attack = Aggression = Evil</u></li></ul>
<br />
Restricting gun ownership, through State background checks and <a href="https://nationalgunrights.org/resources/news/d-c-swamp-ready-to-pass-gun-control-how-you-can-fight-back/" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">"Red Flag" Laws</a>, etc., is a <i>preemptive attack on gun owners, considering them guilty before they have actually committed an aggressive act with the gun; preemptive attack is never legitimate, it is always an act of aggression itself, supposedly to prevent aggression, in other words<u> it is the very evil that it is supposedly preventing</u>.</i><br />
<br />
Politicians are now saying the aggressive privacy-invasion of surveillance of gun owners is justifiable, again based on the supposed legitimacy of preemptive attack, their own superiority, and the flawlessness of their "Red Flags." Red Flag Laws are a way for the State to aggressively persecute people for "pre-crimes," coercing the population into conformist obedience and pushing fear-thy-neighbor suspicion and snitch culture. Just as the vague State instruction (repeated on public transportation speakers over and over, and plastered on State posters all over the place) to "report suspicious activity" is overused and misused, people are now encouraged to report gun owners doing anything "questionable" in order to have their guns taken away, not because they've actually done anything violent, but because they <i>may</i> do something violent; this informing can of course also be done by people who are mentally unwell themselves, or who just want to aggressively mess with the life of someone they don't like (see Case Study 10 - Gun Control in the book <i>Snitch Culture </i>by Jim Redden), or just to push gun confiscation (i.e., a State monopoly on gun ownership) because that's what they believe will make the world a better place. Speaking of the mentally unwell, Red Flag Laws are giving the psychiatric industry authority (through the State) to label people with various "disorders" that will supposedly justify preemptive attack/aggression against them, e.g., made-up disorders including the "Oppositional Defiant Disorder" which paints disobedience and defiance as inherently bad things, as if there is never any good reason to disobey an authority figure. This is leading to a police-state dystopia scenario wherein you can be labeled as a threat or mentally unwell by aggressive people who are mentally unwell themselves, and this labeling can lead to being disarmed, and possibly imprisoned and drugged against your will (measures politicians have talked openly about). And that worst-case scenario is where the slippery slope leads once preemptive attack and other forms of aggression are accepted as legitimate, along with the acceptance of the superiority of State employees to carry it out; it all rests on those ideas, and so that's where the focus should be for anyone who really wants to speak out against this tyranny effectively.</div><div><br /></div><div><div>The recent April 2020 headline of "Armed supporters stand guard outside Dallas salon defying COVID rules" is being buried in search results and changed, just try and find the story with that exact headline now, and why would the powers-that-be suppress that story? Because, like searches on the real Black Panthers and the Vietnam War atrocity documentary 'Winter Soldier' being replaced in online search results with a propaganda entertainment movie with the same name, this recent news is dangerous to the controllers, the "elite" that see people as theirs to manage, deceive and exploit.</div><div><br /></div><div>Armed people defending their neighbors from the police? That's a big no-no. On a deeper level than simply that disarmed people are easier to control, this has to do with the attack on the expression of real core natural/divine masculinity; that is attacked most vehemently because it's what would undermine this whole system of control that depends on the lack of real men in the population; it's what the world most needs for true social-justice, so the control-freaks of the world and their programmed spokespeople try to shout it down as "toxic," discredit and distort/delete masculinity as quickly as they can whenever it manifests. The armed men guarding the woman in the house threatened with arrest are expressing the core/natural/divine masculine trait of a protector, defending a woman from aggression; a preemptive attack is a form of aggression, in this case a preemptive attack against her by police for operating her small business to “keep people safe and healthy.” The heathen rage “pubic health! public safety! public health! public safety!” but these men stand unmoved because they recognize that as a false morality, violating the inalienable rights of someone who hasn't actually harmed anybody. “Maybe/Probably/Possibly could do harm” is not at all an ethically sound justification to commit violence against someone (violence like arresting a woman, kidnapping her at gunpoint and putting her in a cage); in fact if that premise is widely accepted it can quickly lead to many more and increasingly violent and totalitarian preemptive attacks, always in the name of “safety and the greater good,” the end-game being a complete police-state, and even <a href="http://www.davekopel.com/2A/LawRev/lethal.htm" target="_blank">genocide</a>. When the premise is allowed to operate by governing institutions they run with it; if you give them an inch they'll take a mile, and that's why it's crucial to reject it before it really gets out of hand, just as these men are doing. The statists go on a conceited field-day of slanderous commentary, saying these men are wrong and irrational, but the men can still stand tall because they have a firm understanding of good & evil, they know violating someone's God-given rights via preemptive attack is not legitimate, and is an extremely dangerous premise and precedent to have set for these human farmers called officials; what these defenders are doing is 100% good and rational, and if you don't get that, if you even think the issue is “more complicated,” because “both sides are making valid points,” if you think a conclusion that it's “not so black & white” is “more reasonable and intelligent,” you're wrong, and, if you're a male, your moral confusion that does not fully embrace the Non-Aggression Principle is actually the weak masculinity that has made the world such an unnatural and crappy place to live in; by you not seeing any clear and solid wrong to defend against, they have undermined your masculine core and purpose, they have brainwashed you into believing you're an intelligent man when really you've been made into a foolish boy, letting these control freaks have their way with your wives, daughters, friends and neighbors, treating them like livestock, while you just watch and obey.</div><div><br /></div><div>Why is it okay for a man in uniform to carry a pistol but not okay for a man not in uniform? Answer: *statism,* based on a false superiority complex which officials indoctrinate their citizens <cough>livestock<cough> with via state-run education, political theater, & propaganda.</div>
<br />
Again, these gun control laws are wrong because they are based on the assumption that the restrictions will be fair and just, and never arbitrary or over-extended, say to people who just don't believe in the legitimacy of automatic State authority and superiority. To say State employees (and/or psychiatrists) should have the power to evaluate who can have guns and who shouldn't, assumes that those people are superior to whoever they are evaluating, and don't need to be evaluated themselves; this premise that once someone becomes a State employee or psychiatrist they somehow become perfectly ethical and wise (or made to be so by their supposedly perfect law or education that they supposedly follow perfectly), is a premise that isn't given any analysis by statists or the propaganda wings of the state (mainstream news media and entertainment). If you advocate stricter background checks, gun type restrictions (e.g., against so-called "assault weapons"), gun storage restrictions, and magazine capacity restrictions, along with gun registration (a privacy invasion, and precursor to confiscation) etc., you're assuming that the State officials carrying out this control over others are themselves guaranteed angelic (or are made angelic by a perfect law and justice system) and are acting on perfect and complete information, and would never deem someone a criminal incorrectly, or do so just to be able to control them, even though history is full of examples of those very things happening (which should not be surprising because of the never-ending problems with bureaucracy, and the corrupting influence of unnatural power on the human mind). A cursory background check on States, who deem themselves worthy of evaluating the background of other people to see if they are trustworthy with firearms, leads to nothing less than a mountain range of hypocrisy: genocide (often directly following gun confiscations), war atrocities, state-sponsored terrorism, police brutality, along with the <a href="https://colionnoir.blogspot.com/2017/02/gun-controls-racist-history.html" target="_blank">racist roots of gun control</a>, all of which clarify what the truth is behind the political theater for "public safety" for anyone not blinded by idolatry of the State.<br />
<br />
Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. <a href="http://www.anncoulter.com/columns/2012-04-18.html" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">applied for a gun permit</a> in 1956, after having his house bombed. The State of Alabama however did not grant him this permit, and MLK, Jr. was later called “The nation's most notorious liar” by the head of the FBI, J. Hoover. This highlights the falsehood of the automatic superiority of state officials, the falsehood of the premise that State actors are always superior actors. One shouldn't be surprised by the countless examples of corruption and misuse of power, that is standard, because unnatural power invariably corrupts the human mind; libertarians and anarchists understand this, but most people are turned away from this clear understanding of reality by constant conditioning/indoctrination/deception aimed at convincing them that States and institutions are good and necessary, even the pinnacle achievements of civilization, what distinguishes us from “primitives.”<br />
<br />
I believe many people become police officers and soldiers because they want to do good in the world, they want to be a warrior against evil in the world, and that is a very admirable intention; the outside the box perspective to consider is that men and women <i>can still do that</i> in their communities without being a part of the State institution with its corrupting power and unjust origins which actually always end up (via karmic law) undermining those very admirable pro-justice efforts; the State's unethical foundation of aggression/extortion makes justice-making via that institution ultimately an <i>impossibility</i> because God did not create a reality that allows for evil to do good, as we can all observe. I know this will seem to be naïve utopianism or religiosity to many people, but rather than getting lost on that tangent, we can clarify what the truth of the issue is by again returning to the key point that there is nothing that actually ensures that State-employees having a monopoly on weapons actually makes us safer overall, especially when you factor in all of history that shows it's not safer (research state-sponsored terrorism, military atrocities, and <a href="https://www.hawaii.edu/powerkills/20TH.HTM" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">democide</a> if you are somehow unaware of this fact), along with the issue of power corrupting the human mind, which makes it additionally less safe for us to have the people in power have a monopoly on weapon ownership.<br />
<br />
The big picture of the gun debate, zooming out from all the political theater, is that here on Earth we have some humans telling other humans “I can have weapons and you can't, just because I say so” and the person saying that is also thereby saying “I am superior to you,” and even “ I am your master, you are my slave.” This is lost in the debate of course when the media emotionally manipulates the population repeatedly into feeling sad and disgusted with shootings for the purpose of accepting the "solution" of less rights/freedom, which is really pushing a master & slave relationship, based on zero historical precedence, current reality, or sound logic, or sound morality.<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<span style="color: white; margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"> </span></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<span style="color: white; margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"> <img border="0" data-original-height="526" data-original-width="1099" height="190" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEi3t__BfPuL-2aXZqI-FQ37HMtx5DthvMKFcbO8d4UQ82ZOsqbARkkL6cyYEVEejnmAbLy5Pya-S_JzY9orRZSil3humg97mNgK1tyBnjFewzwh0ervuMkSqAPWU9Odj9hPl6IyzqmIbLga/s400/Rutherford.PNG" width="400" /></span></div>
<br /><ul style="text-align: left;"><li><u>Key Point #3: Self-Defense is Good</u></li></ul>
<br />
Mass-shootings in gun-free zones have been used to push for more "common sense" gun control, but this somehow expects the average person to turn off their own common sense to recognize that most of these shootings have occurred in gun-free zones, and that if they were in a <a href="https://www.ammoland.com/2019/07/gun-free-zones-are-shooting-galleries-for-maniacs-end-them/" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">gun-free zone</a> during a mass-shooting they would absolutely be safer if they had their own gun to defend themselves and others nearby with (and this is exactly what has happened many times, wherein deranged shooters were stopped by a non-State employee who had a gun, often not even needing to use it, showing it was sufficient to stop the shooter). Even though these type of shootings are exceedingly rare (despite the way the media makes it seem), if you are concerned about possibly encountering such an event, a rational thought would be "Maybe I should go to a nearby gun shop, inquire about what gun would be best for me, buy one after extensive research, and then take handgun training courses/lessons so that I could defend myself and others if I were ever to encounter such a situation." This true common sense is rarely heard through media outlets. After each shooting by <a href="https://www.naturalnews.com/2019-08-06-the-one-common-thing-that-nearly-every-mass-shooting-has-in-common.html" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">a pharmaceutical-taking</a> mentally and emotionally unwell person, the media amplifies the voices calling for us to “Do Something,” and that “something” is invariably the State having more control over guns, <u>even though an armed populace is the greatest deterrent of crime</u>; the TV news segments, newspaper and online articles portray gun ownership as an irresponsible thing, and often, especially by gun control advocates, with strong suggestions that gun ownership is just a byproduct of "toxic masculinity," or "backward" country culture; this perspective often includes an eye-roll comment about who they call "Get off my lawn!" conservatives, who they make out to be ignorant fools that just stubbornly refuse to join the rest of civilized society [side note: ridiculing the statement "Get off my lawn" also goes against the totally legitimate complaint of someone trespassing on your property; this ridicule often comes from someone who also believes in the truly backward communist ideology that all private property should be abolished]. Similarly many leftists say that the "Don't Tread On Me" written on the Gadsden flag is backward and even somehow "racist" in an attempt to manipulate people into accepting more gun control by villainizing those who are against it. But when you strip away all the superficialities about personalities and lifestyles to get to the bare bones ethics underneath the banter, the intelligent and independent thinker can see that a "metrosexual" liberal in this debate would be on the wrong side, while a "redneck" conservative would be on the correct side (yet in a larger context both are wrong for being statists). History and current events keep pointing us to the best way to go:<u> no preemptive attack on anyone (remember that includes red flag laws and gun-free zones, both of which aggressively disarm nonviolent people), no rulers defining who is "possibly dangerous" or "mentally ill" while being exempt from those very same labels, and instead a society of millions of armed individuals and small independent community militias (i.e., groups of those individuals who train together and are ready to act together if need be) that aren't under the command of corrupt politicians</u>.<br />
<br />
Again, on just a practical and factual level, the key point that many gun right advocates make that is completely ignored by gun control advocates is that if someone breaks into your home or tries to kidnap you or your child on the street, calling 911 will not help at all since by the time they are arrive the harm will already have been committed; and this is true for helping others around you too, again if say there's some <a href="https://www.cchr.org/documentaries/the-hidden-enemy/navy-yard-shooter-was-on-antidepressant-trazodone.html" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">drugged-up</a> guy who starts shooting people in a public place and there's no cops there, only a person that is armed could stop that before more innocent people were killed. This common sense point isn't just theoretically logical, but has been played out <a href="https://www.concealedcarry.com/justified-shooters/" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">countless times</a> in the real world to this day when home-invaders are stopped, rapes are prevented, and mass-shooters are stopped in their tracks, all of which often occur without even needing to fire a shot, just showing the gun is enough to stop the aggressor (e.g., the would-be rapist runs away, or in the mass-shooter cases they often shoot themselves once they see someone else with a gun). I know the idea that more people being armed is safer than less seems counter-intuitive to people who were born and raised in cities where there are no gun-shops and no gun-ranges, no common training courses on firearm use; but the truth is having all the powerful weapons only in the hands of the people that insist on extorting and controlling you isn't actually safer! You're vulnerable to tyranny, and your vulnerable to people who acquire firearms illegally; it's a double-subtraction of safety, yet the powers-that-be push it as if it's progress for humanity; they are fundamentally deceptive abusers, trying to device you into making it easier for them to abuse you more. But again, this will sound outrageous to anybody who has lived in a social and media bubble that never voices a view like this, that never highlights the fact the leader of violence in human history has been States, convinced that their "new" social(ist)-utopia is a reality, and conformity to it is the way forward, just do what you're told and everything will be just fine...</div><div><br /></div><div>*****************************************************************<br /><div style="text-align: center;"><u>Gun Right Logic</u></div>
<ol>
<li>A person usually needs a weapon of equal capability to that of the attacker's weapon in order to defend themselves effectively.</li>
<li>Criminals have guns.</li>
<li>Therefore it's rational to have a gun in case a criminal attacks you or others nearby you with a gun. (Owning a knife & gun isn't "glorifying violence," it's being prepared to adequately defend yourself against violence committed using those weapons.)</li>
</ol>
<div style="text-align: center;">
~~~</div>
<div>
<ol>
<li>People often call police at a shooting because they don't have guns to use for defense, but the police do.</li>
<li>Police can't arrive soon enough for most attacks, which are over in less than a minute.</li>
<li>Therefore it's rational to have a gun in case a criminal attacks you or others nearby you with a gun.</li>
</ol>
<div style="text-align: center;">
~~~</div>
</div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<ol>
<li>State employees have historically misused firearms in a criminal way.</li>
<li>If State employees had a monopoly on firearms, there would be no way for individuals and communities to defend themselves against this misuse of firearms by State employees.</li>
<li>Therefore it's rational to have a gun in case a criminal/State employee attacks you or others nearby you with a gun.</li>
</ol>
</div>
*****************************************************************<br />
<br />
<u>Conclusion</u><br />
<br />
Remember, we aren't <i>given</i> the right to carry guns by the <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gKeM2LwEhBA" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Second Amendment</a> of the Constitution or in any other way by the State, even though you'll here cops and politicians talk about it as a "privilege" (just like our "privilege" to be able to drive a car), it's a <i>right</i> we are actually <i>born with</i>; again, it is <a href="https://www.naturalnews.com/2019-08-16-we-need-a-red-flag-law-for-crazy-members-of-congress.html" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">the bunk premise of automatic State employee superiority</a>, that supposedly authorizes them to give and take away natural God-given rights, that is really the main thing in operation with gun control, and that main thing is baseless. The right to carry a weapon for defense comes from a Creator who values freedom, love of others and self-love; freedom, love of others and self-love logically includes being able to have weapons, of whatever sort you find necessary, for the purpose of self-defense and to defend others near you. <u>Trying to take away that right is an act of aggression by people who <b>believe they are superior</b> from those that they want to control, and they do this in the name of safety via a <b>preemptive attack;</b> identifying these components of the gun control agenda (</u><u><b>Automatic Superiority & </b></u><u><b>Aggression/Preemptive Attack</b>) reveals what the right and wrong in this issue really is, it gets through all the propaganda to reveal the lies, irrationality and immorality at its core masquerading as a vehicle for social-justice</u>. It's really that simple, despite all the propaganda trying to convince you otherwise.<br />
<br />
It all comes down to the Non Aggression Principle. The aggression of gun control over nonviolent people is coming from an institution which depends on aggression just to exist and be in operation (automatic State citizenship/subservience just for being born on the Earth, mandatory taxation/extortion); it's violence on top of violence masquerading as "civilized society. " The truth is there are zero times when aggression is actually a good thing, and trying to make the world a better place through aggression never actually works out, as you can observe today and all throughout history, it's a natural law of Creation, and it's about time humanity fully woke up to it.<br />
<br />
<u>Closing Comment</u><br />
<br />
So yes, you absolutely have a natural right to own and carry a weapon to use for self-defense. This does not mean however that gun ownership and use should be taken lightly at all; training on correct use of your firearm (i.e., how to use and store the gun itself safely, and also what scenarios actually justify shooting someone and which do not), should be sought out and taken by all gun owners; if you're considering owning a gun, learn the <a href="https://youtu.be/W2Vrc2R1oGU" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Universal Firearm Safety Rules</a>, do a search for firearm classes in your area, ask questions at local gun shops, and check this directory: <a href="https://www.usacarry.com/directory/category/firearm-instructors/" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">https://www.usacarry.com/directory/category/firearm-instructors/</a><br />
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
"Live as free people, but do not use your freedom as an excuse for doing evil. Instead be God's servants." (1 Peter 2:16)</blockquote>
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------<br />
<br />
<u>Gun Right Documentaries</u></div><div><u><br /></u></div><div><u> </u><iframe allowfullscreen="" class="BLOG_video_class" height="382" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/TGNuCCjRpGo" width="464" youtube-src-id="TGNuCCjRpGo"></iframe></div><div><br />
<ul>
<li><a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pkJC-FkFuI0&list=WL&index=6&t=0s" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">The Second Amendment: Why It Matters</a></li></ul><ul>
</ul>
<ul>
<li><a href="https://www.amazon.com/Keep-Bear-Darren-Doane/dp/B0769ZW2FH" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Keep & Bear</a></li>
</ul>
<ol>
</ol>
<ul>
<li><a href="https://www.imdb.com/title/tt2520398/" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Assaulted: Civil Liberties Under Fire</a> </li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li><a href="https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0414155/" target="_blank">Innocents Betrayed</a></li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li><a href="https://understandingrelationships.com/the-2nd-amendment-the-gun-solution" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">https://understandingrelationships.com/the-2nd-amendment-the-gun-solution</a>/</li>
</ul>
<ul>
</ul>
<div>
<br />
<u>Gun Right Organizations</u></div>
<div>
<ul>
<li>One Million Moms Against Gun Control (<a href="https://www.1mmagc.org/" target="_blank">1mmagc.org</a>)</li>
<li>Women Against Gun Control (<a href="https://www.blogger.com/(http://www.wagc.com/" target="_blank">wagc.com</a>)</li>
<li><a href="https://www.usconcealedcarry.com/" target="_blank">https://www.usconcealedcarry.com</a></li>
<li><a href="https://www.dcproject.info/join/" target="_blank">https://www.dcproject.info/join/</a></li>
<li><a href="https://www.firearmspolicy.org/" target="_blank">https://www.firearmspolicy.org/</a></li>
<li><a href="https://nationalgunrights.org/" target="_blank">https://nationalgunrights.org/</a></li>
<li><a href="https://www.cagunrights.org/" target="_blank">https://www.cagunrights.org/</a></li>
<li><a href="https://massgunrights.org/" target="_blank">https://massgunrights.org/</a></li>
<li><a href="https://gunowners.org/" target="_blank">https://gunowners.org/</a></li>
<li><a href="https://home.nra.org/" target="_blank">https://home.nra.org/</a></li>
<li><a href="https://www.saf.org/" target="_blank">https://www.saf.org/</a></li>
<li><a href="http://jpfo.org/" target="_blank">http://jpfo.org/</a></li>
</ul>
<div><u><br /></u></div><div>
<u>Gun Right Books</u><br />
<ul>
<li><i><a href="https://www.amazon.com/War-Guns-Yourself-Against-Control/dp/1621575802" target="_blank">The War on Guns</a></i> by John Lott</li>
<li><a href="https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/13163590-shooting-blanks" target="_blank">Shooting Blanks: Facts Don’t Matter to the Gun Ban Crowd</a> by Alan Gottlieb & Dave Workman</li>
<li><i><a href="https://www.hachettebookgroup.com/titles/dana-loesch/hands-off-my-gun/9781478982753/" target="_blank">Hands Off My Gun</a> </i>by<i> </i>Dana Loesch</li>
</ul>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<ul>
</ul>
<div><u><br /></u></div><div>
<u>Gun Right Commentary Videos</u></div><div><u><br /></u></div>
<script>!function(r,u,m,b,l,e){r._Rumble=b,r[b]||(r[b]=function(){(r[b]._=r[b]._||[]).push(arguments);if(r[b]._.length==1){l=u.createElement(m),e=u.getElementsByTagName(m)[0],l.async=1,l.src="https://rumble.com/embedJS/u4"+(arguments[1].video?'.'+arguments[1].video:'')+"/?url="+encodeURIComponent(location.href)+"&args="+encodeURIComponent(JSON.stringify([].slice.apply(arguments))),e.parentNode.insertBefore(l,e)}})}(window, document, "script", "Rumble");</script>
<div id="rumble_v1918tj"></div>
<script>
Rumble("play", {"video":"v1918tj","div":"rumble_v1918tj"});</script>
<div><iframe allowfullscreen="" class="BLOG_video_class" height="266" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/7fKO1-hE2Wg" width="320" youtube-src-id="7fKO1-hE2Wg"></iframe></div><br /></div><div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><iframe allowfullscreen="" class="BLOG_video_class" height="266" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/4_xczjzkDUY" width="320" youtube-src-id="4_xczjzkDUY"></iframe></div><br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;">
<iframe allowfullscreen="" class="YOUTUBE-iframe-video" data-thumbnail-src="https://i.ytimg.com/vi/_H8nXo4q4NA/0.jpg" frameborder="0" height="266" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/_H8nXo4q4NA?feature=player_embedded" width="320"></iframe></div>
<br />
<iframe allowfullscreen="" class="YOUTUBE-iframe-video" data-thumbnail-src="https://i.ytimg.com/vi/NTQQasclD_g/0.jpg" frameborder="0" height="266" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/NTQQasclD_g?feature=player_embedded" width="320"></iframe><br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;">
<br /></div>
<iframe allowfullscreen="" class="YOUTUBE-iframe-video" data-thumbnail-src="https://i.ytimg.com/vi/v-MuqotZH7w/0.jpg" frameborder="0" height="266" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/v-MuqotZH7w?feature=player_embedded" width="320"></iframe><br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;">
<iframe allowfullscreen="" class="YOUTUBE-iframe-video" data-thumbnail-src="https://i.ytimg.com/vi/7DYeYkJkqgs/0.jpg" frameborder="0" height="266" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/7DYeYkJkqgs?feature=player_embedded" width="320"></iframe></div>
<br /></div>
</div>
<div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;">
<iframe allowfullscreen="" class="YOUTUBE-iframe-video" data-thumbnail-src="https://i.ytimg.com/vi/9uCIV367Ftc/0.jpg" frameborder="0" height="266" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/9uCIV367Ftc?feature=player_embedded" width="320"></iframe></div>
<u><br /></u></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;">
<iframe allowfullscreen="" class="YOUTUBE-iframe-video" data-thumbnail-src="https://i.ytimg.com/vi/5a1VkYmPf-I/0.jpg" frameborder="0" height="266" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/5a1VkYmPf-I?feature=player_embedded" width="320"></iframe></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<iframe allowfullscreen="" class="YOUTUBE-iframe-video" data-thumbnail-src="https://i.ytimg.com/vi/LA6qWH0qbyQ/0.jpg" frameborder="0" height="266" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/LA6qWH0qbyQ?feature=player_embedded" width="320"></iframe></div>
<br />
<div style="text-align: left;">
<iframe allowfullscreen="" class="YOUTUBE-iframe-video" data-thumbnail-src="https://i.ytimg.com/vi/1ucCU_NnJ-0/0.jpg" frameborder="0" height="266" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/1ucCU_NnJ-0?feature=player_embedded" width="320"></iframe></div>
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;">
<iframe allowfullscreen="" class="YOUTUBE-iframe-video" data-thumbnail-src="https://i.ytimg.com/vi/2tuhjewGdSo/0.jpg" frameborder="0" height="266" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/2tuhjewGdSo?feature=player_embedded" width="320"></iframe></div>
<br />
<iframe allowfullscreen="" class="YOUTUBE-iframe-video" data-thumbnail-src="https://i.ytimg.com/vi/6jqz9q9IJjI/0.jpg" frameborder="0" height="266" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/6jqz9q9IJjI?feature=player_embedded" width="320"></iframe><br />
<div>
<u><br /></u>
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;">
<iframe allowfullscreen="" class="YOUTUBE-iframe-video" data-thumbnail-src="https://i.ytimg.com/vi/C4Kfs_qOTmE/0.jpg" frameborder="0" height="266" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/C4Kfs_qOTmE?feature=player_embedded" width="320"></iframe></div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;"><br /></div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;"><iframe allowfullscreen="" class="BLOG_video_class" height="266" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/96y6v5U_jAA" width="320" youtube-src-id="96y6v5U_jAA"></iframe></div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;"><br /></div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;"><iframe allowfullscreen="" class="BLOG_video_class" height="266" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/T1VOwmYJN4Y" width="320" youtube-src-id="T1VOwmYJN4Y"></iframe></div></div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;"><br /></div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;"><iframe allowfullscreen="" class="BLOG_video_class" height="266" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/JxQA6ehOE10" width="320" youtube-src-id="JxQA6ehOE10"></iframe></div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;"><br /></div><div>
<u>News</u> </div>
<div>
<ul>
<li><a href="https://www.ccrkba.org/">https://www.ccrkba.org/</a></li>
<li><a href="https://bearingarms.com/" target="_blank">https://bearingarms.com/</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.thegunmag.com/" target="_blank">http://www.thegunmag.com/</a></li>
<li><a href="http://keepandbeararms.com/" target="_blank">http://keepandbeararms.com/</a></li>
<li><a href="https://www.theblaze.com/news/el-paso-gun-class-attendance-skyrockets-after-mass-killing-and-gun-sales-double" target="_blank">https://www.theblaze.com/news/el-paso-gun-class-attendance-skyrockets-after-mass-killing-and-gun-sales-double</a></li></ul><div><br /></div>
<div>
<u>Podcasts</u><br />
<ul>
<li><u><a href="https://diversityshoot.com/about-us" target="_blank">https://diversityshoot.com/about-us</a></u></li>
</ul>
<u><br /></u><u>Social Media</u><br />
<ul>
<li><u><a href="https://twitter.com/2AWisdom/">https://twitter.com/2AWisdom/</a></u></li>
</ul>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/a/AVvXsEhYPu_ULLwMVBk9q2lQTlLRelhouzj28ZzkVGR3Zj3fOJhcA0Et5lmCh7BkiktV1nU_e0ZgXJBNfN9Gk5bF1V3xRKjHvTVMZgciq49-YneAGWCclevjEBAj6O3dkU-QOjroLTJi7ijVwM5qDXUG-JQAchWdqa0SkFFopln4AmZu2ZcFxtPzDihbtwTxMg=s631" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="463" data-original-width="631" height="235" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/a/AVvXsEhYPu_ULLwMVBk9q2lQTlLRelhouzj28ZzkVGR3Zj3fOJhcA0Et5lmCh7BkiktV1nU_e0ZgXJBNfN9Gk5bF1V3xRKjHvTVMZgciq49-YneAGWCclevjEBAj6O3dkU-QOjroLTJi7ijVwM5qDXUG-JQAchWdqa0SkFFopln4AmZu2ZcFxtPzDihbtwTxMg=s320" width="320" /></a></div><div><br /></div>
<u>Articles</u></div>
<ul>
<li><a href="https://www.americas1stfreedom.org/articles/2022/2/2/parting-shot-someone-elses-fear-doesnt-negate-my-rights" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">https://www.americas1stfreedom.org/articles/2022/2/2/parting-shot-someone-elses-fear-doesnt-negate-my-rights</a></li><li><a href="https://www.ammoland.com/author/alan-gottlieb/">https://www.ammoland.com/author/alan-gottlieb/</a></li><li><a href="https://thefederalist.com/2015/10/07/7-gun-control-myths-that-just-wont-die/">https://thefederalist.com/2015/10/07/7-gun-control-myths-that-just-wont-die/</a></li>
<li><a href="https://www.naturalnews.com/2019-09-16-ssri-drug-retailers-psych-drugs-self-defense.html" target="_blank">https://www.naturalnews.com/2019-09-16-ssri-drug-retailers-psych-drugs-self-defense.html</a></li>
<li><a href="https://www.gunownersca.com/2019/08/15/red-flag-laws-insincerity-on-steroids/" target="_blank">https://www.gunownersca.com/2019/08/15/red-flag-laws-insincerity-on-steroids/</a></li>
<li><a href="https://nypost.com/2019/05/04/why-i-always-bring-my-glock-to-shabbat/" target="_blank">https://nypost.com/2019/05/04/why-i-always-bring-my-glock-to-shabbat/</a></li></ul></div></div></div>
</div>
<script src="https://storage.ko-fi.com/cdn/widget/Widget_2.js" type="text/javascript"></script><script type="text/javascript">kofiwidget2.init('Support Me on Ko-fi', '#29abe0', 'T6T54CINZ');kofiwidget2.draw();</script> Unknownnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2111239628760080078.post-34396323879852794432019-07-04T11:50:00.029-07:002022-07-09T11:13:14.036-07:00Top 5 Reasons People Don't Leave Animals Alone<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiYqiroHFFR9UeC1o-HNnwKtCRKC2_1LV7gIhSyTawi4SaTWhbxCXaSGQI2YcxLvIE-R648qpN9Z3tnnpIV03pS7TDIhxcruqs-BSaU81zz6Fa2AJE_-yVhCxoyMef8dEPUGXra-F0zaSzY/s1600/sheep.jpg" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="627" data-original-width="960" height="209" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiYqiroHFFR9UeC1o-HNnwKtCRKC2_1LV7gIhSyTawi4SaTWhbxCXaSGQI2YcxLvIE-R648qpN9Z3tnnpIV03pS7TDIhxcruqs-BSaU81zz6Fa2AJE_-yVhCxoyMef8dEPUGXra-F0zaSzY/s320/sheep.jpg" width="320" /></a></div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><br /></div>
<span style="font-size: xx-small;">[updated July 9th, 2022]</span><br />
<br />
Veganism is the ethical perspective that humans shouldn't use animals for anything; no <a href="https://thoughtcatalog.com/jenn-ryan/2017/10/10-horrifying-facts-about-animal-testing-that-will-completely-ruin-your-day/" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">horrific animal testing</a>, no enslaving or murdering, nothing aggressive at all; in other words, veganism is simply the position that <i>we should just leave animals alone</i>, which isn't hard to do, it's a non-action.<div><br /></div><div>Yet people are bombarded with anti-vegan nonsense on a daily basis that deceives them into thinking that being non-abusive to animals, simply leaving animals alone, is actually the nonsense thing, as a search-engine auto-complete-your-thoughts-for-you shows:</div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhleJ_0Eo80rGBg4U5td5osOgQlArQLu_r1kCc9ROn1mL6-CDwHkWfaBsris-StqiIGxsTZR0nxD5OEVL5PnqWIsx6MrkG1wTaHOQkc55TV0t5CCnBH4XlTO2lBSJCM4I4wsoJE6meFYfw-O2dLv7Vd_2ti-s2Cw5W5Z6tACYorfazAFGuercH4E4PdWg/s827/Screenshot_20220501-204813.png" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="827" data-original-width="496" height="320" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhleJ_0Eo80rGBg4U5td5osOgQlArQLu_r1kCc9ROn1mL6-CDwHkWfaBsris-StqiIGxsTZR0nxD5OEVL5PnqWIsx6MrkG1wTaHOQkc55TV0t5CCnBH4XlTO2lBSJCM4I4wsoJE6meFYfw-O2dLv7Vd_2ti-s2Cw5W5Z6tACYorfazAFGuercH4E4PdWg/s320/Screenshot_20220501-204813.png" width="192" /></a></div><div><br /><div><div>(The major institutions of the world do indeed follow a chain of command and dependency with evil/satanic/pro-abuse people at the top of the pyramid.)</div><div><br /></div><div>Eating organic plant foods and leaving animals alone isn't a NWO/WHO agenda, GMOs are, as well as morally corrupting populations; to ignore all the healthy vegan athletes as if the don't exist is idiotic. It's a deception to associate veganism with abusive control-freaks, abusive-control freaks is actually how animals see humans that abuse them, humans that won't leave them alone even though they *can,* if they actually try, get all their nutrition elsewhere. </div><div><br /></div><div>Most people resist veganism for the same handful of reasons they've been indoctrinated to believe; it makes sense to address those reasons directly in order to be <a href="https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCG6usHVNuRbexyisxE27nDw" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">effective activists</a> and educators on the animal's behalf, and so that's what I'm doing in this post.</div><div>
<br />
Is your hesitancy to being vegan explained in this list below?</div>
<div>
<br /></div>
<div>
<b>1) “I won't be able to get enough protein or Vitamin B12.” </b></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
Even a sub-par vegan diet lacking varied organic whole plant foods will provide enough protein, there's absolutely no issue of protein-deficiency among vegans who are not malnourished.<br />
<br />
Vitamin B12 comes from bacteria, bacteria that does not solely exist on the dead flesh of animals; mainly because of modern industrialized society vegans and non-vegans alike may become low in B12 and need to take a supplement for it.<br />
<br />
<b>2) “Vegan food is not filling or tasty enough.” </b><br />
<br />
This view is due solely to lack of experimentation, vegan meals can be very filling and very tasty, try going to a well-reviewed vegan restaurant or get a good vegan cookbook from the bookstore or library, and try as many vegan meal options as possible that are available at the grocery store (e.g., try all the different vegan burgers and frozen meals).<br />
<br />
<b>3) “We need livestock to maintain the soil.” </b><br />
<br />
This is completely false, livestock grazing is in fact the leading cause of desertification, and <a href="https://ko-fi.com/s/af71c58bbe" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">veganic fertilizers</a> can be the absolute best fertilizers. <br />
<br />
<b>4) “God put animals here for us to use, and Jesus ate fish, so it's not bad.” </b><br />
<br />First of all, read this excellent article:</div><div style="text-align: left;"><br /></div><div style="text-align: left;"><a href="https://compassionatespirit.com/wpblog/2022/04/13/jesus-and-animal-sacrifice/" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">https://compassionatespirit.com/wpblog/2022/04/13/jesus-and-animal-sacrifice/</a></div><div style="text-align: left;"><br /></div><div style="text-align: left;">Secondly, the Greek word <i>opsarion </i>translated into English as "fish," is actually a word used in Greek often to refer to <i>plant foods</i>, not fish or other animal flesh. Jesus, being perfectly loving, who said to "Be merciful, just as your Father is merciful,"who told us to he wanted "mercy, not sacrifice," who told us to "love others" (and it makes sense that animals would be included in the category of others since they have emotions, feel pain, and want to live, like humans do), <a href="https://jesusvegans.wordpress.com/2020/03/24/article-about-why-jesus-was-most-likely-a-vegan/" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">was most likely a vegan</a>, who not only didn't eat fish, but <a href="https://youtu.be/ZfuE6p1GEOQ" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">didn't multiply fish</a> either (it was just bread that he multiplied). Why would God or Jesus want us to inflict unnecessary suffering, enslavement and violence on sentient beings that feel pain, have emotions, and want to live? It's a ridiculous notion, even blasphemous, making God out to be uncaring, which He of course is not. Daniel succeeded on a vegan diet (Daniel 10:3), countless vegan athletes do today, and so can you. For more information on Christianity and veganism see the book <i>The Lost Religion of Jesus</i> by Keith Akers and these websites and articles:</div><div style="text-align: left;"><ul style="text-align: left;"><li><a href="https://christianityandveganism.wordpress.com/" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">https://christianityandveganism.wordpress.com</a></li><li><a href="https://compassionatespirit.com/wpblog/2020/12/14/was-jesus-a-vegan-2/" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">https://compassionatespirit.com/wpblog/2020/12/14/was-jesus-a-vegan-2/</a></li><li><a href="https://www.compassionconsortium.org/essayapril21" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">https://www.compassionconsortium.org/essayapril21</a></li><li><a href="https://www.petalambs.com/feature/" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">https://www.petalambs.com/feature/</a></li></ul></div><div>
Similar to this religious reason/excuse, many people say "Eating animals is natural," which completely ignores all the herbivores on the planet, and the design of the human body, which most closely matches an herbivore preference by the Designer; if you're fixated on your tiny canine teeth as "proof" that God wants you to try and bite through animal hide, remember that the biggest canine teeth belong to hippos, and they’re herbivores; the fact of the matter is that our bodies most closely fit herbivore physiology compared with omnivore or carnivore physiology, and children have a natural instinct to eat fruit and pet bunny rabbits, not to murder animals and eat roadkill. Countless millions of people have lived healthy lives on a vegan diet, we definitely don't need to eat animal flesh or drink animal milk to be healthy, it's in fact not natural for us, and it's immoral (violating the Commandment to "love others," and no, plants don't count as others because they are not sentient; animals do have emotions, feel pain, and want to live, like humans do, and so therefore we should just leave them alone (i.e., not abuse them).</div><div>
<br />
<b>5) “We should respect different cultures and heritages that use animals.” </b><br />
<br />
This is the “culture = sound morality” argument, which of course is false; just because something is a tradition does not make it good. What's universally good is rejecting aggression, stealing and deception. Being aggressive toward animals is a tradition that can be found in cultures around the world, and it is not anything that adds to the uniqueness or awesomeness of any culture, e.g., “veganizing” traditional recipes maintains the tradition while leaving behind the cruelty, an obvious good choice.</div><div><br /></div><div>So in conclusion, veganism is the correct ethical position for humans to take concerning animals; the mass-murder and enslavement of billions of animals every year is extremely destructive on many levels, and again, <a href="https://www.pcrm.org/health" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">it is <i>not</i> necessary for optimum human health</a>.</div><div><br /></div>
<div><span style="text-align: center;">~~~</span></div>
<div>
<br /></div>
<div>
My more complete post on veganism, addressing additional common objections:</div>
<div>
<a href="https://sites.google.com/a/veganmail.com/nutrition-animals/" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">https://sites.google.com/a/veganmail.com/nutrition-animals/</a></div><div><br /></div><div><span style="text-align: center;">~~~</span></div><div>A quality video playlist on veganism:</div></div><div><a href="https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PLzRXyF7K41sNYG3DPsMck6RmTVXxmP1tQ" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PLzRXyF7K41sNYG3DPsMck6RmTVXxmP1tQ</a></div><br />
<script src="https://storage.ko-fi.com/cdn/widget/Widget_2.js" type="text/javascript"></script><script type="text/javascript">kofiwidget2.init('Support Me on Ko-fi', '#29abe0', 'T6T54CINZ');kofiwidget2.draw();</script></div>Unknownnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2111239628760080078.post-14990623367124917332019-06-15T07:37:00.004-07:002022-02-28T18:12:01.646-08:00Noise Pollution & Tinnitus Lessen Quality of Life<br />
<br />
<div style="text-align: center;">
<img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiQGtTIlVC_nPs0v17VVq9ErzCI6uL8Au89A3hJJQiCP8HzihyU6aBarakx2DMZW-yZSOZjVrNJbTbwlAjE7rPZWv5vnWP0GMDEKa0yokMw92d7sd8dMsiM_wQLbEX4kuZnupM7Eni4QN0e/s320/Cuenca+July+2016.JPG" /></div><p>
<br />
<span style="font-size: x-small;">[updated 2/28, 2022]</span></p><p><br />
In this post I will be discussing noise pollution and noise that causes permanent ear damage and tinnitus; the latter is worse so I will address that first.<br />
<br />
<u>Tinnitus: Satan's Hiss in Your Ears 24/7 is No Minor Thing</u><br />
<br />
One important thing (of many) I wish I had known when I was a kid is that if you are exposed to really loud sounds it could permanently damage your hearing and leave you with tinnitus, which is a continuous ringing sound that never goes away, and really undermines quality of life. If I had known what would happen, I wouldn't have put my headphones at top volume I and I would always have been cautious by repeatedly zeroing out volume levels first when using headphones with electronic devices or vehicle stereos that oftentimes change the volume level dramatically and unexpectedly, especially when changing input/output sources), I would have worn earplugs to concerts that were so loud my ears hurt and rang for a week, etc. What I find pretty appalling now is seeing how little concern there is for children and adults getting this condition due to loud noise (approximately 10 million people in the USA have it according to <a href="https://dangerousdecibels.org/">dangerousdecibels.org</a>, and I bet the # is actually higher since I've noticed in comments on tinnitus videos a lot of people saying that they didn't even realize that the ringing in their ears was abnormal, they thought everyone had it). And actually the U.S. Centers for Disease Control estimates that nearly 15% of the general public — over 50 million Americans — experience some form of tinnitus, so, that being 40 million more than the cases attributed solely to loud noise apparently means it can happen just with old age, but I don't know about that, what I do know is that loud noise definitely causes it.<br />
<br />
The lack of concern for the general public and workers getting tinnitus is appalling because of just how bad it is to live with tinnitus, it really really sucks.<br />
<br />
A big case in point on lack of concern is with soldiers, I heard one vet say that every soldier he knows coming back from Iraq has tinnitus, so the military obviously doesn't care if soldiers get it, which continuous a long list of examples like that (e.g., depleted uranium exposure). But also tinnitus is very common among other professions, like auto-mechanics, where again apparently no testing is done to see how loud certain regular occurrences at the workplace are. And this is not rocket science, it's well established at what sound-level permanent ear damage is going to occur: 85 decibels (dB) or higher. So all that is needed is to do a dB test with a sound meter (available as a smartphone app as well) and see what the # is, but who does that? I've never seen or heard of anyone doing that, if it does occur it must be rare, like I said it definitely isn't going on in the majority of auto-repair shops.<br />
<br />
Returning to the example of me blasting my headphones (while in the often loud subway, a double whammy), earphones put at max volume can reach over 100dB, which would cause permanent damage just after 15 minutes.<br />
<br />
The ultra-loud noises we're exposed to by police/fire/ambulance sirens, are those ever tested to see if they're going over 85 dB? Construction equipment and vehicles? Even public buses with their ridiculously loud beeping sounds as it lowers and raises to let passengers on and off, I'm sure that's over 85 dB too, as you can easily hear it from a block away and being right next to it is jolting. And something that again shows technological progress definitely doesn't equate to progress in quality of life, in a lot of new cars that have "bluetooth" and auxiliary device hookups, the volume levels will often go way out of calibration so that when you start up the car you may get blasted with max volume sound as it switches to a different audio source, and this can definitely result in well over 85db, as I can speak from personal experience, it was terribly loud when it happened to me twice (starting up other people's cars, I would have learned the lesson the first time in my own car), one time so much so that I had to turn the truck immediately off and get ear plugs in order to deal with the second or two it would take to turn it down (and some new cars don't even have the power button respond immediately after you start the car, you have to wait for it give you warning message on the screen first! A glimpse of the future autonomous cars that you'll lose all control over and have to appease with various “Warning” & "I Agree" screens before you can go anywhere).<br />
<br />
<u>General Noise Pollution: Unnecessary Disturbing Noise is Bad No Matter Where it Occurs</u><br />
<br />
If you spend a good amount of time in Ecuador, say over 6 months, you'll notice that a lot of the people you'll come across on a daily basis don't value peace and quiet, at all. And once you start giving this attention, you;ll then see it's actually a cultural epidemic, it's actually a serious psychological (and spiritual) problem. If you think this is an overreaction, I understand that limited perspective, that "You just don't appreciate cultural diversity," or "Just because it's a problem for you doesn't mean it's a problem for them." I'm aware of all the counter-perspectives like that, I've evaluated them, and they aren't actually sound, they're more this sort of liberal false morality of "cultural tradition = morally good" than an actual intelligent observation and evaluation of human behavior and human mental/physical health.<br />
<br />
Noise pollution is of course not limited to South America, the same insane tolerance of disturbing noise happens in the USA on a daily basis too, as can be observed in any big and active parking lot, where people use their new vehicle remotes that produce an exceedingly high and exceedingly long high pitched tone, well beyond in length and pitch anything that could possibly be sanely argued as necessary or good; in fact it's so crazy that I find daily use of a vehicle system like that by someone who isn't bothered by it kinda scary (i.e., if they don't think that's bad, they probably don't think a lot of other obvious bad things are bad either). Another way that noise pollution is getting worse in the world is through other new technology (like smart-meters, WiFi routers, etc.) that give off high-pitched background noise, e.g., you may not realize your TV set-up is doing so unless you put your ear right next to it and then pull the plug.<br />
<br />
I've come to understand the greater reality of noise pollution being an evil phenomenon on the Earth (especially that which causes tinnitus), and why downplaying the noise is ignorant, and for those of you that might listen I felt compelled to get this needed truth out there.<br />
<br />
To be clear, I'm not talking about people playing loud (but not <i>too loud</i>) music at a party or concert on occasion, or people enjoying participating in loud gospel singing at a church, or shouting for justice during a march, etc.. Sometimes getting a bit loud is natural and fine, what I'm saying is noise <i>pollution</i> is persistent unnecessary and disturbing noise, like a dog that barks for hours on a daily basis, disturbing everyone who lives near the person keeping that dog (perhaps on the rooftop, which is very common in Ecuador, rationalized for "security" but makes no sense because they bark almost constantly, e.g., at every person that walks down the street, so no one pays attention to them).<br />
<br />
The crucial thing that needs to be understood is that peace and quiet are very very important for mental, physical and spiritual well-being. If you think regular unnecessary noise in your life (or tinnitus) is inconsequential, you're wrong. Ultimately what's going on is the corruption of the quality of life by false beliefs, i.e., lies (the lie here being "Unnecessary disturbing noise is fine."), and that, causing disturbance through lies, is the fundamental operation of Satan on the Earth, in case you're unfamiliar with that spiritual reality.<br />
<br />
Now I'm going to just list some more common examples of what I'll call "satanic noise" to again make clear that this is worse than most people think it is:</p><ul style="text-align: left;">
<li>Screeching playground swings, gate doors, etc., that are never ever oiled, not seen as an irritant, instead it just adds to the mental tension/craziness of people exposed to it. </li>
<li>Specifics of city noise, usually never listed or questioned as to whether these all being part of "normal" daily life is something that should just be accepted as it is: </li>
<ul><li>Very high pitched reverse gear alert for trucks (whether they are moving or not). </li><li>Construction vehicles tractors etc., are especially bad with this, when constructing a building for example, the lot being an immense source of noise pollution, well beyond the sound of the pile drivers, material moving, etc.. </li><li>Fire-truck super-loud horns that can literally shake windows and are used unnecessarily</li><li>Ridiculous new "audio-warfare" police sirens (the full on sirens, plus their regular pulsing sounds, "wooop!...wooooop!" often used unnecessarily). </li><li>Ambulances (the most respected of sirens, again often much louder than needed and used at times when they're not needed). </li><li>Car alarms that go off every day, and make loud sounds every time you lock or unlock the doors.</li><li>Excessive bus/truck/car-horn honking. </li></ul></ul><ul style="text-align: left;">
<li>Crazy loud speaker announcements in stores, etc. (one really did hurt my ear at a thrift store once). </li>
<li>Movie theaters that blast high-pitched sounds on the audience that are definitely well over 85db, which I've noticed have become ubiquitous with movie previews in particular, I guess to build a sense of suspense, but who knows, maybe it's satanists wanting to damage people's ears too.</li>
<li>Audio levels on online videos varying severely for no reason and without warning, damaging the ears of anyone watching and listening with ear buds inserted into their ears,.</li>
</ul>
----------<br />
<br />
Videos and articles:<div><ul><li>Noise Awareness Day 2016 (#INAD2016), commemorated next April 27th. --> <a href="https://vimeo.com/155891645" target="_blank">https://vimeo.com/155891645</a></li></ul><iframe allowfullscreen="" class="BLOG_video_class" height="266" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/3MDO8KB3zjk" width="320" youtube-src-id="3MDO8KB3zjk"></iframe><br />
----------<br />
<br />
“Noise is assumed to accelerate and intensify the development of latent mental disorders. Noise may cause or contribute to neurosis, hysteria, and psychosis. Adrenaline and cortisol, the "stress hormones" are released when exposed to disturbing noise, and mind/body is not meant for that release to be excessive.”<br />
<br />
<a href="http://lifeandhealth.org/lifestyle/how-noise-pollution-affects-the-body/1658.html" target="_blank">http://lifeandhealth.org/lifestyle/how-noise-pollution-affects-the-body/1658.htm</a><br />
<br />
----------<br />
<br />
Deepak Prasher, a professor of audiology at University College in London and a member of the WHO Noise Environmental Burden on Disease working group, states:<br />
<br />
“Many people become habituated to noise over time… The biological effects are imperceptible, so that even as you become accustomed to the noise, adverse physiological changes are nevertheless taking place, with potentially serious consequences to human health.<br />
…Taken together, recent epidemiologic data show us that noise is a major stressor that can influence health through the endocrine, immune, and cardiovascular systems.”<br />
<br />
<a href="http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2015/06/20/noise-pollution.aspx" target="_blank">http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2015/06/20/noise-pollution.aspx</a><br />
<br />
----------<br />
<br />
On Tinnitus Awareness & Prevention: <br />
<br />
<a href="https://ringingears.ata.org/" target="_blank">https://ringingears.ata.org/</a> <br /><br />
<a href="https://www.tinnitus.org.uk/o-blog" target="_blank">https://www.tinnitus.org.uk/o-blog</a> <br /><br />
<a href="http://www.actiononhearingloss.org.uk/TAW" target="_blank">http://www.actiononhearingloss.org.uk/TAW</a> <br />
<br /><a href="https://freshonthenet.co.uk/2013/02/tinnitus-awareness-week/" target="_blank">https://freshonthenet.co.uk/2013/02/tinnitus-awareness-week/</a></div><div><br /></div><div><a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Health_effects_from_noise" target="_blank">https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Health_effects_from_noise</a></div><div><br /></div><div><a href="https://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/health-and-families/features/how-noise-pollution-can-affect-your-health-a6853746.html" target="_blank">https://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/health-and-families/features/how-noise-pollution-can-affect-your-health-a6853746.html</a></div><div><div>
<br />
----<br />
<br />
Peace!<br /><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><br /></div></div></div>Unknownnoreply@blogger.com