Natural Births vs. Satanic Hospital Birth Protocols

 

[updated August 22nd, 2021]

 

This post contains important info for you to review concerning hospital birth protocols, which have been called satanic in that they are abusive to the infant and mother, and damage an infant's trust in people in general through the birth trauma, as well undermine their physical & mental health.  The basic lesson to take away from all of this information is a) the more natural the birth the safer, and b) avoiding hospitals for childbirth is actually a good idea (even though that's not what's taught in mainstream society).

Again there does appear to be an agenda to traumatize children during birth, immediately after birth, and then continuing afterward with circumcision of boys, and sexual abuse of both boys and girls.  This needs to be fully exposed and eradicated for humanity to progress.

Hospital Birth Protocols include: Immediate cord clamping (cutting large amount of oxygen flow to baby, one third of the baby’s oxygen-rich blood stays behind in the placenta, damaging baby's brain & body), artificial Vitamin K shot with other ingredients (which can cause anaphylactic shock), wrapping baby in tight artificial/chemical blanket to quiet them (also traumatizing, inducing shock), breaking the water artificially which makes the contractions painful for the baby, internal heart monitoring with an electrode attached to the baby's head (which is painful to the baby), blinding eye drops given immediately (disallowing eye-to-eye bonding with mother), etc.

 

All hospital birth protocols inflict pain repeatedly on the baby and undermine
a human love-bond between mother and child.

-- Horizontal position which makes it more difficult for mother and baby, causing the "need" for more invasive/harmful drugs/procedures.
– Sonograms (harmful radiation).
– Induction (very invasive and harmful, also the baby gets the message s/he is not in charge of its own destiny.)
– Amniotomy: Breaking/removing the water; the water is there to protect the baby from the intensity of contractions, so results in pain for baby.
- Fetal heart monitor screwed into the baby’s head at soft spot (the spot called "the seat of transmissions from the divine mind"), the screw pulls an tugs with every contraction, very painful.

During a natural/normal birth the baby signals to the mother's body, and the mother starts making the necessary chemicals naturally. In unnatural/abnormal births, these Artificial Drugs are used: 

– Pitocin: “Pit to distress”: can cause "need" for a C section, (synthetic oxytocin). The mother’s ability to bond wit her baby is undermined.  Basically mothers not producing natural oxytocin = no bonding at birth, and thereby the child is negatively programmed. Pitocin causes unnatural and intense contractions. No rest in between. Uterus is made to be as harsh as a mechanical compactor. "Most women during hospital birth, at least in the USSA are given a chemical called pitocin which supposedly speeds up the birth.. and what this does among other things, is interrupt the natural chemical oxytocin, which is a Love bonding chemical that all mammals produce while giving birth.. So the pitocin is given sometimes just because some doctor wants to get to the golf game or whatever.. I think something like 80% of hospital births are with pitocin.. and so, the natural bond between mother and baby is severed that way too..."  The natural oxytocin is released by the body is called the "hormone of well being and love," again creating good contractions that massage all the systems and organs in the baby’s body ("butterfly massage").
– Cytotec used to enhance induction procedure, ripening the uterus,
doing extreme harm and pain.
– Remifentanil: opiate resulting in a confused, disoriented baby.
– Epidural: anesthesia introduced in between the vertebrae. Mother cannot move, cannot help the baby being born. The natural opiates are not forthcoming. Mothers may not feel anything, the baby is feeling all the more pain. She is strapped, laying down, which is narrowing her pelvis. Now the baby has no help, is completely abandoned, knowing there is something out there that is dangerous.
– Vitamin K, anaphylactic shock. (see: http://www.vaccination.inoz.com/VitaminK.html)
- A high # of vaccines are given to infants, especially in the USA, and there is very good reason to be weary of them:
http://www.naturalnews.com/043662_vaccine_safety_medical_myths_junk_science.html

Also in hospital births there is:

– C sections: compounding the imprint of being helpless on the baby's mind, i.e., "someone outside has to do it for me," no victory of life.
– Eye drops for baby, prevents eye contact with parents, prevents bonding and the activating of the capacity for love. "If this neurobiology is not activated at birth, it does not happen."

- Genital mutilation, a.k.a. "circumcision" ==> https://www.iaim.net/extreme-trauma-from-male-circumcision-causes-damage-to-areas-of-brain/

In a natural birth, there is:

-Fulfillment of human love, the family has a memory that can keep the family together for life…

– Skin to skin contact and smell are the primary means for the love beginning to occur.

More info on natural birthing (and negatives of hospital protocol):

http://wellnessmama.com/6657/natural-birth-options-and-tips/

http://whale.to/a/birth_trauma_h.html

Mandatory Masks in the "Land of the Free"

[updated April 11th, 2022]

"It's just a mask."

No, it's not.  In the context of medical mandates, it's a medical device, and it's being forcefully prescribed by politicians; you're being coerced to use this medical device as if government employees have a right to make medical decisions for you, as if you were their livestock, on their farm.  A more honest and accurate statement by those pushing and supporting medical mandates would be: "If you don't submit to the medical tyranny of pre-emptive attack against your bodily autonomy, which pre-supposes the intellectual and ethical superiority of officials and their right to treat you as their livestock, then you're selfish, and should be subject to further violence in the form of fines and possible arrest (which if you resist you can be killed, and that's okay too); they are making the world a better, safer place, so just obey and shut up."

There is a clear right & wrong with this issue, and it's this: Controlling a nonviolent person's body is an act of aggression; your body does not become the property of the State whenever there is a sickness in the world.

 

People that yell at, stare/scowl at, video without permission, exclude from store entry, etc., someone just for not wearing a mask, are following a false morality, they're being aggressive toward someone who could only *possibly* and unintentionally harm someone else.  The real  aggression of medical mandates needs to be rejected, otherwise the State will likely push even more travel restrictions, bodily violation (e.g., toxic vaccines), control of private businesses (putting them out of business), charging people fines  etc., making our lives even more controlled by untrustworthy people we are "mandated" to trust, always in the name of safety; remember, if you're being abused, you're not safe, even if you don't have the flu because of that abuse.

The nonsense-backed tyranny passing as "reasonable precaution" is fundamentally saying it's okay to commit actual violence against someone by controlling their bodies against their will (e.g., mandatory masks) in order to prevent possible harm, it's saying real violence now is fine if it *might* prevent harm, it's saying being abusively controlled is okay if it reduces risk of illness being spread in the world; by that premise the government could seal everyone up in prison cells for "safety," as if being abusively controlled is a condition of safety (of course it's not).  

Preemptive attack is never legitimate, it's just aggression, which is always evil. This is what people should be pointing out, not the latest numbers; the number of supposed cases is irrelevant to the core ethics of it.

"How is the mask mandate communist?" you may have been wondering.  The reason it's communism in action is because communism is defined as the end of private property, all that was previously owned by individuals is now owned by the State, and what is fundamentally more your property than your own body.  Mask mandate operates on the unsaid subliminal premise that the State owns your body, because a main part of property rights is the ability to control your property; so if you can't control your body, but the State can, then who owns it?   We are all now being attacked, yet we are to believe that we are now safer while under this daily attack?

We are essentially being told that we have to trust whatever numbers and "science" they put out are accurate, now and forever, trust that it's impossible that it's a deception in any way, trust that whatever medical treatment they deem necessary (masks today, who knows what tomorrow) is safe and effective... They want you to accept that the State is essentially your doctor and owns your body and the bodies of your children.  State officials are not your doctor, and preventative health care medical choices should always be the choice of the individual.

If you think mask-wearing, distancing, etc., is a good idea at this time, that's fine, again the issue is it being a mandate.  If you believe officials are saints that are never mistaken or deceptive, then you can go on obeying their every order for the rest of your life, submitting to slavery, but don't expect others to do the same. 

Thankfully atheist statism is not everyone's worldview, many people are still clear-headed enough to recgonize the true moral authority of Jesus and his greatest commandments, and they have an inalienable right to do just that.

---

Related website/resource:

https://www.vaclib.org/

Fascist Foo Fighters

foo figh•ter; n.: unidentified flying object (UFO)

[updated January 11th, 2019]

Let's say, even just hypothetically for argument's sake, that there are fascists in the world who engineer crisis situations so their proposed "solutions" (that increase their wealth and power), can be pushed on the public.  Guess what would be a perfect scenario for consolidating their power at a global level previously unheard of?  An alien invasion.  And the aliens could come as enemies, or "friends;" either way could be utilized for the same purpose, either way could utilize the classic problem/reaction/solution dynamic/dialectic, it's jut a matter of whether they use the already-existing problem of the global environmental/health crisis they largely created, or use a new problem of aggressive "aliens."  The reaction is the same for both (mainly anger/fear/discontent), and the solution would be the same too, namely some rehashed form of fascism/communism.

Did a UFO really crash in Roswell, New Mexico in 1947, and the technology has since been reversed engineered?  Or was that just a psy-op to prepare the public for an even grander later psy-op?

Following several mass deceptions concerning terrorism, could there be another even bigger engineered crisis/deception, similar to the "War of The Worlds" book/movie?  Could UFO's (that are really top secret military aircraft, possibly reverse engineered from real UFO's) appear and shoot powerful lasers (that the military already admits they have), and then the solution to this global crisis will be a global government, in keeping with the aforementioned ever persistent fascist agenda?  Or will they come as "saviors," that will facilitate a fascist/communist restructuring of society "for our own good?"

Here's a very interesting quote attributed to Henry Kissinger (former U.S. Secretary of State and National Security Advisor, as well as the G.W. Bush Administration's first choice to direct the 9/11 Commission, a position later rejected for concern that it would be perceived as a conflict of interest):

"Today Americans would be outraged if U.N. troops entered Los Angeles to restore order. Tomorrow they will be grateful. This is especially true if they were told there’s an outside threat from beyond whether real or promulgated that threatened our very existence. It is then that all peoples of the world will plead with world leaders to deliver them from this evil. The one thing every man fears is the unknown. When presented with this scenario, individual rights will be willingly relinquished for the guarantee of their well being granted to them by their world government."

And these from Ronald Reagan:

"... when you stop to think that we're all God's children, wherever we may live in the world, I couldn't help but say to him, just think how easy his task and mine might be in these meetings that we held if suddenly there was a threat to this world from some other species from another planet outside in the universe. We'd forget all the little local differences that we have between our countries and we would find out once and for all that we really are all human beings here on this earth together."

- White House transcript of "Remarks of the President to Fallston High School Students and Faculty," December 4, 1985

"In our obsession with antagonisms of the moment, we often forget how much unites all the members of humanity. Perhaps we need some outside, universal threat to make us recognize this common bond. I occasionally think how quickly our differences worldwide would vanish if we were facing an alien threat from outside this world."

- Speech to the United Nations General Assembly, 42nd General Assembly, September 21, 1987

Keeping all this in mind, I find it very curious that lately there has been more talk of an imminent "revelation" of aliens visiting the Earth, for example, this "transmission" from the "humans are free" (we're definitely not currently free) website--> http://humansarefree.com/2014/10/alien-message-to-mankind-do-you-wish.html

The important take-away from that post is the statement that "our destiny is fraternity." Fraternity is just a code word for collectivism/communism, i.e. the complete elimination of the sovereignty of the individual. 

And what exactly does "the safeguarding of fraternal equilibrium" mean?  Control, no doubt.  The "aliens" say "making a decision by yourself, as an individual, is your right as well as your responsibility," but then they also say that whether they will come or not (to take their "hand-hold over the Earth") is a matter of a collective decision; this is contradictory, irrational and immoral.  There is no such thing as a collective decision unless it is a consensus, and they are not talking about consensus at all, saying just a few is all that is really needed.  What about the minority (or majority) that won't want their "hand-hold," whatever that turns out to be? (again, undoubtedly control, which "they" claim to be against.)   No mention of God in that "transmission" either, though they claim to be of a "higher" sort; this subliminal anti-God content gives credence to those that believe these aliens are actually the fallen angels/demons the Bible speaks of.

Yes, yes I know there are many billions of galaxies out there, so it seems probable that there is life out there somewhere.  But before you think you're smarter than me, because you're making an assumption and I'm not (assuming is never smart btw), and/or that I'm just some "reactionary extremist" (or whatever similar label that might pop into your mind), keep these FACTS in mind:

1.  There really are rich/powerful people that want a "New World Order," and are even pretty open about it sometimes.
2. Some other humanoid life-form has never been confirmed; sure there's lots of people who have seen UFO's (including me, 3 times), and people who have even testified to meeting them in friendly or very unfriendly encounters, but this doesn't actually prove that aliens exist.  They could be humans (i.e. NWO engineers) with advanced costumes & tech posing as aliens, or they could even be extra-dimensional beings (a.k.a. demons). 
3. There has been a lot of information coming at the public in the past 65 years or so (in news media, books, radio/TV/movies "entertainment," etc.) about the "reality" of aliens, and at an increasing rate in recent years, and public conditioning/manipulation/deception certainly does actually go on, a lot, so skepticism about all this unusual activity is definitely rational.

In the TV show Ancient Aliens there's an episode ("The Visionaries") that says that the super acceleration of modern tech, namely with the beginning development of computers,was inspired/given by aliens.  This is thought to be a "gift," but if one looks at this through the Christian lens that identifies such beings as demonic, and the anti-civ lens that recognizes the terribly destructive consequence of modern tech, (to mind, body and spirit; e.g., the trans-humanist agenda, which was covered in "The Next Humans" episode, also in season 9 of Ancient Aliens), then this "gift" is seen more clearly for what may be, sabotage and assimilation by those that are fully possessed, having become totally unnatural cyborg beings with little to no soul left.  The devil wants people to be more and more like him, more morally corrupt and just a tool of the larger collective/system; the trans-humanism agenda may be seeded by demonic ETs who are advanced cyborgs themselves.  The idea being that just like "the Borg" from the TV show Star Trek TNG, they want to assimilate us to be like them and merge with their destructive collective, more aligned with the evil force and not the good & natural.  This behavior of forceful assimilation of course predates cyborgs, and doesn't require tech to carry out (though it is made more powerful and destructive through those means); toxic devil-minded people take pleasure in corrupting others to be like them and really don't like when anyone takes a moral stand and resists.

Overall my two cents is this: I wouldn't bite an "alien" line, whether it came in friend or foe form.  If anything like what's described in the above-shared "channeled transmission" does come to pass, I think it's most likely just the "elites" looking to bring in their New World Order via a grand deception, like 9/11/o1, but bigger.  And of course they would ostracize those that don't buy it as "ignorant Christians set in their beliefs," etc., but that would just be more b.s.; there are really good reasons to doubt any alien revelation, and there is really good wisdom in the Bible too by the way, the warning of false prophets (e.g., "wise aliens") who can deceive many being an example of it (Mark 13:22).

Ultimately I believe, based on a lot of research and contemplation, the key is this: if anyone ("alien" or human) offering a global "solution" isn't talking about sovereign veganic homesteads as an option for everyone, i.e. the ability to live free, naturally and nonviolently, then it's just another collectivist scheme/deception that doesn't really benefit mankind, animals or the Earth.

Never assume, to do so is to be believing the lie that you know something that you really don't, and lies are of the devil, who is here only to kill and destroy (John 10:10).

Focus on la paz, la libertad, la verdad, y el amor!

C

p.s.

Here's another new article, also possibly for the purpose of mentally preparing the public for the coming fake revelation:

http://observer.com/2016/08/not-a-drill-seti-is-investigating-a-possible-extraterrestrial-signal-from-deep-space/

p.p.s. Some more perspective on this topic: