Land, Water & Seeds ("Victory Gardens" For All)

"You trample the poor,

 stealing their grain through taxes and unfair rent."  (Amos 5:11)

[updated September 19th, 2022]

I just came across the quote "You can solve all of the world's problems in a garden," and there's a lot of truth to that, but why does almost everyone ignore the fact that having a garden-based society is not going to happen as long as it is not financially possible for most people on Earth to participate in one?  And rather than think band-aid small/limited steps in the right direction, as good as they are (I certainly like to see them), like a bit more urban "green spaces," community gardens, or plants on top of and inside city buildings, rather than focus on those small and limited steps, why can't we be focused on the real big-leap solution that would have the most positive benefit and also be the most just, namely recognizing that a bit of land, water & seed for nonviolent/veganic homesteading is a birthright of every human?  Why is that repeatedly ignored, even when spelled out in detail?  By ignoring that we will in fact never see significant positive change for the better, we will never "return to Eden."

If people had the option to have some private/sovereign natural space (approximately 1 hectare), where they could cultivate a garden and orchard for themselves and/or family (in a natural voluntary gift-economy community of others doing the same), ending their dependency on the soul-sucking money-system, also ending unnecessary hunger and various other hardships that come with this unnatural and unjust global social-system set-up, don't you think billions of people would do so?  Of course they would.  But this real solution is almost never discussed or even debated, due to people apparently mentally stuck in the Status Quo Fallacy, Failure of Imagination Fallacy, and Fallacy of Incredulity, and the fact that's it's never presented as an option to think about at all.

When we can't grow food freely we're really not free; people often promote decentralization and self-sufficiency, but the key for that, ignored over & over, is recognizing human birthrights to survival natural resources: The key property rights needed for freedom are bodily autonomy, and birthrights to survival natural resources: homesteading land, water & seed. Why does almost everyone crazily dance around that clear and comprehensive solution? Without sovereign gardening space you're necessarily being exploited and ruled over; and since voluntary communities of sovereign homesteads exist nowhere right now, fundamentally all the people in the world are actually under different shades of Communist rule.

Unfortunately and ironically people have been programmed to associate land redistribution with Communism (as if only State-employees could ever do that), and they ignore that their "free" "capitalism" is actually a social-system run fundamentally via central banks and income tax, which are two pillars of the actual Communist Manifesto!  People have been duped into believing up is down and down is up.  So many problems would be solved from disconnecting from a toxic unnatural social system, yet people cling to logical fallacies as good reasons to continue on with the status quo.  

Along with the aforementioned benefits of ending the root injustice of homesteading natural resource birthright denial, if everyone could eat fresh and organic vegetables, greens, herbs and fruits from their own garden, and be able to enjoy the sunshine and fresh air while gardening, that would no doubt alleviate myriad physical and mental health issues people are suffering with as well, better than the band-aid treatments of pharmaceuticals and heart disease surgeries, et al.  People go to detox centers where they basically just get a version of living on a veganic homestead, but it's only temporary because they gotta get back to earning money to pay the rent/mortgage/proprety taxes.  Everyone is dealing with the myriad problems of living with The Root Injustice, but no one is pinpointing what that injustice is exactly, and what the exact solution to it is, so the drudgery just goes on and on.

You will never see or hear a barrage of mainstream media promoting the benefits of men, being naturally and fully masculine, and women, being naturally and fully feminine, living self-sufficiently, non-violently and truly sustainably off the land, because that is where real empowerment is, freed of system-dependency and negative karmic-feedback, it would be a return to the original perfect design for humans for highest happiness, a “return to Eden,” a return to the original design of the good Creator.  In order to not be a slave of the system we must get our needs directly from the Earth instead, so this is continuously made out to be backwards, dangerous, stupid, etc., (as well as economically impossible for most people) when in fact it's the ideal way for humans to live on Earth, with the highest potential for satisfaction and social harmony/justice.  The big picture of what's going on is that God's original plan for humanity, to be gardeners who cultivated and cared for the natural world (including animals), as pointed to in Genesis 2:15, is in fact the ideal, on multiple qualitative & moral levels, but humanity is being distracted away from that fact constantly; the system is a grand deception and conceited folly, trying to improve upon that ideal original plan for humanity;; no improvements have been made, things have just gotten more toxic and oppressive, as the only truly good and free way of life is made more and more obscure, as homestead communities exist less and less every year globally.

 

It's not that complicated, but people seem to always overcomplicate it. Land, water & seed for natural living, survival, privacy, and freedom, are pre-existing God-created birthrights of all humans. That's what needs to be focused on and repeated, not going off on dismissive "that's impossible/impractical" or irrelevant "but some people won't like that" tangents; the  societal change will organically occur at local levels once that birthright is widely accepted as true and good.  About 2 acres for sovereign veganic/nonviolent homesteads (not enslaving and murdering animals or spreading toxins/GMOs), forming voluntary communities, is the clear answer that the Non-aggression Principle and Reality/Nature points to. 

The objection that "all the land is already owned" ignores the main crucial point that owning more land & water than you need for your iwn homestead is actually the theft of other people's birthright, so it's not valid ownership just like owning slaves you paid for isn't valid.

A slaveowner can say "I paid for this man," but the man was never rightfully up for sale in the first place; having more land & water than you need is actually stealing the survival/freedom birthright of others; that's the key truth almost no one is talking about, and that's why nothing is really changing for the better. 

To "agree in principle" but then not even repeat the solution to anyone because of possible bad reactions or logistics that need to be voluntarily sorted out... I'm trying to make it clear, as L. Rose has too (in his more generalized way), that it's actually getting people to understand and agree openly with the principle/solution that is most important, saying "but making it a reality could be difficult!" is like telling a warrior defending his village before battle, "but they will resist you," yeah no kidding, abusers resist stopping the abuse, which is ultimately irrelevant.  Please try to focus on "sovereign veganic homesteads," it's tiring being the only one actually saying the words, as if everyone else is under a spell preventing them from spreading the actual solution. 

Just because there would be difficulties/resistance/complications doesn't mean it's not the best and just solution overall, it clearly is, because anything less than that is actually social-injustice; denial of homesteading land, water & seed is a form of slavery, and slavery is the evil we need to fully abolish. 

Land, water and seed are already built, it's a straw-man fallacy to say that I'm saying others will be required to build houses and gardens for others. And again the main point of a birthright (as in it belongs to newborn babies, without them doing anything for it), is that is not "given" by anyone because it was not theirs to give in the first place, God already gave it to us. Those objecting  to sovereign homesteads being a birthright if everyone talk like slave-masters who used to say things like "Why should I just give this man his freedom, he has to earn it, take action, be responsible, before he deserves it." The idea that a birthright claim *to not be abused and exploited* is "irresponsible" and even somehow abusive itself (demanding "sacrifice" of others), is completely absurd (and again sounds like authoritarians of the past and present).

To object by basically saying "you gotta work for it" is completely dismissive of the justness of it being a cost/tax-free birthright not created by any man *needed for survival and freedom*, and the economic reality that most hard-working people still can't afford their own homestead, and even if they could, if it wasn't sovereign they still wouldn't really be free (e.g., property tax). A close-minded regurgitation of academia's platitudes (and/or a favorite author's view on natural resource property) doesn't actually hold up to reality and the Non-aggression Principle.

If people crash-landed on an uninhabited island they'd share the pre-existing food/seed, water and space because that's the sane and ethical thing to do, and that's the same exact thing I'm advocating; the objection "Well it's different because some rich people already bought all the land" is weak and false ethics, that again ignores that morally right birthrights actually do exist, that the inalienable birthrights of life & liberty *are* denied if you're denied cost/tax-free survival/homesteading land & water, because that undermines both life & liberty directly.

"By removing opportunities to live self-sufficient lives, the Marxists create a system of slavery and convince everyone that it was done in the name of fairness. It’s the same story every time."

So if you agree homesteading land, water & seed is a free birthright of humanity, please bring that crucial truth and solution up with others regularly, because it will never happen until more people are talking and agreeing about it; the thinking must be aligned with it before it can start manifesting.

----

Related philosophy:

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ringing_Cedars%27_Anastasianism

Related history (8th Century Japan):

https://youtube.com/clip/Ugkxxc2bqGRHmrwjDugVbKUGm4Q_IjYsa5Oj

Related Talks:

Articles on Victory Gardens:

1. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Victory_garden
2. https://blog.gardeningknowhow.com/trends/story-behind-victory-gardens/

The Top Disempowering Lies Pushed on You Every Day

[updated September 18th, 2022]

If you watch/read mainstream TV shows, corporate movies, the “news” and/or mainstream religious/spritual media (e.g., popular content-creators on video and social-media sites), for any length of time, you're bound to be hit (by the media and the advertisements) with most if not all of the following messages, delivered in an underhanded/subliminal way, but can be discerned if you are critically analyzing what's being said "in-between the lines" or in other words subliminally.

Prioritized Propaganda Messages in Mass-media (remember, these ideas are NOT true):

• Fear and stress are sometimes good for you, because fear is also the body's crisis response, accurate intuitive risk-assessment, and is also a form of motivation. Some fear is good for you, it keeps you safe.  Some stress is good for you, it, when in just the right amount, has all the benefits of concentration; experts agree that this impossible to pinpoint just-right amount of "eustress," being in the "zone of proximal anxiety," is definitely something you should strive for. Nevermind building relaxed concentration and being courageous, keep believing in fear and stress as your sometimes friends. Fear and stress aren't all bad because they are needed as part of your survival and evolutionary growth. Embrace your negative emotions, they are part of your True Self, it's not possible to reject them without suppressing them, and that's unhealthy, so become friends with your fear and other toxic emotion-thoughts.

• Jesus "paid for your sins" by accepting the crucifixion (it had nothing to do with exposing and perfectly condemning human "authorities" as illegitimate and evil).  You need this cosmic blood-ticket to Heaven because Human Nature is inherently flawed, people can never perfect their thoughts, words and actions, you can't actually "stop sinning" as Jesus said to, you can't actually follow his Greatest Commandments as he said to; ignore all that, and just listen to the false apostle Paul's words about human depravity and a blood sacrifice ritual; just say the "Jesus Prayer" and you'll enter heaven, you don't actually have to comprehend and follow perfect morality in order to experience Heaven on Earth, just accept yourself as permanently perfectly imperfect and call it self-love and self-care.

• Satan, an evil spirit that influences the minds of humans (via completely toxic emotion-thoughts like fear and anger), doesn't actually exist (and neither does God).

• Your ancestors include apes (called "a common ancestor" to make it sound better, and to fit their b.s. in-between species fabrications), and before that, pond scum. (i.e., Darwinian Macro-Evolution is a fact of life.)

• Blind obedience to whoever is employed via extortion is equal to exercising social responsibility, it's equal to you being a good person. Government (especially your country) is overall good and keeps you safe; anarchism is bad and dangerous; only State officials should have powerful weapons. It's okay for the State to commit preemptive attack against a population, e.g., extortion, or taking away their ability to defend themselves (confiscating guns), or mandating preventative health devices or drugs, but it's not okay for you to do those things, they're only criminal abusive acts when you do them.

• People that are independent of groups/collectives are dangerous and/or crazy, and individualism is synonymous with selfishness; collectivism is equivalent to being an unselfish lover of community and good will.

• Having to pay other humans just live on the Earth (being a slave to money/jobs) is normal and fair, you do not have a birthright to a fair share of homesteading land, water & seed.  Living off-the-land/grid in Nature is a sign of backwards foolish dangerous craziness; urban living is a better quality of life; (don't think of the minimal work needed on a veganic homestead with no financial costs, think Nature = hard work and disease).

• Modern electronic technology (now including Artificial Intelligence, which can be fully trusted) is mankind's savior, its benefits outweigh the negatives.  The next step in Human “evolution” is to become cyborgs, look forward to becoming cyborgs, it'll be great! (don't think about your mind and body possibly being hacked and controlled by others).

• Animals are here for you to exploit, enslave, murder and eat; there are no negative consequences to your health or soul for doing so.

• Biological races are real and always in conflict with each other; you should think and behave in a race-based and oriented way to be “woke.”

• Men and women don't have distinct and separate core masculine and feminine qualities (energies that are different but equally important and complimentary); men naturally have feminine energy and women have masculine energy, we're all actually androngynous, and the closer we get to 50//50 internal androgyny, the better (so it's good that this process is aided by contaminating the global population with atrazine, which makes men more feminine and women more masculine on a biological level); women become more liberated the more masculine they become; men become less toxic the more feminine they become.

• Self-love is the same thing as selfish conceitedness.  God is love and it's good to love others, but if you ever direct love at yourself, if you ever feel good about yourself, even for just 2 seconds, you're committing a sin.  Self-love, based on knowing that you were made in the image and likeness of a perfectly good Divine Creator, is not the right view, the right view is believing in Paul's Inherited Sin doctrine, to view yourself as a worthless wicked sinner, because that's the right humble thing to believe.  You are not fundamentally a pure Spirit of love, to think that is egomaniacal.

~~~

TV “news” is mostly pushing fear (through amplifying, sensationalizing or manufacturing fear-inducing events), despair (constantly bringing up disease, disability and destruction) and division (mainly via amplifying, sensationalizing or manufacturing racist & misogynist aggression), while the advertising is mostly pushing fast animal-flesh foods and irradiating electronics; ALL OF IT IS DISEMPOWERING.  

Also realize that advertising is very often used as a propaganda outlet; whatever product or service is being sold is often actually just a smokescreen (so you're more mentally open to it, thinking "it's just an ad"), hitting your subconscious with disempowerment, via sounds/images/acts that are very disturbing (e.g., loud noises, screams, or horrific subject-matter) or very misleading ideas (e.g., normalizing acceptance of medical mandates, and invasive technologies like camera surveillance and robot/drone "helpers"); propaganda ads that pop up only for a few seconds (before you can skip passed them) will put the disturbing/misleading content out right away, so you can't avoid the toxicity that these evil people want to expose you to.  Turn off your TV.  Stop watching corporate movies.  Mute and look away from all advertising.   

Also, avoid pop spirituality, nowadays another major propaganda outlet, that consistently pushes the following toxic mental programs: technocracy, moral realtivism/nihilism, solipsism, androgyny, and "being vulnerable" (subliminally suggesting your True Self is weak and will get you really harmed if you express it).

As I said in my post on Macro-evolution theory, if you think the idea of subliminal programming for the purpose of disempowering the masses is hard to believe, or if you find it overwhelming, remember that fundamentally this psychological warfare/trickery is basically always intent on getting you away from inner peace and the true good design of God, and away from the true morality of The Greatest Commandments (to love God, others and yourself), and toward more stress and following the false morality of false; their propaganda disempowers all who take it in, so it makes sense as to why those who want greater power and control over people would disseminate it.

-----

Mandatory Masks in the "Land of the Free"

[updated April 11th, 2022]

"It's just a mask."

No, it's not.  In the context of medical mandates, it's a medical device, and it's being forcefully prescribed by politicians; you're being coerced to use this medical device as if government employees have a right to make medical decisions for you, as if you were their livestock, on their farm.  A more honest and accurate statement by those pushing and supporting medical mandates would be: "If you don't submit to the medical tyranny of pre-emptive attack against your bodily autonomy, which pre-supposes the intellectual and ethical superiority of officials and their right to treat you as their livestock, then you're selfish, and should be subject to further violence in the form of fines and possible arrest (which if you resist you can be killed, and that's okay too); they are making the world a better, safer place, so just obey and shut up."

There is a clear right & wrong with this issue, and it's this: Controlling a nonviolent person's body is an act of aggression; your body does not become the property of the State whenever there is a sickness in the world.

 

People that yell at, stare/scowl at, video without permission, exclude from store entry, etc., someone just for not wearing a mask, are following a false morality, they're being aggressive toward someone who could only *possibly* and unintentionally harm someone else.  The real  aggression of medical mandates needs to be rejected, otherwise the State will likely push even more travel restrictions, bodily violation (e.g., toxic vaccines), control of private businesses (putting them out of business), charging people fines  etc., making our lives even more controlled by untrustworthy people we are "mandated" to trust, always in the name of safety; remember, if you're being abused, you're not safe, even if you don't have the flu because of that abuse.

The nonsense-backed tyranny passing as "reasonable precaution" is fundamentally saying it's okay to commit actual violence against someone by controlling their bodies against their will (e.g., mandatory masks) in order to prevent possible harm, it's saying real violence now is fine if it *might* prevent harm, it's saying being abusively controlled is okay if it reduces risk of illness being spread in the world; by that premise the government could seal everyone up in prison cells for "safety," as if being abusively controlled is a condition of safety (of course it's not).  

Preemptive attack is never legitimate, it's just aggression, which is always evil. This is what people should be pointing out, not the latest numbers; the number of supposed cases is irrelevant to the core ethics of it.

"How is the mask mandate communist?" you may have been wondering.  The reason it's communism in action is because communism is defined as the end of private property, all that was previously owned by individuals is now owned by the State, and what is fundamentally more your property than your own body.  Mask mandate operates on the unsaid subliminal premise that the State owns your body, because a main part of property rights is the ability to control your property; so if you can't control your body, but the State can, then who owns it?   We are all now being attacked, yet we are to believe that we are now safer while under this daily attack?

We are essentially being told that we have to trust whatever numbers and "science" they put out are accurate, now and forever, trust that it's impossible that it's a deception in any way, trust that whatever medical treatment they deem necessary (masks today, who knows what tomorrow) is safe and effective... They want you to accept that the State is essentially your doctor and owns your body and the bodies of your children.  State officials are not your doctor, and preventative health care medical choices should always be the choice of the individual.

If you think mask-wearing, distancing, etc., is a good idea at this time, that's fine, again the issue is it being a mandate.  If you believe officials are saints that are never mistaken or deceptive, then you can go on obeying their every order for the rest of your life, submitting to slavery, but don't expect others to do the same. 

Thankfully atheist statism is not everyone's worldview, many people are still clear-headed enough to recgonize the true moral authority of Jesus and his greatest commandments, and they have an inalienable right to do just that.

---

Related website/resource:

https://www.vaclib.org/